Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Caution: You Earn Less Than You Think

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

'Jane Doe's paycheck is too small.  Can illustrate poverty, unfair labor practices, or gender based pay inequity.'
Getty Images
Quick quiz: How much do you make per hour?

If you're an hourly employee, that was easy to answer. If you're salaried, you had to do a little math: $X annual salary divided by 52 weeks, then divided by X hours per week equals your hourly wage. For example, $50,000 a year divided 52 weeks equals $961.53 per week, and $961.53 divided by 40 hours per week equals $24.03 per hour.

Got your number? Good. Now hold that number in your mind for a moment, then let it go. Because what you're actually making per hour is likely much less.

Say What?

However you calculated that number, chances are you were missing out on one big piece of the equation: We all have to pay something in order to have the ability to make money. Let's say you work a traditional 9-to-5 office job. You'll have certain expenses because of that job that you wouldn't have without it.

You have to pay for the gas (or public transit) to get to commute. If you drive, you may also have to pay for parking. Maybe if you didn't have a job you needed to commute to, or you had one closer to home, you could get rid of your car.

If you're like most people, you probably grab some food or beverages during the workday. Maybe it's a daily stop for your morning coffee, lunch out or a snack from the vending machines.

Unless your office is super-casual, you've had to invest in a work wardrobe. If you have kids, you may have to pay for child care. And, if you're like most people, you probably treat yourself with something (whether it's a nice dinner or drinks with friends) when the weekend comes to reward (or forget about) all the hard work you put in.

All of these expenses count against your take-home income. You know the saying "you need to spend money to make money"? Well, it's true, and not just if you're an entrepreneur. Every dollar you spend in order to maintain your employment is a dollar you're not able to spend on the rest of your life. But, you need to spend it so that you can stay employed. Sound like a catch-22? It is, but here's how you can make it work for you rather than against you.

The True Value of a Dollar

There isn't much you can do when it comes to work-related expenses. Sure, you can cut back on those daily coffees and brown-bag your lunch more often, but things like commuting costs and child care are still going to be there. What you can do is shift your money mindset so you make the most out of every dollar you do get to take home.

Let's do a little more math. (It will be worth it, I promise.) Rough out your monthly work-related expenses. Multiply by 12 to find you annual work-related expenses. Now, plug that number into the equation you did earlier: $X annual salary minus annual work-related expenses, then divided by 52 weeks, then divided by X hours per week equals your true hourly wage.

Got your number now? Good. Now consider this: that amount is how much money you make for every hour you spend at work. If your true hourly wage worked out to be $10, that means you have to spend one hour working for every $10 you spend. There's a good chance you feel slightly (or more than slightly) uncomfortable with this number. But there's a reason I'm putting you through all of this.

Unless you know how to value your time, you'll have a hard time valuing your money. Throwing away $10 here or there may not feel like much, but when you consider that you're actually throwing away an hour of your time, suddenly that impulse purchase you're considering takes on new weight.

So, if you're brave, take a long, hard look at that final number you came up with, and every time you're faced with a spending decision, remember how much your money is really worth. You can make the most of your money and your time by realizing what goes into each dollar you spend. Would you rather get that shiny new doodad that's trending today or have a few extra hours to spend with your family? Is owning the latest technology worth several more weeks in the office?

It's your choice. Just be aware of what you're spending.

Paula Pant ditched her 9-to-5 job in 2008. She's traveled to 30 countries, owns six rental units and runs a six-figure business from her laptop. Her blog, Afford Anything, is a gathering spot for rebels who refuse to say, "I can't afford it." Visit Afford Anything to learn how to shatter limits and live life on your own terms.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Your Money Mind: Are You Prince Charming or Cinderella?

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Your Money Mind: Are You Prince Charming or Cinderella?
Aijaz Rahi/AP
While many people think of financial planning as a dull but necessary activity, Kathleen Grace, managing director of United Capital Financial Advisers in Boca Raton, Fla., and author of "Prince Not So Charming: A Romantic Tale of Financial Independence," says fiction can be a fun way to guide people and their financial decisions.

"We're all emotional creatures, just like the characters in classic fairy tales," says Grace. "If you understand how you make decisions then it's easier to step back and see whether you're making choices based on your emotional mindset or based on a smart financial plan."

Grace says she uses her company's "Money Mind" quiz at HonestConversations.com as a jumping-off point with new clients to explore their emotional approach to money. The quiz identifies which of three emotional characteristics -- commitment, fear, happiness -- tend to drive your financial decisions.

"I've learned that what someone tells you is the most important thing to them isn't always really the most important thing," says Grace, "So this quiz and some other specific questions and conversations are a great way to get people talking."

The Truth Behind the Fairy Tale

The people who are best at handling their money have a balance of all three money characteristics, Grace says. However, most people are usually driven by one factor more than others.

Grace cites Cinderella as an example of someone whose mind is skewed to commitment. "Cinderella is the type of character who wants her marriage to work above all else and will make financial decisions on that basis," she says. "For instance, if Prince Charming wants an exotic palm tree that's too expensive for their budget, she's likely to just pay for it herself with a credit card because it's more important to her to keep her husband happy than to be realistic about their finances."

Prince Charming, on the other hand, offers an example of someone whose money mindset is focused on happiness. "Most people think of women as shoppers and spenders, but a lot of men are spenders too. They may spend money less frequently, but their purchases tend to be bigger."

Grace says her own mindset is a mix of fear and happiness. On the fear side, she's terrified of debt, which stops her from overspending; but on the happiness side, she sees a new car that's pretty and fast and wants it no matter what the cost. Finding the balance of these two parts of her money mindset allows her to step back and look at the worst-case scenario to decide whether she can afford a particular car.

Pros/Cons of Money Characteristics

Each of the three personality traits Grace identifies has both positive and negative implications for your financial decisions.

Commitment. If your primary trait is commitment, Grace says you're a giver who wants everyone else to be happy. This can be negative if you aren't taking care of your own finances and are putting everyone else first; on the other hand this trait indicates that you're generous, attentive to others and family-oriented. "If you can mix in a little fear with this trait to keep your budget on track, then you'll have a nice balance in your life," says Grace.

Fear. People who are fearful often live below their means, says Grace, which is a very positive trait. However, they're also slow to make decisions, which could be detrimental to their financial well-being. "If they won't reallocate their portfolio or are too risk-averse to invest, it could be a problem," she says.

Happiness. "People who have a happiness mindset are decisive and can make decisions quickly," says Grace. "They tend to enjoy life and live in the moment, which is fine if you have plenty of money. However, if you're living paycheck to paycheck, that's not so great."

In Prince Charming's case, his happiness mindset is probably not too detrimental to his overall well-being since, presumably, as a prince he has unlimited royal funds. Most people, however, share more traits with the commoners in fairy tales and must face reality with a balance of money traits.

Michele Lerner is a Motley Fool contributing writer.


 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Wall Street's Week Ahead: Growth at Comcast, Starbucks

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Comcast Time Warner
Susan Walsh/APComcast's Washington hearing on its expansion.
You can never know in advance all the news that will move the market in a given week, but some things you can see coming. From Chili's checking in with what should be encouraging sales and earnings growth to the country's leading cable TV provider trying to prove that its refreshing increase in video subscribers during the holiday quarter wasn't a fluke, here are some of the things that will help shape the week that lies ahead on Wall Street.

Monday -- Chips off the Old Block

There aren't too many companies in the sweet spot that Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) finds itself in these days. It's a leading provider of electronic design automation tools, and that basically means that it offers the software and hardware used to design everything from individual transistors to more complicated chip products. As consumer electronics gadgetry gets more complex, Cadence Design Systems gets more and more work.

