Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Guns 'n' Ammo More Popular With Americans Than Ever

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

|adult|autumn|brown|caucasian|center|color|companionship|day|exterior|fall|father|field|gun|hat|horizontal|hunter|hunting|leisur
Getty Images
In December 2012, a gunman burst into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and shot 26 people dead. Two years later, sales of guns and ammunition are off the charts.

That's surprising, to say the least. After all, a lot of people thought that Sandy Hook might be a turning point for the gun control movement in America. Investors sold off shares of publicly traded gunsmiths Smith & Wesson (SWHC) and Sturm, Ruger (RGR) in the wake of the tragedy. Retailers of guns and ammunition -- Cabela's (CAB) and Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS), and even the much more diversified retailer Walmart (WMT) all experienced slumps in share price post-Newtown. Dick's went so far as to suspend gun sales to consumers for a time. Private equity house Cerberus Capital Management made plans to exit the guns business entirely, by selling its interest in privately held arms manufacturer Freedom Group.

And yet, according to a new poll out of Pew Research, the percentage of Americans who say they support "the right of Americans to own guns" hit a new high last year, with 52 percent in favor. That's up 7 percentage points since the shootings at Newtown. Up 20 percentage points since the Virginia Tech shootings in 2007. It's nearly twice the level of support for gun rights at the time of the Columbine shooting in 1999. And support for gun rights is only growing stronger.

Indeed, according to Pew, support for gun rights probably should be even higher than it already is. In a separate question, Pew asked the same 1,507 adults "whether gun ownership in this country does more to protect people or put people's safety at risk." 57 percent responded that guns do more to protect people. Logically, those five percentage points-worth of voters who think guns are more of a good thing than a bad thing but who don't yet favor gun ownership seem good candidates for changing their minds on the latter -- and joining the gun-rights camp.

What It Means to You

Note that Pew Research didn't go into the merits of the gun debate, only noting how attitudes toward gun ownership are changing in this country. But these findings alone are enough to raise implications for you and your money. They basically break down as follows.

For gun owners: A rising tide of favorable opinion toward gun ownership makes tightened gun regulation unlikely. This could be good or bad, depending on whether you want to buy a gun or already own one.

Generally speaking, the looser the regulations on buying a handgun, the easier and cheaper it will be to buy one. So Americans' laissez-faire attitude toward guns should be a plus for prospective gun buyers. Conversely, though, if you bought a gun during one of the recent regulation scares, you may soon begin realizing that you overpaid. Prices have already come down sharply from the highs reached post-Newtown. They could come down further -- hurting the resale values of any firearms you already own.

For gun investors: There's similar "contrary to what you might think" news for investors in gun stocks. While it's certainly true that easier access to guns will streamline the retail trade in guns, it may also diminish the urgency some consumers feel to buy a gun "quick -- right now -- before they make it illegal!"

Manufacturers of handguns such as Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger have both experienced sharp rises in sales and profits -- and share prices -- in recent years, as gun buyers flocked to gun stores after Barack Obama was elected president, then after he was re-elected, and then after the Newtown shootings occurred. In fact, pretty much any event that can be interpreted as raising the risk of increased gun regulation tends to inspire a "run on the bank" that can leave shelves bare at gun stores.

In the short term, therefore -- meaning, until the next gun-related tragedy, and until Americans' attitudes towards gun control start to zig instead of zagging -- pro-gun sentiment should work as a con for investors who own gun stocks.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith owns guns and occasionally owns guns stocks, too -- when the price is right. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Airlines Aren't Living Up to the Wi-Fi Promise

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Germany, Bavaria, Munich, Mid adult businesswoman using laptop in business class airplane cabin
Westend61
Taking to the friendly skies has never been more productive. More and more planes are being outfitted with Wi-Fi routers, affording passengers the option to surf the Web from their laptops, tablets and smartphones.

I've checked email, gone online shopping and even edited articles at 40,000 feet. It's merely a coincidence that SkyMall just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, but options on a plane that offers Wi-Fi are no longer limited to leafing through a magazine as a reclining seat in front of you cramps up your living space.

Airborne connectivity is here. The problem is that it's not cheap, and more often than not, it's also not perfect.

Up, Up, and Away

New York Times tech reporter Nick Bilton recently ranted about the quality of in-flight Wi-Fi. Anyone who has paid up for connectivity has probably experienced the same sporadic outages that are far worse than Internet access on terra firma.

Gogo (GOGO) -- a publicly traded provider of in-flight Wi-Fi -- realizes that things can and will get better. Gogo Chief Technology Officer Anand Chari points out in Bilton's article that usage has spiked since it first began offering its platform several years ago.

When in-flight Wi-Fi first became available on commercial flights in 2008, there were no tablets, and smartphones were just starting to gain traction. Now Gogo has to deal with dozens of passengers trying to surf off the router at the same time.

This wouldn't be such a big deal if airborne access was free, but in most cases it's not. The third-party providers need to get paid, and in most cases the prices are high even without the air carriers getting in on the action the way that they do with other extra fees.

In-flight Wi-Fi fees vary based on carrier and distance, but they generally fall between $5 and $35 for the duration of the flight. Those living out of a suitcase can take advantage of passes that cover blocks of time. Gogo, for example, sells a monthly pass for $60.

A Need for Speed

In-flight Wi-Fi will have to battle the reliability issues and tackle passenger security concerns, but the more pressing need at the moment is speed. Chari reveals that as many as 70 passengers can be on its Wi-Fi platform on a flight between Boston and Los Angeles at any given time.

Gogo has to move fast, and not just because it has yet to turn profitable. It announced last week that it has a backlog of 1,000 commercial planes to get connected. It plans to grow its fleet by 500 aircraft in 2015, reaching a total of 2,600 by year's end. It's in the process of updating older systems with a new air-to-ground solution that triples peak speeds, but it's aiming even higher.

Later this year it will introduce 2Ku, a global satellite solution that delivers peak speeds that are 20 times faster than its original air-to-ground solution. As long as the rates for the new platforms don't increase significantly, it could be just what the industry needs to finally deliver the fast and reliable connections that passengers think they are paying for before settling for less.

Motley Fool analyst Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Week's Winners and Losers: Disney Up, Windows RT Out

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Measles California
Jae C. Hong/AP
There were plenty of winners and losers this week, with the family entertainment giant coming through with a blowout quarterly report and the world's largest software company finally putting an end to an ill-advised mobile platform.

Office Supply Retailers -- Winners

Living up to the recent buyout chatter, Staples (SPLS) got on bended knee and made it official, offering to buy Office Depot (ODP) in a $6.3 billion deal. This is a big deal. Office Depot hooked up with OfficeMax, and now Staples is swallowing up the combined retailer. We're talking about the country's three largest office supply chains under a single ownership group.

This may smell like a monopoly, but given the diminishing sales at traditional superstores as folks either flock online for purchases or merely get by with less in this digital age, it's likely to clear regulatory scrutiny. This won't necessarily be good for consumers, but it will be good for the industry.

Windows RT -- Loser

Microsoft (MSFT) made the cut in last week's list after posting problematic quarterly results, and now it makes a repeat appearance on the long overdue death of Windows RT. A Microsoft spokesperson is confirming to tech blog The Verge that the software giant is no longer making the Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet, the last gadget running Windows RT.

Windows RT was a doomed idea from the start. It was a limited mobile operating system introduced in Microsoft's original Surface tablet. It had limited developer support, and it didn't work with Windows software. Microsoft was smart enough to port a version of its Office suite of productivity software to Windows RT, but that wasn't enough to make it stand out in a world where Android and iOS are more widely supported.

Windows RT lasted a little more than two years, and that was still two years too long.

Disney (DIS) -- Winner

The family entertainment giant hit new all-time highs after posting blowout quarterly results. Revenue climbed 9 percent to $13.4 billion, and earnings per share soared 23 percent to $1.27. Analysts were only holding out for growth of 5 percent and 4 percent, respectively.

Disney's growth came with all five of its segments posting year-over-year gains in operating income. With "Frozen" merchandise flying off the shelves, advertisers flocking to ABC, and its domestic theme parks posting record attendance, it was a robust holiday quarter all around.

Keurig Green Mountain (GMCR) -- Loser

Shares of the leader in single-serve coffee were ground down like arabica beans after it missed Wall Street's profit targets for the first time in a year. It also posted flat sales relative to the prior year's holiday quarter. A 9 percent increase in K-Cups was offset by an 18 percent drop in brewers. The new Keurig 2.0 platform isn't selling well, leading Keurig Green Mountain to offer up uninspiring guidance.

