Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

5 Ways to Keep Your Bank Account From Being Looted

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Dollars with padlock isolated on another dollars
S1001/Shutterstock
Identity theft is rampant and responsible for 13 percent of all consumer complaints to the Federal Trade Commission in 2014, according to an agency report. A quarter of these complaints were due to credit card or bank fraud.

Bank fraud is particularly painful. Criminals have a number of ways of attacking your assets, including altering checks you've written, counterfeiting checks or getting access to a debit card. Once money is pulled out of your account, you have to act quickly for the bank to accept a claim of fraud. A delay can mean the difference between recovering money or seeing it vanish for good.

Here are some actions you can take now to prevent looting or at least limit your losses.

1. Use Multiple Bank Accounts

If all your money is in one bank account and a thief gains access, the entire amount is available, as Shaun Murphy, CEO of yet-to-launch online privacy company PrivateGiant, pointed out to DailyFinance. A solution is to break up your holdings across multiple accounts: one for investments, one for savings, a retirement account, an emergency fun, and a regular checking account for bills. Although you may see more total fees, the divisions become firebreaks that keep someone from siphoning out everything.

2. Skip the Debit Card

Privacy and identify theft experts often suggest leaving the debit card at home and depending, instead, on a traditional credit card. The reason is the legal protections differ between the two types of payment cards. Credit cards are protected by the federal Fair Credit Billing Act. If you properly report problems, card issuers are responsible for all but $50 of losses, and many will voluntarily cover even the $50 if you can show the charges were fraudulent. Debit cards are treated like checks and come under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. Money is already gone -- rather than a reduction of immediately available credit. Your personal loss is still limited to $50, but only if you report the problem within two days. Between two and 60 days, you're liable for $500. More than 60 days, and you're out of luck. Some banks will offer similar protections to credit cards, but the prudent approach is to use credit cards instead.

3. Embrace Strong Security

Multi-factor security, particularly when it involves receiving a texted code that you then have to enter, is inconvenient. But it's worth the slight annoyance. Unless a thief also has your phone, online access to your bank account becomes less likely. The harder it is for someone to break into your accounts, the less likely that they'll keep trying.

4. Never Click On an Email Link

Phishing schemes, where criminals send an email designed to look like it comes from your bank in hopes of your providing account names and passwords, are rampant. If you get a message about an alleged problem with your account, never click the links in the email. Instead, log into your account as you normally would and look for any communications. If you click on a provided link, chances are that you'll be directed to a fake site designed to capture your information for someone to later raid the account.

5. Check Your Accounts Regularly

The single most important step you can take is to regularly review your accounts for fraudulent activity -- not once a month, but every couple of days. Doing so should only take a minute or two. Log into your online banking system and scan the most recent activity. If something seems off, you can look into the details or even call the bank and be sure that you actually do recognize the transaction. If not, you've spotted the problem quickly enough to invoke the highest levels of legal protection available.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


10 Mother-Tested Tips to Spend Less on Clothes

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Best Tips: Saving on Clothing

By Maryalene LaPonsie

It doesn't matter if you wear $30 jeans or carry a $200 handbag. If you're reading this, you probably wish you'd spent a little less on clothes and accessories.

1. Start by Getting Cash for Your Old Duds

Before you even think about buying new clothes, you need to empty your closet and fill your wallet. I'm talking about getting rid of the outfit you bought for the special occasion that happened three years ago, letting go of the jeans you got in anticipation of the weight loss that never happened and saying goodbye to the items leftover from your punk phase, which unfortunately did happen.

Anything that hasn't graced your body in the last year should head out the door. Where to, you ask? My vote is the local consignment shop, assuming your clothes are in good condition and don't look like something Austin Powers would try to save the world in.

If the consignment shop won't take them, you could try holding a garage sale. And if that doesn't work, you could give them away to your local thrift store. However, you presumably spent good money on those clothes, so try to recoup some of the cost if you can.

2. Next, Head to Thrift Stores and Consignment Shops

When it's time to buy, I want you to again head to the consignment shops and thrift stores. Yes, I know these are the same places you just unloaded your collection of circa 1990 paisley blazers, but not everyone dumps their unwanted cast-offs there. Some people don't want to hassle with selling their goods. Some people donate really nice stuff to thrift stores. I mean, really nice stuff.

So don't turn your nose up at your local Goodwill, Salvation Army and mission stores. Instead, walk in with an open mind and see what they have to offer. For more on thrift store treasures, check out this article: "Not Your Grandma's Goodwill."

You can also go to consignment shops where you're practically guaranteed to find a better selection of more stylish clothes, but you're practically guaranteed to pay more, too.

3. Check Out EBay

I must admit this isn't my first choice for clothes shopping because you're relying on the seller's description and photos that may or may not show all the details. Plus, you have to throw in shipping for some auctions, and return policies may be non-existent for some purchases. That said, I've had good luck scoring bargain baby clothes on eBay, and I've also seen some good deals on designer clothes. If you do shop on eBay, pay careful attention to descriptions and seller feedback. When in doubt, ask questions. If the seller's response doesn't put you at ease, walk -- er, click -- away.

4. Look at Garage Sales

A final secondhand option to getting cheap clothes is garage sales. You may have to weed through a lot of undesirable items to find the gems, but they're there. If you don't relish the hunt, you can try online garage sale boards through Facebook instead. Schools, churches and other organizations may organize sales that will bring together lots of clothes.

5. Shop at the End of Seasons

But let's say none of those secondhand options turn up what you want. Or maybe you can't bring yourself to wear other people's old clothes. In that case, you'll be stuck buying new clothes. However, that doesn't necessarily mean you'll be stuck buying overpriced new clothes.

Your first strategy to save in the stores is to buy at the end of the season when items are being cleared out. There's something of an art to this. Buy too early at a clearance sale, and you'll pay more than you might later. Wait too long, and you could miss out on the item you're coveting. I had this problem recently with winter coats. By the time I decided to buy, my son's size was long gone. On the plus side, I did manage to score an $8 winter coat for his little sister.

6. Find Coupons or Wait for a Sale

Sometimes you can't wait until the end of the season. If it's 20 degrees out in November, you need a winter coat. In that case, you need to at least look for a sale. Now, in our hypothetical it's-freezing-in-November scenario, maybe you can hold out until Black Friday when you can get some of the best pricing of the year. If your timing isn't so good, do a search at RetailMeNot to see if the store you're considering has any coupons available.

7. Compare Prices Online

Before you log off your computer, go to a shopping comparison site to see if you can find the same clothes at a cheaper price somewhere else. PriceGrabber is one option, or you can simply type the item and its brand name into your favorite search engine and see what comes up.

8. Check Out Discount Retailers

Another way to get brand name items for less is to shop at discount stores such as TJ Maxx, Marshalls and Ross Dress for Less. These stores stock overruns or other items they have acquired at a deep discount. You never know what you're going to get when you walk in the door, which is part of the fun for those who love bargain shopping.

Although you can get deep discounts at these stores, they can also be fertile ground for impulse purchases and overspending. Make a list of what you need before leaving home, and promise yourself you'll stick to the list regardless of what non-essential amazing deal catches your eye. For some more tips on sticking to your shopping list, read "20 Surefire Ways to Slam the Breaks on Impulse Buying."

9. Adopt a Personal Uniform

Sometimes, the best way to save money is to simply not buy so much. You can do this by adopting a personal uniform. Have a go-to outfit that you wear everyday or, at least, stick to a variation of it. Building your wardrobe on only a few foundational pieces ensures everything you own matches seamlessly.