Analysts see revenue climbing just 6 percent in its latest quarter when it reports on Monday afternoon. That may not seem like much, but compared to slumping tech-related companies, it's moving in the right direction.

Tuesday -- It's Comcastic

Comcast (CMCSA) is the country's largest cable and broadband Internet provider, and earlier this month it sent some people to Washington convince the government that it should be allowed to complete an acquisition of a smaller rival's customers and become even bigger. It reports on Tuesday.

Like many cable TV companies, Comcast has struggled to grow its base of video customers. Networks and cable channels continue to increase their rates, and Comcast has to pass those hikes through to consumers that are tiring of paying more for content they're not watching. Comcast has been able to grow its Xfinity broadband service and its Internet phone services. Its NBC Universal acquisition continues to make sense as a content play. Revenue has also inched higher on the TV end as rates are going up higher than the defection rate finds the subscriber count heading lower.

Comcast caught a break on the video customer front in its most recent quarter with a rare sequential increase. It will be interesting to see if it can keep that going or if it was just a fluke.

Wednesday -- Chili's Con Queso

Casual dining restaurants have been struggling, but Brinker International's (EAT) Chili's has been holding up relatively better. The 1,557-unit chain posted comparable-restaurant sales growth of 0.3 percent in its latest quarter. That may not seem like something to brag about, but Olive Garden, Ruby Tuesday, Red Lobster and other mainstream eateries have been checking in with negative store-level results lately.

Brinker reports fresh financials on Wednesday. Wall Street pros do see improvement on the top and bottom line. Chili's is one of the first major restaurant chains to begin deploying table-side tablets for guests to place orders and entertain themselves as they wait for their meals. More than 250 Chili's restaurants are using the system, which Brinker expects to roll out chain-wide by the end of the year.

Thursday -- Venting Over a Venti

Starbucks (SBUX) is probably one of the market's biggest beneficiaries of the country's gradual economic recovery. More people working translates into more commuters stopping by the premium coffeehouse operator for a caffeinated fix in the morning.

Starbucks has expanded with acquisitions of juice bars, bakeries and luxury tea retailers, but it's still a company that relies on its signature coffee brews to keep the bean counters happy. The java giant reports on Thursday.

Friday -- Building Tension

Masco (MAS) has been enjoying the housing market's recovery. The maker of home improvement and building products has benefited during the construction boom. Masco manufactures plumbing, decorative architectural, and cabinetry products, and all three categories grew by at least 6 percent last year. Its installation services grew even faster.

The new home construction market is showing signs of cooling off. Mortgage rates have moved higher, and rising home prices find fewer people able to afford brand new digs. We'll see how this all plays out for Masco on Friday morning.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Starbucks. Try any of our newsletter services free for 30 days.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Top 25 Bargains at Dollar Stores

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Dollar Store The Dollar Tree one dollar symbol inside products cheap Louisana Supreme Wing Sauce  Worcestershire sauce
Cassandra Hubbart/AOL
Dollar stores have become the go-to destination for everyday bargains, for good reason. By offering savings up to 90 percent on all kinds of household goods and accepting coupons and food stamps, the stores attract all income levels.

Chains like Dollar Tree (DLTR), Dollar General (DG) and Family Dollar (FDO) cover the continental U.S. All three are online, too. Dollar General has a featured blog with useful hints, as does Family Dollar. Each dollar store chain has its own personality. Dollar General offers items in bulk. Family Dollar and Dollar General carry more name brands. Dollar Tree has everything priced at one dollar and offers in-store pickup if you order online.

Caveats: Not everything is cheaper than at grocery, drug and specialty stores. An item you saw last week might not be there the next. To comparison-shop, you may need to figure the cost per unit or price per pound.

The top 25 bargains are (in no particular order):
  1. Batteries. AAA, AA, C and D batteries go for a dollar at Dollar Tree. Compare a pack of 8 AAs for a dollar to upwards of $9 at drug and grocery stores.
  2. Light bulbs. Not the expensive compact fluorescents but standard light bulbs that are becoming harder to find.
  3. Flood lights. These are usually more than $5 at hardware stores.
  4. Brand -name cosmetics. They won't be the newest colors, but name brands are significantly cheaper at dollar stores than at beauty supply stores or drugstores.
  5. Beauty supplies. Hairbrushes, accessories, grooming instruments are all much more affordable.
  6. Over-the-counter medicine cabinet staples. Pain relievers, tummy meds and allergy pills are considerably cheaper than at drug or grocery stores. If you need something in a limited quantity immediately, the dollar store is the place to go.
  7. Canned and jarred goods. Some, but definitely not all, are savvy buys. Pickles, olives and salsa are usually cheaper. The trick is to know what the item costs per ounce at your regular grocery to know if you have a deal.
  8. Movie candy. Soooo much cheaper. Just know cinemas don't look kindly on sneaking it in. But for an at-home film fest, it can't be beat.
  9. Clothing. Some dollar stores -- like Dollar General and Family Dollar -- offer sweats, socks, underwear, T-shirts and children's apparel. Dresses come in limited varieties.
  10. Holiday decorations. Standard stuff for holidays at home and for teachers who like to decorate a classroom. Committed bargain finders should buy these in the days following the holiday.
  11. Greeting cards. When you need a little heartfelt sentiment on paper, go for the dollar cards. Few recipients will notice.
  12. Cleaning supplies. Not as cheap as baking soda and vinegar, but bleach, cleansing powder, dish detergent, spray cleaner and laundry detergent go for less than store brands and much less than name-brand products. Name-brand products are occasionally available. If you're a couponer, stock up on these rare events.
  13. Baby needs. Dollar General has its own store-brand diapers and wipes and offers baby bottles in bulk. Other household necessities are available in bulk discount. Watch out, Costco.
  14. Crafting and scrapbooking supplies. Not everything the die-hard crafter needs is available, but glue sticks, artificial flowers and other doodads are there.
  15. Spices and seasonings. Basic spices are much, much less expensive than at grocery stores. Gourmets may sniff, but no one's ever complained at dinner.
  16. Pet supplies. Cat-box filler and pet toys are usually cheaper. Pet food, on the other hand, may cost the same as at a regular grocery store.
  17. Auto care. Windshield washer fluid is a strong buy at a buck. Car washing accessories are cheap, too.
  18. Men's grooming. Stock up on plastic disposable razors and shaving cream.
  19. Party supplies. Items for goody bags, decorations and tableware are available for birthday, holiday parties and even weddings.
  20. Frozen food. These are usually generic versions of popular brands.
  21. Dental care. Noticed the prices of toothpaste and toothbrushes lately? You can buy name brands -- plus floss and mouthwash -- for less.
  22. Cooking tools. Dollar Tree carries the Betty Crocker line of basic cooking items, like graters and sieves.
  23. Toys. These aren't the hot items that kids whine for but are good as stocking stuffers or keeping the kids occupied on a car ride.
  24. Books. Not new bestsellers but worth it as a beach read or something to carry on a plane.
  25. DVDs. Available on a limited basis.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Cost Pressures Aside, Businesses Upbeat About Economy

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Economy Manufacturing
Paul Sancya/APBusinesses reported higher material costs in the first quarter.
NEW YORK -- Rising costs for materials and labor appear to be pressuring businesses, according to a quarterly survey from the National Association of Business Economics.

During the first quarter of the year, 31 percent of businesses surveyed reported higher material costs, more than double the 15 percent that saw costs rise in the previous survey. Additionally, 35 percent reported rising wages and salaries at their businesses in the past three months, up from 23 percent in January.

