Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Obama Calls for More Rights for Struggling Student Borrowers

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Obama Student Loans
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
By JOSH LEDERMAN

ATLANTA -- Issuing a clarion call to Americans saddled by student debt, President Barack Obama urged student borrowers Tuesday to stand up for their rights, and announced a medley of modest steps to bring some order to a notoriously chaotic system.

Obama unveiled his "student aid bill of rights" before a gymnasium packed with nearly 10,000 students at Georgia Tech, where he said the nation must mobilize to bring about deeper changes to student loans. Not only should every American be able to afford college, Obama said, they also should be able to afford the loan payments that kick in with a vengeance once they graduate.

We're trying to tackle this problem from every angle. We want to make this experience more affordable, because you're not just investing in yourselves, you're investing in your nation.

"We're trying to tackle this problem from every angle," Obama said. "We want to make this experience more affordable, because you're not just investing in yourselves, you're investing in your nation."

In the Oval Office ahead of his brief visit to Atlanta, Obama signed a presidential memorandum with policy tweaks that don't require new legislation from Congress -- a plus as far as the White House is concerned. The memo targets third parties like Navient -- formerly Sallie Mae -- that contract with the government to collect on loans. Those companies will be required to better inform borrowers about repayment options and notify them when they are delinquent, the White House said.

Obama also called for a single website where students can see all their federal loans in one place -- a major problem for students with multiple loans or debt that's been sold from lender to lender. He also called for a website where borrowers can file complaints.

The presidential steps aim to crack down on a student loan system known for being complex and confusing to navigate. In recent years, lawsuits and critical government reports have cast a light on industry abuses and the difficulties facing borrowers.

A Consumer Financial Protection Bureau study last year found borrowers were getting little help when they ran into trouble and had few affordable repayment options. And in May, Sallie Mae reached a $60 million settlement with the Justice Department to resolve allegations it charged military members excessive interest rates and improperly sought default judgments.

When Vickie Kight of Houston couldn't afford to pay the interest accruing on her loans, she turned to her loan servicer for help -- and says she didn't get it. Her wages being garnished, Kight dropped out of Louisiana's Southern University, returning to school only years later once her finances were under control.

'Very Aggressive'

"They were very aggressive with me," Kight said in an interview. Her student loan servicer eventually passed her loan onto a collection agency. "That's when it got really hectic. They weren't providing much information. They just said you owe this much to the bank."

Obama also floated the possibility of proposing legal changes to how student loans are affected by bankruptcy. Currently, student loans can't typically be discharged even in bankruptcy. His memo also requires servicers to apply early payments to loans with the highest interest rates, helping students pay off debt faster.

Although Obama has long lamented the high cost of college, he's run into obstacles that have limited his efforts to improve the situation.

Using his executive authority, Obama expanded a federal repayment plan to allow more low-income Americans to cap their payments. But when Obama this year proposed to eliminate the "529" college savings plan to make way for education tax benefits, opposition was so strong that he had to jettison the idea. And the president's $60 billion pitch this year for two years of free community college has gained little traction in the Republican-controlled Congress.

The government estimates total U.S. student debt exceeds $1.1 trillion, with around 7 million Americans in default.

Before returning to Washington, Obama was to headline a fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee, which is beginning to gear up for the 2016 presidential race. Roughly 25 donors paid up to $33,400 to attend.

-Associated Press writer Nedra Pickler contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


To Think Differently, What Apple Should Introduce Next

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Apple Event
Eric Risberg/AP
As expected, Apple (AAPL) finally spilled the beans on the Apple Watch. Monday's media event has consumers buzzing about $17,000 smart watches and fretting about 18-hour battery lives, but smart investors know that now is the time to start thinking about the next big thing.

Given Apple's chunky $740 billion market cap, it needs to keep innovating to stay on top. With the iPhone making up more than two-thirds of its sales this past quarter, there will have to be more than the Apple Watch. Let's take a look at a few things that have either been rumored to be Apple's next big new thing or just make a lot of sense for Apple to pursue at this point.

iTV

A rumor that has been floating around for years is that the consumer tech giant will go from merely making the Apple TV set-top box to introducing full-blown high-def televisions. It makes sense as a big-ticket item. Apple TV is all about software, and Apple is a company that prides itself on stylish hardware that's worthy of a healthy premium.

It won't be easy. Folks aren't going to upgrade their costly TVs every two years the way they do with their iPhones. It will also look awkward lugging TVs to an Apple Store Genius Bar. However, Apple's a pioneer in the digital delivery of media, and there are plenty of Apple fans out there who will buy anything that the tech darling puts out.

Apple Car

Some of the coolest chatter in recent weeks revolves around Apple entering the car market as early as 2020. Apple has reportedly hired away folks from Tesla Motors (TSLA) and auto battery maker A123, adding fuel to the fire.

Apple's already taking baby steps in the automotive realm, but right now that's limited to dashboard technology. Apple's CarPlay will be rolling out in 40 models of cars later this year. However, the real goal has to be an actual car, especially a self-driving car. As long as Apple Maps improves by then, this would be Apple's biggest-ticket market ever.

Smart Home Gadgetry

Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) has made the smart home a battlefield, acquiring the Nest learning thermostat and surveillance camera maker Dropcam. Now it's time for Apple to catch up.
Sure, Apple has HomeKit, a software developed to allow appliances and accessories to communicate with one another in the home. The next logical step is to introduce a line of products to put it all together.

Search Engine

Google crashed Apple's iOS party with its open-source Android platform that now dominates the smartphone and tablet markets. Isn't it time for Apple to fight back, hitting Google where it hurts?
Apple relies on Google as the default search engine on its Safari browser, but that contract is reportedly coming up for renewal. This comes at a time when there's chatter about Apple introducing its own search platform. We saw Apple do this with Apple Maps, and there's more money to be made in paid search.

Wearable Camera

Shares of GoPro (GPRO) took a hit in January on news that Apple was taking out a patent for wearable cameras. Digging a little deeper, the application wasn't for a GoPro killer: It's merely a patent for a remote viewfinder, which basically allows for the Apple Watch to be used as a viewfinder for the iPhone camera. Does this mean that folks will strap iPhones to their heads and use Apple Watch to take snapshots and shoot video? We'll see, but Apple can do more here.

If the patent does live up to the initially unfounded fears, we could see Apple make a bigger splash in digital cameras in general and wearable cameras in particular. After all, if the company prides itself on the quality of its cameras and its Retina Display imaging, this wouldn't be that much of a stretch.
There are so many directions that Apple can take as it prepares for its next step. The only thing that's certain is that there will be a next step.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Google (A and C shares), GoPro and Tesla Motors. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A and C shares), and Tesla Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Target Lays Off 1,700, Won't Fill Another 1,400 Vacancies

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Target Layoffs
David Denney/Star Tribune via APTwo employees leave Target's corporate campus in Brooklyn Park, Minn., carrying boxes of belongings. They said they were affected by Tuesday's layoffs.
MINNEAPOLIS -- Target (TGT) said Tuesday that it is laying off 1,700 workers and eliminating another 1,400 unfilled positions as part of a restructuring aimed at saving $2 billion over the next two years.

The news put a number on planned layoffs first announced last week as several thousand. The company said the cuts would fall primarily on headquarters locations in Minneapolis. The layoffs would amount to about 12.5 percent of the 13,500 workers there.

Today is a very difficult day for the Target team, but we believe these are the right decisions for the company.

"Today is a very difficult day for the Target team, but we believe these are the right decisions for the company," Target said in a statement.

New chief executive Brian Cornell has said the company needs to become more nimble and innovative. His plan calls for spending up to $2.2 billion on capital expenditures in the current fiscal year. About half that would go toward technology as Target seeks to grow online sales in an era when more shoppers than ever are on mobile devices.