It isn't a surprise to see the market avoiding Keurig 2.0. I pointed out the lousy initial reviews back in October, when buyers and potential buyers were turned off by the restrictive nature of the machine that would only work with newer Keurig K-Cup capsules. Keurig Green Mountain took a big gamble by trying to corner the market on its ecosystem, and like a lap full of scorching hot coffee, it got burned.

Under Armour (UA) -- Winner

It's true that Under Armour posted better-than-expected quarterly results on Wednesday, but the reason that the athletic apparel maker makes the cut this week is because of its shrewd acquisition of MyFitnessPal and Endomondo.

MyFitnessPal is the leading free fitness-tracking app with 80 million registered users. Endomondo is a social fitness network with 20 million users, primarily in Europe. The deals didn't come cheap, reportedly costing Under Armor a combined $560 million. However, it's a great way to stay close to the group of fitness-minded individuals that make up its target audience.

Some may argue that buying hot fitness apps and sites is risky given the fickle nature of the online trends. However, Under Armour will be able to market its products better and get an early read on fitness trends to make sure that it stays on top of consumer demand.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Keurig Green Mountain and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Keurig Green Mountain, Under Armour and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft, Staples, Under Armour and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Looking for a winner for your portfolio? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Here's the Money Behind the Anti-Vaccine Movement

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Anti-Vaccine Movement Causes Measles Epidemic in US

As the country sees a measles flare-up, some politicians seem to jump on the anti-vaccine bandwagon, as the Washington Post reports. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called for "some measure of choice" on vaccines by parents, while Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said that most vaccines should be voluntary. Both Republicans are expected to run for president in 2016.

Medical science says the evidence is clear that childhood vaccinations for such potentially dangerous diseases as measles, whooping cough and rubella are safe, with risks of protection far lower than the potential for permanent damage or even death the conditions can bring. And yet, a public debate on the subject -- often spearheaded by celebrity laypersons and promoted by various nonprofit organizations -- races on. Funding the organizations is a number of wealthy family foundations.

Media Campaign, Research Funded

The National Vaccine Information Center promotes concern about the risks of vaccinations through billboards, the giant Jumbotron display in Times Square and a film on Delta's (DAL) in-flight video network. Some of the money necessary came from the Dwoskin Family Foundation, set up by Alfred and Lisa Claire Dwoskin, which has donated $263,000 over time to the center, according to CNN Money.

From 2011 to 2013, the Dwoskins donated $950,000 to the University of British Columbia for research, at least some of which looked at potential links between aluminum in vaccines and neurological disorders. The couple's foundation put money into a film that suggested vaccines cause various childhood illnesses.

According to the foundation's website, it "has funded efforts focused on finding the root causes of immune, inflammatory and cognitive disorders in children and older adults."

This mission is based on the acknowledged significant increases of previously rare autoimmune and inflammatory diseases that have become prevalent since the 1980s. These diseases include a wide range of conditions varying from asthma to autism and age related neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's.

Barry Segal created the foundation Focus for Health, "dedicated to advocacy, education, investigation, and research that explores the autism epidemic and the causes of chronic illness." Focus for Health donated $171,000 to another family foundation advocacy group called Generation Rescue, this one started by Lisa and J.B. Handley and now headed by television personality and former Playboy model Jenny McCarthy.

Paper Retracted

According to CNN Money, Generation Rescue has helps support former British doctor Andrew Wakefield, a co-author of the now-discredited 1998 paper that claimed a link between the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and autism and set off the anti-vaccine movement. The Lancet, a leading medical journal that originally published the paper, eventually retracted it, and Wakefield lost his medical license.

Of course, nothing in science and medicine is simple, and there are significant unknowns. A recent study by Danish researchers suggests that 60 percent of the apparent increase in reports of autism spectrum disorder is due to "changes in diagnostic criteria and the inclusion of out-of-hospital diagnoses," according to CBS News. In 1994, diagnostic criteria changed the symptoms that are supposed to diagnose the disorder. That still leaves 40 percent of the causes of increased diagnoses unaccounted for, although there have been many studies that have refuted a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, according to the Immunization Action Coalition, an organization that works closely with the Centers for Disease Control.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

TurboTax Stops Processing State Tax Returns on Fraud Reports

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

TurboTax Stops State Returns
Paul Sakuma/AP
NEW YORK -- NEW YORK -- TurboTax, the country's most popular do-it-yourself tax preparation software, said Friday that it has temporarily stopped processing state tax returns because of an increase in fraudulent filings.

State agencies have reported a rise in filings with stolen personal information, said Intuit (INTU), the company behind TurboTax.

Most victims found out that a fraudulent tax return was submitted in their name when they received a rejection notice after filing their returns, said Intuit spokeswoman Julie Miller.

There haven't been issues with federal returns to date because the Internal Revenue Service has implemented stronger fraud detection policies, Miller said.

Intuit is working with security company Palantir to investigate the problem. So far, there has been no security breach of its systems, the company said. Instead, it believes personal information was stolen elsewhere and used to file returns on TurboTax.

Miller linked the problem to recent security breaches at large companies. Just this week, Blue Cross Blue Shield insurer Anthem (ANTM) said hackers gained access to the Social Security numbers, names, addresses and other personal information of about 80 million people. It follows other security breaches at JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and several retailers, including Home Depot (HD) and Target (TGT).

"You have a pretty rich pool of data out there in the world," said Miller.

Intuit said state tax returns already filed when the halt began Thursday will be transmitted as soon as possible. Consumers can still use TurboTax, and the company will file the state tax returns when the halt is lifted. The company expects to start processing state returns again Friday with increased fraud protections, said Miller.

TurboTax processed 30 million tax returns last year, Miller said.

Rival H&R Block (HRB), which also sells tax preparation software, didn't respond to a request for comment.

Another tax preparer, Liberty Tax Inc. (TAX), said it is letting TurboTax customers to file state returns for free at its more than 4,000 locations around the country.

Shares of Intuit Inc., based in Mountain View, California, fell $3.41, or 3.7 percent, to $88.30 in afternoon trading Friday.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Postal Service Revenue Up as Holiday Package Deliveries Rise

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Postal Service Finances
Alex Washburn/AP
By TOM RAUM

WASHINGTON -- Political campaign mailings and an increase in holiday package deliveries helped boost U.S. Postal Service revenue at the end of 2014, even as the agency posted a $754 million loss in the final three months of the year.

Still, Postmaster General Megan Brennan said that despite continuing losses, the outlook is much brighter than it has been in the past.

The agency's revenue rose 4.3 percent in the final quarter of the year

"Our employees delivered double-digit growth in packages this holiday season, which shows our growing ability to compete for and win new package delivery customers," Brennan told a meeting of the Postal Service's Board of Governors.

She said a top priority of the Postal Service is to replace its aging fleet of trucks, with many of them more than 20 years old. "That's key for us today," she said. "Given the age of the fleet, you can appreciate that this investment is long overdue," she said. "It will be a multi-year effort," she added.

Brennan spoke to the Postal Service Board of governors and later took questions in a conference call with reporters.

Holiday shoppers and political mailings ahead of November's midterm elections helped the agency's revenues, she said.

Losses in large part due to a law Congress passed in 2006 to prefund the health care costs of its future retirees -- a requirement the agency has unsuccessfully fought to have Congress repeal.

She cited a 35 percent decline in the volume of first class mail in the last 10 years as a reason for the closures and consolidation of many individual post offices around the country, closures which have generated some opposition among lawmakers.

"That's a prudent business decision," she said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Americans Borrow Big in December, Set Debt Record

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Consumer Borrowing
Elise Amendola/AP
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER

WASHINGTON -- Consumers increased their borrowing in December, with credit cards rising at the fastest pace in eight months. It could be a sign that consumer spending will accelerate as strong jobs gains give shoppers more confidence about taking on debt.

Consumer borrowing expanded by $14.8 billion in December, pushing consumer debt to a record $3.31 trillion, the Federal Reserve reported Friday. In November, borrowing had climbed by $13.5 billion.

The December rise included a $5.8 billion jump in the category that includes credit cards, marking the biggest gain since April. The result followed a $945 million drop in the category in November.

Consumer borrowing in the category that includes auto loans and student loans also rose in December, climbing $9 billion after a $14.4 billion increase in November.

Total debt is up 6.9 percent in the past year. The category covering auto and student loans is up 8.2 percent, while the credit card category has risen just 3.5 percent.

The auto and student loan category has been growing at the fastest rate since the Great Recession of 2007-2009. That partly reflects the fact that many workers who lost jobs during the downturn decided to take out loans to go back to school. Some students also stayed their longer, acquiring more student debt, because had trouble landing jobs.

In contrast, consumers aren't using credit cards as much as they used to before the recession. Many economists believe this indicates greater caution about taking on debt to finance consumer spending. But with robust job growth over the past year, consumers are likely to borrow more and fuel consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of economic activity.