In addition to saving you money, some people suggest a personal uniform could make you more successful. Lest you think a personal uniform has to be modeled after Steve Jobs and his turtlenecks, I'll let one of my favorite bloggers explain how it can work for the ladies.

10. Baby Everything You Buy

Finally, you can spend less on clothes if you take better care of what you own. That means no more walking over the week's laundry that was left on the floor. That means not letting your dog use your dirty clothes as a bed. That means hanging something back up in the closet after you wore it for 20 minutes rather than throwing it in the wash. Also, launder your clothes as directed by the label. And avoid the dryer if possible. The high heat can dramatically shorten the lifespan of some fabrics.

How else can you save on clothes? Share your ideas in the comments below or on the Money Talks News Facebook page. Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Job Market Brightens for Adults 55 and Over

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Black businesswoman smiling in office
Jose Luis Pelaez Inc./Getty Images
In recent years, Americans over 55 were considered to be the new unemployables. Now, Time reports that their career prospects are looking up. Just 4.1 percent of seniors are claiming unemployment, compared to 5.7 percent for the rest of the population.

This is positive financial and health news for seniors. A 2013 MetLife (MET) study showed that 40 percent of seniors strongly agreed that they would have to work beyond their planned retirement dates for their own financial benefit. Additionally, those losing their job after age 58 run a greater health risk that averages a loss of three years of life.

While long-term unemployment remains high for the demographic -- 31.5 percent -- some companies are expanding senior hiring efforts, and they're revising returnship programs that have been criticized for short-training periods, low pay and strict criteria for applications.

AARP Is Pleased

Barclays (BCS) recently announced plans to expand its apprenticeships and look for candidates above 50 years old. Other companies with such programs include the Harvard Business School, MetLife and McKinsey. This shift indicates a need for reliable, flexible and experienced workers -- something the AARP has championed for years.

Projections indicate that larger numbers of seniors will return to the workforce in the coming decade. The Bureau of Labor Statistics expects that people aged 75 and over will jump from 10.5 percent by 2022, while those aged 55 and older will make up 25.6 percent of the labor force at that time.

Seniors working part-time may soon be in for additional support as well. President Barack Obama has proposed broadening retirement plan coverage for part-time workers.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Retirees Have Some Options to Pay for High Medical Costs

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Doctor weighing senior woman in doctor office
AVAVA
By Brian O'Connell

Carl Stoces, a 70-year-old Monterey, Indiana, resident, recently fell off an extension ladder and suffered a traumatic leg injury. He was airlifted to Memorial Hospital in South Bend and had a two-month rehab stay in a nursing home. "The bills that resulted were overwhelming, and the payments would have never been manageable for my fixed retirement income," he says.

Fortunately, a hospital program called CarePayment allowed Stoces to finance his payments, starting at $54 a month. "I was immediately relieved," he says. "I had no options. For me, it was one of the greatest things that has happened. Now I can pay my bills off, and that's good for me and the hospital."

Of course, financing is a temporary measure -- you still have to pay the bills off, sooner or later, and health care bills can really mount later in life. According to Bankrate.com (RATE), high medical expenses are the biggest financial worry in for retirees like Stoces. That's true even for people earning more than $75,000 a year, who are "more concerned about high medical expenses than the overall population."

"Health care costs can be one of the most difficult, yet also most critical, expenses to project in retirement," says Joe Jennings, vice president of PNC Wealth Management (PNC) in Baltimore. "Not only do they have the potential to consume a disproportionate amount of a retiree's income, but they have also been rising at a rate much higher than inflation. Another concern is that while life expectancy for retirees continues to rise, many retirees fear they may live longer, but with a lower quality of life due to health-related issues."

Getting the Right Coverage

Jennings says the key is to understand what insurance coverage retirees currently have, how they may need to supplement that coverage and whether long-term care insurance is appropriate.

"Cash-flow projections and a retirement income analysis employing various scenarios with different health care needs and expenses should be performed to determine best, median and worst-case scenarios," he says, with the idea being to figure out whether "your income and assets will be sufficient to cover the worst-case scenario." "Always be conservative in estimates and plan for the worst-case scenario to determine where any shortfalls may exist."

Yet Americans are failing, and in somewhat spectacular fashion, in planning for future medical expenses. According to a study from the Washington, D.C.-based National Foundation for Credit Counseling, most Americans don't even have $1,000 put aside for medical emergencies. Some health care consumers are working with financial professionals to create a "patchwork" strategy to cover health care costs in retirement, and they're making some progress.

Health Savings Accounts

"A few years ago I was meeting with a client who casually mentioned that he was worried about being laid off, as his company was starting to downsize parts of his division," says Mathew Dahlberg, a financial adviser at 111th Street Investments in Kansas City, Missouri. "While the client, aged 62, had been looking forward to retiring, he was worried that he would not be able to afford health coverage on the individual market for himself and for his non-working spouse." The client and his wife were in relatively good health, but he wanted to protect his retirement savings until he could apply for Medicare at age 65.

"After some research, the client, his wife and I came up with a solution: the client would opt for the high-deductible health plan offered through work so that he could sign up for a health savings account at the same time," Dahlberg says. That's a creative approach, as the HSA provides for tax benefits and, more importantly, are available regardless of income.

Supplemental insurance and long-term care insurance are options for worried seniors. "There really is something for everyone, including plans that cost very little and let you sort of pay as you go," says Danielle Kunkle, vice president of Boomer Benefits in Fort Worth, Texas.

But Kunkle sees the fear in the eyes of retirees when she discusses future health care costs, and it's not a pretty sight. "I'll never forget one of my Medicare 101 presentations at a local hospital a couple of years ago," she says. "During my Q&A session at the end, one of the attendees stood up and said: 'There should be a mandatory class that all Americans must go through at age 50 to explain how much these things cost, when we still have time to prepare for it. To find this out now is just devastating.' I couldn't have put it any better myself."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Private Employers Add 212,000 Jobs in February

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

ADP
APActive-duty U.S. Marine Jerome Atger, left, prepares to show his resume to a recruiter at the annual Veterans Career and Resource Fair in Miami.
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

WASHINGTON -- U.S. businesses added more than 200,000 jobs in February for the 13th straight month, a private survey found. It was the latest sign that strong hiring should boost the economy this year.

Payroll processor ADP (ADP) said Wednesday that companies added 212,000 jobs last month, a solid gain, though down from 250,000 in the previous month. January's figure was revised up from 213,000.

The figures come just before Friday's government report on the labor market, which economists forecast will show an increase of 240,000 jobs, according to a survey by data provider FactSet. The unemployment rate is expected to fall to 5.6 percent from 5.7 percent.

The ADP numbers cover only private businesses and sometimes diverge from the government's more comprehensive report, which includes government agencies.

A burst of hiring in the past year has lifted the number of Americans earning paychecks, and a sharp drop in gas prices means those paychecks can buy more goods and services. That has accelerated U.S. economic growth and encouraged companies to add jobs at a steady pace.

Still, February's hiring was the slowest in nine months, according to the ADP data. Most economists have expected a slight slowdown, however, after a run of huge job gains. Employers added 423,000 jobs in November, and more than 1 million from November through January, the fastest three-month pace since 1997. More than 3 million people have been hired in the past 12 months.

"Job growth is strong, but slowing from the torrid pace of recent months," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. "Job gains remain broad-based, although the collapse in oil prices has begun to weigh on energy-related employment." Moody's Analytics helps compile the report.

Those job gains are lifting consumer spending, which rose in last year's fourth quarter at the fastest pace in four years. Spending grew at a solid 0.3 percent rate in January, after adjusting for prices, which fell.

Zandi also said heavy snow and unseasonably cold weather in the Northeast may have dragged down hiring last month.