Earlier this year Target said it would end its foray into Canada, closing all 133 of its stores there and laying off about 17,000 workers.

The company is eliminating some jobs at a location in Bangalore, India, where Target has about 3,000 employees. But the concentration of layoffs in Minneapolis has spurred concern about the effect on the regional economy and even some fretting about the company's future. Gov. Mark Dayton met with Cornell on Monday and said he was assured Target would keep a strong corporate presence and its headquarters in Minnesota.

Boosting Internet Sales

Target has said it plans to spend about $1 billion on technology in its current fiscal year. In the past it's spent more money on new stores and renovations, but the company wants to speed up its online sales growth. Target and other retailers have seen their customer traffic decrease as consumers do more of their shopping online instead of at physical stores.

In February Target cut its free-shipping minimum in half, saying users who orders merchandise worth $25 or more online won't have to pay for shipping. The move was intended to help Target keep pace with competitors such as Amazon.com, Google (GOOGL) and eBay (EBAY). Customers can also have their orders shipped to Target stores for free. Earlier this month the company suggested it will look for other ways to get orders delivered to stores and customers faster.

Target said Tuesday that each employee being laid off would get at least 15 weeks of severance plus more based on years of service.

Target had 366,000 employees as of Feb. 1, 2014. That number doesn't reflect the layoffs in Canada and an updated figure wasn't immediately available.

Shares of Target lost 83 cents to $77.74 in midday trading. The stock is up 3.5 percent in 2015 and has climbed 28 percent over the last 12 months.

-AP Business Writer Marley Jay contributed to this report from New York.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Changes to Credit Reporting: How Will They Affect You?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Credit-Reporting Giants Agree to Overhaul

By MICHELLE CHAPMAN and ALEX VEIGA

The three big credit reporting agencies are making changes that could help steer some consumers clear of the credit dog house.

Data collected by the agencies Equifax (EFX), Experian and TransUnion on hundreds of millions of people are used to create credit scores. Those scores can determine who gets a loan and how much interest is paid on it.

The move stems from months of negotiations between the companies and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of several state attorneys general who have placed the credit reporting industry under increased scrutiny.

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood sued Experian last June, claiming the firm has knowingly included error-riddled data in consumer credit files. In Ohio, Attorney General Mike DeWine is leading more than 30 states in an investigation into the credit firms. That suggests more changes by the industry could be coming.

So how will these latest changes affect you?

Q: What's changing here?

A: The credit bureaus have agreed to make several changes. Two of them have the potential to affect consumers the most: changes to how people go about disputing errors in their credit files and in the type of credit data that will appear in their files.

Q: Will it be easier to dispute errors in my credit report?

A: In theory. Let's say you've made a timely payment on your credit card but it mistakenly shows up in your credit file as a late payment, potentially weighing down your credit score. Right now, consumers who want to fix that error can file a dispute with the credit reporting agencies, but it falls on the consumer to get the mistake fixed with their credit card company. In addition, the credit agencies basically defer to the creditor.

To address this, the firms have agreed to hire employees tasked with reviewing consumer credit disputes independently and not merely rubber-stamping what credit card issuers and lenders say.

Q: What are the changes to medical debt?

A: In a bid to increase accuracy, medical debts won't be reported until after a 180-day waiting period to allow time for insurance payments to be applied. The agencies agreed to remove from credit reports previously reported medical collections that have been or are being paid by insurance companies.

Medical debts often arise from insurance coverage delays or disputes. Over half of all collection items on credit reports are medical debts and those debts may not accurately reflect consumers' creditworthiness, according to a statement from Schneiderman.

Q: What about parking tickets?

A: The credit agencies have agreed that parking tickets, library late fees and similar fines won't appear on consumers' credit reports, sort of. The idea is to exclude debts that don't arise from an agreement by the consumer to pay back money, as in a loan or credit card. Still, if any of those debts gets sold to a collection agency, it's possible the unpaid debt record could end up on your credit report anyway.

Q: Who will monitor these changes?

A: A working group will be formed under the agreement to regularly review consistency and to ensure that collected data is applied to consumers uniformly.

Q: When will the changes take place?

A: The changes will start to be implemented over the next several months. Discussions with other attorneys general are ongoing and there remains the possibility for more agreements ahead.

Q: Am I eligible for more than one free credit report a year?

A: Yes. Right now, consumers are entitled to get one free credit report a year from each credit reporting agency. The Attorney General's agreement requires that the firms provide a second free report to consumers who experience a change in their report after they dispute something in their file. This will let consumers verify that the credit agencies corrected the error. To get a free report, visit AnnualCreditReport.com.

-Chapman reported from New York. Veiga reported from Los Angeles.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Save on Tax Software -- Savings Experiment

$
0
0

Filed under: ,


Save on Tax Software
Tax season can come with pricey accountant fees, stress and long wait times. However, you can take the e-filing route and do it yourself online. But is it really worth it? Let's take a closer look.

If you're like most people and use a straightforward 1040A or 1040 EZ form when filing, you can actually file your federal returns for free on some tax software sites like TaxAct. This software offers great pricing and all the right tools, but that's only if your taxes aren't too complex. It's also the lowest when it comes to filing for state taxes, as well, which isn't free with most commercial tax software. At about $18 for state and about $21 for a deluxe package, which includes email and telephone support, TaxAct can be a great low-cost choice.

H&R Block offers some inexpensive options, too. For only $20, you can file for your state and federal return, but to qualify for this price you have to use a 1040A form and fit a narrower criteria. While their premium package is a bit pricier at about $50, it does come with more features that can help with more complicated tax returns.

One last thing to remember is that the later you file, the higher the software charges tend to be, so expect to pay more if you procrastinate. And since the IRS processes tax returns on a rolling basis, e-filing can get your returns to you in as little as 21 days if you use direct deposit. That's a lot quicker than the 8-10 weeks that it takes the IRS to process paper returns.

So while the idea of filing your own taxes online can be intimidating, you can potentially save hundreds by doing them yourself online. If you're an investor, property owner or self-employed, though, using an accountant might be a better way to get you more money on your returns. Before you choose, assess your situation, because when it comes to taxes, there are more than a few ways to save.

View Poll

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: S&P Posts Worst Day in 2 Months on Rate Worries

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Stocks Close Down Over 100 Points
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks fell Tuesday, giving the S&P 500 its biggest decline in two months, on increasing views the Federal Reserve may raise rates as soon as June.

The Dow and S&P 500 ended in negative territory for the year, with the S&P 500 off 3.5 percent from its March 2 record closing high.

Those Fed worries pushed the U.S. dollar to a nearly 12-year peak against the euro, and added to concerns the dollar will continue to weigh on U.S. multinationals' earnings.

The issue out there has been the strong employment report, which has set off fears of an interest rate hike by the Fed sooner or more aggressively than had been anticipated.

Friday's stronger-than-expected jobs report was largely behind the recent rate jitters.

"The issue out there has been the strong employment report, which has set off fears of an interest rate hike by the Fed sooner or more aggressively than had been anticipated," said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment officer of Solaris Group in Bedford Hills, New York.

All 10 of the S&P 500 sectors ended lower. Financial and technology sectors, each down more than 2 percent, were the biggest drags. Shares of Wells Fargo (WFC) were down 2.5 percent at $53.29.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) fell 332.78 points, or 1.85 percent, to 17,662.94, while the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) lost 35.27 points, or 1.7 percent, to 2,044.16, its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 5.

The Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) dropped 82.64 points, or 1.67 percent, to 4,859.80.

The euro was last down 1.4 percent at $1.0696 after hitting $1.0691, the lowest in almost 12 years.