Yet those who said they raised the prices they charge in the past three months remained unchanged at 20 percent, according to the latest NABE survey of 72 members, which was conducted between March 18 and April 1.

"It appears that businesses were not able to pass on costs increases, resulting in increased pressure on margins," the survey findings said.

The quarterly survey by NABE is intended to gauge business conditions at members' firms or industries. The April survey reflects first quarter results, as well as the near-term outlook.

Despite the cost pressures, businesses seem more upbeat about the direction of the broader economy. The survey found that 80 percent said they expect the GDP to rise at least 2 percent over the next year. Nearly three-quarters also said they expect labor market conditions to improve, with unemployment easing to between 5 percent and 6 percent in the next one to three years. And over the next six months, 43 percent of respondents expect their firms to expand employment.

Still, a majority expect wage growth to remain subdued, with growth of up to 3 percent over the next three years.

The number of businesses that reported rising sales in the first quarter fell to 53 percent, down from 63 percent in the previous quarter. Jack Kleinhenz, president of NABE and chief economist at the National Retail Federation attributed the decline to "a very rough winter" in a statement.

Capital spending rose for 38 percent of respondents, up from 28 percent in January. Meanwhile, those reporting rising profit margins during the period declined slightly to 32 percent, from 34 percent in the previous survey.

Looking ahead to the coming quarter, 41 percent said they expect costs to increase up to 5 percent. Whether they'll be able to pass that on to customers is uncertain; 31 percent said they expect their businesses to raise prices. That's down from the 43 percent who said they planned to raise prices in January, but still an elevated level from most of last year.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Kraft Recalls 96,000 Pounds of Oscar Mayer Wieners

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Kraft recalls 96,000 pounds of Oscar Mayer wieners
Mark Lennihan/AP
NEW YORK -- Kraft Foods is recalling 96,000 pounds of its Oscar Mayer wieners because they may mistakenly contain cheese.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service said Sunday that Kraft's "Oscar Mayer Classic Wieners" may instead contain the company's "Classic Cheese Dogs."

The agency said the product labels are incorrect and don't reflect the ingredients associated with the pasteurized cheese in the cheese dogs. Those products were made with milk, a known allergen, which isn't declared on the label.

It said the problem was discovered by a consumer who notified Kraft on Friday. The company alerted the USDA the following day, according to the statement.

The Food Safety and Inspection Service said it hasn't received reports of adverse reactions. A representative for the agency wasn't immediately available for comment.

A representative for Kraft Foods Group (KRFT), Joyce Hodel, said in an email that the hot dogs were made in a plant in Columbia, Mo.

The products were made in early March and bear the number "Est. 537H" inside the USDA mark of inspection. People with questions about the recall are being asked to contact Kraft's consumer relations department at (855) 688-4386.

The recall applies to:
  • 16-ounce individual consumer packages of "Classic Wieners Made with Turkey & Chicken, Pork Added," with a "USE BY 16 Jun 2014" date and product code "044700000632."
  • Cases of 16-ounce packages that were distributed to retailers of "Classic Cheese Dogs Made with Turkey & Chicken, Pork Added, and Pasteurized Cheese Product," with "USE BY 16 Jun 2014" date and case code "00447000005300."
Those cases may contain packages that are mislabeled as "Classic Wieners," according to Hodel.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

13 Ways to Get Deals on Hotel Rooms

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Man jumping on bed in his underwear
Getty Images
By Teresa Mears

Everyone wants to hear that one or two apps or websites will always find the best deal on hotel rooms. Sorry. It's just not that easy.

The price of hotel rooms changes daily, often hourly, based on demand. Sometimes one site has the best deal for the hotel you want, and sometimes another.

You can often get the best rate by picking up the phone or just showing up. "This drives techo-babble people crazy," says Tim Leffel, author of "Make Your Travel Dollars Worth a Fortune" and editor of Hotel Scoop, a lodging review website. "They think you should be able to find the best prices on the Internet, but that's not always the case."

Going Online Is a Good Way to Begin

The Internet, however, is a good place to start. The first thing you want to research is location. If you're visiting New York City, you probably want to stay in Manhattan. Before you can look for hotels, you need to know which neighborhoods you're willing to consider and how you'll get from those neighborhoods to the places you're going to visit. After all, a lot of $30 taxi rides will quickly eat up any savings on lodging.

Start with the big names in the industry: Travelocity, Expedia (EXPE) or Orbitz (OWW). If you're looking for a broader picture, Leffel likes aggregators that gather price quotes from a variety of search engines, such as Kayak or Trivago.

Then check discount sites such as BookIt.com, Hotels.com or Booking.com, plus the named hotels at Hotwire and Priceline (PCLN). If you find a hotel you like, check the hotel website before calling to see if you can find an even better deal directly from the hotel.

If you'd happily stay at any number of hotels in a specific neighborhood, consider bidding on rooms at Hotwire or Priceline. Both sites offer big discounts if you're willing to buy a room without knowing which hotel you'll be staying in. You can narrow your selection by neighborhood and by star rating, but sometimes the neighborhood boundary is pretty big.

Not only is there no magic website, but there's no magic time to book to get the best price. Often, you can get the best deal at the very last minute. But this is not going to work in a popular location at a busy time. For those deals, you'll do better booking earlier.

Here are 13 tips for getting the best deal on hotel rooms.

More from U.S. News

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

New York Attorney General to Subpoena Airbnb on Sublets

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

New York apartment buildings in Soho are of Manhatten with typical exterior fire escape ladders.
Janine Wiedel Photolibrary/Alamy
By Supriya Kurane

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is set to subpoena online home-rental marketplace Airbnb seeking records to identify users who are illegally renting out apartments, the New York Post reported, citing sources.

Nearly two-thirds of New York city apartments recently listed on Airbnb were illegal sublets, according to an affidavit from the state Attorney General's office, the newspaper said.

The affidavit, which is expected to be filed in court Monday by the AG's office, shows 64 percent of Airbnb's 19,500-plus offerings for Jan. 31 cover an "entire apartment," the Post said.

More than 200 of the offerings came from just five "hosts," suggesting third parties were renting out pads on behalf of their owners, the newspaper said.

Schneiderman opened an investigation last year into whether hosts on Airbnb, a Silicon Valley venture capital-backed website that lets people put up spare rooms or couches for rent, are breaking a 2010 law that prohibits renters from subletting their room for less than 30 days.

Schneiderman's office first demanded in August that the company turn over records of all Airbnb hosts in New York State. State prosecutors issued a subpoena in October after failing to obtain the records, despite several rounds of negotiations with Airbnb lawyers. Airbnb then went to court to block the subpoena.

A group led by private-equity firm TPG Capital Management has agreed to invest $450 million in Airbnb, valuing the online home-rental marketplace at $10 billion, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday.


Airbnb Tax Tips: How to Know What You Owe the IRS

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Hasbro Earnings Buoyed by Sales of Girls' Toys

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Earns Hasbro
Steven Senne/AP
PAWTUCKET, R.I. -- Hasbro returned to profitability in its first quarter, driven by sales of girls' toys such as My Little Pony and Nerf Rebelle. The prior-year results were dragged down by restructuring charges.

Hasbro's (HAS) latest earnings topped Wall Street estimates but revenue was short of what analysts expected.

Sales of girls' products rose 21 percent. Sales of My Little Pony Equestria Girls dolls also resonated with customers.

The boys' category reported a 2 percent increase in sales, helped by Nerf and Marvel products. This was partially offset by weakening Beyblade sales.