Still, he expects the economy to grow 3 percent this year, a level consistent with hiring of about 250,000 a month.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Agents Target Industry Helping Chinese Have U.S. Babies

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Suspected 'Maternity Hotels' Raided in California

By AMY TAXIN

IRVINE, Calif. -- Federal agents on Tuesday searched three dozen homes in California during a crackdown on "maternity tourism" operators who arrange for pregnant Chinese women to give birth in the U.S., where their babies automatically become American citizens.

The investigation of three alleged birth tourism rings may be the biggest yet by federal homeland security agents who say that, while pregnant women may travel to the United States and deliver their babies here, they cannot lie about the purpose of their trip when applying for a visa.

Authorities believe people from other countries are carrying out similar schemes but recent cases in California have catered to wealthy visitors from China, most likely due to the country's large population, recent economic boom and ties to the region. It is unclear how many women travel to the United States for maternity tourism.

"It is fertile ground for this kind of scheme," said Claude Arnold, special agent in charge for Immigration and Customs Enforcement's homeland security investigations in Los Angeles. "These people were told to lie, how to lie, so that their motives for coming to the U.S. wouldn't be questioned."

$50,000 Package

Shortly after sunrise, dozens of federal agents swarmed an upscale apartment complex in the Orange County city of Irvine, where authorities say a birth tourism business known as You Win USA Vacation Resort marketed to pregnant women who were then charged $50,000 for lodging, food and transportation.

Investigators said women were coached to lie about their travel plans when applying for tourist visas and to wear loose clothing to hide their pregnancies, and they were promised Social Security numbers and U.S. passports for their babies before returning to China.

In one instance, a trainer in China helped fabricate employment and income information for an undercover federal agent posing as a pregnant client to secure a tourist visa. The undercover agent was encouraged to fly through Hawaii, where customs officers were believed to be more lenient than in Los Angeles, according to a copy of an affidavit in support of a search warrant.

The business netted its owners hundreds of thousands of dollars in the past two years and helped Chinese tourists deliver more than 400 American babies at just one Orange County hospital, the court papers said. No arrests were made or charges filed. Investigators obtained warrants for the searches in Orange, Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties hoping to collect evidence of suspected crimes, including visa and tax fraud, immigration officials said.

Birthright Citizenship Is the Key Draw

Chinese Embassy spokesman Zhu Haiquan said in response to the crackdown that compared with "4 million people traveling between our two countries every year, these cases are sporadic. The Chinese government always requests overseas Chinese citizens to abide by the laws of their resident countries."

Authorities did not release details of their findings or say how many women they found. Whether the women will stay here to give birth will be handled on an individual basis; authorities say some may need to remain as material witnesses.

The key draw for travelers is that the United States offers birthright citizenship. Maternity tourists believe citizenship will help their children secure a top-notch U.S. college education and provide a sort of insurance policy should economic conditions crumble in their home country -- especially since the tourists themselves can apply for a green card once their American child turns 21.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection warns on its website that officers at airports and on the border will consider a pregnant woman's due date, travel plans and medical insurance to determine whether she can enter the country.

Similar Situation for Mexican Women

In Irvine, neighbor Linda Trust said she saw small groups of pregnant Chinese women together at the complex, and people bringing in platters of food and cases of diapers. "I don't think it's right," she said, adding that she had never seen any of the babies.

Dr. Jin-Jou Lu, who also lives in the complex, said he wasn't surprised to learn of the scheme. "Come on, people go across the border to have a baby from Mexico all the time, so what's the problem?" he told reporters.

Federal agents started investigating the business in Irvine after an anonymous tip last year. During the investigation, they tracked the movements of a couple who arrived in February 2014, had their baby in April and returned in May. While the couple's bank account recorded charges at luxury stores including Louis Vuitton and Rolex, they paid $4,080 -- less than 15 percent of the billed amount -- to an Orange County hospital for medical services after stating the mother was not employed, the affidavit said.

Efforts to interview the purported operators of the Irvine business were not immediately successful. In 2013, Los Angeles County cited more than a dozen maternity hotels for code violations after an uproar in a nearby suburban community about a hotel operating in a residential neighborhood.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

McDonald's Dropping Human Antibiotics From Chicken

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

McDonalds Sales
Nam Y. Huh/AP
By CANDICE CHOI

NEW YORK -- McDonald's (MCD) says it plans to require chicken suppliers to stop using antibiotics important to human medicine within two years.

The company says the chicken change will take place within the next two years. It says suppliers will still be able to use a type of antibiotic called ionophores that keep chickens healthy and aren't used in humans. The milk change will take place later this year.

Many cattle, hog and poultry producers give their livestock antibiotics to make them grow faster and ensure they are healthy. The practice has become a public health issue, with officials saying it can lead to germs becoming resistant to drugs so that they're no longer effective in treating a particular illness in humans.

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Panera Bread (PNRA) already say they serve chicken raised without antibiotics, but the announcement by McDonald's is notable because of its size; the company has more than 14,000 U.S. locations. Chipotle has nearly 1,800 locations, while Panera has almost 1,900 locations.

"This really does move the ball quite a bit," said Gail Hansen, a senior officer with the antibiotic resistance project with The Pew Charitable Trusts. Hansen noted that ionophores, the antibiotics that will be allowed by McDonald's, aren't considered medically important for humans.

Marion Gross, senior vice president of McDonald's North America's supply chain, said the change will cost the company more but noted the increase won't necessarily be passed on to customers because several factors are used to determine restaurant prices.

"I think you will hear more from us as it relates to our food," Gross added.

Image Transformation

The announcement comes as McDonald's struggles to transform its image amid intensifying competition from smaller rivals positioning themselves as more wholesome alternatives.

The company has long battled negative perceptions about its food, but that has become a bigger vulnerability as more people shift toward options they feel are made with ingredients that are higher quality or meet standards on social responsibility.

After seeing customer visits to U.S. stores decline two years in a row, McDonald's had recently hinted changes could be on the way. Franchisees were told of the upcoming chicken and milk announcement Tuesday night at a "Turnaround Summit" in Las Vegas.

Scott Taylor, a McDonald's franchisee who was at the conference, said ingredients are "becoming more and more important" to customers. And he said the company was suggesting it needs to "be where our consumers want and need us to be."

"You're going to see more stuff like that in the future," Taylor said.

In a statement, chicken supplier Tyson (TSN) said it looks forward to working with McDonald's to meet its new standards. Tyson noted it has reduced the use of antibiotics effective in humans by more than 84 percent since 2011.

Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said selling milk produced without rBST was a good step because the artificial growth hormone can cause health problems in dairy cows.

As McDonald's fights to hold onto customers, the company has also made a number of leadership changes, admissions of shortcomings and declarations that changes are in the works.

The pressures reached the top of the company in late January, when the company said CEO Don Thompson would be replaced by Steve Easterbrook, its chief brand officer.

The CEO change officially took effect this week, and Easterbrook was at the franchisee summit in Las Vegas.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Billions of Political Survey Robocalls Used to Sell Cruises

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

A woman relaxing on a hammock on a beach, Treasure Island, Abaco, BahamasCreative image #:  71442586License type:  Royalty-fre
Getty Images

A cruise line and seven other companies accused of making billions of robocalls to consumers around the country under guise of political surveys were accused by the Federal Trade Commission and 10 states of breaking telemarketing and consumer protection laws.

The charges were announced on Wednesday by the FTC. Political surveys are exempt from telemarketing restrictions but can't then be used as for commercial sales calls.

"Marketers who know the ropes understand you can't steer clear of the do not call rules by tacking a political or survey call onto a sales pitch," said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Anyone who assists in making illegal calls is also on the hook."

