Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Everyone Hates the IRS - But We Hate It In Different Ways

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

internal revenue service...
Shutterstock
Tax Day is coming. Are you excited?

According to the latest data out of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Americans as a people pay one of the lowest tax burdens in the developed world. Out of 34 countries with democratic governments and market economies, the U.S. ranked third lowest for overall tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2012, and probably fourth lowest in 2013 (for which data is not yet complete).

And ... we're mad as hell about it, and we're not going to take it anymore. Wait, what?!

Survey Says ..

That's right. America may rank in the lowest decile of countries for tax burden, but that doesn't mean we're happy about it. In fact, according to a new poll out of Pew Research, 59 percent of American taxpayers believe that "there is so much wrong with the federal tax system that Congress should completely change it." At the same time, though, we can't quite agree on just what needs to be changed.

And 72 percent -- and they'll tell you they're a little bit, or even "a lot," bothered by the complexity of America's tax system. At last count, the U.S. Tax Code was just under 74,000 pages long, and growing rapidly -- up 10 percent in length since President Obama took office. If you tried to read the whole thing, averaging, say, five minutes per page, and spent eight hours a day, seven days a week, it would take you more than two years to finish.

By which time, Congress will have changed it. Twice.

With such a big document, it's impossible for any single taxpayer to know everything that's in the Tax Code. And so, many of us worry that even if we're paying our fair share, someone else probably isn't. But who is that "someone else," exactly?

Twenty percent of respondents polled by Pew worry "a lot" that "poor people" don't pay their fare share. Sixty-one percent of us have the exact same concern about "wealthy people." And corporations? We trust them least of all. Sixty-four percent of individuals polled are convinced that corporations-that-are-people aren't pulling their weight.

The More You Earn, the Unhappier You Are

Simplifying the tax code might help to alleviate such concerns, and the greatest impetus for change here seems to lie in Form 1040. As in, not the 1040EZ form that the IRS says "is the simplest form to fill out."

You see, the more likely you are to earn so little that you qualify for 1040EZ filing, the less likely you are to think taxes are too complex. Earning more than $100,000 -- or earning any income at all from stock and mutual fund dividends, which most well-off taxpayers do earn -- is enough to disqualify a taxpayer from filing an "EZ" form, limiting its usage to lower earners. And tellingly, among very low earners, Pew's responses show that only 33 percent of taxpayers earning under $30,000 (for example) are bothered "a lot" by the system's complexity.

That number spikes to 47 percent as incomes rise past $30,000 and approach $100,000. And above $100,000, there's a clear majority in favor of simplifying tax forms, with 55 percent saying they're bothered "a lot" by the tax code's complexity. These folks -- the $100,000-plus earners -- are also twice as likely as folks earning less than $30,000 to argue they pay more than their fair share in taxes -- 54 percent versus 27 percent.

After April 15, 2015 Comes Nov. 8, 2016

One final note, this being the week in which candidates began coming out of the woodwork to declare their interest in running for the 2016 presidency. According to Pew, 66 percent of Republicans responding to the survey now support changing the tax code "completely." That number jumps to 72 percent for self-described "conservative" Republicans.

Tax-wise, Democrats are more laissez-faire, with only 48 percent advocating wholesale change to the tax code. (But curiously, the more liberal the Democrat, the more they want to change the tax code.) Meanwhile, Independents -- the nation's swing voters -- lean toward the Republican position, with 63 percent backing wholesale tax reform.

All of which suggests that tax reform could become an important part of the national debate as Election 2016 kicks into gear -- both in the Republican primaries, and then in the general election as well.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith is proud ... no ... more like relieved to say that his taxes are done and posted. (Honest, IRS. The check's in the mail.) Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.​​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Utah Man Returns 75-Pound Bag of Cash Found on Highway

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Brinks armored truck makes a routine stop at a business in downtown Indianapolis Indiana IN
Alamy
SALT LAKE CITY -- A Utah man got a surprise when he stopped to pull a large orange bag off the highway, fearing that it would become a traffic hazard.

The Deseret News reports the 75-pound bag tumbled out of a truck driving in front of Dan Kennedy on Interstate 80 on Tuesday. When he looked inside, he found stacks of cash.

"I thought it was going to be light. I reached down to grab it, and I couldn't move it," Kennedy said.

Approximately 4 feet tall and 2 feet wide, the sack was filled with smaller bags packed with currency including $50 and $100 bills. Kennedy estimated each of the small bags contained $22,000.

Never in all my years have I heard of a bag of money bouncing out of the back of an armored truck.

It was unclear Thursday how much money the entire bag contained.

Kennedy tried but failed to chase down the Brink's armored truck that had lost the bag. He then drove the money to his work parking lot and called the police.

The three Utah Highway Patrol troopers were "stunned" at the bag of money, Kennedy said.

"Never in all my years have I heard of a bag of money bouncing out of the back of an armored truck," said trooper Brady Zaugg. "That's something that happens in the spy movies."

Kennedy said it never occurred to him to do anything other than turn in the money.

"He hadn't disturbed it at all, so he obviously did the right thing for the right reason," said Zaugg, who said Kennedy reported his find to the police immediately.

Brink's employees told police they drove over a bad bump on a highway off-ramp but didn't notice the back latch opening or the bag falling out.

Kennedy said he hasn't heard anything about a reward for his good deed, but he was still excited by the unusual discovery.

"I was just jazzed all day long," he said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Obamacare Bumps Up Tax Refunds for Some, Others Take Hit

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Health Overhaul Tax Refunds
Steve Nesius/APWilliam Preus was covered by Obamacare for part of last year before transitioning to Medicare, creating a major tax headache for him.
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

WASHINGTON -- As the April 15 tax deadline nears, people who got help paying for health insurance under President Barack Obama's law are seeing the direct effect on their refunds -- hundreds of dollars, for better or worse.

The law offers tax credits so people without access to job-based health insurance can buy private coverage. Because these subsidies are tied to income, consumers must accurately estimate what they will make for the coming year.

That's been a challenge for millions of people.

"I was expecting to get dinged a little bit, but I was actually kind of surprised when it came down that much.

Guess on the low side, get more help now with premiums, but owe money later at filing time. Overestimate income, expect bucks back from the taxman.

Many consumers may not have understood that is how it works when they signed up. Some experts caution that such complications could discourage uninsured people from getting covered.

Rob Tuck of Dublin, California, said he had anticipated a refund of about $400 on his 2014 taxes. But that almost has been wiped out because he had to repay some of the subsidy. He changed jobs during the year, and his income went up a little.

Tuck, who works for a San Francisco area tech-support company, said he enrolled to avoid tax penalties for being uninsured, but feels penalized anyway now.

"I was expecting to get dinged a little bit, but I was actually kind of surprised when it came down that much," he said.

'Hard to Estimate'

Kelsey Park started out 2014 in Dallas, earning good commissions by selling wedding gowns. She left for graduate school at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, and signed up for coverage through the law. She ended up overestimating her income because she didn't get another job as anticipated.

Park's tax refund came to $2,500, partly because she had too much income tax withheld and partly because she received a smaller health care subsidy than she was entitled to.

"It was hard to estimate what I would be earning because I was transitioning in life," said Park, who's studying for a master's degree in marketing. "I tend to overestimate because I don't want to have to pay back," she said.

The average refund is large enough to offset any repayment in most cases, according to the Treasury Department. The White House says the Affordable Care Act is working even better than anticipated.

But this is the first year that the complicated connections between the law and the tax system are playing out for consumers.

Initial reports suggest a fairly even split between tax-return winners and losers.

Earlier in the filing season, tax preparation company H&R Block (HRB) reported that 52 percent of its customers who got health insurance subsidies owed money back. Repayments averaged $530, reducing expected refunds by 17 percent.

On the other hand, roughly one-third of customers with subsidies overestimated their incomes. As a result, their refunds went up by $365 on average.