Game sales fell 4 percent, hindered partly by declining sales of trading card game Duel Masters.

Sales of preschool products slipped 4 percent due to soft sales of core Playskool items.

Sales for the entertainment and licensing division rose 13 percent thanks to the inclusion of Backflip Studios. International sales increased 5 percent, led by Europe and Latin America. In the U.S. and Canada, sales edged down 1 percent.

The Pawtucket, R.I.-based company earned $32.1 million, or 24 cents a share, for the period ended March 30. That compares with a loss of $6.7 million, or 5 cents a share, a year earlier.

Stripping out favorable tax adjustments of 10 cents a share, earnings were 14 cents a share.

The year-ago period was pulled down by restructuring charges totaling 14 cents a share. It also had favorable tax adjustments of 4 cents a share a year ago.

Analysts surveyed by FactSet expected earnings for the latest period of 10 cents a share, on average.

Revenue edged up 2 percent to $679.5 million from $663.7 million, but missed Wall Street's estimate of $690.1 million.

Last week rival Mattel (MAT) reported an unexpected first-quarter loss, hurt by soft Barbie sales and markdowns to clear excess inventory.

Hasbro Inc. shares climbed $2.39, or 4.4 percent, to $57 in premarket trading Monday about an hour ahead of the market opening. Its shares are down slightly so far this year.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Money Minute: Pfizer Seeks Merger with Reluctant AstraZeneca

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

A huge merger may be brewing in the drug industry.

Pfizer (PFE) reportedly has approached British rival AstraZeneca (AZN) about a takeover. Britain's Sunday Times says the deal could be worth $100 billion. The report says AstraZeneca has resisted the idea, but it's often mentioned as a possible takeover target. The two companies have worked together on several projects in recent years. A number of AstraZeneca's key products will lose patent protection over the next few years, but it also has some interesting drugs in the pipeline.

Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Intel (INTC) and other tech giants are reportedly in talks to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that they colluded to hold down wages. More than 64,000 software engineers are seeking $3 billion in case that set to begin next month, if no out of court settlement is reached.

The Supreme Court hears a case this week that could have a huge impact on media companies and for those of us who enjoy watching TV. There's a small company called Aereo that grabs the broadcast signals from network TV and sells it to Internet subscribers. ABC (DIS), CBS (CBS), NBC (CMCSA) and Fox (FOX) claim that Aereo is stealing its copyrighted product with permission or without payment. Analysts say that if Aereo wins this case, the networks are likely to switch more of their programming -- especially sports -- onto cable only channels.

Here on Wall Street last week, the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) rallied 2.4 percent, and the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) jumped 2.7 percent. The S&P is now back within 26 points of the record high set at the beginning of this month.

Finally, New York and New Jersey could lose more than $1 billion in federal funding they had been counting on to help homeowners recover from Hurricane Sandy. The Wall Street Journal reports that money could be redistributed to other areas of the country that have suffered from natural disasters. Leaders from the two states say that's a misinterpretation of the law.

-Produced by Drew Trachtenberg.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Americans Already Forgetting Big Lesson from Meltdown

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Americans Have Already Forgotten One Of The Biggest Lessons Of The Financial Crisis
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
By JOE WEISENTHAL

Gallup recently released the latest edition of an annual survey asking Americans what they considered to be the best long-term investment.

The No. 1 answer? Real estate!

Americans Sold on Real Estate as Best Long-Term Investment
This chart doesn't go back that far, sadly, but you can see that just a few years ago, the percentage of Americans who thought real estate was the best investment was MUCH lower, a fact obviously attributable to the trauma of the housing crash.

After the housing crash, numerous pundits predicted that America's love affair with homeownership would be doomed for good and that it might take generations for people to be into the idea of owning real estate again.

Nope.

One problem here is that Americans are wrong: Crash aside, real estate isn't historically that great of an investment.

Cullen Roche, who brought the survey to our attention, writes that the long-term performance of real estate as an investment is actually quite pathetic:

According to the U.S. Census Bureau Survey of Construction single-family real estate generates a 0.74 percent annual return over the last 30 years (this includes multiple housing booms, mind you, so the data is probably much lower if we go further back in time). So there appears to be some recency bias here despite the housing bust.

And this doesn't even account for many of the miscellaneous costs involved in real estate. As I've shown previously, a house is basically a depreciating asset that comes with an appreciating piece of land. But that depreciating asset is extremely expensive over its lifetime. When you calculate the total costs that go into maintaining this asset the returns are very likely to be negative over long periods of time. So that 0.74 percent figure is probably higher than you should really expect. In fact, the returns from stocks and bonds trump real estate by a healthy margin so Americans have this one totally backwards -- the American Dream isn't quite the dream we have been sold.

People may have excellent reasons for buying a home, as opposed to renting. And right now in many cities, the math indicates that buying is preferable. But as a long-term investment, it's wild to see real estate retain its perch as the clear favorite among Americans.


More from Business Insider

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Biggest Tax Cheaters of the Past Decade

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

With 30 percent of an average American's income going toward federal and state taxes, it's no wonder that some people cheat on their taxes. The $4.5 trillion that Americans will pay in 2014 in federal and state taxes is more than they will spend on food, clothing and housing combined, according to the Tax Foundation.

Tax Freedom Day -- the day when taxpayers will have worked enough to pay their taxes for the year -- is April 21, 2014. If federal borrowing is taken into account, that date is extended to May 6, according to the foundation. That's a long time to start earning income for yourself. Some tax cheaters, especially the biggest cheaters, don't want to wait that long. They file fake tax returns, don't file and just plain lie to avoid paying taxes.

In fiscal 2013, the IRS increased criminal investigations related to identity theft by 66 percent from the previous year. Sentencing almost doubled to 438 cases, with prison terms ranging from two months to 317 months. Twenty-six years in prison is a lot of time to think about how being honest with the IRS might be more worthwhile.

Here are the worst and most widely known tax cheaters during the past decade who aren't celebrities, a group that's in a whole other world when it comes to avoiding taxes. The list isn't comprehensive because the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Justice don't publish lists of criminals with the highest tax bills.


A former newspaper journalist, Aaron Crowe is a freelance writer who specializes in personal finance, real estate and insurance for various websites, including Wisebread, insurance websites, MortgageLoan.com and AOL.

More from Aaron Crowe

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How Grocery Delivery Can Save You Time and Money

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Online Start-Up Helps To Deliver Fresh Food To New Yorkers
Mario Tama/Getty Images

When my husband and I lived in New York City, we became spoiled. Every two weeks, a truck would show up to our second-floor walkup, and a strapping young man would deliver fresh groceries to our door. How did we get sucked into such a luxury? FirstDirect, the city's top grocery deliverer, was offering a promo for first-time customers, and Johnny and I decided to give it a try. We found that promo or not, having our groceries delivered was comparable and often cheaper than shopping at our local grocers. No more carrying groceries five blocks as each of our fingers slowly lost circulation? Yes, please.

While grocery delivery may currently only be the norm in metro areas, soon it may be an option for you. And you. And you. Amazon.com (AMZN) and Walmart Stores (WMT) have recently joined the grocery delivery industry. While AmazonFresh was only available in Seattle just a year ago, it has now expanded to San Francisco and Los Angeles. Before you shrug this off as a modern-day fairytale (delivery by drone?) or just an unnecessary extravagance, consider the following reasons grocery delivery could save you money -- and most definitely time:

No More Impulse or Distracted Purchases

Oreos on a screen are much less tempting than an actual package in a grocery store. Marketers spend millions of dollars figuring out the most effective ways of tempting you while you browse the aisles. By shopping online, you can stay focused on the shopping list. And you won't have a toddler screaming and grabbing items off the shelf as you struggle to compare prices on salad dressing.