At the height of the calling barrage, in 2011 and 2012, consumers were getting 12 million to 15 million calls per day, the FTC said, generating millions of dollars of cruise sales. The calls would start with a greeting from "John from Political Opinions of America."

Caller ID Spoofed, Too

Regardless of whether consumers were on the national Do Not Call Registry or had asked to be removed from sales lists, the calls kept coming. And recipients were often off-guard when they came because the FTC said what showed up on caller ID was often manipulated.

Consumers were told they had been chosen to take a 30-second survey and could then get a two-day cruise to the Bahamas. Those who said they wanted the cruise, by pressing "one" on their keypad, would be connected to a telemarketer hired by Caribbean Cruise Line, the FTC said.

The telemarketing firm sold cruises, hotels, excursions and other travel packages. Two other companies -- Linked Service Solutions and Economic Strategy -- were accused of violating federal telemarketing rules by making the robocalls. The cruise company and those firms all agreed to settle the charges lodged against them.

Parties Can't Pay the Penalties

Five other companies, all owned by Fred Accuardi, were accused of "assisting and facilitating the illegal cruise calls." The companies provided the phone numbers and what the recipients' caller IDs would say when the call came. These companies -- Telephone Management, T M Caller ID, Pacific Telecom Communications Group, International Telephone Corp. and International Telephone LLC -- face a lawsuit over the accusations.

Under the terms of the settlement, the cruise line faces a $7.73 million penalty. That will be partially suspended after the company pays $500,000. Penalties of close to $6 million against the telemarketers will also be largely suspended after about $30,000 total is paid. The FTC said it is due to the parties' inability to pay.

States whose attorneys general took action along include Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and Washington.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Justices Sharply Divided Over Obamacare Tax Subsidies

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Supreme Court Hears Case Challenging Obama's Affordable Health Care Act
Alex Wong/Getty ImagesSupporters of the Affordable Care Act gather in front of the U.S Supreme Court during a rally Wednesday.
By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON -- Sharply divided along familiar lines, the Supreme Court took up a politically charged new challenge to President Barack Obama's health overhaul Wednesday in a dispute over the tax subsidies that make insurance affordable for millions of Americans.

The outcome in what Justice Elena Kagan called "this never-ending saga" of Republican-led efforts to kill the Affordable Care Act appears to hinge on the votes of Chief Justice John Roberts, whose vote saved the law three years ago, and Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Roberts said almost nothing in Wednesday's 85 minutes of lively back-and-forth, and Kennedy, who voted to strike down the health law in 2012, asked questions of both sides that made it hard to tell where he might come out this time.

Otherwise, the same liberal-conservative divide that characterized the earlier case was evident in the packed courtroom with the same lawyers facing off as in 2012.

Millions of people could be affected by the court's decision. The justices are trying to determine whether the law makes people in all 50 states eligible for federal tax subsidies to cut the cost of insurance premiums. Opponents say that only residents of states that set up their own insurance markets can get federal subsidies to help pay the premiums.

'Death Spiral'

Roughly three dozen states didn't set up their own exchanges and rely on the federal healthcare.gov website. The Obama administration says it would make no sense to condition subsidies on where people live, and that doing so would set off a "death spiral" in which enrollment declined, driving premiums up and leaving only the sickest, and costliest, people insured.

Liberal justices peppered lawyer Michael Carvin almost from the outset of his argument to limit the subsidies.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the law set up flexibility for states to either set up their own markets or rely on federal healthcare.gov. Giving subsidies only to people in some states would be "disastrous," she said. "I have never seen anything like this."

Several justices tried to use Carvin's comments from the 2012 case that seemed to cut against his argument Wednesday.

Finally, Roberts gently came to his defense. "Mr. Carvin, we've heard talk about this other case. Did you win that other case?" Roberts said as laughter washed over the courtroom. "So maybe it makes sense that you have a different story today?"

It may not be the statute Congress intended, but it may be the statute Congress wrote.

When Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. stepped to the lectern, the liberal justices fell silent, and Justices Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia took over. They questioned Verrilli over the four words in the law, "established by the state," that the challengers say are clear and conclusive evidence that Congress wanted to limit the subsidies to state-run exchanges.

"I mean, it may not be the statute they intended. The question is whether it's the statute that they wrote," Scalia said of the provision in question, part of a more than 900-page law that passed Congress without a single Republican vote in 2010.

Verrilli argued that the law can only be read broadly because its very purpose was to reduce the ranks of the uninsured. He noted that millions would lose health insurance if the court rules against the administration.

Alito wondered whether the justices could delay the effect of such a ruling to allow states and perhaps the federal government to enact a remedy. Scalia said he believed Congress, where majority Republicans have staunchly opposed the law and held dozens of votes to repeal it, would act.

"This Congress, Your Honor?" Verrilli said to widespread laughter among listeners who included leading congressional Democrats and Republicans.

'Serious' Constitutional Problem

Kennedy's questions Wednesday could give hope to both sides.

He suggested that challenger Carvin's argument raised a "serious" constitutional problem affecting the relationship between states and the federal government.

If the court buys Carvin's case on subsidies, "the states are being told either create your own exchange or we'll send your insurance market into a death spiral," Kennedy said.

On the other hand, he said, "It may well be that you're correct as to these words, and there's nothing we can do. I understand that." Kennedy also seemed less than convinced by Verrilli's reading of the law to allow the subsidies nationwide.

Each side in the case argues that the law unambiguously supports only its position. However, one other option for the court would be to declare that the law is ambiguous when it comes to subsidies and defer to the Internal Revenue Service's regulations making tax credits available nationwide.

Verrilli advanced this point as his backup argument, provoking one of Roberts' few comments. If the court finds that the law is ambiguous and bows to the current administration's take on the law, Roberts said, "that would indicate that a subsequent administration could change that interpretation."

With four votes in hand, the administration would appear to need only one more, either from Roberts or Kennedy, to prevail. The challengers would need both justices to win.

A decision in King v. Burwell, 14-114, is expected by late June.

-Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Beige Book Survey: U.S. Economy Growing at Moderate Pace

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Beige Book
Lynne Sladky/AP
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER

WASHINGTON -- he U.S. economy was growing at a moderate pace through mid-February despite severe winter storms that had disrupted activity in some regions, the Federal Reserve reported Wednesday.

The Fed said that six of its 12 regions had reported moderate growth with modest gains seen in most other areas. The Boston district said businesses in its area remained upbeat despite a series of huge snowstorms.

The Fed survey found that consumer spending was up in most districts, travel and tourism was increasing and manufacturing had shown solid gains with aerospace companies in the San Francisco region forecasting a record year.

The information contained in the Fed report, known as the beige book, will be used when the central bank next meets on March 17-18. Economists expect the Fed will not start raising interest rates until June or later.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen delivered the central bank's semiannual economic report to Congress last week and indicated that the Fed is still willing to be "patient" in terms of raising interest rates because of weak wage growth and inflation well below the Fed's 2 percent target.

The beige book found that wage pressures remained moderate and were largely limited to workers in skilled occupations. The report said prices were either flat or rising only slightly.

Most districts reported increases in overall consumer spending with the Minneapolis, Atlanta, Kansas City and San Francisco districts reporting growth in restaurant sales. Economists regard gains in the number of people eating out as a sign of an improving economy.

The New York and Boston districts reported that harsh winter weather had depressed overall retail sales but Boston and Cleveland reported an increase in sales of winter clothing, rock salt and snow shovels.

Auto sales were up in most districts and home sales increased in most districts although housing construction was mixed with some districts reporting disruptions due to the winter weather.