Bigger Refunds?

In a recent study, the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation estimated that half those eligible for a subsidy would owe money, while 45 percent would receive a bigger refund.

The estimated average repayment was $794, and the refund was $773. The estimates were based on an analysis of census data about income changes among people likely eligible for health care subsidies.

Kaiser calculated that overall between 4.5 million and 7.5 million households have to account to the IRS for their subsidies.

This year is "a learning experience" for consumers and the government alike, said Kaiser's Cynthia Cox. "To the extent this makes people unsure of how much financial help they are going to get, it could be a discouragement for some to sign up."

To avoid tax surprises, consumers should contact the health insurance exchange if their income changes during the year.

Tucker Bush, an AmeriCorps VISTA volunteer in Tacoma, Washington, basically broke even. He ended up giving back $19 of his subsidy, but not before he had spent an hour trying to figure out IRS Form 8962, which taxpayers must use to account for their subsidies.

'Bit of a Headache'

"It caused me a little bit of a headache, and I have a college degree," said Bush, who volunteers at a nonprofit dental clinic for children. "If you are trying to help someone who may not have a college diploma, this is going to be a nightmare."

Bill Preus of St. Petersburg, Florida, was covered under the health care law for three months last year before transitioning to Medicare because of disability. Preus once had his own insurance agency, selling life and health policies. He is used to complexity, but said he never has seen anything like this.

Preus said he faces the prospect of paying back close to $4,000 because of poor coordination between HealthCare.gov and his insurer, the government's failure to discontinue his health law subsidy after he went on Medicare, and forgiveness of a student loan debt that caused his income to go up.

"There is no one to talk to who can coordinate when extenuating circumstances like this come up, and it's a total mess," he said.

Preus said a tax preparer and an IRS representative both advised him to file an incomplete return so as to trigger an audit, suggesting that may be the best way to straighten things out.

-Associated Press Social Media Editor Eric Carvin contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Last Week's Biggest Movers: Movado Clicks, WWE Slammed

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Wrestlemania XXXI
Don Feria/AP Images for WWESeth Rollins celebrates becoming the new WWE world heavyweight champion in March.
Plenty of stocks go up and down in any given week. The gainers inspire us to keep investing. The decliners keep greed in check while reminding us about the risks of the equity markets. Let's go over some of last week's best and worst performers.

Movado (MOV) -- Up 28 percent last week

These aren't the best of times to be a maker of luxury wristwatches, but Movado's making the most of its borrowed time. Movado impressed the market by posting better-than-expected quarterly results. It may not seem all that great on the surface: Sales and profits declined 4 percent and 13 percent, respectively, since the prior year. However, analysts were forecasting much larger declines.

Folks just aren't wearing fine watches the way they used to, as smartphones do more than merely tell time. Things might also get hairy with the Apple Watch rolling out later this month. However, Movado appears up for the challenge, offering up a stronger-than-expected profit forecast for the new fiscal year and hiking its dividend.

J.C. Penney (JCP) -- Up 20 percent last week

Shares of the struggling department store chain moved higher after an analyst boosted its prospects for the retailer. Piper Jaffray now sees comparable-store sales for the current quarter ending later this month climbing 3 percent. It was previously modeling a mere 1 percent uptick. Piper Jaffray is boosting its price target on the shares from $13 to $14, suggesting a gain of better than 50 percent.

Freshpet (FRPT) -- Up 13 percent last week

We're willing to spend a little more to feed our dogs and cats. Freshpet, a provider of high-end refrigerated pet food, climbed higher after posting a strong financial report. Revenue soared 38 percent in its latest quarter since the prior year, as the number of Freshpet fridges in grocery stores and pet shops rose 23 percent to 13,386.

Freshpet also essentially broke even on an adjusted basis. Wall Street was settling for a small loss.

World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) -- Down 17 percent last week

Shares of World Wrestling Entertainment were slammed to the mat after the company provided an update on its video streaming service. The WWE rolled out its Web-based service 14 months ago, and its subscriber base has nearly doubled over the past year to 1.3 million on the strength of WrestleMania 31 two weekends ago. That's not shabby, but WWE's guidance suggests that near-term growth will be harder to come by.

Carbonite (CARB) -- Down 14 percent last week

The data backup specialist tumbled on Friday after J2 Global -- the company that abandoned plans to buy all of Carbonite last month -- disclosed that it's trying to buy Carbonite's endpoint business subsidiary. This would seem to be a positive development for Carbonite shareholders in theory, but it also suggests that J2 truly has no interest in acquiring the entire company. Some investors were apparently holding out in hopes that J2 would return to the bargaining table after its initial offer was rebuffed.

TrueCar (TRUE) -- Down 12 percent last week

An analyst initiated coverage of TrueCar last week, and it wasn't very flattering. B. Riley is slapping a sell rating and a $10 price target on the company that makes it easy for car buyers to secure haggle-free discounted pricing on new automobiles. TrueCar has been growing quickly, but B. Riley is concerned that it has already added many of the leading car dealerships to its platform. It's also concerned about the cyclical nature of auto purchases.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends TrueCar. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Volkswagen Seeks Big Plant Expansion in Tennessee

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Volkswagen Union
Erik Schelzig/APRobotic arms weld the interior of a Volkswagen Passat sedan at the German automaker's plant in Chattanooga, Tenn.
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. -- Volkswagen is seeking to add to a planned expansion announced last year to produce a new sport utility vehicle in Tennessee.

The Chattanooga Times Free Press reports documents show the automaker wants to add an additional 130,153 square feet to the original expansion, 25 percent more than first planned. The additional expansion will add about $18 million to the $900 million project.

VW plant spokesman Scott Wilson said the company has decided to increase the size of the body shop to accommodate future production needs. He said that doing that now will save money and give VW flexibility as it makes changes to the way it assembles vehicles.

VW is scheduled to go before a local industrial development board Tuesday to seek permission for the new expansion proposal.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

ISM Survey: Service Sector Grew at Slower Pace in March

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Go For the Food Denver
Brennan Linsley/AP
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

WASHINGTON -- U.S. service firms expanded at a slightly slower yet still healthy pace in March, an encouraging sign after multiple reports last week pointed to a slowing economy.

The Institute for Supply Management said Monday that its services index slipped to 56.5 last month, from 56.9 in February. Any reading over 50 indicates expansion.

A measure of sales fell last month and dragged down the overall index. But gauges of hiring and orders rose, evidence that services firms may see solid growth in the coming months.

Based on this survey, rumors of the demise of the US economy have been greatly exaggerated.

That suggests that recent signs of a weakening economy could prove temporary. The services figures come after a disappointing jobs report last week, which echoed a slew of other weak economic data this month. Employers added just 126,000 jobs in March, the fewest in 15 months.

"Based on this survey, rumors of the demise of the US economy have been greatly exaggerated," Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics, said in a note to clients.

At the same time, service firms covered by the report, which include health care providers, hotels, restaurants, construction companies, and banks, are less affected by some of the trends which have held back manufacturing. Factory output has slowed partly because of a rapid rise in the value of the dollar, which makes goods exports more expensive.

Manufacturing firms were also hit by a labor dispute at ports in California, which delayed the shipping of needed parts and components.

Fourteen of 18 services industries reported growth in March, led by real estate, hotels and restaurants, and transportation and shipping.

Still, many analysts now forecast that the economy barely expanded in the first three months of this year. Growth has slowed dramatically in the last six months.

The ISM is a trade group of purchasing managers. Its survey of services firms covers businesses that employ 90 percent of the American workforce, including retail, construction, health care and financial services companies.

Cheaper Oil

The ISM's manufacturing index, released last week, fell for the fifth straight month in March. In addition to the strong dollar, factories have been held back by cheaper oil, which has hurt orders for steel pipe and other equipment.