Comparable Prices

However unbelievable it may seem, prices for delivered groceries tend to be comparable to local grocers. And just like local grocers, delivery services offer coupons, weekly specials and price matching. Some companies even waive the delivery fee once your total reaches a certain amount. My husband and I made a habit of only ordering if we had a coupon for free delivery, which happened regularly.

No Travel Expenses

Grocery delivery eliminates the costs incurred for traveling to and from the grocery store, which means no more money spent on gasoline or a cab fare. And the opportunity cost of avoiding the grocery store means you can do your shopping while watching Jimmy Fallon at night.

Knowing the Total Before You Buy

I try to add up how much my groceries are going to cost as I shop in brick-and-mortar stores, but inevitably I lose count or get distracted. With online grocery shopping, you can see the total before you confirm your order. And that means you can check and double check whether each item is really necessary. It's both more difficult and less likely to go back on purchases that have already been rung up by a cashier.

While currently only a handful of cities have grocery delivery, within the next 10 years, it might be an option for most of the country. And when that day comes, you can bet that my wallet and I will be first in virtual line to have groceries delivered to our door, drone and all.

Joanna and Johnny are the writing duo behind OurFreakingBudget.com, a personal finance blog documenting the joys, pains and realities of living on a budget.


More from Joanna & Johnny

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Upheaval in How Money Flows Leaves Hospitals Scrambling

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Upheaval in How Money Flows Leaves Hospitals Scrambling
Alamy
By Dr. Michael F. Roizen

I frequently write about how you can stay young in face of events you can't control. Today, that focuses on the changes in the health care system that are and would occur due to cost pressures and transparency so big that even President Obama and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) can't make it easy for you.

That's why his statements ("If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor; if you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan") have proven to be false for so many. Even in the most powerful executive office in the U.S., Obama couldn't ensure that. But the errors in his statements simply reflect that the changes American medicine is undergoing are bigger than Obamacare -- and were occurring without Obamacare. Yes. Obamacare is shaping them, and maybe accelerating them, but these changes alter what you need to do to get care.

Let's look at this from how the most major payers of health care costs are responding -- the insurance companies and the U.S. government (through Medicare, Medicaid and payment for insurance for government employees) is responding. How is that changing your doctors' and hospitals' income statements? And then, what can you as an individual do for you and yours until these changes shake out? While finances often seem boring, it's probably causing your local hospital trustees' blood to boil, and we'll try to make it that exciting for you, too.

Payment Rates at 18% to 38% of Bills

Hospitals are seeing lower reimbursements now due to declining admissions -- and greater transparency and lower payment rates. I'll take the hypothetical example of a for-profit system, although the exact same logic goes in spades for a not-for profit academic system. This hypothetical but realistic hospital system currently bills about $3 billion for medical services and collects around $1 billion. That's right -- the institution, through insurance contracts and payment of fractions of bills by the government, gets 33 cents for every dollar it bills. It costs such a system around $900 million to provide all the services, and thus they are able to have a profit and invest $100 million in plant and equipment maintenance, as well as new equipment. And this hospital system was exceptional, as many community hospitals function on margins below this 10 percent figure -- like 5 percent.

A system like this one gets this revenue by collecting about 23 cents on the dollar billed from Medicare, about 18 cents on the dollar billed from Medicaid and about 38 cents on the dollar billed for the aggregate of commercially insured patients. We are sure this seems bizarre to someone from outside the U.S., and actually it does to us, too, but it's the way the system has evolved.

But now, insurance exchanges are helping more people chose policies that pay Medicaid rates -- nearer 18 cents for each dollar billed -- and it isn't just the uninsured that are choosing these policies, but those who work for small companies that do not cover health insurance for their employees. Eight million people have chosen these policies so far. That is increasing outpatient demand and reducing reimbursements -- going from a policy that paid 38 cents to one that pays 18 cents per dollar billed seems (from what I can learn from friends) to be hitting many hospitals and even academic health systems hard. That's right, being paid 20 cents less on each dollar billed on just 20 percent of the $3 billion you bill reduces our hospital system's income from $1 billion to $880 million, or a net loss of $20 million versus a profit of $100 million (remember it cost $900 million to provide the care the hospital provided). What would you do if you ran that hospital system? You'd cut every non-essential service you could, and darn fast. Your grass would get cut less often. And those decreases mean less money for everyone selling services to that hospital

More Pressure from Reference Pricing

Now couple that with reference pricing: An article in Health Affairs indicates that in California, the Calpers system -- the largest state-run health insurance provider -- has gone to reference pricing in some areas. Calpers gives employees $30,000 for a total hip or total knee replacement and lists the hospitals that charge less than that. Virtually all academic medical centers (those that provide care for the sickest, and those that train our future doctors, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, etc.) fall into the high-cost group, and their share of the Calpers patient population that has hip or knee replacements went to 35 percent from 54, while the share for low-cost hospitals has climbed to 65 from 46 percent in less than two years. (Only one high-priced group hospital in California converted to a low-cost group hospital in the past three years. These trends have accelerated since 2012, we are told.)

Many other states will soon adopt reference pricing, where you'll be guided to hospitals that charge less for a service (and maybe try to not take patients with conditions that increase cost). This means there will be less dollars for the hospitals that have taken the sickest patients to continue to do so in transfer from the lower priced hospitals, as well as less dollars to train doctors. And doctors are seeing less revenue as more of their patients are paid for at or near the Medicaid rate of 18 cents per dollar billed, versus the private or even Medicare rates of 38 and 23 cents on the dollar billed. So it's not just the for-profit hospitals that are seeing less revenue, but all health providers.

How long will the pain last for the hospitals and health service providers till we remodel the system so all practitioners practice at the limit of their license and only the sickest get nursing or physician care? We don't know how this will settle out. This change was tried twice in the U.S. and once in several Canadian provinces in my job lifetime, but each time political pressure -- "I want a great neurosurgeon when I want one, not when my back pain has lasted 10 weeks" -- forced reversion to something close to the prior system. But this time seems different. And for you to avoid a shortage of providers or find out that your doctor has dropped out of accepting your specific insurance here are four tips:
  • Hug your doctor and your doctor's office manager, and do whatever you need to make sure your doctor is willing to make an exception for you and yours to be covered by her -- even if she takes no one else from that network.
  • Hug your company HR director and CEO, and hope they provide insurance coverage and a plan that allows you to keep your doctor. It isn't the ACA or Obamacare that changed this; it is your company or its insurance plan. Also hope that they'll include the academic center nearest you -- in case you or yours need complex care. And tell these folks how much your company's health insurance plan means to you and your productivity.
  • Get preventive care now. Do whatever you can to avoid toxins such as tobacco, secondhand smoke and the five food felons and learn to love physical activity and manage stress.
  • Take your do-over, and stay as well as you can for three to five years until this all shakes out.
Michael F. Roizen, MD, chairs the Wellness Institute at Cleveland Clinic, the first such position at any major health care institution, where he actively coaches patients. He is a former editor of six medical journals and has published more than 175 peer-reviewed scientific papers. Board-certified in internal medicine and anesthesiology, Roizen co-founded with Mehmet Oz YouBeauty, a media company focused on helping women lead healthier, more beautiful lives and RealAge. He is 67 calendar years of age but his RealAge is 48.7. His RealAge series of books as well as his "You" series, written with Oz, are worldwide bestsellers. Roizen and Oz write a daily syndicated column that appears in more than 130 newspapers. Roizen has appeared regularly on "Oprah," "Today," "20/20" and "Good Morning America" and has a two-hour, 33-station radio show. He routinely tweets the week's top medical stories @DrMikeRoizen.