Oil drilling service firms in Minneapolis and Dallas reported reduced demand, reflecting a drop in drilling activity due to the big plunge in oil prices.

Manufacturing showed gains across the country with auto manufacturing up in the Cleveland, Chicago and St. Louis districts.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks End Lower for 2nd Day After Rally

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Financial Markets Wall Street
Richard Drew/AP
By Sinead Carew

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks closed lower Wednesday for the second day in a row as investors stepped back after a recent rally ahead of jobs data due later in the week.

Health care stocks were the only bright spot in the market after a U.S. Supreme Court hearing and a cancer drug approval.

Equities had surged in February and both the Dow and S&P hit record highs Monday, when the Nasdaq surpassed the 5,000 level for the first time in 15 years.

We would not read anything into today's pullback. The market had a terrific February.

"We would not read anything into today's pullback. The market had a terrific February," said David Katz, chief investment officer at Matrix Asset Advisors, in New York. "We suggest buying into any weakness."

Many investors were holding off on making big bets ahead of a flurry of economic data due in the rest of the week, culminating with the Labor Department's February payrolls report. The jobs report is viewed as a gauge for the timing of the first Federal Reserve interest rate hike in years.

The S&P 500 health care index, which has risen 5.75 percent since year-end, finished up 0.39 percent Wednesday as investors bet that the Supreme Court may lean toward the Obama administration's view on the Affordable Care Act after the court heard a second major challenge to the law.

"I think that hearing assuaged fears -- at least for now -- that we were headed for overturning of Obamacare," said Quincy Krosby, market strategist at Prudential Financial in Newark, New Jersey.

Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) shares surged 6 percent to $65.67 after U.S. health regulators approved its Opdivo treatment for lung cancer.

HCA Holdings (HCA) closed up 5.8 percent at $74.93 and Tenet Healthcare (THC) finished up 6.2 percent at $49.99.

Economic Expansion

The U.S. economy continued to expand across most regions and sectors from early January through mid-February, the Fed said Wednesday afternoon in its Beige Book report.

The ADP National Employment Report showed private employers added 212,000 jobs in February, short of the 220,000 forecast, although January's reading was revised upward. Readings on the services sector from Markit and the Institute for Supply Management both pointed to modest growth.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) fell 106.47 points, or 0.58 percent, to 18,096.9, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) lost 9.25 points, or 0.44 percent, to 2,098.53 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) dropped 12.76 points, or 0.26 percent, to 4,967.14.

About 6.34 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, below the 6.52 billion average for the last five sessions, according to BATS Global Markets.

Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by 1,869 to 1,170, for a 1.60-to-1 ratio; on the Nasdaq, 1,586 issues fell and 1,118 advanced, for a 1.42-to-1 ratio.

The S&P 500 posted 17 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq composite recorded 79 new highs and 50 new lows.

-With additional reporting by Caroline Valetkevitch.

What to watch Thursday:
  • At 8:30 a.m. Eastern time, the Labor Department releases weekly jobless claims and fourth-quarter productivity data.
  • At 10 a.m., the Commerce Department releases factory orders for January and Freddie Mac releases weekly mortgage rates.
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Costco (COST)
  • Kroger (KR)
  • Cooper Cos. (COO)
  • Paramount Group (PGRE)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Cap'n Crunch Enlisted to Boost Taco Bell's Breakfast Sales

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Can't beat 2 for 5
Michael D. Dunn/Flickr
Taco Bell is testing Cap'n Crunch-coated doughnut holes for its nascent morning menu.

Cap'n Crunch is owned by oatmeal giant Quaker Oats, which in turn is a property of soft drink and salty snack behemoth PepsiCo (PEP). Taco Bell is owned by Yum Brands (YUM). Yum and PepsiCo have a special bond, and not just because Yum Brands' Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut are some of the few restaurant chains to offer Pepsi instead of Coke beverages. PepsiCo used to own all three concepts before spinning them off as Yum.

Good to the Last Crunch

Taco Bell's new breakfast item is being tested at units in Bakersfield, California. It's a variation of Cinnabon Delights, the cream-filled doughnut holes that the chain began offering as part of the breakfast menu that it rolled out nationwide last year.

The new doughnut holes that were introduced in the test market late last month are coated with Cap'n Crunch's Crunch Berries cereal, filled with the same milky-cream center as the original Cinnabon Delights. If it takes off, Taco Bell will naturally roll out the new item nationwide.

It's been a little more than 11 months since Taco Bell decided to throw its sombrero into the highly contested breakfast ring. It didn't merely phone things in with bacon burritos or sausage tacos, however. Taco Bell got creative, making waves with the Waffle Taco, Cinnabon Delights and the A.M. Crunchwrap that wraps hashbrowns, scrambled eggs, cheese and your choice of meat into a grill-pressed flour tortilla.

Taco Bell's distinctive menu should have resulted in a dramatic spike in comparable-store sales. The leading Mexican fast-food chain's sales have improved over the past year -- climbing 2 percent, 3 percent and 6 percent, respectively, over the first three quarters of the breakfast menu's availability -- but certainly not enough to account for the new breakfast market it just entered. The new Cap'n Crunch Delights may not change that, but if they prove popular, the growth will obviously be incremental.

Brand on the Run

Taco Bell and PepsiCo teamed up in 2012 to roll out Doritos Locos Tacos. Yes, PepsiCo owns Doritos as part of its Frito-Lay subsidiary.

Doritos Locos Tacos has been Taco Bell's biggest new product in years. The chain announced that 825 million of the Doritos-flavor-dusted tacos had been sold as of May of last year. The figure has likely topped a billion by now.

Taco Bell has also partnered with PepsiCo's flagship beverage line to put out Mountain Dew-flavored freezes. The only mystery here is why its sister brands at Yum haven't followed suit. Planet Hollywood made Cap'n Crunch-coated chicken fingers popular, so it's a surprise that KFC hasn't followed suit. We may not be ready for a Cap'n Crunch pizza crust at Pizza Hut, but stranger things have happened. For now, we have Taco Bell once again taking a household brand and incorporating it into its menu. The tactic paid off nicely with Doritos Locos Tacos, and there's a lot riding on it succeeding again.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of PepsiCo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Netflix Basks in the 'House of Cards' Era

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

netflix.com
The third season of "House of Cards" is now showing on Netflix (NFLX), giving legions of binge-watchers an excuse to call in sick to work.

For those few who've yet to tune in, "House of Cards" is a 13-episode Netflix original series that follows the rise of fictional political power couple Frank and Claire Underwood (played by Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright). On screen, their scheming topples titans. Their real-world influence is less certain, because we don't have ratings data to understand how many Netflix members are tuning in to the show.

And yet there's no mistaking the timeline. The four years since Netflix announced plans to make "House of Cards" have been some of the best in the company's history.

Profile of a Power Couple

The good times began on March 17, 2011. That's when Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos announced in a blog post that Netflix had acquired the exclusive broadcast rights to "House of Cards" from producer Media Rights Capital. Subsequent reports put the price tag of an initial 26-episode order at $100 million.

"We've found the gripping, serialized one-hour drama, such as 'Heroes,' 'Lost,' 'Dexter' and 'Weeds,' has become a very important part of the Netflix experience and over the years, we've been able to add these shows from many different channels, with the notable exception of HBO. With David Fincher's unique vision, the incredible acting skills of Oscar winner Kevin Spacey, and a great and timeless story of power, corruption and lies, we think 'House of Cards' will become a big hit among Netflix members and thus, represents a manageable risk," Sarandos wrote at the time.