Home construction has been weak despite low mortgage rates. And Americans are still cautious about spending, even with a sharp plunge in gas prices since last June.

Growth has faltered as a result. The economy expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate in the final three months of last year, down sharply from a blistering 4.8 percent in the six months from last April through November.

Most analysts expect it slowed even further in the January-March quarter. Harsh winter weather may have been partly to blame. But paychecks are still barely keeping up with inflation, even as the unemployment rate has fallen. That is likely weighing on spending and growth.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

15 Cool Things You Didn't Know That Your iPad Can Do

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

cardtableapp.com

By Steven Tweedie and Jillian D'Onfro

Since Apple first launched the device five years ago this month, its usefulness has increased hugely. Here's how to tap into your iPad's full potential.

1. Use It as a Card Table

The next time you're looking for a deck of cards, just use Card Table ($1.99). The app turns your iPad into a card table, and players use their iPhones to hold the cards in their hand.

2. Quickly Navigate to an App's Settings Using Siri

When you have an app open on your iPad, simply hold down the Home button to bring up Siri and say, "Settings." Siri will then bring up the settings page for that particular app.

3. Watch Free Movies, TV Shows (Legally) With Crackle

There's no need to sign in or pay to enjoy Crackle (Free). And while you won't always see the newest movies or TV shows, there's plenty of original content and old-time favorites to keep you entertained.

4. Use It as a Second Monitor

With Air Display 2 ($9.99), you can use your iPad or iPad Mini as a second monitor to extend your screen real estate.

5. Home or Sleep Button Broken? Create Virtual Ones

Assistive Touch gives you easy access to virtual versions of all your iPad's physical buttons such as Home, sleep, volume, or lock screen. To enable Assistive Touch, go to Settings > General > Accessibility > Assistive Touch and turn the feature on.

6. Drag Your Hand Left or Right to Quickly Switch Between Apps

Apple lets you take advantage of your iPad's larger screen by allowing you to switch between apps quickly using four or five fingers and dragging them sideways. You can also close out apps this way by pinching all of your fingers together. To enable the feature, go to Settings, toggle on Multitasking Gestures, and you're all set.

7. Create an Arcade and Controller

With Joypad, you can play over 50 arcade-style games on your iPad using your iPhone as a controller. Just download the Joypad Game Console for iPad (Free), and the Joypad Game Controller (Free) for your iPhone.

8. Watch Movies From Your Computer

Don't want to clog your iPad's memory with videos from your computer? Air Video HD ($2.99) streams videos between the two -- without you having to worry about video formats or bit rates.

9. Read and Annotate Any PDF with GoodReader 4

GoodReader 4 ($6.99) is the easiest way to see your PDFs in all their glory, annotations and all. You can also mark up PDFs on your end too, and the app will automatically work with your iPhone.

10. For Better Night Reading, Invert the Colors

Black text on a white background can strain your eyes, especially at night. Why not flip them? To invert colors on your iPad, go to Settings > General > Accessibility, and toggle on Invert Colors

11. Reduce Transparency and Darken Colors

There's transparency all over in the latest operating system, but you can darken things up by going to Settings > General > Accessibility > Increase Contrast. Once there, you can toggle on the option to both reduce transparency and darken colors.

12. Use Facebook Messenger to Make Phone Calls

Facebook's Messenger app (free) now allows you to make phone calls to your Facebook friends using Wi-Fi or your data plan.

13. Edit Photos

With the larger screen, the iPad is great for editing photos. If you're editing in the flagship app, switch between edited and non-edited version of a photo. While editing, touch and hold the photo to temporarily show the original. That way, you can easily vet whether the changes you're making improve the image.

14. Enjoy the Details in Your Photos With the Magnifying Glass

To turn the magnifying glass on go to Settings>General>Accessibility>Zoom. Then to make it appear, simply double-tap the screen with three fingers.

15. Use Launch Center Pro to Create Task Shortcuts

Recently highlighted on Apple's "Best iPad Apps of the Year" list, Launch Center Pro ($4.99) is like "speed dial for every day tasks." You can create shortcuts for actions like searching Wikipedia or Scanning a barcode to search on Amazon, letting you get things done with a single tap.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Sam's Club Pulls All Blue Bell Ice Cream Products

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

This undated photo provided by Blue Bell shows Blue Bell Chocolate Chip Country Cookies.  Blue Bell Ice Cream has voluntarily suspended operations at an Oklahoma production facility that officials had previously connected to a foodborne illness linked to the deaths of three people, the company announced Friday, April 3, 2015.
Blue Bell via AP
DALLAS -- One of the country's largest retailers has decided to pull Blue Bell ice cream from its shelves as a precautionary measure after Blue Bell announced it was temporarily closing an Oklahoma production plant.

Blue Bell spokesman Gene Grabowski confirmed Sam's Club (WMT) has joined H-E-B in halting sales. The dairy company based in Brenham, Texas, last month issued a recall after ice cream contaminated with listeriosis was linked to three deaths at a Kansas hospital.

The foodborne illness was tracked to a production line in Brenham and later to a second line in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. Blue Bell announced Friday it had stopped all production at the Broken Arrow plant.

Kroger spokeswoman Kristal Howard says the grocer has pulled items produced at the Oklahoma plant but continues to sell other products.

Note: A previous version of this story incorrectly noted that Kroger was also pulling all Blue Bell products.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Breast Milk Sold Online May Contain Cow's Milk

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Mixed race mother holding baby and shopping on laptop
Alamy
By Andrew M. Seaman

People who order human breast milk online for their babies may end up receiving shipments contaminated with cow's milk, according to a new study.

Researchers purchased and tested 102 samples of human milk from the Internet. There was enough evidence to suggest 10 samples were contaminated with cow's milk, which may affect kids with allergies or intolerance, researchers write in the journal Pediatrics.

You really just don't know what you're getting.

"When you combine these results with our 2013 study that showed a high level of bacterial contamination in milk bought online, we conclude that milk purchased on the Internet is unsafe," said Sarah Keim, the study's lead author from The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

"You really just don't know what you're getting," Keim wrote in an email to Reuters Health.

In their previous study, the researchers found that about 75 percent of the milk samples were contaminated with disease-causing bacteria like E. coli or harmful levels of bacteria such as Streptococci.

They say the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends against feeding infants human milk from unscreened donors, but the practice of donating or selling human milk on the Internet is growing in popularity.

In their recent study, the researchers tested the DNA of 102 samples sold in 2012 as human milk, for $1 to $2 per ounce.

All of the samples contained human DNA, but 12 also tested positive for cow DNA. And 10 of those 12 contained what the researchers called a "significant amount" of cow milk products - enough to rule out minor or incidental contamination.

Human milk contaminated with cow milk may harm babies who are allergic to cow milk proteins, the researcher write. In past research, they found about a fifth of people buying human milk online were doing so for a child with a medical condition - some with formula intolerances.

Keim's group would like to see research into ways to increase breastfeeding support and improve access to nonprofit milk banks so women don't have to buy milk on the Internet.

Mothers who have difficulty making enough milk should work with their pediatrician to identify safe, healthy ways to feed their babies, she said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Walmart Exec: New Credit Card Design Won't Solve Fraud

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Smart card super macro , credit card chip
nobeastsofierce Banking/Alamy
There's been some hope that improved credit card technology might finally lead to greater security and a reduction of credit card fraud. One idea has been credit cards with embedded chips, which can encrypt data during transactions, according to Bank of America (BAC), making the process more secure.

But the basic technology, which is widely used throughout the world, is being introduced with a significant flaw in the U.S., as a Walmart (WMT) executive said at a conference, according to CNNMoney. The cut corner will turn the new implementations into a "joke," said Mike Cook, assistant treasurer and senior vice president at the company. The problem is banks that enable the chip technology will only require signatures, not the input of a PIN code.