The Fed's monthly report on consumer credit does not cover mortgages, home equity loans or other types of loans secured by real estate.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Anthem Warns Consumers of Email Scam After Data Breach

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Anthem Inc. Hacked in 'Sophisticated' Attack on Customer Data
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
By Bill Berkrot

Health insurer Anthem (ANTM) warned U.S. customers Friday about an email scam targeting former and current members whose personal information was suspected to have been breached in a massive cyberattack.

The No. 2 U.S. health insurer said Wednesday that hackers breached its computer system containing data on up to 80 million people.

Anthem said there was no indication the email scam was connected to those who perpetrated the security breach. It wants customers to know it is not calling members regarding the breach and not asking for credit card information or social security numbers over the phone.

The company said it will contact current and former members via mail delivered by the U.S. Postal Service about the attack.

Anthem confirmed media reports that data accessed by hackers hadn't been encrypted to prevent such a security breach.

How we managed our data in the warehouse has been appropriate. No one has pointed a finger and said you did this wrong and this is why this happened.

"When the data is moved in and out of the warehouse it is encrypted. But when it sits in the warehouse it's not encrypted," Anthem spokeswoman Cindy Wakefield said.

Anthem needs to be able to easily access patient data in order to create the numerous reports it generates for customers and regulators as part of doing business, Wakefield explained. "I think that is standard practice," she added.

"How we managed our data in the warehouse has been appropriate," Wakefield said. "No one has pointed a finger and said you did this wrong and this is why this happened."

Several U.S. states are investigating the cyberattack on Anthem that a person familiar with the matter said is being examined for possible ties to China.

"The level of protection of this highly sensitive information is very much a focus of our investigation," said Jaclyn Falkowski, a spokeswoman for Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen.

Major Concern

Cybersecurity has become a major concern for U.S. firms. Some of the biggest data breaches reported to date include those at retailers Target (TGT) and Home Depot (HD).

Wakefield said Anthem wasn't worrying about lawsuits by states or customers as a result of the security breach.

"Our first priority is to determine who was impacted and to notify our members," she said, adding that Anthem was working with cybersecurity experts on ways to prevent future attacks.

The insurer has been communicating with regulators and attorneys general in the markets where it does business, Wakefield said.

U.S. law doesn't specifically require sensitive health data be encrypted, said Washington lawyer Deven McGraw, an expert in health care privacy.

"Encryption is one physical safeguard that can be very helpful to lowering cybersecurity risk," McGraw said.

Anthem's shares were down 1.1 percent at $135.69 on the New York Stock Exchange.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Market Wrap: Stocks Slip on Interest Rate, Greece Jitters

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

US-ECONOMY-MARKET-TRADE-NYSE
Jewel Samad, AFP/Getty Images
By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK -- Wall Street stocks fell Friday as a better-than-expected U.S. jobs report raised expectations that the Federal Reserve will increase interest rates by midyear, while renewed worries over Greece's debt negotiations added to the bearish tone.

The S&P 500 index of utilities, often used as a bond proxy by investors in a low-rate environment, fell 4.1 percent, its biggest daily drop since August 2011, as U.S. government debt yields jumped.

In another sign of concern about interest rates, Simon Properties, a real estate investment trust, sank 4 percent at $195.08.

But the financial sector, which tends to benefit from rising interest rates, rose 0.7 percent.

Still, all three major indexes registered strong gains for the week, with the Dow industrials rising 3.8 percent for its biggest weekly gain since January 2013.

Nonfarm payrolls increased more than expected in January and wages rebounded, while employment numbers for November and December were revised sharply higher, the U.S. Labor Department reported. The unemployment rate ticked up to 5.7 percent as a result of an increased labor force.

After the report, traders added to bets that the U.S. central bank will start to hike interest rates by midyear.

"With the stronger-than-anticipated employment report, there's discussion the Fed might move earlier rather than later ... so we've seen the financial sector do well and the interest rate-sensitive utilities sector do poorly," said Bucky Hellwig, senior vice president at BB&T Wealth Management in Birmingham, Alabama.

Adding to that, "the negotiations on the Greek debt weighed on the market this afternoon," he said.

Euro zone finance ministers are waiting to hear on Feb. 11 how Greece wants to become financially independent, the chairman of the ministers said. Greece must apply for a bailout extension by Feb. 16 at the latest to ensure that the eurozone keeps backing it financially, the Eurogroup chairman told Reuters.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that Greece was rebuffed by lenders for $5 billion in short-term debt; the country is facing a cash crunch because the EU wants more reforms.

Indexes End Lower

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) fell 60.59 points, or 0.34 percent, to 17,824.29, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) lost 7.05 points, or 0.34 percent, to 2,055.47, and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) dropped 20.70 points, or 0.43 percent, to 4,744.40.

For the week, the S&P 500 was up 3 percent, its best weekly gain since December, while the Nasdaq was up 2.4 percent.

About 7.7 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, compared with the 7.9 billion average for the last five sessions, according to data from BATS Global Markets.

Among the day's gainers, Twitter jumped 16.4 percent to $48.01 after any earnings report on Thursday that beat Wall Street's profit and revenue targets in the fourth quarter.

Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the New York Stock Exchange by 1,961 to 1,128, for a 1.74-to-1 ratio on the downside. On the Nasdaq, 1,458 issues fell and 1,260 advanced for a 1.16-to-1 ratio favoring decliners.

The benchmark S&P 500 index posted 43 new 52-week highs and two new lows; the Nasdaq composite recorded 99 new highs and 26 new lows.

-With additional reporting by Chuck Mikolajczek.

What to watch Monday:
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • CNA Financial (CNA)
  • Dunn & Bradstreet (DNB)
  • Hasbro (HAS)
  • Loews (L)
  • NetEase (NTES)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How to Gracefully Handle Your Midlife Crisis

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Tips For Dealing With Your Midlife Crisis

By Chris Taylor

Say the words "midlife crisis," and most people think of cringe-worthy scenes like graying men squiring around much-younger paramours in zippy sports cars. Matt Welch went in a more wholesome direction: Baseball cards.

The 46-year-old editor-in-chief of Reason magazine set out to collect every Topps-brand baseball card ever printed of his beloved Angels. It took roughly five years and $1,000, but this past New Year's Eve, the final two cards came in the mail. "Strange things happen to men in their 40s, and this was my midlife crisis," said Welch, a New York City resident originally from Long Beach, California. "I hadn't thought about baseball cards in 30 years. But then I bought one, then two, and it was so pleasurable I thought 'Oh hell, why not?' "

A relatively harmless midlife crisis, to be sure. And one which his wife Emmanuelle Richard has given her tacit approval. "She's said from the beginning, 'It beats the convertible, and it beats the expensive mistress,' " he jokes. But its is a crisis nonetheless, which no doubt feels very familiar to 40- or 50-somethings who feel increasingly alarmed at the passage of time. One common response: Whip out the wallet.

Personal Desires vs. Family Needs

Whether it's for an extravagant vacation, a pricey hobby or a shiny new ride, the many challenges of midlife can lead us to throw off our usual financial restrictions, if only for a moment.

"People spend all this time investing in their marriages and careers and families, and then 10 or 20 years down the line, they often want to renew their enthusiasm for life," said Dr. James Hollis, a psychoanalyst in Washington, D.C., and author of "Finding Meaning in the Second Half of Life." "That can lead to risky purchases. I knew one couple whose marriage was teetering on the brink, and they went out and bought a home they couldn't afford. They got to this big empty house and said, 'What have we done?' "

The danger is that the midlife splurge comes during a period of life when Americans can ill afford it. After all, in their 40s and 50s, many members of the so-called sandwich generation" are dealing with the twin financial challenges of raising children and helping their own elderly parents. Meanwhile, they must save for their own retirement, a task for which most Americans have fallen woefully behind. One recent Wells Fargo survey found that 41 percent of those in their 50s were saving nothing for their golden years.

Consider It a Financial Dance

That all makes for a delicate financial dance, with no room for a misstep. That's why experts advise that those in midlife need to be extra-vigilant that some big, emotional purchase doesn't mess up a lifetime of diligent planning. Financial planner Robert Foley of Tustin, California, said the key is to recognize these midlife emotions when they occur. "It's normal and OK to have these feelings," said Foley, who just turned 50 himself and admitted to "longing for the sports car I never had."

Set up some roadblocks for yourself, so those emotions don't translate into massive bills. Clearing larger purchases (over $500 and up) with your partner, for instance, can be one line of defense against overly impetuous decisions.