"For large-cap U.S. multinationals, what will the be the cost of hedging and the impact on earnings growth?" said Oliver Pursche, chief executive officer of Bruderman Brothers in Suffern, New York.

Shares of IDT (IDT) dropped 21.2 percent to $16.30, a day after it released results.

On the upside, Urban Outfitters (URBN) rose 11.5 percent to $44.06, the S&P 500's biggest daily percentage gainer, after reporting earnings late Monday that beat expectations.

About 7 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, above the 6.5 billion average for the month to date, according to BATS Global Markets.

Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by 2,256 to 835, for a 2.70-to-1 ratio; on the Nasdaq, 2,077 issues fell and 664 advanced, for a 3.13-to-1 ratio.

The S&P 500 posted five new 52-week highs and 15 new lows; the Nasdaq composite recorded 44 new highs and 87 new lows.

-With additional reporting by Ryan Vlastelica.

What to watch Wednesday:
  • The Treasury Department releases federal budget for February at 2 p.m. Eastern time.
Earnings Season
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Express (EXPR)
  • Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (KKD)
  • Shake Shack (SHAK)
  • Men's Wearhouse (MW)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Why OPEC Might Be Prepared to Raise Oil Prices

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

|BAC0092.JPG|BAC|Business and Commerce|Business & Commerce|business|day|derricks|equipment|horizontal|industry|metal|oil|outdoor
Getty Images
Low oil prices are taking their toll on the U.S. energy industry, but the impact domestically pales in comparison to the effect on countries that rely on oil to balance their national budgets. OPEC countries like Nigeria, Venezuela and Iran are going to experience massive deficits in 2015 if oil prices don't rise, and they're increasing pressure on OPEC to rein in production in an effort to increase oil revenue.

Meanwhile, in an effort to regain control of the oil market, Saudi Arabia is trying to keep production high so as to lower prices and squeeze U.S. shale producers and countries like Russia that have expanded oil production over the past decade. However, if the price of oil doesn't rise soon, there will be at least $257 billion in lost revenue for OPEC, and with budget deficits growing, the oil market will pit nation against nation for the future of oil prices.

Why Everyone but Saudi Arabia Wants Higher Oil Prices

According to Bloomberg, 10 out of the 12 OPEC members will run a budget deficit this year, including an expected $38.6 billion deficit in Saudi Arabia. But Saudi Arabia has around $750 billion in foreign currency reserves to ease the blow, so it's willing to take a long view on oil. Smaller OPEC countries don't have the same luxury.

Nigeria could have a budget shortfall of as much 5 percent of GDP, which could be a funding gap of $21 billion over the next four years. That's one reason it is pushing hard for a cut in OPEC production.

Venezuela's budget deficit may reach a whopping 19 percent of GDP in 2014, and it owes $23 billion to partners like oil drillers and airlines, according to Ecoanalitica. With the country's currency spiraling out of control, low oil prices only make Venezuela's calls for an emergency OPEC meeting more urgent.

As budgets across OPEC are pummeled by the fall in oil prices, calls from the cartel to cut production in 2015 grow louder from within its ranks. Nigeria is the president of OPEC this year and has said an emergency meeting might be necessary before the regularly scheduled June meeting. Iran and Venezuela would certainly be on board with a production cut in 2015, and with hundreds of billions of dollars at stake, the calls will only get louder. But one voice trumps all in the oil market.

Saudi Arabia Is Playing the Long Game

While most OPEC countries are looking at short-term budget deficits and the threat these pose to their economies as a reason to cut production, Saudi Arabia is looking at its long-term place in the oil market as a reason to keep production high. In the last 30 years, OPEC's share of the global oil market has fallen from about 50 percent to about 30 percent, meaning the group holds less sway over price fluctuations. If members cut production and shale oil production increases, that share could drop to 25 percent or lower very quickly, and OPEC might be completely ineffective in controlling prices. Short-term, a production cut might be a good thing to do, but long-term, Saudi Arabia -- and OPEC -- would risk giving up control over the oil market.

Saudi Arabia wants to control the market because then it will be able to effectively set the price for oil in the future. Whether or not its strategy of squeezing the market this year works is anybody's guess, and even then, Saudi Arabia might have to wait years for its strategy to pay off. In the meantime, you're getting a discount at the pump.

How This Affects You at the Pump

The side effect of this bickering over oil prices is low gas prices for the American consumer. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that the average consumer will save $550 on gasoline this year, but how long those savings will last is anyone's guess.

If Nigeria and other OPEC countries get their way, we'll be headed back toward $100 oil before the end of the year. But Saudi Arabia is the country to watch because it's the largest producer in OPEC and has shown no signs of letting up the price pressure on oil prices. What OPEC decides to do with oil production in 2015 could have a significant impact on your wallet and the economy as a whole. With the cartel's power players divided on where oil prices should be headed next and literally hundreds of billions of dollars at stake, the whole world should be watching what they do next.

Travis Hoium is a Motley Fool contributor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out The Motley Fool's free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

5 Discount Stores That Are More Expensive Than You Think

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

On The Money-Price Match Guide
Jeff Chiu/AP
By Brittany Lyte

If you think you're getting a great bargain by shopping at big box stores that market themselves as purveyors of incredibly low prices, you may want to think again. Consider the alluring "loss leader" pricing strategy, for example. America's discount retailers draw you in by selling certain items at or below cost. But, they make up for lost profits on those dramatic mark-downs by selling you other, higher-priced products during that same visit. By the time you reach the register, the amazing savings you reaped from that doorbuster special is reduced by all the other higher-priced items you purchased. (See also: How Retailers Manipulate You Into Spending More)

Stores use a variety of such techniques to make themselves only seem cheaper than they really are. Read on for our roundup of some of the big name stores that are more expensive than you think.

1. Walmart (WMT)

"Always the Lowest Price. Always." That's the original Walmart slogan. But the world's biggest retailer was forced to stop using it when the National Advertising Review Board ruled that Walmart's lowest price claim simply wasn't true. Perhaps a more accurate tagline would have instead utilized the word "sometimes."

Indeed, some of Walmart's items are priced lower than anywhere else. Those key products are strategically chosen commodities that customers like you tend to know the going price of. Therefore, you know a steal when you see one, such as 25 cent cans of Progresso soup or a Dyson upright vacuum for $369. Eventually, you see enough good deals and assume everything Walmart sells is cheap. Alas, it's not. If you pile up your shopping cart with a mix of good deals, bad ones, and regularly priced items, you've merely neutralized your big savings, while helping Walmart achieve its bottom line.

2. Target (TGT)

Though it caters to the fashion-forward shopper rather than the self-identified thrifty one, Target sells many of the same products as Walmart. In fact, 80 percent of the merchandise sold in Target and Walmart is identical, according to Charles Fishman, author of The Wal-Mart Effect. The two stores also offer the same discounts. A recent comparison by Bloomberg Businessweek found only a 46 cent difference between the two retailers per $100 of purchases. You'll save those 46 cents at Target, the analysis found, although Walmart usually wins independent price comparisons. (See also: How to Find the Secret Deals and Biggest Markdowns at Target).

3. Dollar General (DG)

Despite the name, not everything here is a dollar or less. And even when it is, you're not necessarily getting bang for your buck. Case in point: The price tag on bulk goods at Dollar General is often lower due to smaller unit counts, but they can be higher per piece. For instance, an analysis by the Wall Street Journal found a 28-pack of Pampers diapers sells for $10, or 35 cents per diaper, on Dollar General's website. But the same diapers on Walmart's website sells in a 180-pack box for $45.97, or 25 cents per diaper. So, yes, you can get diapers for less money at Dollar General. But they'll cost you 40 percent more per diaper than if you were to buy a bigger bulk package at Walmart.