"Signature is worthless as a form of authentication," Cook said during his presentation, as quoted by CNNMoney. "If you look at the Target and Home Depot breaches ... not a single PIN debit card needed to be reissued in those breaches. The card number was worthless to the individual thief and fraudsters, because they didn't know the PIN."

PINs, not Signatures

Using signatures instead of PINs, criminals could still commit fraud because verifying someone's signature from a central source is next to impossible. The use of PIN codes with chip cards in Europe has significantly decreased both counterfeit and stolen card fraud there, according to Mercator Advisory Group. But U.S. retailers have largely pushed for a chip and signature system, making the implementation "markedly different."

In the 1990s, when chip cards were first introduced, telecommunications costs in Europe were much higher than in the U.S. It meant retailers couldn't afford to process all credit card transactions online, as Mercator explained. Instead, they opted for a PIN system that would let them verify identity more securely through existing separate payment systems.

To add a PIN system in the U.S. now would force the banks and payment systems to do additional data processing, which would require expensive system upgrades and more data being moved during transactions. In addition, the banks don't want to add a hurdle to using credit cards. They make a lot of money from credit card fees and interest on accumulated balances. Executives are worried that if they make their cards less convenient to use, consumers might instead opt for cards from other banks.

The reaction is similar to one among retailers. Even as massive data losses -- whether at a Target (TGT), Home Depot (HD) or Sony (SNE) -- that can lead to identity theft and credit card fraud have become a regular experience, companies haven't significantly changed how they do business. It turns out that have retailers have little incentive to improve security, as CBS MoneyWatch reported, because the losses they face are tiny in the context of their annual sales. And, like the banks, they too worry that inconvenience might drive people to spend less, and push sales revenue down.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks End Higher on Reduced Rate Hike Worries

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Dow Starts Week Off With Sharp Gains, Closing Over 250 Points Higher
Andrew Burton/Getty Images
By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks rose Monday as expectations the Federal Reserve could hold off longer on raising interest rates offset concerns over Friday's surprisingly weak jobs report.

The jobs report was well below expectations, with data showing U.S. employers last month added the fewest jobs in more than a year.

The weekend allowed market participants to see the positive side of the weak Friday [jobs] number.

Underscoring the economic weakness, an ISM report Monday showed the pace of growth in the U.S. services sector fell in March to its lowest level in three months.

"The weekend allowed market participants to see the positive side of the weak Friday [jobs] number, which is that rates probably aren't going to rise very quickly," said Rick Meckler, president of investment firm LibertyView Capital Management in Jersey City, New Jersey.

The Fed is expected to raise rates for the first time in almost a decade later this year if the economy, especially the labor market, keeps improving.

The S&P utilities sector, which tends to outperform in low interest rate environments, rose 1.3 percent, making it among the best-performing sectors of the day.

The S&P energy sector, up 1.8 percent, led gains as U.S. crude oil futures jumped 6.1 percent after Saudi Arabia raised its price for sales to Asia and estimates for crude buildups fell.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) rose 117.61 points, or 0.66 percent, to 17,880.85, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) gained 13.66 points, or 0.66 percent, to 2,080.62 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 30.38 points, or 0.62 percent, to 4,917.32.

'Economy Remains Weaker'

The lackluster economic data also eased some concerns that the U.S. dollar would continue to strengthen and pressure the earnings of companies with international exposure.

"So far the data continues to suggest the economy remains weaker, not stronger," said Adam Sarhan, chief executive of Sarhan Capital in New York.

Adding to the day's bullish tone, New York Fed President William Dudley said the central bank will need to determine whether that jobs report foreshadows a more substantial slowing in the labor market, adding he expects the path of rate hikes to be "relatively shallow."

U.S.-listed shares of Amsterdam-based Uniqure (QURE) jumped 47 percent to $33.61 after a deal with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) to develop gene therapies for cardiovascular diseases.

Tesla Motors (TSLA) added 6.3 percent to $203.10 after it reported a 55 percent increase in deliveries in the first quarter.

Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by 2,217 to 836, for a 2.65-to-1 ratio on the upside; on the Nasdaq, 1,505 issues rose and 1,262 fell for a 1.19-to-1 ratio favoring advancers.

The benchmark S&P 500 index posted 24 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq composite recorded 74 new highs and 25 new lows.

About 6.2 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, matching the daily average for the last five sessions, according to data from BATS Global Markets.

-With additional reporting by Rodrigo Campos.

What to watch Tuesday:
  • The Labor Department releases job openings and labor turnover survey for February at 10 a.m. Eastern time.
  • The Federal Reserve releases consumer credit data for February at 3 p.m.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

3 Reasons I Procrastinate Filing My Income Taxes

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Businessman Playing with Paper Airplanes at Desk
Radius Images/Alamy
I hate April. More accurately I hate tax time. Like many Americans, I dread April 15th. The dread is my own doing, though. Every year I procrastinate filing my income taxes.

My wife is constantly nagging me to file our income taxes. But our taxes are complicated. We have multiple streams of income, a limited liability company, rental property income and a host of other items that make our taxes more complicated than most.

It doesn't help that I also have put off hiring an accountant or a tax professional to help me file my taxes. I have a feeling I'm not alone. Is there something fundamentally wrong with waiting to file my income taxes until the last minute?

I'm Scared I Will Owe Money

I've underpaid my tax withholdings before and owed taxes after filing my income tax return. It's not a fun feeling.

I'm scared that I will be one of the 25 percent of Americans who owe taxes at the end of the year. This is of course my own doing.

Thanks to side incomes, rental income and pet projects, I have variable monthly income. And of course I haven't been diligently setting aside money to pay the taxes on the amount that I've earned as an independent contractor.

One way to avoid this is to pay quarterly taxes. I should be doing this on top of the taxes withheld from my regular paycheck. But that leads into my next excuse as to why I procrastinate filing my tax return. I'm lazy.

I'm Lazy and Don't Want to File

It's inertia. Like Isaac Newton's first law of motion, objects at rest tend to stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force. The same is with my taxes. It's easier to stick my head in the sand and continue to hide.

I know that's not the right answer, but I'm lazy. Filing my taxes is boring, tedious work. And I'm a control freak. I have trouble turning over control and even my taxes to a professional. So, I choose to continue to do them myself.

This is true even though I have made mistakes on my tax forms in the past. You know that you've made a big mistake when Internal Revenue Service sends you an additional check out of the blue because it has caught mistakes you made. That actually happened to me a few years ago.

I've Been Deployed Serving in the Army

Another reason that I continually postpone filing my income tax return until the last possible minute is that my day job often finds me out of the country. I've been deployed four times while serving in the U.S. Army that have hampered my ability to file my taxes on time.

Or at least that's the excuse that I'm using. Being deployed allows me to file an extension for my tax return. And, like many soldiers, I've used the extension on occasion.

But this is another excuse and has only delayed the inevitable. The Army has made it easier than ever for soldiers to file their taxes. There are tax centers on every base. Military One Source has free online tax tools for service members use. My wife even has a power of attorney. But, here we are only a few days away from the tax deadline, and I still have not filed my income tax return.

Is It Such a Bad Idea Waiting to File?

Filing an extension or waiting until April 15th isn't too bad of a practice, though. The one drawback is that it delays you receiving an income tax refund -- if you get one.

A tax refund occurs when you overpay your taxes from your paycheck each month. Most financial experts equate it to giving the government an interest free loan.

Almost 75 percent of Americans earn an income tax refund. We have too much of our money withheld every year. Many of us overpay taxes on purpose to get a refund each year. My wife thinks of it like an annual bonus like you'd receive from your employer.

Your tax refund is yours. You've earned it, and you've paid too much in taxes to the government. That's why you're getting a refund. Who would put that money to a better use, you or the federal government?