Today, "House of Cards" is a multiple Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning series. Nearly 5.4 million have rated the show on Netflix, giving it an average of 4.5 out of 5 stars. Another 187,000 have weighed in at IMDB, giving the show 9.1 out of 10 stars, while 82 percent of viewers tracked at Rotten Tomatoes have rated season 3 as "fresh." Seasons one and two were rated 97 percent and 95 percent fresh, respectively.

Origins of a Strategy

As much of a boost as "House of Cards" has been to Netflix's creative credentials, the show has arguably had an even bigger impact on the company's financials by making it safer to strike new deals for original programming.

None have been so big as Netflix's partnership with Disney (DIS), which hits a new milestone on April 10 when 13 episodes of "Marvel's Daredevil" become available. The series is the first of five announced in November 2013, just 11 months after the two companies agreed to a landmark streaming deal worth a reported $300 million annually. The Marvel series wouldn't have been possible if "House of Cards" hadn't first proven that original programming is a worthwhile investment.

Political Capital

Just how well have Netflix's programming bets paid off? While we don't have enough public data to measure precisely, a few key statistics reveal the importance of originals:
  • Since March 2011, Netflix has either aired or commissioned 11 new series and added new seasons for five canceled shows, including acclaimed comedy "Arrested Development."
  • Annual programming investment (marked as "additions to streaming content library" on the cash flow statement) is up 62.6 percent since Netflix announced plans to make "House of Cards," from $2.32 billion in 2011 to $3.77 billion in 2014.
  • Revenue is up 71.8 percent over the same period as worldwide streaming subscriptions zoomed from 23.53 million then to 58.97 million as of December. Profits and cash flow have barely budged in response as CEO Reed Hastings and his team have chosen to reinvest in the business and grow Netflix's global footprint.
  • Even so, the stock is up over 130 percent since Sarandos' blog post -- more than doubling the four-year return of the benchmark S&P 500 (^GSPC).
Call it the impact of the Underwood administration, four years in which Netflix has put billions in capital to work creating new programming -- and winning a global audience in response. Are you binge-watching the new season of "House of Cards"? Have you signed up for Netflix to get access to the show? Leave a comment below to let us know where you stand.

Motley Fool contributor Tim Beyers owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney.. Find him on Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

5 Things Your Taxes Bought for the Pentagon in February

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

modern military helicopter...
joyfull/Shutterstock
Tax Day approaches, and with it, the perennial question: We're paying the government a lot of money -- but what are we getting for our money?

Despite all the trees that get killed every year making paper for government budget reports, much of the U.S. government remains decidedly opaque to taxpayers. Quick: Name the Department of the Interior's budget amount for fiscal 2015, and describe in 10 words or less what the Department of the Interior even does.

Clarity From an Unexpected Source

And yet, there's one part of the U.S. government that makes a habit of telling taxpayers not only how much money it spends, but what it spends this money on -- down to the penny and in near-real time. Believe it or not, we're talking about the Pentagon.

Despite having a reputation as a somewhat secretive organization, the Pentagon is one of our most "open" government agencies. Almost every day on its website, the Department of Defense tells U.S. taxpayers what contracts it's issued, to whom and for how much. Whether it's tanks, drones, bullets or even aircraft supercarriers, the Pentagon tells you about it openly, in black and white.

And now we're going to tell you about it, too.

What Your Tax Dollars Bought in February

In the previous month, the Pentagon reported awarding contracts totaling $13.93 billion. Here are a few of the more interesting items the generals spent your tax dollars on:
  • Drones. Unmanned aerial vehicles remain as popular as ever. Early in the month, the Pentagon awarded $279 million to General Atomics to produce 24 MQ-9 "Reaper" unmanned aerial vehicles ("drones," in the popular parlance) for the U.S. Air Force. Toward month's end, the Pentagon awarded Northrop Grumman (NOC) $26 million to support U.S. Navy MQ-8 Fire Scouts (robotic helicopters).
  • Aircraft carriers. There's been a lot of talk lately about the state of the American aircraft carrier fleet, and in particular, the fact that we only have 10 carriers in operation, despite a statutory requirement that the Navy maintain an 11-carrier fleet. Carrier fans, then, will be pleased to learn that on Feb. 4, the Navy awarded Huntington Ingalls (HII) a $224 million contract to begin preparations to refuel and refurbish the aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73). Once complete, this years-long task will return the Washington to service, ready to sail for another 25 years.
  • Helicopters for the Army. For $220 million, the U.S. Army will receive 41 72A Lakota Helicopters from European aerospace conglomerate Airbus. Then, for $591 million more, it will get 35 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters from Boeing (BA).
  • Nukes. You may have thought that nuclear weapons went out of fashion with the Cold War -- but everything old is nuke again for the Navy. On Feb. 9, the Navy awarded Charles Stark Draper Laboratory (no relation to Tony Stark) $302 million to fund the testing of the guidance systems aboard U.S. Trident sub-launched nuclear missiles.
  • Foreign aid. Finally, never one to be stingy, the Pentagon awarded a slew of contracts facilitating arms sales to U.S. allies around the world. Among these were awards for $144 million to supply 2,040 of Lockheed Martin's (LMT) Hellfire missiles to customers in Australia, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Qatar; $221 million to pay Britain's BAE Systems to support and maintain F-16 fighter jets flown by the air forces of Morocco, Egypt, Oman, Pakistan, Indonesia and Portugal; and $402 million to have Boeing upgrade four AWACS planes for Japan.
Mind you, this is just a small sampling of the $13.93 billion in contracts the Pentagon announced on its website. That sounds like a lot. In fact, though, this was a light spending month for the Pentagon, which is budgeted to spend some $585 billion in fiscal 2015, or nearly $49 billion a month. Even with nearly half that sum budgeted to pay for military servicemembers' pay and benefits, the Pentagon still spent significantly less than you'd expect it to, in an ordinary month.

Will it make up the difference in March? Tune back in at month's end to find out.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith thinks that, with just a little effort, the Pentagon might have been able to find someone named Howard Stark to work on its nukes. And that that would have been pretty cool. He has no position in any stocks mentioned. Follow him on Facebook for more defense news. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned either. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

10 Organic Grocery Items That Aren't Worth It

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

By Elizabeth Lang

If you're like me, you buy organic because you believe it's good for you (fewer chemicals in your body and more nutrients in the food) and good for the environment (fewer pesticides sprayed on crops). But it's also expensive. So the question is: what kinds of foods can you get away with buying non-organic? (Contrast that to the the only 15 foods that are worth buying organic. Here are 10 foods for which you can skip the organic and buy conventional instead.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Investors Should Watch This Trend-Setting Grocery Chain

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Our New Publix Grocery Store - Opened Nov 15, 2012
California Harts/Flickr
Unless you live in the Southeast, you may be unfamiliar with Publix Supermarkets. Yet some of the innovations we take for granted when shopping for groceries -- such as "electric eye" sliding doors and parking lots with angled spaces -- were developed by this grocery chain.

The 85-year-old firm, based in Lakeland, Florida, is also notable for its profits. At a nearly 8 percent operating margin and 5.7 percent profit margin, Publix is more profitable than Walmart (WMT), Kroger (KR) and even tiny natural grocer Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM). The company's annual profit margin also exceeds that of Whole Foods Market (WFM) by roughly 1.5 percentage points, even though, at $27 billion in annual revenue, it's nearly twice Whole Foods' size.

Publix is a quiet force in American retail. It's No. 104 on the Fortune 500 list, it falls between Dow Jones Industrial components McDonald's (MCD) (No. 106) and 3M Corp (MMM) (No. 101). Unfortunately, however, you and I can't buy Publix stock on the open markets. The company is employee-owned through its Employee Stock Ownership Plan. According to the National Center for Employee Ownership, Publix is by far the country's largest majority employee-owned company.