More from U.S. News

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Look Who's Pocketing the Profit from TARP

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , , ,

IPOs Turning Point
Richard Drew/AP
As recent initial public offerings go, it wasn't one for the ages. Ally Financial (ALLY) listed on the stock exchange in mid-April, and its shares dropped under their listing price in the days following the issue. Investors didn't hit a home run with the offering, but the selling shareholder reaped a nice windfall (around $2.4 billion).

That's a good thing, because that seller was the U.S. government, in the form of the Treasury Department.

The Feds had held a majority stake in Ally Financial, and the IPO was the latest divestment in the government's once-lambasted Troubled Asset Relief Program. With the sale, the public notched another win in a program that's been more successful than many dared hope -- and is returning a bit of profit to a group of people that could use the money.

A Big Lifeboat

TARP was launched in 2008 to bail out the many organizations -- mainly financial companies and automakers -- affected by the financial crisis. It was a monster of a program, eventually handing out $423 billion and change, a great deal of which was exchanged for various forms of equity and debt.

A big chunk went to financials crippled by the near-vaporization of key assets during the crisis; two notably big charity cases were sprawling financials Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC), which received $50 billion and $45 billion, respectively.

This was topped by insurer AIG (AIG), recipient of nearly $68 billion, while JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Wells Fargo (WFC) were given $25 billion apiece. Sputtering car manufacturers like General Motors (GM) were given fresh tanks of financial gas, with GM taking over $50 billion.

Handing over hundreds of billions of dollars in hard-earned taxpayer money to a cabal of seemingly rich companies attracted heaps of criticism. Given the sickly economy, how in the world could the government donate money to entities that not only had plenty, but found themselves in the mess due to their own mismanagement and negligence?

Speedy Recovery

But then a funny thing started to happen. Instead of squandering the cash and plunging further into the abyss, many TARP recipients began to turn their businesses around.

AIG, for one, slimmed down and narrowed focus by selling a bunch of not-particularly-core divisions. It also made a smart move in appointing a no-nonsense veteran executive -- Bob Benmosche -- as president and CEO in mid-2009.

The insurer's rebound was fast. From a gut-wrenching net loss of $10.4 billion that year, the company flipped into the black to the tune of $9.9 billion in 2010. And it's posted a net profit in every fiscal year since then.

Meanwhile, the "big four" incumbent banks (Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo), despite some weak quarters here and there, have generally been in good financial health and have performed well relative to those dark days. All four have been paying regular quarterly dividends to their shareholders for some time now.

Many of the program's recipients repaid their benefactor quickly. In mid-2009, less than a year after receiving their bailouts, nine big financials-- including JPMorgan Chase -- announced they had returned their TARP funds. That December, Bank of America made a similar announcement that it had retired the $45 billion the government had bestowed on it.

Pocketing the Difference

All told, according to the Treasury's latest reckoning, the Feds have taken in $438.4 billion in returns from the program, against disbursements of $423.4 billion. This is largely because much of the government's financial relief was given in return for equity in the form of preferred shares (which often pay higher-than-average dividends) and warrants. In more than a few cases, these ended up turning a profit.

Looked at from a purely investment perspective, TARP has so far been profitable by more than $16 billion, returning nearly 3 percent on the original mammoth investment.

At the end of the day, that money will go right back into the government's cash register. In other words, the taxpayers are benefiting -- the more money in the till, the lower the burden on them to help shore up public finances.

TARP is almost at an end. Again according to Treasury figures, only $4.7 billion remains outstanding, so the program should wrap up rather soon.

Motley Fool contributor Eric Volkman has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends AIG, Bank of America, General Motors and Wells Fargo, and owns shares of AIG, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool has the following options: long January 2016 $30 calls on AIG.


 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Do Firms That Create Cool Things Make for Hot Stocks?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Clemson v Maryland
G Fiume/Maryland Terrapins/Getty ImagesThe Maryland Terrapins wear Under Armour shoes against the Clemson Tigers during the annual Play 4 Kay pink game in February.
Daymond John and Jim Cramer have compiled their second annual list of hot stocks for their Lifestyle Brand Index. Over the last year, the index has outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC), 34 percent to 18 percent.

John is founder of FUBU and now more famous as a shark on the ABC's "Shark Tank." Cramer told smartCEO magazine, "He's made more money for 'Mad Money' viewers than just about any guest I have had in more than 2,000 shows." Since John's first iteration of the Lifestyle Index in 2010, those stocks are up 92 percent, compared to the S&P 500 up 54 percent.

This Year's Hottest of the 'Cool'

The 2014 list is Under Armour (UA), Facebook (FB), Tesla Motors (TSLA), Walgreen (WAG), Netflix (NFLX), Wells Fargo (WFC), AOL (AOL) and Samsung (SSNLF).

There is a notable absence of names including Urban Outfitters (URBN), Visa (V), Yahoo (YHOO) and Nike (NKE). The biggest surprise delisting was Apple (AAPL), replaced by Samsung (SSNLF). John deems Apple phones not as cool anymore, but the new Samsung smartphones red hot.

AOL, publisher of Daily Finance, was added because, according to John, "They've generated a new delivery of content that we love." Aww shucks, John.

Under Armour is "smoking, absolutely smoking," says John, thanks to a new fashion focus from the athletic wear company. The company is going toe to toe with Nike on footwear and to the mat with Lululemon Athletica (LULU) for yoga fans.

Facebook made the list again, despite continuing reports of younger users leaving. "Even Grandma is on Facebook and it's still cool," John argues.

John and Cramer like Tesla because both believe the company will sooner, rather than later, come out with an affordable mass market electric car.

Walgreen redefines what a drugstore can be into a health and wellness center that also offers a destination experience with on-site manicures and pedicures, juice bars and a spa-like vibe at some larger locations. The company has been expanding in Europe with a stake in Alliance Boots, and it is anticipating trends, offering battery charging stations for electric cars, for example.

Netflix -- formerly hot, then not, then hot again -- is creating its own media empire with "House of Cards," and "Orange is the Black." It is attracting A-list talent and is redefining the way Americans watch TV even as it did with movies.

Wells Fargo (WFC) is another cool lifestyle brand, which at first might seem a head-shaker for a company founded in 1852. But John notes it is revitalizing inner cities all over America with its commercial and residential loans. He also admires its support of entrepreneurship, especially as he says, "Fifty percent of millennials say they will never work for anybody in their entire life."

Sum it up in Two to Five Words

John's recommendations are all based on his definition of a brand with strength you should be able to "sum it up in two to five words." It should also have a wow factor. But what's the true strength of these brands?

Wells Fargo is Warren Buffett's largest holding, pays a dividend of 2.5 percent and is one of the largest commercial and community banks in the U.S.

Under Armour was founded in a University of Maryland dorm as performance wear for athletes that last and are truly comfortable. It has been a winner since 2010, up tenfold.

Facebook, the social media brand with a billion unique users globally, continues to evolve and monetize itself. John says,"At the end of the day [they'll] be able to sell to everybody." Other reasons: Facebook will soon launch a mobile ad network, and acquisitions such as Instagram and What's App seem to be working out well.

AOL, not to toot our own horn, owns Huffington Post and TechCrunch and is moving into original online video content. AOL is No. 1 in video ads in the U.S.