One drawback to waiting to file is that it is harder to fine help in a timely manner if you need it. We're not alone waiting until the last minute. And because of that, most tax professionals and accountants are incredibly busy this time of year. If you find that you need help with your taxes in April, you may struggle to find someone who can help you right away. You may have to file an extension until you can get the professional help you need.

Adjust Your Withholdings This Year

The best way to avoid giving the government an interest-free loan is to adjust your monthly withholdings. Your goal should be to keep more money in your pocket each month and have a very small, if any, income tax refund at the end of the year.

According to the IRS, the average income tax refund in America is approximately $3,500. That's almost $300 per month that you could take home in your paycheck instead. Who couldn't use an extra $300 each month in his paycheck?

You can find a withholding calculator on the IRS website that can help you determine how many withholdings to claim to more accurately pay the taxes you owe throughout the year and shrink your income tax refund. You can submit a new W-4 to your employer anytime throughout the year.

I tell myself each year that I'm going to adjust my W-4 to withhold fewer taxes each year. And this just may be the year that I actually do it.

Are you like me and procrastinate filing your income taxes each year? What holds you back from filing early? Is it necessarily a bad thing to wait until the last minute?

Hank Coleman is the publisher of the popular personal finance blog Money Q&A, where he answers readers' tough money questions. Follow him on Twitter @MoneyQandA.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Build Your Own Personal Board of Directors for Your Family

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Businesswoman leading meeting in conference room
Getty Images
We all need a team on our side every now and then. You need help making decisions or even just bouncing ideas off of someone else. But we often don't know where to turn for help.

Corporations have boards of directors to help them make decisions and draft corporate strategy. You should do the same. Develop your own team of professionals to help guide you through life and the financial decisions you make for your family. Think of your certified financial planner, lawyer, certified public accountant and real estate broker as members of your personal board of directors.

Add a Financial Planner to You Team

We all need advice from time to time, especially about our finances. We need someone to reassure us that we are heading in the right direction, saving enough for our financial goals and making the best possible choices.

Whether you need a complete financial plan or simply want to make sure that your idea to invest in a Roth individual retirement account vs. a 401(k) retirement plan is a sound choice, having a financial planner on your team who you can turn to will help.

"I would recommend that, at a minimum, people find a CFP professional when putting together a team of trusted advisers," says Michael H. Baker, a certified financial planner with Vertex Capital Advisors in Charlotte, North Carolina. "A competent CFP can bring valuable insights into all areas of your financial life and potentially act as a coordinator amongst all of the professionals, which simplifies the process for clients."

Some financial planners charge an hourly fee, instead of a flat rate, which can make it easier for you to seek out their advice. A good financial planner should be the cornerstone of any family board of directors that you put together. Even if you only turn to him or her from time to time for guidance, you'll feel better knowing that you have such a safety net.

You can find a certified financial planner through the CFP Board of Standards, which sets the standards for the education, exam, ethics and other requirements for the designation.

Should You Have a Lawyer on Retainer?

I feel very lucky that my brother-in-law is a lawyer. I can, and have, turned to him for advice from time to time. Last year, he helped me understand the fine print of an employment contract that I was considering signing.

Not everyone has the luxury of having a family member who is a lawyer. That's one reason that you should have the name and number of someone that you trust before you need it. You don't want to be in pickle and have to settle on a random lawyer. Or you don't want to have to fish around for recommendations at the last minute when you're in a crunch. That's why it is critically important to already have a relationship with a lawyer before you need it.

"Usually when someone needs an attorney the situation has escalated to being a significant problem," says James Sullivan, an attorney from Nashville. "If you are in the market for a lawyer after something has happened, your bargaining power may be more limited because you are dealing with the strain of a legal issue and a faster timetable that can result in a larger legal fee."

Get a lawyer and have his or her card in your wallet. Get him on the team, save him or her for a rainy day, and hope that you never need to use the business card in your wallet. But, if you do, you'll be glad that you already have someone you can turn to.

"If you have a prior relationship with an attorney (either personally or professionally), you could likely ask their advice on simple issues at no cost," says Sullivan. "If you were to retain an attorney for advice, then you could likely negotiate a monthly retainer where you could pay a small monthly fee and be able to call in whenever you had questions."

An Accountant Saves Me Hundreds Each Year

I've found that my taxes get harder to file every year. As we get older, our financial situation changes, our family grows, and often our taxes become more complex. A good accountant pays for him or herself many times over.

I've recently become an accidental landlord, but I routinely lose money on my rental property. My accountant has helped me deduct those losses from my taxable income.

My accountant has saved me hundreds of dollars every year with tax-saving strategies that I never would have thought of. An accountant is an invaluable member of any financial team that you build for your family.

Real Estate Agent

Even if you are not in the market to buy or sell a home, having someone that you can ping with questions about real estate can be a huge help.

"I think it is an excellent idea to have a Realtor that you trust that you can consult with when you have real estate questions," says Nicholas Pasquini Jr., chief financial officer at Century 21 Redwood Realty. "Although a retainer fee is a nice idea that would ensure some clients access to real estate information when they need it, a true real estate professional is willing to offer this advice for free as part or their service. In my personal experiences, quality advice has always led to future sales and income."

I've turned to my Realtor many times even for things as simple as recommendations for landscapers, contractors, and the like. Whether your looking to start dabbling in rental properties, selling your home, or just looking to fix it up, a real estate agent can help provide you with valuable advice along the way.

Picking someone to help you with your finances or in a legal situation out of the Yellow Pages is always a bad idea. But it takes time to get recommendations for professionals from friends, family, and coworkers. You need to put together you family's financial team, your own personal board of directors, now before you need their help.

You never know when you'll need someone to give you advice until the decision is upon you. Then you're scrambling around to get recommendations for a lawyer, a real estate agent, or an accountant.

But it doesn't have to be that way. If you had your own personal board of directors, you would have a treasure trove of professionals to turn to for advice. Whether it is having someone on retainer, establishing a relationship, or simply having business cards in your wallet, it's a good idea to have trusted professionals on your side that you can turn to for help.

Do you have a lawyer on retainer? Do you have a CPA or CFP that you can turn to? Have you ever thought about building your own financial advice team to help guide you along the way?

Hank Coleman is the publisher of the popular personal finance blog Money Q&A, where he answers readers' tough money questions. Follow him on Twitter @MoneyQandA.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The ABCs of ZZZs: Your Guide to Buying a Mattress Online

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Buying Bed Mattress and Sofa, Hand Touching Furniture while Shopping
Liza McCorkle
By Susan Johnston

Anyone who's visited a mattress showroom knows the dizzying variety of options available: plush or firm, memory foam or innerspring, platform bed or box spring. Each store often carries mattresses with different model numbers, so apple-to-apple comparisons can be all but impossible. And, when you tally up the final cost -- including delivery and setup, box spring and bed frame, accessories like a mattress cover and removal of an old mattress -- it can easily stretch into the thousands of dollars. It's more than enough to keep a budget-conscious consumer up at night.

Several online startups and other retailers are working to change the way we shop for mattresses. Casper.com, for instance, sells one type of mattress (starting at $500 for a twin) and offers free shipping to the U.S. and Canada, along with a 100-night trial. If you're unhappy with the mattress during those first 100 nights, Casper will pick up the mattress at your convenience and refund your money. Depending on local regulations, they donate or recycle the unwanted mattresses, according to CEO and co-founder Philip Krim.

Another online retailer, Tuft & Needle, offers a 30-night trial. "Lying on a bed for 30 seconds or a minute doesn't really tell you much about that mattress," Krim says. "You can avoid all that online." Casper has mattress showrooms in New York and Los Angeles, but Krim says most customers buy the mattresses sight unseen. Tuft & Needle has its own showroom in Phoenix.

The Best Fit for You -- or Both of You

Experts urge consumers to rest test their mattress before buying, and unfortunately not all online retailers have this option. "It's not just an investment in your home furnishings, it's an investment in your health," says Mary Helen Uusimaki, vice president of marketing and communications for the Better Sleep Council, the consumer education arm of the International Sleep Products Association.