Also, build some smaller indulgences into your budget instead, Michael Baker, a financial planner from Charlotte, North Carolina, advised. Allow yourself a bigger-than-usual vacation, tie it to some milestone like a birthday or an anniversary, and then work towards it in anticipation. That way, like a dieter allowing yourself an occasional dessert, you won't go crazed with deprivation and react by going too far in the other direction.

Welch's baseball card quest was just such a minor extravagance and seems to have done the trick. At the very least, his affordable midlife crisis got him an excellent collection to show off to fellow Angels fans. Welch's advice for others desiring a midlife splurge? "Get the spouse's buy-in early on," he quips. "That's very important."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

What Went Wrong at DreamWorks Animation?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

DreamWorks Studio Opening
Paul Sakuma/APCEO Jeffrey Katzenberg says he is taking on a more hands-on role at DreamWorks Animation, which just went through another round of layoffs.
The feature films released by DreamWorks Animation (DWA) are typically frothy entertainments that feature happy endings. In real life, though, the studio itself might not have such a cheerful final act.

The company has had to take writedowns for four of its last six films, and it's posted a net loss in two of its preceding four reported quarters. Recently, it announced layoffs that will send around 20 percent of its staff packing. Overtures to potential buyers haven't yet succeeded. How did the company fall this far?

Different Movie, Same Ending?

In some ways, these developments shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, the entity that DreamWorks Animation was spun off from (and derives its name from) was pegged for major success only to fall far short of the mark itself.

This was DreamWorks SKG, an omnibus entertainment company founded in 1994 that was supposed to be a major power in film, TV and music.

On the film end, the idea was to create a new big-time live-action and animation studio that could stand toe to toe with Hollywood majors like Disney (DIS), Viacom's (VIA) Paramount and 21st Century Fox's (FOX) 20th Century Fox.

But DreamWorks SKG, in spite of a few successful movies and a formidable talent roster, couldn't compete with the well-diversified operations of its rivals. Disney, for example, not only makes money from its movies, but also owns a set of broadcast TV assets like ABC and ESPN, and operates hugely popular theme parks.

After DreamWorks Animation split from its parent, going public in a 2004 IPO, DreamWorks SKG only lasted another year as a stand-alone company. In 2005, it was sold to Paramount.

Standing Alone

Like its former parent, DreamWorks Animation aimed to succeed largely on its own as a big-time producer of movies.

That's a risky proposition to begin with -- feature films, after all, are awfully expensive to make and distribute. Animated ones are even more labor-intensive than their live-action counterparts, and they take far longer to develop.

So the company is under the gun to a much greater degree than its major studio peers. First, the major studios have a bigger slate of releases, meaning more chances for a hit. And second, they're better diversified across other media and businesses, which helps to cushion the inevitable flops.

Trolls Film Due in 2016

For example, in 2012 Disney released the sci-fi epic "John Carter," a notorious bomb. But thanks to the performance of some of its other releases that year (like 2012's top domestic grosser, "Marvel's The Avengers"), plus its non-film business units, overall the company was a stellar performer. It netted an annual profit of $5.7 billion on revenue of $42 billion.

And that's DreamWorks Animation's problem. In short, it's stuck producing expensive films that take a long time to bring to the screen, and it isn't sufficiently hedged against losses.

As a result, the company has only released two or three films every year since its IPO. If only one of those movies tanks, it can easily plunge the studio into the red.

And despite efforts at diversification -- purchasing the license for the Trolls line of dolls in 2013 (its Trolls film is slated for release in 2016), supplying several animated series to Netflix (NFLX) and starting an in-house publishing imprint -- DreamWorks Animation remains overwhelmingly dependent on film releases. In the third quarter of 2014, for example, almost 80 percent of its total consolidated revenue came from this source.

Cost Cuts and For-Sale Signs

DreamWorks Animation has set goals for cost savings, announcing that it aims to reduce its per-film production expenses to around $120 million (the latest release, "Penguins of Madagascar," cost around $132 million).

Starting next year, it also intends to stick to releasing only two movies every year, one from original material and one a sequel to an existing property.

It seems a lower per-film cost and fewer releases means fewer troops necessary to make them. Hence the announced layoffs -- which, by the way, are not the company's first. It let go of around 350 employees in 2013.

The company is also reorganizing, with several top executives stepping down and CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg saying that he will take a more hands-on role in both development and production of upcoming titles.

Meanwhile, DreamWorks Animation has been trying to sell itself to outside parties -- basically, turning it into a unit of a larger company as with the major Hollywood studios. There have been no takers yet.

So the company will keep pumping out movies as a stand-alone entity. But the question is, for how much longer? After all, the movie business has been a pretty rough place for lone wolves lately.

Motley Fool contributor Eric Volkman owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends DreamWorks Animation, Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Best Valentine's Deals Go Beyond Candy, Jewelry, Flowers

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

|box|brown|celebration|center|chocolate|closeup|color|culture|food|heart|holiday|horizontal|interior|lifestyle|love|mitch hrdlic
Getty Images
By Louis Ramirez

Valentine's Day wouldn't be the same without chocolates and jewelry. But as much as we appreciate both, true deal hunters know this isn't where the savings lie. In fact, both items are typically cheaper during the weeks after Valentine's. So we sifted through last year's best Valentine's Day deals to predict where you'll find the real value this year.

Cupid Arrived in January

In 2014, Valentine's Day deals began on Jan. 22 with a stackable coupon code from Cost Plus World and a 15 percent off coupon from Blue Nile. Groupon (GRPN) also kick-started Valentine's Day early with a 50 percent off FTD voucher.

That pales in comparison to 2015. This year, the first DealNews Valentine's Day deal was posted on Jan. 15. The deal, courtesy of Cherishables, offered a free personalized Valentine's Day photo card. That was quickly followed by Amazon's (AMZN) Valentine's Day jewelry sale, which started on Jan. 16 and extends through Feb. 14. Other early sales we've seen this year include sitewide sales from Perfumania, Valentine's Day decor sales from Kohl's (KSS), and an early jewelry sale from Szul.

Jewelry and Flowers Reign Supreme

Of the many deals we listed last year, jewelry and flowers were the most dominant, accounting for 35 percent and 17 percent of all Valentine's Day deals respectively. For jewelry, expect to see aggressive discounts ranging from 60 percent to 94 percent off. Retailers to look out for include Szul, Jewelry.com, Blue Nile, Sears (SHLD) and Amazon.

While some of those sales won't top our best April deals (which are traditionally the best jewelry discounts we see all year), they're still respectable discounts when compared to the rest of the year. For instance, last Valentine's Day, Szul took from 60 percent to 91 percent off select items with an extra 5 percent off. Weeks later during the month of April, Szul discounted the same jewelry, but this time by up to 93 percent with the same extra 5 percent off.

Szul wasn't the only retailer to do this. Last April, Amazon took up to 78 percent off diamond jewelry, whereas during Valentine's Day the retailer took 75 percent off women's heart necklaces only. It's a subtle difference, but we've found that the jewelry deals in April tend to offer more variety and slightly better discounts. That's not to say you'll find bad deals in the coming weeks, but consumers should know that what you buy today could be cheaper in April.

Likewise, flowers will see better discounts in April. Last February, 1-800-Flowers took up to 30 percent off select items, whereas in April the same retailer took 40 percent off the same items. A slightly safer bet is to get your flowers using vouchers or credits from daily deal sites like Groupon. These deals typically offer savings of up to 50 percent on purchases from retailers like FTD. Last February, for instance, Groupon offered a $40 FTD credit for $20. It offers the same discount again in April. Our only recommendation is to make sure there are no restrictions or blackout dates on any voucher you buy.

Opt for Perfume Over Chocolate

By now we all know and expect to see overpriced chocolates on Valentine's Day. For instance, Godiva took 15 percent off its products last Valentine's Day, but later it took up to 50 percent off its chocolates during one of its semiannual sales. The same can be said of Ghirardelli, which was only discounted by 5 percent in February, but later saw discounts of up to 20 percent off. As tied to the holiday as they are, chocolates are the one item you should definitely pass on if you're looking to save some money. Instead, we recommend you opt for perfume.

Although they only accounted for 6 percent of last year's Valentine's Day deals, perfume sales were strong during the month of February, beaten only by Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales. Perfumania had a particularly memorable sale last February, taking 30 percent off sitewide with a stackable $10 off $50 coupon. By comparison, the same retailer took 35 percent off sitewide on Cyber Monday, which was its best discount of the year. Target (TGT) also had an impressive deal last Valentine's Day, bundling a complimentary third fragrance with the purchase of any two fragrances. So you could either stock up on your significant other's favorite fragrances, or buy two as a gift and save one for yourself. That was the retailer's best fragrance sale of the year.