Netflix has benefited from the burgeoning cut the cord cable movement and binge viewing.

Since 1901, Walgreen has been a trusted pharmacy chain, growing faster than peers CVS (CVS) and Rite Aid (RAD). John loves the new, "beautifully lit" stores and goes into Walgreen every day.

Tesla has made the electric car into a performance vehicle winning automotive media awards. CEO Elon Musk just announced that Tesla will manufacture in China within a few years to better penetrate that huge market.

Samsung's new Galaxy phones are incredibly popular and gaining on Apple. However, Apple will debut another phone in the fall.

The Bottom Line

All of these -- save Wells Fargo and Walgreen -- don't pay dividends and are fairly expensive on a price to earnings ratio basis. Tesla in fact has negative earnings per share. Netflix as of the April 21 close before earnings has an 184.93 P/E, the highest of the bunch. John may not be a stock-picker, but when it comes to brands, he is the man.

More from Annalisa Kraft-Linder

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Is Nike's FuelBand Running on Empty?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Nike FuelBand
Bebeto Matthews/AP
The tank is starting run dry for Nike's (NKE) FuelBand. CNET is reporting that the athletic footwear and apparel giant is laying off the majority of the members of the hardware team responsible for Nike's fitness bracelet.

CNET speculates that this is the end of the FuelBand, and that this also includes nixing a slimmer model that was supposed to hit the market this year. Nike is refuting the claim that the FuelBand is toast, but the massive layoffs don't paint a very flattering prognosis.

A Strong Start

Nike seemed to be taking the nascent fitness tracking market by storm 26 months ago when its FuelBand hit the market to rave reviews. The original Nike+ FuelBand -- a $149 wristband -- stylish and simple, with a three-axis accelerometer tracking all of the wearer's physical activity. An LED screen measured calories burned, steps taken and time. It also recorded NikeFuel, a proprietary metric of movement that Nike pitched as "the ultimate measure of activity."

Preorders sold out quickly, and early adopters bid them up on eBay and other online exchanges. Nike later introduced new colors, styles and games called Missions. Nike seemed to be leading the fitness craze, but then it got undone by its own complacency and a rapidly evolving marketplace.

Nike wasn't the first fitness tracker on the market. FitBit wireless trainers and the Jawbone UP band had beaten Nike to market -- and with cheaper price points. However, Nike brought financial muscle and brand awareness to the niche, flooding the market with celebrity-studded ads.

It should have put Nike on top for a long time, but supremacy didn't last. Just as the Nike+ FuelBand was being introduced, folks were turning to Kickstarter to bankroll an upstart named Pebble, which would go on to introduce the first smartwatch.

Samsung (SSNLF), Qualcomm (QCOM) and other tech tastemakers quickly introduced watches and bracelets that use Bluetooth to connect with smartphones. Suddenly it didn't seem so cool to have a wristband that tracks steps taken when smartwatches could do that -- and take incoming texts and social notifications and engage with a growing number of apps.

Missing the Android Memo

One of the biggest shortcomings for the FuelBand is that it never got around to embracing Android. The original Nike+ FuelBand could connect with Apple's (AAPL) iPhone via Bluetooth to update wirelessly into an App Store application, and it was assumed that support for the more popular Android devices would happen. It never did.

Conspiracy theories bubbled up to the surface. Apple CEO Tim Cook sits on Nike's board. Was that why Nike was ignoring the global leader in mobile operating systems? As more fitness trackers and smartwatches hit the market with broader wireless support than the iPhone, Nike didn't have much of a chance.

Is this really the end of the FuelBand? There is no such thing as a permanent death in the tech world. The software end of the business isn't going anywhere, and it wouldn't be a surprise to see NikeFuel evolve as a measuring tool across more third-party devices. However, Nike blew a golden opportunity to corner the market of fitness trackers. It failed to evolve. It failed to embrace more than one mobile operating system.

Complacency kills, and that's something that anyone taking it easy while wearing a Nike+ FuelBand knows all too well.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Qualcomm. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Nike. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Nike and Qualcomm.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

After Market: Modest Gains Stretch S&P 500 Winning Streak

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

The S&P 500 is now riding its longest winning streak in six months. Stocks posted modest gains, helped by generally upbeat earnings and some merger news.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) gained 40 points, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) rose 7, and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 26 points. The S&P and Nasdaq extended their winning streaks to five sessions.

Pfizer (PFE) gained more than 2 percent on a British newspaper report that it's interested in buying rival drugmaker AstraZeneca (AZN) in a deal that could be worth more than $100 billion. AstraZeneca jumped 9 percent.

That helped lift others in drug sector: Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) rose 2 percent and Merck (MRK) rose more than 1 percent.

Also on the merger front, Newmont Mining (NEM) and Barrick Gold (ABX) have run into problems on the deal they've been working on. That sent Newmont 6 percent higher, but Barrick fell 4 percent, and investors chipped away at other mining stock too. Allied Nevada Gold (ANV) fell 4 percent. Yamana (AUY) and Hecla Mining (HL) both lost about 2 percent.

On the earnings front, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) jumped 12 percent. It posted a surprise profit late Thursday.

Also beating the Street:
  • Halliburton (HAL) rose more than 3 percent. Rival oilfield services company Baker Hughes (BHI) also gained 3 percent.
  • Hasbro (HAL) added 2 percent.
  • SunTrust (STI) gained 1.5 percent.
Elsewhere, Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) was the day's big winner, jumping 39 percent. It received positive guidance from the Food and Drug Administration to file for approval of its drug to treat muscular dystrophy.

Micron Technology (MU) rose 6 percent. The stock has more than doubled over the past year, and Drexel Hamilton thinks it will double again.

Tesla Motors (TSLA) gained 3 percent on reports that its set to make deliveries to China. Ford Motor (F) was little changed following reports that Alan Mulally is about to step down as CEO and be replaced by COO Mark Fields.

Finally, Moneygram (MGI) tumbled 13.5 percent after Walmart Stores (WMT) said last week it would enter the money transfer business.

What to Watch Tuesday:
  • The Federal Housing Finance Agency release its home price index for February at 9 a.m. Eastern time.
  • The National Association of Realtors reports existing home sales for March at 10 a.m.
These major companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial statements: -Produced by Drew Trachtenberg.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Kimberly-Clark's First-Quarter Earnings Have Sent Its Shares Lower, Should You Buy?

$
0
0

Filed under:

Kimberly Clark , the global personal-products titan behind brands such as Kleenex, Scott, Pull-Ups, Cottonelle, and Kotex, has just reported its first-quarter results to kick off fiscal 2014. The stock has reacted by moving lower in the trading session, so let's dig deep into the report to determine if this is a buying opportunity or if we should avoid it and go with another consumer goods giant, like Clorox .

Source: Kimberly Clark


The quarterly breakdown
Before the market opened on April 21, Kimberly Clark released its first-quarter report and the results were mixed in comparison with analysts' expectations; here's a summary:

MetricReportedExpected
Earnings Per Share $1.48 $1.47
Revenue $5.28 billion $5.31 billion

Source: Benzinga

Kimberly Clark's earnings per share were flat and its revenue declined 0.8% year-over-year as global volume increased 3% and organic sales rose 4%; here's a breakdown of its revenue by segment:

SegmentQ1 2014 RevenueQ1 2013 RevenueChange
Personal Care $2,382 million $2,397 million (0.6%)
Consumer Tissue $1,689 million $1,718 million (1.7%)
K-C Professional $800 million $793 million 0.9%
Health Care $397 million $397 million 0%
Corporate & Other $10 million $13 million (23.1%)
Total $5,278 million $5,318 million (0.8%)

Source: Kimberly Clark

Source: ScottBrand.com

Even with the decline in revenue, Kimberly Clark's adjusted operating profit increased 0.4% to $853 million, which was helped by $70 million in cost savings from the company's FORCE program and $10 million in cost savings from pulp and tissue restructuring.