4. Amazon Prime (AMZN)

The $99 annual fee you must pay to gain membership to Amazon Prime gets you free two-day shipping on selected products. If you're a fairly frequent Amazon Prime shopper, a membership should work out in your favor. But beware: As a Prime customer, you may not always be presented with the cheapest item.

A GeekWire analysis found that a search for a Hamilton Beach Slow Cooker turns up a Prime-eligible product that costs $49.95 for free two-day shipping. But if you were to click on more options, the same slow cooker is available from a different seller for $38.01 plus $11.99 for shipping, for a grand total of $50. In this case, as a Prime customer, your $99 membership fee would save you a mere 15 cents.

In another scenario, the analysis found a vacuum cleaner filter from Dirt Devil was actually cheaper if you didn't use your Prime account. The Prime item cost $13.49, but another vendor was charging $12.74, plus free shipping. Now, this isn't always the case. Often the Prime-eligible item is the cheapest one. But if you are a sporadic Prime shopper rather than a loyal one, or if you don't want to have to dig to ensure you're getting the best deal, a Prime membership might not be worthwhile for you.

5. Kohl's (KSS)

At Kohl's, sales prices aren't always what they seem. A CBS hidden-camera investigation conducted between November 2011 and January 2012 found that the discount retailer was in the habit of marking up items as much as $100 from earlier levels before putting them on sale. For Pattie Woody, the result is that the $202.99 sheet set she purchased at a 50 percent discount had actually been priced at $169.99 before the sale, the investigation found. The pre-sale markup meant that Woody really only saved 40 percent rather than the advertised 50 percent. In another example, a twin sheet set was listed at half off the original price of $89.99. But inside the plastic zipper, the earlier price tag read $49.99, indicating the sale was only a $5 savings from the original tag.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Maximize Tax Deductions During Your Job Search or Move

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

BFH5Y2 Man and couple unloading truck of cardboard boxes. Image shot 2008. Exact date unknown. unhappy stress moving problem hom
Alamy
By Ellen Chang

Landing a new job can be a tough, expensive slog -- and so can just moving, but luckily the costs of both can be reduced on your tax bill. The Internal Revenue Service allows you to deduct many job-seeking costs, ranging from travel expenses for interviews to outplacement agency fees.

Bruce Mendelsohn, a former communications director for schools job-hunting in the Auburn, Massachusetts, area, often meets with people for coffee for job leads and plans to deduct expenses for gas, coffee and meals. "I am happy the government understands that people need help for both the short and long term," he said. "I take people to lunch or for coffee for 'informational' interviews. When you are looking for a job, it's about relationships and to see if there is a future partnership."

The Nitty-Gritty

Similar to all miscellaneous itemized deductions, the total costs must be in excess of 2 percent of your annual gross income for you to receive any benefit, said David Walters, a certified public accountant and certified financial planner from Palisades Hudson Financial Group in Portland, Oregon. For example, in the case of a taxpayer earning $50,000 who spent $1,200 that year on job-seeking expenses, the first $1,000 would be limited, and the taxpayer would get the benefit for the $200 in deductions.

You can even deduct memberships to professional organizations, the costs of printing and sending resumes and networking events. For the costs to qualify, the job search must be in the same field as the prior job, Walters said. Another exception is that people looking for their first job do not qualify for this kind of deduction.

The Benefits Aren't Over Once You Snag the Job

If your new job requires that you relocate, and the company is at least 50 miles farther from your former home than the new job, the costs of moving your home and travel expenses qualify as deductions, too. One exception is that the IRS does not allow deductions for your meals while you are traveling to your new location.

Unlike job search expenses, the ones you rack up to move for a job are not subject to the 2 percent of adjusted gross income limitation, but the position must be full time. Recent college graduates looking for their first job can take the moving expense deduction.

Aside from tax deductions, people changing jobs may also want to consider a direct rollover of their 401(k) account from a prior employer to an IRA.

"Since many 401(k) plans have very limited investment options, rolling over an old 401(k) account to a well-known custodian can provide better, low-cost investment option," he said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

6 Painless Ways to Pay Off Your Mortgage Years Earlier

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

How to Pay Off Your Mortgage Faster

By Marilyn Lewis

Chances are your home mortgage is the largest debt you'll ever have. How would you like to pay it off and run your mortgage contract through the shredder a lot faster than the 30 years most homeowners sign up for? Let's consider some ways to painlessly pay off your home loan sooner. You can choose to do it a little faster or a lot. In some cases, you'll scarcely notice the added expense.

1. Make Biweekly Mortgage Payments

Since there are 12 months in a year, homeowners make 12 monthly mortgage payments. But if you make half-sized payments every two weeks (biweekly), you'll make 26 half payments, the equivalent of 13 full payments, essentially making 13 monthly payments every year rather than the usual 12.

To go this route, call your lender and ask the best way to do it. Some lenders will set you up with biweekly payments. Or you might simply prefer to send in the extra payments by mail or electronically. Whenever you make any extra payment, however, be sure to designate it "apply to principal." Otherwise, the lender may treat the extra as a prepayment of your next regular monthly payment.

Use a calculator like this one from the Mortgage Professor to see your savings. Example: According to this calculator, if you have a 30-year fixed rate mortgage at 3.8 percent, making biweekly payments would save $20,573 in interest over the life of the loan and pay off your mortgage four years earlier. That's a big bang for not many extra bucks.

One thing to avoid: "mortgage acceleration" products and plans. Paying down your mortgage is an easy thing to do, and you shouldn't have to pay anything to do it. No expertise or pipeline to a higher authority is required. When you see ads and pitches for mortgage "acceleration" plans, programs and products, run the other direction. (Learn more about these gimmicks here.)

2. Pour Every Bit of Extra Cash Into Your Mortgage

Dedicate every bonus, raise and windfall, birthday, holiday and graduation gift you receive toward paying down debt. Obviously, the highest interest debt takes priority, but if you have an adequate emergency savings fund and your mortgage is your only debt, when extra money falls into your hands, don't even ask yourself what you'll do with it: Add it to your mortgage payment, designating it as additional principal.

It's possible you'll find better uses for extra cash than paying down your mortgage. For example, if your mortgage rate is 3.8 percent, but you can earn 5 percent on your money elsewhere, you're obviously going to be better off earning the 5 percent. Read Stacy's discussion about the pros and cons of using extra cash to pay down your mortgage.

3. Round Up Your Payments

The monthly payment on a $200,000 mortgage at 3.8-percent fixed over 30 years is about $932 a month. Get into the habit of rounding up that amount to $1,000. Or even $1,030, or $1,050. Do it on a regular basis, and you'll shave years off your mortgage while feeling little pain.

4. Make One Extra Payment a Year

Give yourself a holiday gift by making an extra payment at the end of the year -- or any time. Or, if you'd rather, add an amount equal to one-twelfth of your mortgage payment to each month's payment. For instance, with the $932 monthly payments in the example above, one-twelfth is $78. Add that to your normal payment, for a total payment of $1,010, and you'll shave 30 payments off a 30-year mortgage, paying it off in 26 years instead of 30.

5. Refinance Into a Shorter Loan

Nearly 90 percent of Americans who financed their homes in 2013 chose a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, according to Freddie Mac. One reason to do so: Monthly payments are lower on longer-term loans.

Only 8 percent chose 15-year loans in 2013. But those borrowers stood to save a lot of money over the long haul. You can, too, with a shorter duration mortgage. Follow these three steps to find out what you would save: Here's an example: If you pay 3.8 percent on a 30-year fixed rate home loan of $200,000, your payment (principal and interest) will be $932 a month. After 30 years, you'll have repaid the $200,000 plus $135,489 in interest, money that could have gone to a college education for your kids or helped you retire earlier.