Say It With a Personalized Gift

Sometimes the best gifts are the smallest ones. Fortunately, the days leading up to Valentine's Day see a significant amount of deals on small items that can be easily personalized. For instance, you could take advantage of Shutterfly's or Groupon's various card offerings to create your own personalized Valentine's Day card or photo album. Alternatively, you can turn to Google (GOOG) Play or Amazon for free or cheap MP3 downloads that you can then use to create a personalized playlist for your significant other. Retailers like Walmart and GOG will also discount DVDs and video game downloads, respectively, for a cozy night in.

So while there are various items that will sell at or slightly above their usual price on Valentine's Day, with a little patience and help from our deal hunters it's possible to find the right Valentine's Day gift regardless of your budget.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Shop Humanely: 15 Brands With Strong Cruelty-Free Policies

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Mouse
Alexander Metzger/Shutterstock
By Louis Ramriez

Becoming an ethical consumer, especially when it comes to avoiding animal cruelty, is something most of us would like to do, but very few of us attempt. And it's no wonder; the task can be difficult and oftentimes confusing. But with animal cruelty in the news of late (a GoDaddy Super Bowl ad causing a commotion once again), many consumers might be wondering how you can do more to help our furry friends.

These days, responsible shoppers have various tools at their disposal to help make the task of shopping ethically easier. If you're shopping to protect animals, our guide below will help make your transition to ethical shopping smooth and effortless.

Where to Begin: Find Out What 'Cruelty-Free' Means

First the good news -- becoming an ethical shopper doesn't mean you have to buy everything from an organic health store. Instead, it means doing a little research before making your next purchase, something most deal hunters are already doing anyway.

It's no secret that a vast majority of companies rely on animals to some extent for their product lines. Unfortunately, that means many companies directly and indirectly wind up exploiting our four-legged friends, whether it's through cosmetic testing or the manner in which they source their materials.
Equally troubling is the fact that any company can label itself "cruelty-free," much like any company can call its ingredients "natural." Unlike the term "organic," which is regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture, cruelty free is up for grabs.

"There are no legal definitions in the U.S. that companies must adhere to to use the words 'cruelty-free' on their labels," says Kim Paschen, spokesperson for the Leaping Bunny Program. "This is the principle reason the Leaping Bunny Program was founded, so that a third-party certification could independently verify companies' claims."

Look for the Leaping Bunny Logo

The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics' Leaping Bunny Program was formed in 1996 by leading animal protection groups. When certifying companies, the Leaping Bunny Program adheres to the Corporate Standard of Compassion for Animals that they established as a way to guarantee products to be cruelty free.

The coalition includes agencies such as the Humane Society of the United States, the Doris Day Animal League and the Animal Alliance of Canada. Together, these agencies created what's today known as the international Leaping Bunny logo. Companies that meet the standard are listed in all versions of the Compassionate Shopping Guide that they publish. Companies can optionally elect to license the logo to display on their packaging.

The logo ensures that a product and its ingredients are 100 percent free of animal testing. There's an emphasis on ingredients because a brand may call itself cruelty-free, but still contract other companies to test its ingredients on animals. However, companies certified by the Leaping Bunny Program must be cruelty free from ingredients through finished products, says Paschen. Moreover, the Leaping Bunny Program certifies by company, rather than by product. This makes it easier for consumers to shop cruelty free and encourages companies to purchase their ingredients from suppliers which use alternative methods to assess safety and effectiveness, she adds.

While not associated with the CCIC, another great starting point for would-be ethical shoppers is the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' Beauty Without Bunnies Guide. The searchable guide lists over 1,500 companies that have passed PETA's strict standards for animal welfare. Our beginner's guide below lists brands that meet either PETA's or the Leaping Bunny's standards, unless otherwise noted.

Household Brands
  • Seventh Generation: This Vermont company is among the biggest cruelty-free brands, with certifications from the CCIC, PETA, B Corp and LEED, to name a few. Moreover, its products, which range from laundry detergent to tissues, can be found in most mainstream supermarkets and drugstores.
  • Mrs. Meyer's Clean Day: "Smells like a garden, cleans like the dickens." That's the motto behind this earth- and animal-friendly company, which carries household cleaners, air fresheners, and body washes. Mrs. Meyers is a member of the Leaping Bunny program and like Seventh Generation, can be found in various stores. Just note that in 2014 the company was integrated into SC Johnson, which is not CCIC-certified.
  • Common Good: If you've ever wondered what an ingredient like sodium benozate does or how it's derived, Common Good can help. Dedicated to safe, green, and plastic-free products, this 5-year old company lists a readily-accessible FAQ describing all of the ingredients it uses in its products. Its line of cleaning products can be found at Vine.com, Sur La Table, and FreshDirect, to name a few.
  • Method: PETA lists Method as being both vegan and cruelty-free. Moreover, this California company is also CCIC- and B Corp-certified. Its product range encompasses everything from bathroom cleaners to hand sanitizer and it can be found in most mainstream stores.
  • Martha Stewart (MSO): She may not have the cleanest record with Wall Street, but when it comes to animals, Martha Stewart's Clean line of household products is certified by the CCIC's Leaping Bunny Program. Martha Stewart's namesake brand avoids animal by-products, animal testing, artificial colors/preservatives and harsh synthetics.
Beauty
  • Aubrey Organics: This Leaping Bunny-certified company has a comprehensive list of beauty products for men and women that range from body lotions and shampoo to sunscreen and lip balm. Even better, their products cater to all skin and hair types including dry, oily, and blemish-prone.
  • JĀSÖN: Founded in 1959, this California company was creating a natural line of health care products long before it was popular. The company meets PETA's standards and specializes in facial creams, body care, dental care, and hair care. In addition, JĀSÖN features a special line of products for children along with a gluten-free line of products.
  • The Body Shop: This popular beauty chain has long been a champion of cruelty-free cosmetics, and although it was purchased by L'Oréal in 2006, its principles have not wavered. In fact, many would argue that consumers who want to show big business how serious they are about purchasing ethically-produced products would make a significant impact by continuing to support The Body Shop.
  • Loving Naturals: If you've ever searched the Environmental Working Group's catalog of safe sunscreens, chances are you've come across Loving Naturals. In addition to its high safety marks on EWG's catalog, Loving Naturals is also on PETA's list of company's that don't test their products on animals.
  • Beauty Without Cruelty: This British company was first introduced to U.S. consumers in 1989 and has a comprehensive line of Leaping Bunny-approved beauty products including mascara, lip gloss, and eye pencils. The company was founded by trustees of an animal welfare organization and claims to be both vegetarian and natural.
Apparel/Miscellaneous
  • Moo Shoes: This New York-based company shows us that not all shoes and wallets must be made of leather. Instead, Moo Shoes relies on other man-made materials such as pleather and fake suede. The result is a massive catalog of animal-friendly boots, sneakers, shoes, bags, and wallets.
  • Alternative Outfitters: Like Moo Shoes, this vegan boutique specializes in men's and women's shoes, belts, and wallets. It also offers a handful of beauty products including face masks and blush.
  • Matt & Nat: Short for "material" and "nature," this company is both animal- and eco-friendly, using recycled plastics, nylons and rubber. In addition, the company works with factories that qualify for the SA8000 standard, a social certification standard for decent workplaces set forth by Social Accountability International. In terms of products, Matt & Nat sells everything from laptop sleeves to backpacks.
  • H&M: In addition to being a fur-free retailer, H&M also abides by select standards committed to improving the welfare of animals in their supply chain. Among these standards are the Responsible Wool Standard, which declines wool sourced from farms that practice mulesing, and the Responsible Down Standard, which doesn't accept down and feathers plucked from live or force-fed birds. Keep in mind that H&M isn't a fully vegan company, but it has taken steps to protect the welfare of animals.
  • Stella McCartney: Responsibility, honesty and modernity are the three pillars from which Stella McCartney founded her namesake fashion house. That means the company strives to create fashion that's both animal- and eco-friendly. In addition to bypassing furs, Stella McCartney is also an outspoken advocate against the use of leather.
Do Your Research and Look for Special Cruelty-Free Sections

The aforementioned brands are just a handful of companies that take a responsible approach to their product lines. Naturally, not all of your needs will be covered by these companies, so we recommend shoppers do their own research before making new purchases. Databases from PETA and the Leaping Bunny Program make for excellent starting points.

Also keep in mind that many of your favorite stores may already carry products from these guides. For instance, Vitacost and drugstore have special sections with certified cruelty-free products. Likewise, Amazon (AMZN) has a cruelty-free filter by which consumers can shop, although we recommend consumers proceed with caution as Amazon doesn't clarify their definition of cruelty free.