"We suggest that consumers get down and lie on the bed. Your preferences and your physical needs are different. The mattress that is right for you is not going to be the mattress that's right for me. It's a big investment, and if you get the wrong one, it's not like a pair of pants that are a little tight." Medical professionals agree that mattresses are not a one-size-fits-all proposition.

"There is very little scientific evidence demonstrating that one type of mattress is better than another," says Ilene Rosen, an associate professor of clinical medicine for the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine and a member of the board of directors for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. "The best mattress for you is the one that helps you achieve seven to nine hours of uninterrupted nightly sleep."

Choosing the right mattress can be especially challenging for couples. "What I do recommend to patients whose needs or comfort differs from their bed partner's," Rosen says, "is to try a bed with personal dual options -- a bed that can be customized for the comfort of each person -- or push together two twin beds that meet the individual needs of each bed partner."

Aside from giving you the chance to test mattresses before buying, brick-and-mortar stores also give you the chance to negotiate on price, something you can't easily do online. "There's usually more room for haggling if you purchase from a showroom than if you purchase online," says Nick Robinson, editor and publisher of Sleep Like The Dead, an independent sleep product review website. However, he adds that many online retailers offer more competitive prices so you may still come out ahead without haggling.

A Few More Tips
  • Read online reviews. Krim encourages consumers to read online reviews before buying a mattress online. "That's one of the beautiful things about the transparency that the Internet provides," he says. Reviews shouldn't be the only factor that consumers consider, but looking at aggregate ratings can give you a barometer, Robinson adds. Beyond the top star ratings, look for reviews that align with your needs. "When reading customer reviews, make sure to look for mattress descriptions that suit your preference," Rosen says. "Determine what attributes are important to you -- firm, soft, etc. -- and find a mattress that meets your needs."
  • Go beyond the retailer's website. Before buying, check out the retailer's Facebook page and Twitter feed, and see if they're registered with the Better Business Bureau. A few consumer complaints aren't necessarily a deal-breaker -- after all, some consumers are just chronic complainers -- but watch how and if the retailer responds. Does it try to resolve the issue promptly? Or, does it delete or ignore negative comments? Robinson says social media is "a really powerful transparent lens that isn't in place for a lot of traditional stores."
  • Check the return policy. Regardless of how or where you buy a mattress, it's important to check the retailer's return policy because even mattresses that have been rest-tested in a store may not be comfortable for a full night's sleep. "Some will require you to take the mattress to, say, your local UPS outlet, whereas others will arrange that someone will come and pick it up," Robinson says. Also, check if you'll get a full refund for returns or if there are any fees deducted from what you paid. "How is it processed?" Uusimaki asks. "Are there going to be charges? Is there going to be a restocking fee?"
  • Decide what to do with your existing mattress. Many municipalities won't take bulky items like mattresses as part of regular trash pickup, so you may need to arrange for a donation or disposal if you're not keeping your old mattress. Your mattress retailer may be able to take away your old mattress for you, but often for a fee.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Erase Your Carbon Footprint for $9 a Month! What's the Catch?

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

wind turbines  at sunset
majeczka/Shutterstock
"You can make a difference. Sign up for our GoGreen Indiana program, and you'll help: add green energy to the power grid, keep CO2 out of the air, reduce dependence of fossil fuels, build more green energy resources."

That's the promise that Duke Energy (DUK) made to its customers in a mailing last year. According to the electricity giant, by voluntarily adding $1.80 more to your monthly electric bill, Indiana residents can buy "two 100-kilowatt-hour (kWh) blocks of green power." That's enough power, says Duke, "to offset the carbon emissions of about 20 percent of your home's energy use."

It's an attractive promise, and it holds the potential to become even more attractive -- but it also contains the risk of confusing Duke customers, and not only in Indiana. In addition to Hoosiers, Duke is making similar offers to customers in Ohio and Kentucky, and in North and South Carolina as well. But what exactly is Duke promising?

The Promise of a Greener Tomorrow...

Through GoGreen and its sister programs, Duke invites customers "to buy more blocks of green energy, and have an even bigger impact" than the initial 20 percent "offset" in carbon emissions. If you examine the fine print of this program, you'll discover that Duke is actually selling the ability to help it buy Renewable Energy Certificates, which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says represent "the property rights to the environmental, social and other non-power qualities of renewable electricity generation." You're essentially paying a bit extra to add the environmental benefits of green power to your bill, on top of your usual bill for power, period.

Each REC represents the "green" attributes of 1,000 kWh (one megawatt-hour) of renewable energy. The $1.80 that Duke charges Indiana customers to buy 200 kWh actually thus buys you only 20 percent of one REC. To buy a whole REC would cost five times more -- $9 a month, or about $108 per year.

That's not necessarily a bad thing. After all, if $1.80 buys you "green power" equal to "20 percent of your home's energy use," then $9 should buy you 100 percent. In theory, that should turn your entire electric bill "green," as if you had used nothing but green, renewable energy to power your home for the month. Thus, promises the utility: "It's easy to help support renewable energy through Duke Energy's GoGreen Indiana program."

... for Just $9 a Month

That certainly sounds easy. Simply check a box online and add $9 to your electric bill. Solve global warming with one click.

But consider: According to a U.S. Energy Information Administration report for 2013, the average cost of a home's electricity use in Indiana (and nationwide) is about $110 a month. Adding $9 to that electric bill, to pay for one full REC credit, increases the cost by 8.2 percent. If that were all it cost to buy clean, green, renewable energy, as opposed to "dirty energy" that contributes to global warming, chances are that a lot of consumers would be willing to pay the premium. Even if those $9 just bought the environmental benefits of not using dirty energy, offsetting the damage of burning hydrocarbons to power our homes, that would probably sound like a good deal to environmentally conscious homeowners.

But data from the government, and even from green energy advocates such as WattsUpWithThat.com, suggest that the true cost of green energy is significantly higher than the 8.2 percent premium that Duke is charging.

How much more? In the Frequently Asked Questions section of the GoGreen site, Duke Energy admits that "green power produced from renewable and environmental sources costs more than traditional power." But asked in an email to be more specific, and if in particular it cost 8.2 percent, Lew Middleton, senior communications consultant at Duke, was only able to say that it "depends on the source and is difficult to quantify."

So let's help with that.

Citing data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, WattsUpWithThat.com notes that in the United States in 2012, green energy derived from solar and wind power, two of the more popular "green energy" sources, cost significantly more than electricity produced by burning clean natural gas. Solar power cost more than 20 times the equivalent amount of energy produced by a natural gas-fired power plant, for example. Wind power was 11 times more expensive than gas. Granted, Duke is right that there are other sources of green energy, such as hydroelectric and geothermal, and that the costs of these multiple sources vary. But combined, the two marquee green energy sources of solar and wind average roughly 12 times the cost of electricity from a natural gas power plant -- a 1,085 percent difference, rather than 8.2 percent.

The Upshot for Homeowners

The idea that by paying $1.80 a month you can buy "two blocks of renewable energy" and offset the carbon footprint of "20 percent of your home's energy use" -- or pay $9 to go 100 percent "green" -- sounds too good to be true. And the data suggests that it probably is. The true cost of going green is probably a whole lot more than Duke is charging. That's a real disappointment for fans of green energy, who might have wanted to sign on to the program, willing to bear a somewhat higher cost of electricity in the interests of "saving the planet."

What's even more disappointing, though, even if this promise could be fulfilled, is that according to Duke Energy's Middleton, out of a total of "800,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers in a 23,000-square-mile service territory in 69 of [Indiana's] 92 counties," at last count just over 1,300 customers have signed up. Which suggests that when offered a chance to pay up to convert the economy to sustainable, renewable, "green" energy -- customers just aren't interested.