Reducing the term, or duration, of the loan usually saves money in two ways: You pay less total interest, and you often get a lower rate. When I researched this story, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 3.8 percent. The average 15-year, fixed rate mortgage had an average interest rate of just 3.07 percent. The monthly payments on a $200,000 loan would be $1,388, which is $457 higher than the 30-year version. But you'd be done in half the time, paying only $49,823 in interest, instead of $135,489. That means you'd keep nearly $86,000 in your pocket rather than putting it in a lender's.

If you want to shorten your mortgage's term but 10 or 15 years feels too tight, the payments on a 20-year loan might be more comfortable.

6. Refinance and Just Pretend It's a Shorter Loan

If locking into a shorter mortgage with higher monthly payments feels scary (what if you hit a rough patch and need the money?), you can get much the same effect by refinancing - if rates are low enough to justify it -- into a cheaper 30-year mortgage but paying it off on a 15-year (or 10-year or 20-year) schedule.

You won't enjoy any lower rates offered for shorter-term loans, but you'll save heaps of money on interest. To stick with our sample mortgage, the new payment on your $200,000 (3.8 percent, 30-year fixed-rate) mortgage is $932. Go ahead and pretend you're on a shorter schedule. Your monthly payment would be:
  • $1,190 to pay it off in 20 years.
  • $1,459 to pay it off in 15 years.
  • $2,006 to pay it off in 10 years.
Do the math yourself using the HSH, or any number of other free calculators. This option requires willpower, because you must choose a higher payment than you are required to make each month. But it gives you the flexibility of falling back to your smaller required payment if you need extra cash.

Is Refinancing Cost-Effective?

The last two options involve refinancing your home. Before considering them, decide if refinancing is a good move for you. Whether refinancing is worth it depends on the associated costs and how long you'll stay in the home. To be a good deal, you'll need to stay long enough to more than recoup your costs. Refinancing is loaded with costs, including, but not limited to:
  • A lender's origination fee.
  • A title search fee and title insurance.
  • Taxes.
  • A settlement professional's fees.
  • The cost of pulling your credit report.
  • An appraisal fee.
  • State or county tax and/or transfer fees.
You can pay for these costs out of pocket at the time you refinance. Many lenders encourage borrowers to have the fees added ("rolled in") to their loan balance. But if you do, your monthly payment will grow and you'll pay additional interest.

Estimate Your Costs to Refinance

On average, homebuyers paid an average of $2,539 in closing costs for a $200,000 mortgage in 2014, according to Bankrate's annual survey. The cost of refinancing is similar. Here's rule of thumb: Expect to pay 2 percent to 5 percent of the loan amount to refinance, says Zillow.

Estimate your own costs using MyFICO's refinance calculator. Also, you can shop around by telling several mortgage lenders how much you want to borrow and asking for their estimates of fees. Again, the Money Talks News mortgage search tool is a good place to start. Don't give lenders consent to pull your credit until you're ready to actually apply for a loan.

What's your approach to paying your mortgage? Are you trying to pay it off faster? Tell us how that's working by posting a comment below or at Money Talks News' Facebook page. Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Could Hackers Take Over Your Car Via Its Computers?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Fiat ChryslerAs this Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat's dashboard shows, the latest cars include complex computers. That has experts worrying about a new threat to the auto industry: hackers.
Modern cars are full of software. But are they safe from hackers?

That's a question a lot of experts are asking right now, and the answers aren't always reassuring. At a conference hosted by the Center for Automotive Research recently, several industry experts said that the latest high-tech cars have become tempting targets for hackers -- but the industry is determined to fight back.

Today's Cars Are Very Vulnerable, but the Threat Is Still Low

Current cars are vulnerable to attacks, according to Andrew Brown, chief technologist at giant auto-industry supplier Delphi (DLPH). In his presentation at the conference, Brown noted that the computers in a modern high-end car have about 100 million lines of computer code -- more than in a Boeing 787 airliner.

That number could double or even triple over the next few years, he said, as vehicle-to-vehicle communications systems and more self-driving features come to market. All of that code needs to be protected -- lest a hacker manage to take charge of a vehicle, possibly using a wireless device.

This isn't just a hypothetical threat. At a hackathon sponsored by Delphi last year, a 14-year-old using a circuit board built from some inexpensive parts managed to crack a new car's security.

It's not a big threat right now. But the concern is that as cars become more interconnected, a hacker could use a compromised vehicle to access other vehicles, the traffic infrastructure -- or even financial networks.

IBM (IBM) executive Brett Hillhouse, who specializes in the emerging Internet of things (how all our tech stuff is inter-connected), noted in his presentation that a hacker can "infiltrate" almost any electronic control unit, via any of several wireless access points -- and could, theoretically, make a car very unsafe using a radio device.

Studies have shown that these attacks could be carried out quite easily by hacker standards, he said. That's why the industry is moving to get a lot better at securing those on-board computers.

Cars Could Communicate With Each Other

Automakers have been building increasingly sophisticated computers into cars for decades. Why are these security concerns only starting to receive attention now?

Apparently, it's because there haven't been very many people inside automakers or key suppliers who have computer-security expertise. The people who write all of this software code for cars tend to be electrical engineers, who are good at coming up with algorithms -- but unlike software engineers, they aren't trained in building computer systems to the latest standards.

But now, the industry, encouraged by the U.S. and other governments, is moving toward systems that will allow cars to communicate with one another and with the traffic infrastructure. Why? Because there are huge safety advantages: If your car's computer brain knows that the driver in front of you just slammed on the brakes, for example, it can react faster than you can -- perhaps fast enough to prevent an accident.

More Complex -- but More Secure -- Systems Are Coming

While self-driving cars are likely still years away, the first of these "vehicle-to-vehicle" and "vehicle-to-infrastructure" systems are likely to hit the market in the next year or two. Mercedes-Benz and General Motors (GM) are known to be making major investments in the technology, and other automakers are almost certainly preparing to follow suit.

The increasing interconnectedness of cars makes hacking a potentially huge problem. But the industry's increasing focus on improving the security of in-car systems now should help head off that problem as cars become more interconnected in coming years.

Motley Fool contributor John Rosevear owns shares of General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. The Motley Fool owns shares of International Business Machines. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Looking to invest in the latest new tech? Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Why Warren Buffett's Son Isn't Berkshire's Heir Apparent

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Today - Season 62
Peter Kramer/NBC NewsWire via Getty ImagesWarren Buffett, left, and his son, Howard G. Buffett.
By Lawrence A. Cunningham

Gen. Douglas MacArthur's son, Arthur, escaped the towering shadow of his heroic dad only by changing his name and living as a recluse for most of his life. Bill Gates Jr., son of a renowned lawyer whose name graces a top global firm, eschewed the bookish discipline of law and dropped out of college to forge his own spectacular path in computer software and, lately, philanthropy. Winston Churchill's son might have been better off had he never run for public office. Greg Norman Jr.'s golf game may be better than average, but even impressive performance matters little when the frame of reference is his championship father.

The children of legends who carve out their own niche offer a broad model and lesson: Find your own strengths and play to them, rather than try to measure up to those of your parent's. The succession challenge may be greatest in the context of a family business, as several generations of DuPonts or Pritzkers might attest.

An exquisite case to watch concerns Howard Buffett, son of Warren Buffett, the legendary investor and builder of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A)(BRK-B).

While Howard has served on Berkshire's board since 1994 and owns a billion-dollar stake in the company, his primary occupation is farmer, operating large grain farms in three Midwestern states. Rather than pick stocks or build a conglomerate, Howard has worked to spread knowledge of sustainable farming techniques throughout the developing world to reduce hunger.