Ultimately, the best way to help this industry grow is by asking your favorite store to carry products approved by the Leaping Bunny Program or PETA. You can even carry copies of the Leaping Bunny's Compassionate Shopping Guide on your smartphone or use their app to remind you which companies are certified. The more you know about the product you're buying, the better informed you are as a consumer, and the more responsible your purchase.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Ask Stacy: What Can I Do About My High Property Taxes?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

How to Appeal Property Taxes

By Stacy Johnson

Depending on where you live, property taxes can range from a slight inconvenience to a crushing expense.

Here in South Florida, for example, the annual tax bill for my 2,200-square-foot waterfront home is close to $9,000 annually. Outside Atlanta, where my parents lived, they were paying less than $1,000 a year. But wherever you live, if you feel your taxes are unfair, you have options.

And that brings us to today's reader question: "Do you have an article on how to fight property tax hikes? I feel like I'm being held hostage. I'm fighting my property assessment, but feel that I am hitting a brick wall despite all the evidence I've been providing to the various government entities." -- Keya

I've successfully appealed my property taxes twice over the years, once in Arizona and once in Ohio. According to the National Taxpayers Union, 30 percent to 60 percent of taxable property in the United States is overvalued for property tax purposes, yet fewer than 5 percent of homeowners challenge their assessments. In my experience, appealing tax bills isn't all that difficult. And because it can result in saving hundreds, even thousands, every year, if you think you have a case, try it.

Learn the Rules of the Game

The way property taxes are computed -- and how they are appealed -- differs from state to state. But property taxes all start from the same place, the value of your property. So the first step is to check the value your county is placing on your property. Historically, doing this meant waiting to receive an annual appraisal in the mail. These days you can often find this information online in seconds.

However you find it, if it seems too high, take the next step: Look online or contact your local property assessor or appraiser's office and find out exactly how they arrive at values. Then determine how the appeals process works.

When property values were plunging here in South Florida, it seemed that my appraised value was way too high. Then I learned the assessor's office was using prior year values to determine current year assessed values. For example, my 2012 tax bill, due in November 2012, was based on the value of my home between Jan. 2, 2011, and Jan. 1, 2012. So here they're using values beginning nearly two years before bills are sent out.

The point is, before you start challenging values, be sure you understand where they came from. It's also important to understand how properties are appraised. Where I live, the appraiser's office uses sales to determine values, placing more weight on more recent sales. To find out how properties are appraised where you live, call the applicable county office or do a search online: "How property values are determined in (your city, county, state)."

Bureaucrats Can Be Friendly

After understanding how appraisals are conducted, if you think you have a case, do another search: "How to appeal property taxes in (your city, county, state)." You'll probably find simple instructions. As an example, here's what I found with those search terms for my county: "If you believe the market value as shown in the box 'Your Property Value This Year' is higher than the market value of your property as of this past January 1, we encourage you to contact us. One of our Deputy Property Appraisers will happily meet with you and discuss your market value and how it was calculated. After this conference, if you still feel your market value is too high, you can file a simple petition with the [Value Adjustment Board]. The VAB appeal application forms are available on our website and are also available online on the VAB's website (and you can also check the status of your filed petition). The VAB has a statutory $15 filing fee, which must accompany the application. The VAB doesn't accept petitions on valuation cases after the mid-September filing deadline.'

Note the above description comes off as fairly friendly. While it may seem you'll be entering a hostile environment by challenging your local taxing authority, in the instances that I've challenged my property taxes, the people at the respective county offices were both friendly and forthcoming. While I obviously can't guarantee you'll have the same experience, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Winning the Game

You won't win a property tax appeal based on a belief your taxes are unreasonable or because you have a gut feeling your appraised value is too high. If you can't make your case with facts and figures, you'll lose.

When it comes to challenging value, the first thing to do is make sure there are no mistakes. Does the county have your correct lot measurements? How about the square footage and age of your house? Verify everything.

Next, see if there are arguable differences between the nearby comps used by the county and your property. Ask the county for the comparables they used. See how those homes differ from yours.

The goal is to show how the comparables used by the county weren't really all that comparable. Was the home that sold down the street a few months ago really like yours? Or was it newer, nicer or otherwise an unfair comparison? Arm yourself with recent sales and comparables that support your home's lower value, along with evidence the homes used by the county weren't comparable after all.
You can find current comparables yourself online (do a search for "Recent sales (your ZIP code)," or ask a real estate agent for help.

The Importance of the Appraisal

Your ultimate weapon in challenging property taxes, however, is an appraisal. If the county says your home is worth $200,000, but a licensed, independent appraiser says it's worth only $150,000, it's going to be a hard argument for the county to win. An appraisal will set you back a couple hundred bucks, but depending on your county's rules, it may be necessary. A simple call to the appraisal office should tell you.

An example: My home in Cincinnati sat on one lot, but my side yard was a different, comparably sized vacant lot. The county placed a high value on my vacant lot, evidently considering it buildable. At my hearing, I used plat maps and pictures to show that my home completely blocked my side yard from the street. Since there was no possible ingress or egress, meaning the vacant lot couldn't be built on, it was worth far less than a buildable lot.

My argument worked, and the appraised value of my side yard, along with my taxes, went down. In that case, I didn't need an appraisal. I was able to simply state my case. Here in Florida, however, I was told I'd need an appraisal to win a similar case. That's why it's important to talk to the folks at the responsible agency and find out how decisions are made.

The Bottom Line

Keya says, "I'm fighting my property assessment but feel that I am hitting a brick wall despite all the evidence I've been providing to the various government entities." While I don't know the rules of engagement where Keya lives, to win this battle, he or she may have to spring for an appraisal. I've won appeals without one, but that's the most reliable weapon.

Another option is to hire help in the form of a local real estate attorney or one of many services that will fight for you. But my advice, especially if the amounts aren't major, is to go it alone. Best case, you'll put some money in your pocket. Worst case, you'll get an interesting civics lesson.

Got a Question You'd Like Answered?

You can ask a question simply by hitting "reply" to our email newsletter. If you're not subscribed, fix that right now by clicking here. The questions I'm likeliest to answer are those that will interest other readers. In other words, don't ask for super-specific advice that applies only to you. And if I don't get to your question, promise not to hate me. I do my best, but I get dozens of questions daily and only answer one weekly.

Stacy Johnson founded Money Talks News in 1991. He has earned a CPA (currently inactive) and has also earned licenses in stocks, commodities, options principal, mutual funds, life insurance, securities supervisor and real estate. Got some time to kill? You can learn more about him here.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The 10 Best Bargains at Drugstores

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

How to Get Deals at Drug Stores
By Stacy Johnson

When it comes to most items, drugstore chains such as Walgreens (WBA) or CVS (CVS) frequently can't compete on price with stores such as Walmart (WMT), Target (TGT) or the local grocery store. But as with many things in life, there are hacks that level the playing field.

For example, WildForWags and WildForCVS owner Christie Hardcastle told me she regularly finds deals at chain drugstores that beat the pants off big box and grocery stores. In fact, she claimed to routinely get things free, and sometimes even came out money ahead! Impossible? I thought so, so I invited her to meet me at a local Walgreens and explain how she does it.

As you saw in the video, you can sometimes get a good deal at places such as Walgreens and CVS just by keeping an eye out for ad circulars and in-store signs revealing what's on sale. But to get the best deals, you'll have to do more -- join loyalty programs and look for coupons, both store and manufacturer -- and check out sites such as Christie's for ways to get the best current deals.

While that may sound like a hassle, the rewards are powerful: very cheap and sometimes free stuff.

I asked Christie to expand on the tips she offered in the video. For those of you new to the drugstore discount game, here in her own lightly edited words are some of her favorite products to purchase at drugstores:

1. Cereal

This is one of the items drugstores price below grocery stores to get you in the door. Each week you'll normally see a different cereal brand or selection on sale. If you aren't brand-loyal, you can pretty much bet on getting a great deal every week. If you have a brand you prefer, you'll usually see sales every six weeks or so. Plus, there are often coupons you can print even if you're new to couponing or don't have newspaper coupon inserts.

2 and 3. Milk and Eggs

Drugstores will often run sales on milk and eggs with savings up to $1 over grocery store prices. Dairy prices vary regionally, but keep an eye out for sales or special offers.

4 and 5. Toothbrushes and Toothpaste

These items will often have pharmacy rewards (like Walgreens Register Rewards or Balance Rewards Points) that can really lower the price. Combine points with coupons, and you should be able to grab toothbrushes and toothpaste free or very inexpensively every four to six weeks.

6. Makeup

If you're using drugstore brands, you'll usually get a much better deal at drugstores than grocery or department stores. There are often rewards for these products that you can combine with coupons and sales to get fabulous deals. We see buy-one-get-one-free or buy-one-get-one-half-off sales on cosmetics regularly. Plus, because of limited space, drugstores often have great clearance deals to make space for new make-up products. Another tip: If your store has a beauty counter always ask the beauty adviser for coupons.