No matter the cost.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report for one great stock to buy for this year and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


3 Reasons You're Not Buying the Apple Watch This Month

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Apple Event
Eric Risberg/AP
The time has come for Apple (AAPL) to reinvent the way that it tells time. The world's largest consumer tech company begins taking orders for the Apple Watch on Friday. It will hit stores two weeks later.

There are plenty of reasons it should be a hit. It's a product that piggybacks on the success of the iPhone, Apple's hottest product accounting for more than two-thirds of its sales. Apple's latest mobile operating system update even plants an Apple Watch icon in every updated iPhone.

However, there are also plenty of reasons to worry about Apple's chances to hit it out of the park right away. Let's go over a few of the things that may keep you from wrapping an Apple Watch around your wrist later this month.

1. The Battery Life Is Weak

One of the biggest knocks revealed during last month's unveiling is that the watch will require nightly charges. Apple's March preproduction tests show that an Apple Watch paired up to an iPhone has a battery life of 18 hours under normal conditions.

Folks may be used to charging their smartphones every day or every other day, but it may be a tall order when it comes to a piece of wearable jewelry. After all, the selling point for fitness bracelets is that they hold their charges for several days, allowing them to be worn through the night to monitor sleeping patterns. That won't be the Apple Watch. The original smartphone -- Pebble Watch -- can last as long as a week between charges.

It also bears pointing out that more active users will need more than just nightly charges. Apple's 18-hour day consists of 90 time checks, 90 notifications, 45 minutes of app use, and a 30-minute musical workout. It's hard to fathom anyone checking the time 90 times a day, but there will certainly be people going through a ton of notifications and spending more than 45 minutes on smartwatch apps.

2. The Price Is High for a Nonessential Gadget

No one "needs" an Apple Watch, and it's not cheap. Forget the high-end 18-karat-gold $17,000 model. Even the low-end $349 is pretty pricey in the realm of smartwatches. The only company that has been successful in the smartphone niche starts its price range at $99, and most of the Android devices that initially hit the market close to $349 can be had for a lot less these days.

Apple deserves a market premium, of course. However, it's going to be hard to justify $349 for an Apple Watch when even an iPad mini or a subsidized iPhone can be had for at least $100 less than that.

One can argue that the iPad succeeded despite being more expensive than rival tablets, but that happened over time. It didn't hit the market when there were much cheaper Android rivals already available, but that's what is happening now with smartwatches.

3. Apple Will Put Out a Better Model Soon

Everyone has pretty much figured Apple out. It will update its products with better versions every year, and if it's not selling well it may put out the next generation even sooner. That could very well happen here, and if the market starts to speculate that Apple will roll out a cheaper Apple Watch or one that has a more reasonable battery life or even a more seamless charging solution, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Folks don't care when it comes to the iPhone, since wireless carriers in this country subsidize the devices, so it makes a point to upgrade every two years. However, consumers apparently tired of the perpetual obsolescence of Apple's nonsubsidized mobile gadgetry, since iPad and iPod sales have been declining for more than a year.

Early adopters may not mind spending $349 for the original Apple Watch, but mainstream consumers might wait until the kinks get worked out -- and likely so will you.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Backyard Chickens, Cuteness Included

$
0
0

Filed under:

Homes-Ready For Chickens
Charles Dharapak/AP
By Lars Peterson

At a Safeway in Southern California, chicken egg prices range from $3.29 to $6.09 per dozen. At the top end are cartons labelled "organic" and "free-range," suggesting happier hens, better feed and, ultimately, better tasting and more nutritious eggs. At the bottom end are cartons labelled "large," suggesting little more than big, cheap eggs.

In California, egg producers are now required to provide each hen a cage big enough to allow her to spread her wings -- about twice as much room as the industry standard -- which makes eggs destined for the California market 35 to 70 percent pricier than elsewhere, Ronald Fong, CEO of the California Grocers Association, told NPR. Out-of-state producers have brought a lawsuit in federal court in an attempt to end this requirement -- or at least not have it apply to them.

All of that is to note that one of the drivers of the recent boom in small, backyard egg layers is humanitarian concern for hens in factory farms. Following a big salmonella outbreak in 2011, egg safety has become a concern, too. Other factors include the trend toward locally produced foods, a growing do-it-yourself movement and the sheer novelty of raising three or six chickens at home.

But What About the Cost?

A number of backyard egg advocates have crunched the numbers -- and sadly, this is not a money-saving endeavor for most. Cost per dozen of backyard eggs ranges from about $3 for non-organic free-range eggs to $6 and up for organic.

Feed is by far the biggest expense, but it takes money to start a backyard flock, house it, feed it, provide it with fresh straw or wood chips for bedding and protect it from predators. The average hen's egg production peaks at one year and declines until she stops producing altogether at four or five years. At that point, the rancher can continue to house and feed the non-laying hen (recouping none of those costs via eggs) or slaughter her for chicken soup. Unless the backyard rancher is capable of this, that's another cost.

Add it all up, and there's no question about it. Grocery store eggs, even the high-priced organic free-range variety, cost less than home grown for all but the most efficient ranchers. Given that the economics do not favor the backyard flock, here are a few reasons why people still do it:
  • Backyard, free-range eggshells are more colorful. Hens that forage for bugs and grubs, grasses and clovers produce eggs in a variety of colors. Backyard hens reward their owners with white eggs, brown eggs, speckled eggs and even blue eggs. Every day is Easter.
  • Backyard eggs look and taste better. Because of the forage, table scraps and generally high quality feed backyard ranchers offer their flocks, the yolks are brighter. In addition, fresh eggs feature yolks that stand up better and whites that resist beating. Most aficionados claim backyard eggs taster better. Some testers agree, while others -- including researchers who work in the egg industry -- do not.
  • Backyard eggs are more nutritious. According to a 2010 study by Pennsylvannia State University's College of Agricultural Sciences, eggs from pasture-raised or free-range hens have about half as much cholesterol as factory-produced eggs, twice as much vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids and 38 percent more vitamin A.
  • Backyard hens live happier lives. Backyard hen husbandry is not without its cruelties. Few backyard ranchers desire roosters, which means hatcheries have to rid themselves of unprofitable male chicks; hens may meet violent ends due to predators or butchers. Nevertheless, the life of a free-to-roam backyard hen is far happier than that of a factory hen crammed into a narrow cage in a dark room.
  • Backyard flocks teach lessons about agriculture and responsibility. From farm economics to avian behavior, a backyard flock has plenty to teach. In addition to a strong work ethic, children given the responsibility of raising hens have to learn to make decisions, set goals and perhaps even experiment with different tools, techniques and practices.
  • Backyard flocks are entertaining. Most backyard egg ranchers describe their flocks as funny and entertaining to watch as they scratch and forage. Some even describe their hens as affectionate pets. Seen that way, maybe it's unfortunate that a cheerful flock also produces a commodity and must do so profitably. After all, few of us expect our pet dogs and cats to pay us back in anything other than joy and companionship.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Berkshire Buys Nearly 10% Stake in Axalta for $560 Million

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Power Lunch
Adam Jeffery, CNBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty ImagesBerkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) will pay $560 million for a nearly 10 percent stake in Axalta Coating Systems, which has seen its stock rise more than 36 percent since it went public last fall.

Axalta makes high performance coating systems for use on vehicles and in industrial markets.

Axalta Coating Systems said Tuesday that Berkshire will pay $28 each to buy 20 million shares of Axalta from the private equity firm The Carlyle Group (CG), which will still hold a 45 percent stake in the Philadelphia company after the sale. Berkshire's price is a slight discount to the stock's closing price of $28.33 Monday.

Axalta won't receive proceeds from the sale.

Berkshire owns companies in several industries including utilities and energy, freight rail transportation and insurance. It agreed not to dispose of Axalta's shares for 90 days after the sale is completed, and Axalta will provide Berkshire with certain registration rights after that 90-day window.