True, Warren, in his recent annual shareholder letter, declared that he wants Berkshire's board to elect Howard as chairman one day. But in a pattern familiar to the sons of legend, this prompts critics to object that Howard is no Warren and to complain that he cannot possibly fill his father's shoes. Critics miss, however, that Warren and Howard have carefully avoided this typical trap, as Howard's tasks will include none of the things Warren has done and instead consists solely of tasks Warren has never performed.

"One manager taking over for another is expected to cover the same territory -- leadership, strategy, manufacturing merchandising, acquisitions. But each can be done in varying ways. And you are more likely to succeed by deploying your unique talents than trying to emulate those of your parents."

Warren's primary responsibilities at Berkshire have been making investments, allocating capital and sculpting a distinctive corporate culture. After his tenure, investments are to be handled by a small group of portfolio managers the company began to put in place five years ago. Capital allocation will be led by a successor chief executive chosen from among managers now running Berkshire subsidiaries.

The job of sculpting the corporate culture having been completed, the remaining task is to preserve it. That is the task that Howard will be assigned, and one for which he is uniquely suited: He knows Warren better than any other prospective board chairman and is dedicated to preserving his father's legacy. As Warren explains in his letter, Howard's principal job will thus be to oversee the successor managers to assure that they adhere to Berkshire culture and to lead their removal and replacement if necessary.

Buffett on Buffett Jr.

Here are Warren Buffett's exact words from the 2014 Berkshire Hathaway annual letter on why he wants his son Howard to be a non-executive chairman at Berkshire:

"To further ensure continuation of our culture, I have suggested that my son, Howard, succeed me as a non-executive chairman. My only reason for this wish is to make change easier if the wrong CEO should ever be employed and there occurs a need for the chairman to move forcefully. I can assure you that this problem has a very low probability of arising at Berkshire -- likely as low as at any public company. In my service on the boards of 19 public companies, however, I've seen how hard it is to replace a mediocre CEO if that person is also chairman. (The deed usually gets done, but almost always very late.)

If elected, Howard will receive no pay and will spend no time at the job other than that required of all directors. He will simply be a safety valve to whom any director can go if he or she has concerns about the CEO and wishes to learn if other directors are expressing doubts as well. Should multiple directors be apprehensive, Howard's chairmanship will allow the matter to be promptly and properly addressed."

The Parent Trap

One manager taking over for another is expected to cover the same territory -- leadership, strategy, manufacturing merchandising, acquisitions. But each can be done in varying ways. And in the case of a family business, you are more likely to succeed by deploying your unique talents than trying to emulate those of your parents, especially as a company and its business environment changes from generation to generation.

Succession plans are vital for any institution but especially those led by iconic figures. But a succession plan is less likely to succeed if a company's prosperity is due primarily to a leader's personality traits. And many people attribute Berkshire's success primarily to Warren's peculiar tastes, including Berkshire Hathaway Vice Chairman Charlie Munger in his postscript to Buffett's recent letter.

However, Berkshire culture runs far deeper and broader than a single personality, defined by a core set of common values that stretch across the company's 350,000 employees. Far from a one-man show run from a central corporate office staff of 25, Warren's greatest achievement has been building an institution larger than himself. Berkshire's scores of companies tend to share management principles such as thrift, integrity, trust and a sense of permanence. Maintaining this culture will be Howard's job, one far easier than carrying out the jobs his dad did, which is better left to a group of experienced professionals.

Many children have learned to avoid the trap of following in parental footsteps, and it's something the rest of us can heed as well, whether children of legend or not. Compare the twin children of legendary British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Carol and Mark. While Mark tried but failed to mirror his mother in national politics, Carol never ran for public office. She first moved to Australia to make a name for herself in journalism, before returning to Britain to cement her leadership role in that profession. Chelsea Clinton may yet enter her family business of politics but has thus far moved through other fields -- business consulting, hedge funds, journalism and, most recently, nonprofit work.

Some may still judge the children of legend by the outsized standards of their parents. But tempting as it can be to struggle to measure up -- or to become a recluse -- it is best to forge ahead on your own path and to walk in shoes made just for you.

-Lawrence A. Cunningham is author of "Berkshire Beyond Buffett: The Enduring Value of Values" and Henry St. George Tucker professor at George Washington University.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Why DreamWorks Hates Cinderella

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

NY Special Screening Of Cinderella
Andy Kropa, Invision/APLily James, left, and Richard Madden attend a special screening of Cinderella in New York on March 8.
Walt Disney (DIS) is hoping that to mine gold out of glass slippers this weekend. "Cinderella" -- a live-action film based on the family entertainment giant's animated classic -- hits thousands of multiplex screens across the country Friday.

It's not packing much of a punch in terms of movies stars. "Downton Abbey's" Lily James and "Game of Thrones' " Richard Madden star as the fairy tale couple. It should still be a Hollywood smash. Disney has fared well in recent years with spinning some of its hand-drawn animated fare into modern flicks. From "Alice in Wonderland" to rebooting "Sleeping Beauty" with "Maleficent," Disney's been milking its enviable catalog of content. It also doesn't hurt that the Disney Princess toy line has been a huge success, making the seemingly timeless "Cinderella" popular again with young girls.

Disney is rolling these days. The stock hit an all-time high earlier this month. The same can't be said for its theatrical animation rival DreamWorks Animation (DWA), probably the only company out there that dreads the arrival of "Cinderella."

A DreamWorks Is a Wish Your Heart Makes

DreamWorks Animation has fallen on hard times. A few rough movie releases and the mismanagement of costs resulted in a painful restructuring earlier this year. The studio that once feasted on the "Shrek" and "Madagascar" franchises had to scale back. It eliminated nearly a fifth of its workforce, and its once aggressive theatrical release slate has been pared back for 2015.

It's only putting out one movie this year, and as DreamWorks' lucky misfortune should have it, that movie just happens to be rolling out during the same month as "Cinderella."

DreamWorks' "Home" hits theaters on March 27, two weeks after "Cinderella's" debut. Given the staying power of Disney's family-friendly releases, it's a safe bet that it will eat into the volume of moviegoers who would normally be checking out what DreamWorks Animation is up to. That's just bad timing. DreamWorks is betting its entire slate of releases on a single computer-rendered movie, and it just happens to be putting it out 14 days after Disney woos families to the multiplex.

Home Alone

"Home's" plot may seem familiar. The story of a misfit from another planet befriending an adventurous girl as he's being chased by his own people sounds a lot like Disney's "Lilo & Stitch." However, the setting and the actual story are quite different.

There's a big cast starring Rihanna, Jim Parsons, J. Lo, and Steve Martin. However, getting big stars to turn out for speaking gigs on animated movies is an easy art, and one that doesn't always pay off. The real fear for DreamWorks Animation is that "Cinderella" will still be lighting up movie audiences by the time "Home" makes its debut, and if it's a flop, the studio won't have a comeback project until 2016.

DreamWorks Animation is providing Netflix (NFLX) with some original content, but that hasn't been enough to breathe new life into the moribund shares. The stock is trading lower in 2015, and that was after losing more than a third of its value last year. DreamWorks Animation wants to go "Home," but "Cinderella's" ball may get in the way.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends DreamWorks Animation, Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Average Wall Street Bonus Rings In at Nearly $173,000

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Average Wall Street Bonus for Securities Workers Hits $172,860, Highest Since 2007

By MICHAEL VIRTANEN

ALBANY, N.Y. -- The average bonus paid to securities industry employees in New York City grew 2 percent last year to nearly $173,000, New York's state comptroller reported Wednesday.