7. Personal Care Items

Soap, body wash and lotions can often be purchased very inexpensively at the drugstore. Look for sales, rewards and store coupons that you can stack along with manufacturer's coupons for these items, too.

8. Store-Brand Garbage Bags

I love Walgreens brand (Nice!) garbage bags. The quality is excellent, and the regular price is very reasonable. I usually wait for a sale, when I can grab them for about half the price of brand-name garbage bags.

9. Drugstore-Brand Diapers

While not a user myself, I've heard great things about Walgreens-brand diapers. Look for the buy-one-get-one-free sale that happens a few times a year, and you can grab diapers for about 12 to 13 cents each.

10. Hair Color

Not only do drugstores have a great selection of hair color, they often run sales and rewards promotions. You can also find many clearance hair color deals. Combine that with coupons, and you can easily get hair color kits from your favorite brands for about $2.50 to $3.50 a kit.

The Bottom Line

While surveys such as ConsumerWorld's offer evidence that drugstores charge for convenience, learning to hack prices with rewards programs, sales and coupons can turn those high prices upside down. If you haven't tried it yet, do.

What deals have you found at the local drugstore? How about sites that help you save? Spread the word by leaving a comment below or the Money Talks News Facebook page.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Last Week's Biggest Stock Movers: Glu Mobile, Stratasys

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Katy Perry in Concert - Nashville
Wade Payne/Invision/APKaty Perry and Glu Mobile have a five-year partnership.
Plenty of stocks go up and down in any given week. The gainers inspire us to keep investing. The decliners keep greed in check while reminding us about the risks of the equity markets.

Let's go over some of last week's best and worst performers.

Glu Mobile (GLUU) -- Up 44 percent last week

Mobile gaming has been a tough sector lately for investors, but Glu Mobile soared last week after posting better-than-expected quarterly results and announcing a potentially lucrative licensing deal. The five-year deal with Katy Perry comes with exclusive rights to mobile gaming. Glu Mobile made the most of its partnership with Kim Kardashian to put out one of the hottest apps of this past summer. Perry's star power is likely to be more lasting, giving the mobile app developer fertile ground to continue putting out chart-topping games.

Conn's (CONN) -- Up 43 percent last week

Last year was brutal for consumer electronics, but there may be some relief in 2015. Conn's reported a nearly 5 percent uptick in year-over-year same-store sales for January after clocking in with flat comps during the holidays.

At least one analyst is feeling charged up with the potential here. B. Riley reiterated its buy rating with a price target of $52. Even with last week's big move, we're still looking at a gain of 131 percent if it hits B. Riley's target.

Frontier Communications (FTR) -- Up 18 percent last week

Verizon (VZ) is streamlining its old-school businesses, and Frontier Communications is the beneficiary. Frontier announced that it would be buying Verizon's wirelines business in a $10.5 billion deal.

Folks are shedding landlines these days, but there's still residual revenue to be milked before everyone cuts the phone cord. Frontier will be picking up Verizon's operations that include 3.7 million landline customers, 1.2 million FiOS video connections and 2.2 million broadband users in California, Florida, and Texas. That's a lot of money for Frontier to be shelling out, but the market's excited about the synergies and the incremental growth at the seemingly stagnant provider of telecom services.

Stratasys (SSYS) -- Down 23 percent last week

3-D printing is a once-scorching-hot sector that gave consumer electronics a run for its money in becoming one of the worst-performing industries of 2014. Hype propelled 3-D printing stocks higher through 2012 and 2013, but they came crashing down last year as mainstream consumers stayed away from the expensive machines that render physical objects.

Stratasys didn't lose as much ground as its smaller rivals last year, but it's off to a bad start in 2015. Morgan Stanley and Stifel Nicolaus downgraded the stock last week after it provided an unflattering outlook for growth in the year ahead.

DeVry Education (DV) -- Down 15 percent last week

It's not easy being a for-profit post-secondary educator these days. DeVry became the latest provider of career-building skills to come up short this earnings season, posting slight declines in revenue and profitability. DeVry missed Wall Street's quarterly profit target for the first time in more than a year.

Yelp (YELP) -- Down 14 percent last week

Yelp may get high marks from foodies and travelers looking for customer reviews of local eateries and other establishments, but investors aren't feeling the love. The company took a hit after posting mixed financial results last week.

Yelp delivered better-than-expected results and provided a reasonable outlook, but the one thing keeping enthusiasm in check is that year-over-year user growth had slowed to just 13 percent. Slowing popularity given Yelp's lofty valuation prompted Pacific Crest, Northland Securities, and B. Riley to downgrade their ratings on the former dot-com darling.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Stratasys, Verizon Communications and Yelp. The Motley Fool owns shares of Stratasys. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How Ford Will Boost Its Profits in 2015

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

FordFord spent a lot of time and money in 2014 updating the F-150. Now that production is ramping up, Ford CEO Mark Fields expects that big investment to start paying off.
Ford Motor Co. (F) said last month that it earned a pre-tax profit of $6.3 billion in 2014. That was down more than 26 percent from its 2013 result, as overseas troubles and short supplies of F-150 pickups hurt the Blue Oval's bottom line.

Ford CEO Mark Fields said that he expects the company to bounce back strongly in 2015. He's forecasting a pre-tax profit of between $8.5 billion and $9.5 billion this year. That would be a big jump from 2014, but Ford's guidance is usually spot-on. How will the company get there?

In North America, Ford's Pickups Should Drive Good Gains

Think of it this way: Ford has spent the last few years making a lot of investments -- in new products, in restructuring in Europe, in new factories and facilities in Asia. As Fields and his team see it, 2015 is the year when some of those investments will start to pay off.

In North America, 2014 results were helped by a strong environment for auto sales in the U.S. -- but hurt by short supplies of hot-selling pickup trucks. Ford's new aluminum-bodied F-150 requires different tooling and techniques to manufacture. Setting up Ford's two truck factories to build the new truck required a lot of downtime, and that meant that Ford couldn't make as many trucks as its dealers wanted.

The upshot: Sales of pickups, the company's most profitable product, were down in 2014, while rivals posted gains. That will change in 2015, as Ford's two truck factories get up to speed with the new F-150 -- or put another way, as Ford's big investments in its new truck start to pay off. (One of those factories is already working at full speed; the other will join it in the spring.)

Ford's North America unit earned $6.9 billion last year; it'll do better in 2015, Fields promises.

Tough Situations in Europe and South America Should Improve

Meanwhile, Ford lost just over $1 billion in Europe last year, and almost $1.2 billion in South America. Europe's problems are chronic: Steep, lingering recessions in many European nations have clobbered new-car sales. Ford has extensively restructured its European operation and added several new models to its regional portfolio.

The company had expected those changes to produce a profit in Europe in 2015. Fields now says that won't happen -- Russia's troubles have thrown a wrench into those plans -- but losses will be lower than they were last year, and the unit could break even in 2016.

South America's problems, on the other hand, were mostly acute: Government currency controls in Venezuela made it nearly impossible for Ford to do business there; changing the way it accounts for its operations in the country meant a charge of some $800 million. Ford (and rivals) are also contending with economic slowdowns and rising inflation in key markets like Brazil and Argentina.

Ford might still post a loss in South America in 2015, but it promises that its results will be "substantially improved."

Big Investments in Asian Growth Will Start to Pay Off This Year

In Asia, the story is a happier one. Ford's Asia-Pacific unit, which includes its fast-growing operations in China and India, made $589 million last year -- despite huge ongoing investments in new factories and facilities.

The good news is that some of those factories got up and running in 2014 -- and the rest will be running later this year. Ford has a tremendous opportunity in China, where its products seem to have hit a "sweet spot" with Chinese consumers. Making enough cars and trucks to keep up with demand has been a challenge, but those new factories should help -- and the extra cars and trucks should find ready customers.

The upshot: Ford promises an even better result in its Asia-Pacific region in 2015.

Improvements All Around Should Add Up to a Nice Jump in Profits

All of these improvements, Fields says, will add up to a pre-tax profit between $8.5 billion and $9.5 billion, an improvement of at least $2.2 billion over 2014's result.

Of course, surprises could knock those expectations off course. It happened last year: Ford's guidance at the beginning of 2014 was replaced by more subdued expectations after the extent of troubles in Russia and South America became clear. But absent any surprises, Ford seems set for a bounce-back year in 2015.