Carlyle Group took Axalta public last November with an initial public offering of 50 million shares. Its stock closed at $20.75 on its first trading day.

Axalta (AXTA) shares rose $1.87, or 6.6 percent, to $30.20 in morning trading. Its shares are little changed over the past year.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

It's Astonishing How Far Disney Is Going to Bury the X-Men

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

X-Men   X-Men   Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) *** Local Caption *** 2000  20th Century Fox
United Archives GmbH/AlamyHugh Jackman as Wolverine.
By Gus Lubin

At first it seemed coincidental that the X-Men were fading in popularity, while the Avengers were rising. Then there was a conspiracy theory that Marvel, which was bought by Disney in 2009, was downplaying the mutant superheroes because their film rights were owned by 20th Century Fox.

After all, X-Men comics of the past decade have featured the decimation of the mutant population, a negative portrayal of the team in a big crossover in which they battled the Avengers, the death of star hero Wolverine, and the retconning of two popular characters to cut their ties to the X-Men. Meanwhile, the number of X-Men series and licensed products declined.

The theory was all but confirmed last summer, with reports that Disney forbade the creation of new X-Men characters and with senior vice president of publishing Tom Brevoort telling a fan: "If you had two things, and on one you earned 100 percent of the revenues from the efforts that you put into making it, and the other you earned a much smaller percentage for the same amount of time and effort, you'd be more likely to concentrate more heavily on the first, wouldn't you?"

Movies Matter More Than Comics

It's understandable that Disney would do this. As Alex Abad-Santos pointed out at Vox, "The Avengers" earned around twice as much in the box office ($1.5 billion) as the entire North American comic market in 2013 ($870 million). In other words, movies matter a lot more than comic books. Still, it's a shame to see the company squelch such a rich creative property -- one that has millions of fans and thousands of official or unofficial co-creators -- for cold, commercial reasons.

Now the more you look, the more you'll see just how much Disney is burying the mutants, even while continuing to publish several X-titles to keep fans from freaking out.
  • On marvel.com, you'll find few prominent mentions of the X-Men. The top stories on the site right now feature Daredevil, the Avengers, Hawkeye, Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, Spider-Man, Spider-Gwen, and the Agents of SHIELD. Marvel owns the exclusive film rights to most of those characters, along with rights to its own versions of Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch and a profit-sharing deal for Spider-Man with film rights-holder Sony.
  • Marvel's shop page includes only three X-Men items in a list of 60 featured-product picks.
  • Marvel's subscriptions page features more than 50 titles, and only four star characters from the X-Men.
  • Marvel's movies page prominently features the Disney movies, and only by clicking the "All" tab and scrolling to the bottom can you find Fox's movies.
  • Games like Marvel's "Mighty Heroes" apparently don't have any X-Men.
The Power Team of the '90s

The disappearance of the X-Men is astonishing given how big they used to be. Wolverine, Professor X, Storm, Gambit, Cyclops, Jean Grey, Magneto and company were popular going into the '90s and blew up after the launch of a Fox Kids cartoon in 1992. This was followed by wave after wave of X-Men action figures, X-Men lunch boxes and everything else, more video game appearances than any character but Spider-Man, hundreds of characters, a bunch of spinoff teams and many, many comics.

The group represented something inspiring as genetic outsiders who rise above bigotry, and they were edgy and exciting, with wildly complex and imaginative story lines.

Even "Avengers" director Joss Whedon has acknowledged that the X-Men are Marvel's best characters (and he's written a great X-Men series himself). As he told "In Focus" in 2005 -- with comments that would later seem ironic -- "The thing about the X-Men is they have a coherent core. The Avengers to me is tough. I wouldn't approach The Avengers, I wouldn't approach the Fantastic Four. The X-Men are all born of pain, and pain is where I hang my hat."

Decline Over the Years

To see how popular the mutants used to be, look at the top comics in 1991, per Comichron, when an X-title topped the charts in six different months. X dominance only grew for the next decade, with the mutants winning seven months in 1994, nine months in 1998 and a stunning 11 months in 1999.

But things started going downhill. X-titles won only two or three months in 2002. They won only one month in 2003, three in 2004. In 2005, they didn't win any months, except for a universe-wide "House of M" crossover issue that featured the X-Men prominently and an issue of the newly launched "New Avengers" that featured Wolverine on the cover.

In 2007, Marvel beat DC for the top comic in every month, but none were X-titles (though two had Wolverine on the cover). And that's been the status quo ever since, with universe-wide crossovers starring the Avengers sharing top billing with Spider-Man, while the X-Men languish on the bottom shelf.

What's Next for the Mutants?

Disney recently sidestepped its standoff with Sony, which was widely thought to be bungling the Spider-Man movies; however, it may have a harder time winning concessions from Fox, which has been building a promising movie universe of its own, even without much comics and merchandising support.

Disney is supposedly promoting the Inhumans -- humanoid alien characters whose film rights it owns -- as replacements for the X-Men, with an Inhumans movie scheduled for 2019. But it will take a lot more than that to get fans to forget some of the best characters Marvel ever created.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Microsoft Might Finally Have a Hot Tablet: Surface 3

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Germany's CeBit Tech Show
Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesMicrosoft's Surface Pro 3 tablet computer was displayed a at German tech show in March.
It took three years and three generations of hardware, but Microsoft (MSFT) may finally be getting it right with its new tablet. The world's largest software company is introducing Surface 3 next month. Unlike the original Surface RT and the Surface 2 that followed, Surface 3 won't be fueled by Microsoft's poorly supported Windows RT.

Surface 3 -- like the pricier Surface Pro models before it -- will run the same version of Windows that most consumers know and enjoy as the Microsoft experience. That's a big distinction, and pricing the new tablet at $499, the same as earlier RT-powered tablets, should make it far more successful than the Surface RT and Surface 2.

Microsoft finally did what it should have done three years ago, and while there will be a price to pay for betting on RT for too long, it's better to see the company finally get it right than to never get it at all.

The Fall and Fall of RT

Microsoft's initial foray into tablet hardware was doomed from the start. The Surface may have had some innovative features like the magnetically attached keyboard cover and snapping kickstand, but the new operating system was never going to fly.

You need software and developer support to woo mainstream users, especially if you want to sell a tablet that at $599 was more expensive than the entry-level iPad and far pricier than the vast number of dirt-cheap Android devices. Developers, naturally, don't want to waste their time putting out their popular apps in fringe operating systems. Microsoft was able to talk a few major developers into supporting RT, but at the end of the day it was stuck with a tablet that did little that other tablets or even Windows PCs could do.

A couple of price cuts and improving features helped Surface 2 improve on the original's sales, but it still left Windows in all flavors a distant third to Android and Apple's (AAPL) iOS. Microsoft was running out of options, and it finally did the right thing in abandoning RT in favor of the more conventional Windows for its entry-level tablet.

It Might Be Too Late

The sad note to this otherwise upbeat development is that Microsoft may be too late. Even Apple -- the company that ushered in the era of tablets with 2010's introduction of the iPad -- has suffered year-over-year declines for several quarters.

Consumers have largely tired of tablets. As smartphones get bigger and tablets get smaller, it's less necessary to own two devices. Why spring for an iPad mini when a slightly smaller iPhone Plus 6 can do the same thing? Just 76.1 million tablets shipped worldwide during the holiday quarter, according to industry tracker IDC. This is the first time that tablets have posted a year-over-year decline.

Microsoft $499 price may also be too high in light of Android tablets that can be had for as little as $100, but it doesn't really have much of a choice. If it prices Windows tablets too cheaply, it could start to eat into the sales of Windows desktops and laptops. So, yes, Surface 3 should be Microsoft's most successful tablet ever next month. Unfortunately for Microsoft, it may not be enough.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images