After launching its first location in 1930 in Winter Haven, Florida, Publix has expanded methodically ever since. It's the dominant grocer in Florida, with 760 locations statewide. The organization totals nearly 1,100 stores, with the remaining locations split among Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina (the company's newest market).

An Impeccably Run Business

Publix stores strive for off-the-charts customer service as a primary means to lure customers back again and again. In fact, company management cites its labor-intensive focus on greater customer service versus competitors as a possible business risk as well as an advantage, due to the uncertainty in the labor market, which could lead to increased costs.

Yet company employees have a vested interest in keeping shoppers returning, while performing with maximum productivity. In addition to quarterly and annual bonuses, employees receive an annual equity share bonus the company calls "free stock" in their retirement accounts. Wage earners also get perks not typically found in larger companies, such as weekly, rather than monthly, paycheck deposits. Culture and employee engagement are often cited as reasons Publix is more profitable than peers of every size and stripe.

To be fair, the employee base, while a clear driver of results, isn't the only reason behind Publix's success. Continuous operation since its Great Depression-era founding has provided Publix plenty of time and toughness to hone its approach in the cutthroat grocery business. And because the company's sales are still heavily concentrated in Florida, it gets a seasonal boost from the influx of nonresidents who flock south each winter, swelling the company's grocery aisles with snowbirds and tourists.

Freedom From Wall Street

Being private means that Publix can be a maverick when it chooses. For example, for years, the company has taken some of its excess cash each quarter and purchased short- and long-term investments. Publix now has a monster hoard of $6.4 billion invested in debt and equity securities. To put that into context, Publix holds more in cash and investments on its balance sheet ($6.8 billion) than does Walmart ($6.7 billion), which is 16 times its size by revenue.

A public grocer would likely come under fire from activist shareholders for keeping such a large investment balance on its books and be forced to liquidate some holdings to buy back shares or increase its dividend to shareholders.

Without this pressure, Publix realizes handsome income each quarter from its stock and bond holdings: In the last quarter, investment income of $96.4 million was the equivalent of a remarkable 5.4 percent of total operating profit.

Why It's Important for Investors to Keep an Eye on Publix

Publix stock may only be available to employees, yet the company's stellar financial performance provides a benchmark that public competitors can be measured against. Grocery chain investors can visit the Publix stockholder information page for yardsticks in the form of the company's quarterly and annual financial statements.

One comparable company leaps to mind that, like Publix, places a great deal of emphasis on culture. For a publicly traded corporation, Whole Foods Market's well-regarded benefits, bonus plans and stock grants have a cooperative feel. For example, 95 percent of Whole Foods employees receiving stock grant options are non-executives.

Rumors flared in June 2014 that Publix had some interest in acquiring Whole Foods. While the company didn't comment on the rumor, and a merger would seem implausible, the two do share many similarities regarding employee philosophy and financial performance.

In fact, if you own Whole Foods, Publix may be the single most important competitor for you to follow. Whole Foods shareholders often wonder if the natural-foods grocer can maintain its current profit margin of 4 percent, manage a same-store sales growth rate above 5 percent and still maintain its core values, as it seeks to nearly triple its store count over the long term to 1,200. Well, there's a massive if publicity-shy grocer in the Southeast that will soon hit 1,200 stores, and regularly nails very similar financial targets,while rewarding its employees quite handsomely in the process.

Motley Fool contributor Asit Sharma has no position in any stocks mentioned. John Mackey, co-CEO of Whole Foods Market, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. The Motley Fool recommends 3M, McDonald's and Whole Foods Market. The Motley Fool owns shares of Whole Foods Market. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

8 Rites of Passage as You Prepare for - and Enjoy - Retirement

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

senior woman relaxing in...
Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock
By Emily Brandon

Retirement is a transition into a new stage of life. Retirees get the freedom to choose how to spend their time, but they also walk away from the comfort of a steady paycheck and need to make important financial decisions. Here are some important retirement rites of passage.

1. Reaching Financial Freedom

You have achieved financial freedom when you no longer need to work to pay your bills for the rest of your life. "Once you reach that inflection point, you can leave this job or negotiate part-time work, and you know things are going to be OK," says Maura Griffin, CEO and principal for Blue Spark Capital Advisors in New York. Griffin recommends doing an analysis of your finances, using conservative investment returns and factoring in inflation and taxes, to reassure yourself that you have enough money to retire.

2. Telling Your Boss

There's a certain satisfaction that comes from being able to tell your boss that you're simply not going to come into work anymore. "Some people just want to get away from a job that is killing them, and they want to get out of the rat race," Griffin says. But other people find they miss some aspects of the job, especially the social life they had in the office. The transition is often easier if you have hobbies or travel plans to look forward to.

3. Shutting Down Your Work Computer

There will come a moment after your stuff is packed when you walk out of your office for the last time. You get to escape from boring meetings and tight deadlines, but you also won't get another invite to a business lunch or holiday party.

4. Responding to "What Do You Do?"

Most people answer this question with their profession, but retirees need to think of a new answer. You may want to talk about your volunteer position or an important hobby, or have a quip ready about how you finally get to do whatever you want every day.

5. Withdrawing From Your Retirement Accounts

After decades of saving for retirement, retirees finally get to spend some of that money. But you also need to worry about making your savings last for the rest of your life. Once you turn 59½, there's no longer a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty to take money out of your retirement accounts, but you will need to pay income tax on each withdrawal from traditional 401(k)s and individual retirement accounts. After you reach 70½, you will be required to take withdrawals from your retirement accounts each year. The penalty for missing a required minimum distribution is 50 percent of the amount that should have been withdrawn. "When you retire, you are going to be using up those savings, sometimes very rapidly," says Stan Hinden, a retiree and author of "How to Retire Happy: The 12 Most Important Decisions You Must Make Before You Retire." "My wife and I had not had the time to travel very much while we were working, and that was a lot of fun and we enjoyed it, but it made a big dent in our savings. Having fun costs money, and unless you have got a lot of money in retirement, you have to have some discipline."

6. Collecting Social Security Payments

Workers pay into Social Security throughout their entire career, and many retirees are eager to collect. However, the age you sign up for benefits drastically changes the monthly payment you receive. Although you can begin collecting benefits as early as age 62, monthly payments are reduced if you claim benefits before your full retirement age, which is 66 for most baby boomers and 67 for people born in 1960 or later. Monthly payments will increase for each additional year you delay claiming payments up until age 70. "The decision about when to take Social Security is a bet on longevity," Griffin says. "If you have longevity in your family, waiting until 70 gives you the most that you can have for your life, but if you have health issues, then maybe you want to go ahead and take it early."

7. Signing Up for Medicare

Beginning three months before you turn 65, you can sign up for Medicare. It's important to sign up for benefits in the seven-month window around your 65th birthday, because premiums are sometimes increased for beneficiaries who sign up later. Medicare is likely to have different coverage and cost-sharing requirements than your previous health insurance plan, so it's a good idea to examine how your benefits and medical bills will change. "The expenses for our medical bills after we retried were considerably higher than before we retired. Those benefits paid for things like dental work, but Medicare doesn't pay for those things," Hinden says. "And even if you have a Medicare supplement, which you certainly need, you are going to wind up somewhat surprised by the expenses for health care after you retire."