Motley Fool contributor John Rosevear owns shares of Ford. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Ford. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Critical Issue After Anthem Hack: Alternatives to Passwords

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

AFX9XK Password window.  Firewall, windows, computer screen
Alamy
By Tom Groenfeldt

Most people have dozens of online accounts, all protected by passwords. Yet passwords are low tech, can easily be hacked and are a nuisance for most people to remember. Isn't there a better alternative? Surprisingly, the answer appears to be "not yet."

"Passwords are the cockroaches of the Internet," said Don Thibeau, executive director of the OpenID Foundation. "You kill one and others hop up; it is an ecosystem problem. Or as one person described it, you have to convince everyone to stop peeing in the pool."

The continued dominance of passwords takes on renewed importance after a stolen password was used to hack into Anthem (ANTM), the second-largest U.S. health insurer, with 80 million customers. The hackers stole millions of Social Security numbers and other personal information -- a far more serious threat than just credit card information.

Why Passwords Are Still the Default

Still, despite all their faults, passwords remain the easiest and most reliable way to control access to our computers, mobile phones, Internet sites and apps. The reasons are numerous:
  • Passwords are free. You don't have to pay to register them, and at most sites you can choose any password you want.
  • Using passwords is cheap. Companies don't have to equip their staff and clients with password generators.
  • Passwords are simple for Web sites. They store your user name and password and can see when you log in. E-commerce sites can link your purchase to a shipping address and stored credit card information.
  • Passwords are always with you. They don't require that you carry any accessories, just that you remember them. You can use them on any computer: at home, at work, at computer kiosks during trade shows or at Internet cafes from Europe to Asia.
  • Using passwords can be simple. Some computers will remember individual passwords for you. So if you work from home or keep your computer close, you can let it remember the passwords for news and social media sites but perhaps insist on keying in the password for your bank account each time you gain access it.
  • Passwords are flexible. If your information has been compromised, or if you think a co-worker has been watching over your shoulder as you enter a password, you can easily change it.
  • Passwords do require a little work. To secure a device, you have to create a password and store it. Many people leave the default password in place or don't implement one at all so they can access their phone more quickly. That's simply not smart.
The drawbacks, however, are equally numerous. Passwords are not super secure. Since most people use common words or names for passwords, hackers can run programs with 500 to 1,000 potential passwords and succeed in getting into many accounts.

Simplicity and Complexity

Powerful programs that run millions of potential variations of words can do much more harm. Many times they don't need to bother with complexity. CNET's list of the most popular passwords of 2013 included 123456 and password, and ran to trustno1 and 000000.

But complex passwords are no help when a retail site, such as Target's (TGT) or Home Depot's (HD), doesn't protect your information and someone gets into its systems and steals all those credentials. Things are slowly changing, however. Several leading corporations -- Microsoft (MSFT) , Google (GOOG), Yahoo (YHOO), eBay's (EBAY) PayPal unit, Orange -- are moving into more sophisticated protection. Chances are good you have used this protection without realizing it.

Popular and sophisticated Web sites may ask for your user name and password, but that's largely a formality. What they are relying on for authenticating you is your location, your IP address and your behavior. Visa (V) says it runs about 600 checks in a fraction of a second before approving a transaction. Financial sites and online stores can do the same, and their accuracy and interest increase as mobile access to the Internet grows; projections are that a large and growing percentage of Internet access is moving to mobile in 2015 and beyond.

The Future Is Still the Same, for Now

The new ways of knowing who you are online opens up new personalized services and some enticing profit opportunities. Mobile network operators can see where you are, what you have shown interest in the past and how much you have to spend. With a change in regulations, they could monetize that information by selling it to restaurants, car companies, retailers or bars much in the same way unregulated online players do today.

Even so, we seem to be stuck with passwords for the foreseeable future. "Passwords do have their problems," admitted Kevin Haley, director of Symantec (SYMC) Security Response. "But we have a huge infrastructure in place that is dependent on the password and no clear agreement on what should replace it. While passwords have a lot of problems, I am not sure we are going to see a replacement for them anytime soon."

This article is commentary by an independent contributor. At the time of publication, the author held no positions in the stocks mentioned.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Ice Bucket Challenge: 6 Months, $115 Million Later

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

By Meg Tirrell

Last summer, neurology professor John Landers was stuck. His grant proposal for funding to sequence the genomes of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig's disease, as part of a worldwide project to better understand the illness, had been rejected. The ALS Association, a nonprofit that supports research, didn't have the funds. Then about 3 million people dumped buckets of ice water over their heads-and everything changed.

"We had a grant in with them asking for about $1 million, and although they were very excited about the project, it was beyond what they were able to do," Landers said in an interview from his lab at University of Massachusetts Medical School. "However, luckily the Ice Bucket Challenge kicked in and as a result of that, they were able to fund this."

The Ice Bucket Challenge -- a viral sensation that involved daring friends to dump ice on themselves or donate money to ALS research -- raised $115 million for the ALS Association last summer (many people both dumped and donated). That compares with its total annual budget, including regional chapters, of $60 million. It's also spurred international awareness about a crippling neurodegenerative disease with no good treatments, and which is often fatal within two to five years of diagnosis.

Understanding the Cause

ALS afflicts about 30,000 people at any given time in the U.S., and about 5,600 people are diagnosed with it each year. But its causes aren't well understood, making research like Landers' -- called Project MinE -- crucial.

"To the extent that we can understand what's going on on the genetic side, those are things we can target through drug development," Landers said. "The best way to think about this is: You bring your car into the garage and it's just not working right; until you figure out what's going wrong with the car, you can't fix it."

The grant to Project MinE was one of four the ALS Association announced in October as part of the initial $22 million it allocated. The others are going to a partnership between academia and industry, called ALS Accelerated Therapeutics, to speed drug development; the New York Genome Center, to further explore the genetic basis of the disease; and three medical labs in California in a project called Neuro Collaborative, which also works on drug development. The association aims to invest $21 million to $25 million a year in research projects, spokeswoman Carrie Munk said.

Assistive Technology

The funding has also enabled more support for patients and their caregivers. The Greater Philadelphia chapter, for example, used Ice Bucket Challenge funding to buy assistive technology devices to loan to people with ALS who can't afford them: power wheelchairs, or eye-gaze technology for communication, she said.

"Another chapter was able to reinstate a respite care program, giving caregivers of people with ALS a break," Munk said by telephone. "Previous to the Ice Bucket Challenge, they had to cut the program; now they can provide it to people who need it."

The funds, Munk said, have energized the research community. The ALS Association has received triple the number of applications for grants for young scientists than in previous years. "A lot of times that funding enables them to continue a lifetime career in the area of ALS," she said.

Other nonprofits saw more funding as well, though the ALS Association took in the bulk of it. Project ALS, a group that aims to fund collaborative research on the disease, took in $750,000 from the Ice Bucket Challenge, almost 10 times more than in the same period the year before.

What's Next?

The organization has already allocated all of the funds to research, including projects focused on testing existing drugs for use in ALS. Others supported research aimed at better understanding whether lipid metabolism, central to rare maladies like Gaucher's disease and Fabry's disease, plays a role in ALS. "We wouldn't have been able to do it without that money," Valerie Estess, director of research at Project ALS, said in a telephone interview.

There's a concern, though, that the challenge will have provided just a one-time boost in funding, and then could peter out. "Of course you'd want it to continue, but what you're hoping with the initial burst in support is that you're seeding pilot studies that are going to bear fruit," said Estess, whose sister was diagnosed with ALS at age 35. "To me, nothing speaks louder than actual data."

Promising projects may then be able to draw funding from the National Institutes of Health, researchers said. And while it may be unlikely to see a repeat of the viral videos this summer, the ALS community is hopeful the effects of a challenge that encompassed so many people will continue to pay off.

"Even if people don't dump ice over their heads in August, hopefully every year, people will remember the Ice Bucket Challenge," Munk said. "We asked people, 'Why did you participate in the Ice Bucket Challenge?' The No. 1 answer was: 'Because I was asked to.'"

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Qualcomm Pays $1 Billion to Settle Chinese Antitrust Dispute

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Earns Qualcomm
Gregory Bull/AP
By Noel Randewich and Matthew Miller

SAN FRANCISCO and BEIJING -- Qualcomm (QCOM) said Monday it agreed to pay China a fine of $975 million, ending a 14-month government investigation into anti-competitive practices.

The deal also sees chipmaker Qualcomm lower its royalty rates on patents used in China, the company said in a statement.

Discussions in Beijing over one of the most contentious cases under China's 2008 anti-monopoly law had intensified in recent weeks, culminating in meetings Friday between Qualcomm senior executives and National Development and Reform Commission officials.

Qualcomm is just one of several overseas companies, including Microsoft (MSFT), that have come under investigation in China for allegedly anti-competitive practices.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images