That's the largest average Wall Street bonus since the 2008 financial crisis, Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said, according to his office's analysis, though the industry was slightly less profitable last year while adding 2,300 jobs.

"One area that anecdotally we keep hearing is a growth sector is compliance," DiNapoli said.

The securities industry has been profitable for six consecutive years and had 167,800 workers in New York City in 2014, the report said. That's still 11 percent less than before the crisis.

Pretax profits last year for broker/dealer operations of some 200 New York Stock Exchange members -- the traditional measure of profitability for the securities industry -- totaled $16 billion last year, down $700 million from 2013.

According to the comptroller's office, lower profits were a result of weakness in fixed income and commodities trading, higher capital reserve requirements and the continued cost of legal settlements stemming from the crisis. Authorities have blamed inflated mortgage-backed securities that plummeted along with the U.S. housing market.

Regulatory reforms since have included larger reserve requirements, new limits on proprietary trading and measures intended to reduce risk. Securities firms now pay a smaller share of bonuses in the current year with more deferred.

The average salary including bonuses on Wall Street was $355,500 in 2013, according to an October report from the comptroller's office.

"The compensation is five times the average for private employment in the city," DiNapoli said. "But it's a challenging work environment, and in recent years because of the downsizing it's been harder to get these positions."

DiNapoli added that it's important to be concerned about excessive risk-taking and possible regulatory rollbacks to be sure there isn't another meltdown, noting the industry is key to the economic viability of the city and state. The goal should be a business model with sustainable profits, he said, not the short-term, high-risk, high-reward profits "that invariably results in the periodic downturn or crash as we had."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Selling Amazon Now Could Be a Mistake

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Holiday Shopping
Ross D. Franklin/AP
Just when it seemed as if shares of Amazon.com (AMZN) were starting to bounce back in 2014, one analyst has had enough. SunTrust Humphrey Robinson's Bob Peck is downgrading the stock of the country's leading online retailer to neutral.

He's sticking to his $370 price target. It's just the stock's run in recent weeks -- above and beyond that target, just north of $380 at the time of the downgrade -- that finds him cooling on his call.

The call makes sense in theory. Shares of Amazon had been on fire since it announced quarterly results in late January. It's up to the analyst to revisit the original thesis in that kind of scenario and either bump a price target higher or cool on the investment's upside. However, it's also important to put the recent rally into perspective.

Yes, Amazon shares had risen 22 percent this year through Monday morning's Peck downgrade. However, the stock had also surrendered nearly a quarter of its value through 2014. The stock is actually trading lower now than it was at the start of last year. Is Amazon really a less valuable company now than it was back then?

Capital Hill

Peck's concerns were piqued with Amazon's recent financial filing, where it broke out the high cost of some of its capital leases. This is leading the analyst to adjust the way that he calculates the stock's free cash flow. Investors under the assumption that they're snapping up shares of the dot-com pioneer at roughly 40 times trailing free cash flow are actually looking at a multiple closer to 70 based on Peck's interpretation of the numbers.

Amazon has rarely been cheap by most conventional measuring sticks. Now one analyst is suggesting that it's even more expensive.

Peck makes a strong argument, but it's hard to bet against Amazon. CEO Jeff Bezos has never been one to run a company for today, investing heavily in ventures and initiatives that will pay off in the future.

"Sometimes they don't pan out," one can say into a rare Amazon Fire Phone. However, when things do go well -- and for Amazon this happens often between the Kindle e-reader, the Amazon Web Services platform, and its shrewd acquisitions over the years -- it's hard not to get excited about the e-commerce bellwether's future.

Here's to the Future

Retail tracker Channel Advisor estimates that Amazon's sales grew at a 23 percent clip in February from a year earlier, a slowdown from the 27 percent year-over-year growth that Channel Advisor pegged for Amazon in January.

Let's not call this decelerating growth. After all, Amazon's sales grew at a mere 20 percent rate for all of 2014, falling to just 15 percent during the seasonally potent holiday quarter. This is still impressive for a retail giant that rang up nearly $89 billion in sales last year. Most chains, even online ones, would kill for that kind of growth.

There's no shortage of naysayers. There were 7.2 million shares of Amazon sold short as of the end of last month. That's not a big number, but when you consider the stock's triple-digit price tag, we're talking about more than $2.6 billion in bearish wagers looking to profit if the stock moves lower.

Betting against Amazon pays off from time to time. Last year's 22 percent decline was a good example. However, with Bezos at the forefront of cost-shaving automation, risk-taking innovation, and global expansion, the smart money can't be betting on a replay of 2012 this year. Amazon hasn't delivered back-to-back years of stock declines in its nearly two dozen years as a public company. It doesn't seem likely to start doing so in 2015.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Amazon.com. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to make 2015 a winning investment year? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Amazon Opens Store for Unique Products by Small Businesses

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

ABC's Shark Tank - Season Six
Michael Desmond/ABC via Getty ImagesMark Cuban and Daymond John on the set of ABC's "Shark Tank."
By MAE ANDERSON

NEW YORK -- It may be the biggest online marketplace in the U.S., but a new store on Amazon will support the little guy.

The e-commerce powerhouse is opening a store that will offer exclusive electronics, toys and other products created by inventors and small businesses, including products featured on the ABC reality show "Shark Tank."

Dubbed Amazon Exclusives, the online store promotes unique products created by small businesses such as a range of Jackery mini phone chargers, $70 Hot Chocolate Design's Chocolaticas Mariquita shoes and $75 Zackees LED turn-signal gloves that alert cars when a cyclist makes a hand signal to turn.

Some of the products like the gloves and phone chargers were funded by Kickstarter campaigns. Others like a $700 inflatable paddle board were featured on "Shark Tank" -- the ABC show that pits inventors with new products seeking funding against each other. Amazon said it also focused on products that won innovation awards from industry associations. All products in the Amazon store will be available only on Amazon or at the product creators' own website or physical stores.

The items are eligible for free two-day shipping for members of Amazon's $99 annual Prime loyalty program.

The new store is the latest push by Amazon to expand into different areas and reach new customers. The company's strategy has long been to spend a big chunk of the money it makes to grow and expand into new areas like cloud computing, streaming video, hardware and adding services for its Prime loyalty members. Last week the company opened a store on Chinese e-commerce company Alibaba's Tmall retail platform to reach more Chinese customers.

Shares of Seattle-based Amazon.com (AMZN) rose $1.12 to $370.63 in midday trading.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Toyota Recalls Cars, SUVs for Steering, Software Issues

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Washington Auto Show
Samuel Corum, Anadolu Agency/Getty ImagesToyota's 2015 Camry on display at the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, D.C.
DETROIT -- Toyota (TM) is recalling 112,500 cars and SUVs to fix problems with electric power steering controls and electric vehicle software.

The largest of two recalls announced Wednesday covers about 110,000 2015 Camry midsize sedans and Highlander SUVs, as well as 2014 and 2015 RAV4 SUVs.

Toyota says a circuit board in the electric power steering may have been damaged at the factory. Power-assisted steering could fail, increasing the effort needed to steer and raising the risk of a crash.

Dealers will inspect and replace power steering controls if needed.

The other recall covers 2,500 RAV4 electric vehicles from 2012 through 2014. Software in a motor assembly can make the vehicles shift into neutral on their own. Dealers will fix the motor assembly.

Toyota says it knows of no crashes or injuries in either case.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stronger Dollar Sends Stocks Down a Bit

$
0
0

Filed under:

APTOPIX Financial Markets Wall Street MasterCard
Richard Drew/APTraders gather Wednesday at the New York Stock Exchange post for MasterCard.

By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks ended lower for a second session on Wednesday as worries increased about the timing of a Federal Reserve interest rate hike and dollar strength further dampened the outlook for U.S. earnings.