Gross profit increased 0.2% to $1.83 billion and the gross margin showed strength, expanding 30 basis points to 34.6%. These great results allowed Kimberly Clark to repurchase roughly 4.3 million shares of its common stock for approximately $464 million and pay dividends of over $300 million during the quarter.

Overall, it was a fantastic quarter for Kimberly Clark and I believe the market reacted incorrectly to the results when it sent the company's shares lower; however, before we make a final decision on whether or not this is a buying opportunity, let's take a look at the company's outlook for the rest of the year...

Source: VivaTowels.com

What will the year hold?
In the report, Kimberly Clark also reaffirmed its outlook on 2014, which calls for earnings per share in the range of $6.00-$6.20; this represents growth of 4%-7.5% from fiscal 2013. The company did not comment on the total amount of shares that it expects to repurchase over the course of the year, which is a crucial factor for whether it will meet its earnings guidance, but it appears to be on pace to reach the $1.3 billion-$1.5 billion target it projected in its fourth-quarter report. 

With the key financials and guidance in hand, I believe Kimberly Clark is still one of the best investment opportunities in the market today. The company has shown consistent organic growth and it has been one of the most active share repurchasers. It has paid a healthy 3% dividend that it has increased for 42 consecutive years. Any weakness provided by the market in the coming days should be used as an opportunity to build a long-term position.

Another consumer goods giant 's results are due out shortly
Clorox, the company behind global brands such as Clorox, Burt's Bees, Fresh Step, Kingsford, and Glad, will report its third-quarter results on May 1 and Kimberly Clark's report may be an indication of things to come; here's what analysts currently expect to see:

MetricExpectedYear Ago
Earnings Per Share $1.08 $1.00
Revenue $1.43 billion $1.41 billion

Source: Estimize

Source: Clorox

These expectations call for Clorox' earnings per share to increase 8% and revenue to increase 1.4% from the same period a year ago. In addition, for the stock to react positively, it will be very important for the company to provide guidance for the fourth quarter that is within analysts' estimates; currently, expectations call for earnings per share of $1.45 and revenue of $1.57 billion, which represent year-over-year increases of 5.1% and 1.3%, respectively. 

Following the strong report out of Kimberly Clark, I am confident Clorox will satisfy the earnings and revenue expectations while guiding toward a fine fourth quarter; for these reasons, I am a buyer of Clorox, as it is more than 6.5% below its 52-week high and it has a healthy 3.1% dividend that will provide protection to the downside.

The Foolish bottom line
Kimberly Clark has just reported a strong second quarter and reaffirmed its full-year outlook, but its shares have reacted by falling about 1% in the trading day. I believe this decline is an opportunity to buy, as the company has growth on its side and an excellent 3% dividend to boot. Foolish investors should consider initiating positions right now and adding to them if the company's shares decline further. They could also take a look at Clorox, as both companies represent great long-term investments. 

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks like Kimberly Clark simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

 

The article Kimberly-Clark's First-Quarter Earnings Have Sent Its Shares Lower, Should You Buy? originally appeared on Fool.com.

Joseph Solitro has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Kimberly Clark. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Facebook and Apple Are Knocking Down PayPal's Doors

$
0
0

Filed under:

By the numbers, eBay's PayPal may be entering a battle that it cannot win. Until now, PayPal has been the payment processing king, with no real competition, thus making its 143 million users the largest of any online platform. However, in a new world of large ecosystems and social media, such as Apple's iOS and Facebook , PayPal is one large competitor away from seeing its growth significantly threatened.

PayPal: King of payment processing, for now
PayPal's 143 million users is considered large by any standard, and with that user base, PayPal accounted for more than 40% of eBay's $16 billion in total revenue in the last 12 months. Moreover, PayPal is expected to become a $10 billion business by 2015, and with its high margins -- PayPal generated nearly all of eBay's $2.86 billion in net income last year -- is very valuable to the company.

PayPal has yet to be challenged with a similar business model that has an equally large user base. However, a slew of new companies are now stepping up to the plate, obviously having seen a large market opportunity.


Bad news for eBay
Earlier this month, the Financial Times reported that Facebook is preparing to launch an electronic money service. The social media giant is currently in discussions with the Central Bank of Ireland to allow customers to store, pay, and exchange currency through its platform. Thus, Facebook's payment system will be very similar to PayPal.

In a previous article, Facebook's entrance into the payment industry was discussed, and with 1.2 billion users, the conclusion was that, if Facebook uses a similar system to PayPal, it could generate $10 billion fairly easily because, after all, Facebook has nearly 10 times the users of PayPal, and thousands of large and medium-sized businesses already using its platform.

It gets worse for eBay
As if Facebook wasn't bad enough news for eBay, numerous reports this year suggest that Apple is developing a similar service, and that it is high on the company's list of priorities. The Wall Street Journal initially reported in January that Apple was acquiring patents related to payment processing. Then, on Monday, re/code reported that Apple was not only interviewing senior level management for the service, but was in fact building the service.

What does this mean for all parties involved?
For Facebook, a new payment system could double its annual revenue. The company will likely integrate payments in a way where retailers can post merchandise on the site that can be bought directly from Facebook, which means that advertising will become even more valuable.

For Apple, $10 billion in revenue is large, but not enormous or especially meaningful as it relates to the entirety of its $170 billion business. Instead, it will likely be touted as yet another advantage to using iOS in comparison to other operating systems.

In terms of numbers, Apple has more than 600 million users who already have iTunes accounts, and who also have credit card information stored. Therefore, a payment processing system shouldn't be too difficult, and will be convenient for app developers. Additionally, Apple's fingerprint sensor will likely play a large role, as originally reported, thus making purchases particularly simple.

PayPal clearly has the most to lose, as much of eBay's valuation is tied to PayPal. In retrospect, 144 million users is small, relative to the user bases of both Facebook and iTunes. As a result, PayPal will be the company that suffers.

Final thoughts
Given the latest developments surrounding payment processing, including Facebook and Apple's interest, investors should keep in mind eBay executives' hard stance on keeping eBay and PayPal as one company.

Carl Icahn had asked for a PayPal spin off, as have many other investors over the last five years, yet eBay management insists the company is better as a pair. However, if not for the eBay connection, and if PayPal were an independent company with a separate board and management, it's possible that PayPal would have struck a deal with Apple, Facebook, and others to provide large-scale payment processing. Instead, eBay has always viewed PayPal as its advantage, and in the end this notion might actually hurt eBay.

Currently, any conclusion is speculative, but looking at the numbers alone, both Facebook and Apple have an enormous advantage, and eBay has a lot to lose.

This is just another example of why your credit card may soon be completely worthless
The plastic in your wallet is about to go the way of the typewriter, the VCR, and the 8-track tape player. When it does, a handful of investors could stand to get very rich. You can join them -- but you must act now. An eye-opening new presentation reveals the full story on why your credit card is about to be worthless -- and highlights one little-known company sitting at the epicenter of an earth-shaking movement that could hand early investors the kind of profits we haven't seen since the dot-com days. Click here to watch this stunning video.

The article Facebook and Apple Are Knocking Down PayPal's Doors originally appeared on Fool.com.

Brian Nichols owns shares of Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, eBay, and Facebook. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, eBay, and Facebook. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images