8. Realizing You Don't Have to Be Anywhere

Retirees don't have to get up early or report anywhere at a specific time. You're free to linger over a second cup of coffee and take your time running errands. But you may find that you want to make an effort to get out of the house and be with other people. "There are three needs that a job provides to most people: structure, purpose and sense of community," says Ernie Zelinski, a life coach and author of "How to Retire Happy, Wild, and Free: Retirement Wisdom That You Won't Get from Your Financial Advisor." "Retirees have to put those three things back in their life."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

6 Actions to Take Today to Take Control of Your Finances

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Do you find yourself overwhelmed at the idea of managing your money? Are you only living for today while ignoring what your bank account will look like tomorrow? Do you doubt your ability to create a personal finance plan for yourself that will lead you to success?

You're not alone. Many millennials want to start doing more with their money but aren't sure where to start. You can take control of your financial situation and empower yourself with knowledge. Here are six steps you can start taking right now.

Sophia Bera is a virtual financial planner for millennials and the founder of Gen Y Planning. She is location-independent but calls Minneapolis "home." She offers a free Gen Y Planning newsletter and recently published her first ebook to provide a Gen Y guide to empowered personal finances.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The Simple Trick to Make Your Tax Deductions Work Harder

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

tax forms
Ryan Mackay/Getty Images
With April 15 less than six weeks away, taxpayers are looking for every possible way to cut their tax bill on their 2014 returns. Yet while there's only so much you can do to make your taxes easier to deal with this year, there are some steps you can take now that will pave the way to lower taxes in future years. One little-known trick that takes advantage of the standard deduction and itemized deductions can help millions of taxpayers save hundreds or even thousands of dollars over the course of multiple years, and to use it well, it's smart to start thinking about it right now.

Standard vs. Itemized Deductions

The IRS gives nearly everyone two ways to take deductions from their gross income before calculating their tax bill. Typically, you have a choice: You can take the appropriate standard deduction for your particular filing status, or you can itemize your deductions. Obviously, it makes sense to use whichever one produces the larger deduction.

Yet for many taxpayers, there's not a huge difference between itemizing deductions or taking the standard deduction. This makes sense, as the general idea of providing a standard deduction isn't to give taxpayers a windfall but rather to approximate a typical amount of deductions that you would otherwise have to itemize in order to claim. That also explains why standard deductions are higher for those who are 65 and older or are blind, as those groups of taxpayers tend to have higher levels of itemizable deductions that would warrant a corresponding increase in the standard deduction amount.

If the deductions you could itemize are within a small amount of your standard deduction, then you might figure that you should go ahead and save yourself the time and trouble of extra calculations and just take the standard deduction. But for many people, there's a better way to get the best of both worlds.

Bundling Your Deductible Expenses

The best solution to the standard vs. itemized deduction dilemma is to alternate back and forth from year to year. How it works is simple. In one year, aim to maximize your itemized deductions. In the next year, reduce your itemized deductions and take what will therefore be a much larger standard deduction. When you look at the sum of the two years, you'll find that your total deductions can sometimes be thousands of dollars higher using this method.

This strategy might seem too good to be true, but all it involves is the timing of when you pay bills that you'd eventually owe anyway. For instance, in order to maximize your itemized deductions, look at doing the following:
  • Prepay your state and local property taxes before Dec. 31, even if they're not due until later in the following year.
  • Make estimated tax payments on state and local income taxes before the end of the year that you can use to reduce your tax liability the following year.
  • Try to group predictable medical expenses into the same year.
  • Bundle two years' worth of charitable giving into a single year. For instance, you can make one year's gifts in January and then give again in December, and then go the entire following year without making annual gifts at all, instead waiting until January two years from now and repeating the pattern.
You can use the same general strategy with nearly any deductible expense, as it's the timing of when you make the deductible payment that determines which tax year it goes into.

For example, say that your standard deduction for 2015 will be $6,300 and you typically have $6,000 worth of itemized deductions. Ordinarily, you'd just take the standard deduction and end up $300 ahead. But if you can take $5,000 of those $6,000 in itemized deductions and bundle them into a single year, then you'll be able to take an $11,000 deduction by itemizing, while then only paying $1,000 the following year and still getting to claim the $6,300 standard deduction. That boosts your total deductions for the two years from $12,600 to $17,300 -- a 37 percent increase that could put anywhere from $470 to more than $1,860 in tax savings back in your pocket.

Itemizing your deductions can seem like a pain in the neck. But by taking some simple steps to make the most of your ability to itemize, you could end up with huge tax savings you'd never before dreamed possible. That's an April gift everyone deserves.

Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger never met a deduction he didn't like. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google Plus. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

529 Plans Make a Money-Saving Comeback

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

serious students listening...
wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock
As the costs of college education have risen steadily over the years, families have realized that they need to do what they can to help their kids avoid a mountain of student-loan debt once they graduate. One of the most popular ways that Americans have saved for college is through 529 plans, also known as college savings plans. Back in January, though, the future of 529 plans was in peril, as President Obama's budget included a provision that would have endangered the use of college savings plans as a viable way to save more for college education.

Backlash against the budget proposal was extremely strong, leading to its removal from the administration's budget. Now, lawmakers have taken action to make 529 plans an even more useful tool for savers. Below, we'll take a look at why 529 plans were under threat and what the government is not trying to do to strengthen college savings plans for the future.

Taking Away a Key Tax Break

The most important element of the 529 plan is that it allows you to save money in a special account that is free of tax. Not only do you avoid having to pay income taxes on the interest, dividends, and investment appreciation on your holdings within the 529 plan throughout your children's pre-college years, but you also get to make tax-free withdrawals of those earnings as long as you spend the money on qualified educational expenses.

The administration's budget proposal sought to take away the tax-free feature of 529 plan withdrawals used to pay for a college education. Instead, the earnings that 529 plan accounts collected would be subject to income tax when they were withdrawn, in a manner similar to how traditional IRAs for retirement get taxed. Taxpayers would get credit for the after-tax money they had used to contribute to the 529 plan in the first place, but they'd have to pay taxes on any rise in the account's value resulting from investing those contributions.

The changes would only have applied to new 529 plans, but in response to loud criticism from the public, the administration withdrew its proposal on 529 plans. Now, though, lawmakers have started work on measures that would enhance the value of the college savings plans.

Making 529 Plans Even More Useful

Late last month, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 529, a bill aimed at expanding college savings plans. If it passes, the bill would make some major enhancements to 529 plans going forward.

First and foremost, the bill would expand the definition of qualifying educational expenses to include computer equipment and software as well as Internet access for students to use while in college. Currently, you're only allowed to withdraw money tax-free for tuition and other fees required by the college or university, as well as materials like books that are specifically required for the coursework the student does. Room and board also qualifies as long as the student is enrolled at least half-time, but most furnishings and other optional costs don't qualify.

Second, the bill would remove an onerous and largely outdated provision of 529 plan law that requires parents to add up the money they take out of multiple plan accounts and perform certain calculations to determine whether any of the money is subject to tax. Under current law, those provisions rarely apply, but the bill would ensure that even if the tax-free nature of 529 plans comes into question again in the future, savers wouldn't have to deal with the complication of coordinating multiple accounts for tax purposes.

Finally, the bill would allow parents who get refunds from colleges and universities to put that money back into a 529 plan account. Parents would have 60 days to get the refunded money back into the 529, closely mirroring what retirement savers are allowed to do with rolled-over IRA withdrawals.

Be Smart About College Savings

The passage of H.R. 529 is far from assured, despite the House's 401-20 vote in favor of the measure. Despite a veto-proof majority, the Senate still has to consider the bill, with possible amendments that could change its provisions.

Nevertheless, with 529 plans having survived the threat of having their tax-free nature taken away, college savers can still benefit greatly from using college savings plans under current law. Any added provisions making them even more attractive would just be icing on the cake for parents looking to do their best to support their children's education.

Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger isn't looking forward to his 10-year-old's future fight with financial aid offices. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google+. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images