The move followed the S&P 500's (^GSPC) biggest one-day decline in two months in the previous session, which surpassed a selloff of similar magnitude on Friday. The S&P 500 is now off 3.6 percent from its March 2 record closing high and is down 0.9 percent for the year so far.

Friday's stronger-than-expected jobs report is largely behind the recent rate jitters, solidifying views the Fed could raise rates as early as June. "It's all about rates. I think many are holding onto the view that if the Fed raises rates, stocks stop in their tracks and reverse, and the bull market ends," said Bruce Zaro, chief technical strategist, Bolton Global Asset Management in Boston.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) fell 27.55 points, or 0.16 percent, to 17,635.39, the S&P 500 lost 3.92 points, or 0.19 percent, to 2,040.24 and the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) dropped 9.85 points, or 0.2 percent, to 4,849.94.

Avian Flu Affects Tyson, Pilgrims Pride

The rate concerns have helped push up the dollar, as well, which has added to worries the currency will continue to weigh on U.S. multinationals' earnings.

"The big story is the dollar, and it continues to strengthen. That is a double-edged kind of development in that it will lead to more investor interest in the United States, but on the other hand it hampers the ability of U.S. multinationals to compete overseas," said John Carey, portfolio manager at Pioneer Investment Management in Boston.

Shares of Tyson Foods (TSN) were down 5.6 percent at $37.55 and Pilgrims Pride (PPC) dropped 4.4 percent. The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday confirmed the discovery of highly pathogenic avian influenza in a commercial turkey flock in Arkansas.

What to watch Thursday:
  • At 8:30 a.m. Eastern time, the Commerce Department releases retail sales data for February, and the Labor Department releases weekly jobless claims, and import and export prices for February.
  • At 10 a.m.; the Commerce Department releases business inventories for January, and Freddie Mac releases weekly mortgage rates.
Earnings Season
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Aeropostale (ARO)
  • Dollar General (DG)
  • El Pollo Loco (LOCO)
  • FTD Cos. (FTD)
  • Hovnanian Enterprises (HOV)
  • Ulta Salon (ULTA)
  • Vail Resorts (MTN)
  • Zumiez (ZUMZ)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Why We Return to Those Big Banks That Burned Us

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Bank of America-Settlement
Matt Rourke/AP
By Brian O'Connell

The reputations of America's biggest banks hit all-time lows a few years ago, sending customers off to smaller institutions, credit unions and online-only experimenting. Why are those customers headed back to the giants?

Emily Veach, a community and media relations manager at New York City-based CB Insights, a venture capital data services firm, says she is leaving her online bank this year over some basic issues. "I've been an online banking customer since June 2014," Veach said. "I loved the thought of banking with a non-bank, and generally, it's been great. But I'm probably going to switch this year because sometimes I need to write a personal check or make an international transfer, and my online bank isn't set up to handle those tasks."

For Scott Marr, president of Melbourne, Florida-based Fleet Cleaning Service USA, a transportation fleet maintenance service, going with a larger financial institution was all about comfort. "Being from a smaller town and having the option of plenty of hometown community banks, the reason that I went with a large bank is because of having branches everywhere and better technology," he said. "Yes, large banks charge fees on accounts. But isn't it worth the nominal account fee for the added convenience? I certainly think so, and I've worked at a community bank."

Customer Satisfaction

Veach and Marr aren't alone. Fresh data from a widespread study of the U.S. banking industry by Boston-based ath Power Consulting show that customer satisfaction with banks (especially big banks) is on the rise. The survey shows 46 percent of U.S. banking consumers are "satisfied overall" with their financial institutions, up from 36 percent four years ago.

"The chief source of this year's gain has been among the four largest U.S. banks -- Chase, Bank of America, Citibank and Wells Fargo," the survey said. "These banks made significant strides in customer service rankings, as compared to their regional and local counterparts in 2014."

Frank Aloi, chief executive at ath Power, also notes the number of bank customers who want to jump ship to a new bank is down to just 8 percent of all banking consumers. He cites better problem-solving and customer service, along with a bigger push to provide value to customers, as the primary drivers of the shift back toward bigger banks. "Our study results tell the story of the largest U.S. banks turning the corner regarding customer satisfaction. These national banks have committed to improving customer service after their public standing hit all-time lows a few years ago."

"Big banks are growing, taking a larger share of the market and are enhancing the reasons that people are drawn to a large banks -- convenience, comprehensive product suites, cutting-edge technology, etc. -- with improved responsiveness and overall service experience," Aloi said.

A Contrarian View

The survey has its skeptics. "We disagree that big banks are receiving more business than small-business banking," says Jim Angleton, president of AegisFs, a banking and financial services firm. Their costs of services are two times that of smaller banks, and big banks have higher turnover of bank representatives. It's hard to get acquainted with [workers at] big branch banks -- they don't stay long, and that is problematic."

Angleton acknowledges one advantage of the big banks: "The only reason big banks flourish is that they are on every street corner and have saturated the market -- you almost are forced to conduct business with a big bank," he said, "but in fact do not have to."

There's also the tons of money spent on marketing and advertising campaigns that position large banks in a better light than smaller bank (and non-bank) competitors. "The big banks still flex their muscles with regard to marketing," said Rohit Arora, chief executive at Biz2Credit, a New York City small-business funding provider. "They are bigger and thus have deeper pockets to spend on marketing and advertising to keep themselves top of mind."

"Consumers tend to stick with things that are familiar, particularly when it comes to financial related matters," he added. "The branch system, for example, is a big advantage for larger banks."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Have You Heard? Brands Sneak Messages Into Your Music

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Advertising Week Day 1
Brian Ach/Invision for Advertising Week/APAfter the 2002 Busta Rhymes hit single "Pass the Courvoisier," sales of the cognac jumped.
By Karla Bowden

We're used to seeing products and brands overtly pitched to us via TV, Internet and billboards. But it is also increasingly common to hear them pitched via music, whether we realize it or not, according to a new study in the Journal of the Music & Entertainment Industry Education Association.

Storm Gloor, who teaches music business at the University of Colorado Denver's College of Arts and Media, set out to quantify how often the names of products, people and places are mentioned in pop music. This practice is sometimes known as "advertainment." Gloor found that the mention of specific products, people or places has increased over the past 50 years -- and advertainment has succeeded in prompting us to spend money on wants, while also helping artists to make money in the digital age.

"Many people thought music was the last bastion free of marketing, but that train has left the station. Many musicians these days make less money from their recorded work so they must become marketing entities since the music doesn't entirely pay the bills," Gloor said in a report featured in the American Association for the Advancement of Science's EurekAlert. "People could get sick of it and there could be a backlash, but for now this is the new reality."

What Rhymes With Courvoisier?

To reach his conclusion, Gloor dissected the top 30 Billboard songs of each year from 1960 to 2013. That's 1,583 songs. Among them, he found 1,544 product references, with most of them occurring between 2000 and 2010. Cars were the mostly commonly referenced product type, with Mercedes-Benz, Bentley, Corvette, Cadillac and Chevrolet among the most commonly mentioned brands, according to the study.

The study also showed a direct link between product placement and awareness of a brand, according to the EurekAlert report. After the 2002 Busta Rhymes hit single "Pass the Courvoisier," sales of the cognac jumped 10 percent to 20 percent that year, the study found.

As with products, specific locations are named for various reasons, including purely artistic reasons like to "add color and texture to lyrical descriptions," the study states. Other reasons include to promote an artist's own brand or image and to influence radio or club airplay in certain markets, especially when a location is named in "call out" fashion, as rapper Tupac's 1995 song "California Love" did.

How do you feel about advertainment in your favorite music? Sound off in a comment below or on Facebook. Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images