Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

The Time to Refinance Your House Is Right Now

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

The Time to Refinance Your House Is Right Now
By Jim Gold

If you've wondered about refinancing your home, this is definitely the moment to look into it. If you're like many other American homeowners, locking in a lower interest rate right now could save you thousands. The housing market is recovering and mortgage rates are still in the basement.

But interest rates won't stay that way forever and already are creeping up from historic lows. "Mortgage rates dropped sharply at the end of 2014, breathing new life into the refinance market," Leonard Kiefer, deputy chief economist at Freddie Mac, said in a recent analysis. Refinances made up about 52 percent of single-family home loan originations in 2014.

"Borrowers who refinanced in 2014 will save on net approximately $5 billion in interest over the first 12 months of their new loans," he reported. For the first time since 2009, the median appreciation of a refinanced property in 2014 turned positive, meaning that over half of all borrowers who refinanced saw their home equity increase since taking out their original loan, Kiefer said.

Save Thousands of Dollars

For those refinancing in the fourth quarter of 2014, the average interest rate reduction was about 1.3 percentage points. On a $200,000 loan, that translates into mortgage interest savings on average of about $2,500 during the next 12 months, Kiefer said. In February 2015, according to Freddie Mac, the average interest rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was 3.71 percent, up from 3.61 percent a month earlier.

The February rate still was considerably lower than it was six years earlier, in February 2009, when mortgages averaged 5.13 percent. Six years is the average age of a loan refinanced, Freddie Mac says.

The monthly payment on what was a typical $165,000 mortgage in 2009 would have been $899, according to an HSH.com refinance loan calculator. If you refinance now for the remaining balance of $148,460 for 24 years (the rest of the original loan's term), the 1.52-percentage-point difference in the rate would mean a new monthly payment of $779, or a savings of $120 a month, if there were no costs associated with the loan. Adding typical loan refinancing costs of about $2,970 would make the payment $795, still a monthly savings of $104, or nearly $30,000, over the life of the new loan.

Shorter Loans Another Possibility

About one in three homeowners refinancing in 2014 took out shorter-term loans, allowing them to pay down principal and build home equity faster than on their previous loans, Kiefer noted. That tactic should save you money in the long term, but your monthly payment could go up.

The average rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage in February was 3.01 percent, Freddie Mac reported. With no closing costs, refinancing the $148,460 balance on your 2009 loan would boost your monthly payment to $1,026, or $127 more a month than the original $899 payment. But over the next 15 years, you would pay a total of $184,680, or $74,232 less than the $258,912 total you'd pay for the next 24 years if you never refinanced. The 15-year loan refinancing still would be $39,672 less than the $224,352 total you'd pay if you refinanced the balance for 24 years at $779 monthly.

Either way, your house would be paid off nine years sooner, and the money you spend on mortgage payments could be redirected toward investing, kids' college bills or even a vacation. The key is paying less interest through shorter terms or lower rates.

"There are two ingredients to the best possible mortgage rate: having stellar credit and shopping hard," according to the Money Talks News Mortgage Solutions Center.

Yellen Says Interest Rates Could Rise This Year

Time may run out soon to make a great money-saving deal on your mortgage refinancing. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said on March 27 that an increase in the central bank's key federal funds rate could come later this year. The Fed has maintained a near-zero federal funds rate - the amount banks charge each other for overnight loans - for more than six years to help the United States economy recover from the Great Recession. An increase "will influence the borrowing costs faced by households and businesses, including the rates on corporate bonds, auto loans, and home mortgages," Yellen said.

Fed Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer, speaking to the Economic Club of New York on March 23, said, "it is widely expected that the rate will lift off before the end of this year, as the normalization of monetary policy gets underway."

Even though Yellen and Fischer didn't say when rates would rise, borrowers anticipating a rate hike are rushing to lock in lower interest rates now. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly survey for the week ending March 20, the Refinance Index increased 12 percent from the previous week. Although Freddie Mac expects the refinance share to be about 40 percent in 2015, the MBA says refinancing has been running around 60 percent of total applications.

If you're underwater on your mortgage, look at the Home Affordable Refinance Program, a federal refinance program, advises partner website hsh.com.

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Most Taxpayers Plan to Use Their Refund to Pay Down Debt

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Item number:  92347801Files with labelsCollection:  Image Source (RF)Title:  Files with labelsLicense type:  Royalty-freeRe
Jupiterimages

What do you plan to do with your tax refund? Do you have your eye on some new furniture or a relaxing vacation -- or do you plan to use your refund to pay for the furniture that you already purchased and the vacation that you have already taken?

Of course, paying down debt is the more responsible path. According to a recent poll by The National Foundation for Credit Counseling, a majority of Americans plan to take that more responsible path with this year's tax refund. Of the 1,121 respondents, 68 percent indicated that they would use their refund to pay down debt, while only 2 percent said they would use the money to take a vacation or go shopping.

In other poll responses, 15 percent plan to use the refund for basic necessities, 11 percent plan to save the money, and another 4 percent are not sure how they plan to use their refund.

In some ways, this is good news, because paying down debt should be the highest priority choice if you do not have to use your refund for necessities. The foundation is looking at the poll from the overall debt perspective by pointing out that over six times as many respondents are applying their tax refund to debt compared to savings. According to foundation spokesman Bruce McClary, "These poll results indicate that debt is still getting in the way of personal savings for many Americans."

Most Respondents Think Responsibly

For perspective, consider that the average 2014 individual tax refund was $3,034 while the average 2014 credit card debt was $5,047. Applying every bit of tax refund money toward debt would knock the average debt down by over half, but still leave the average American with over $2,000 in debt.

A shift toward debt repayment is a welcome conclusion for the foundation and similar credit/debt counseling agencies. Merchants and economists may find this statistic alarming, since consumer spending drives the majority of the U.S. economy. However, there are two things to keep in mind when assessing this poll.

  • Intent: The poll is saying what people plan to do with a tax refund this year, not what they did with a tax refund. Sometimes, plans go out the window when a check is burning a hole in your pocket.
  • Location: The poll was conducted through the home page of the foundation website. Therefore, anybody who sees the poll question at all has taken the time to contact a website regarding credit counseling. It may be possible that the poll respondents have more pressing debt to deal with and have a more responsible attitude about paying it down, compared to the general public. Psychology may also play a part -- you may expect paying down debt is the "right" answer in the context of a credit-counseling website.

We suspect that if this poll were taken later to find out what people actually did with their tax refund and was an actively random survey of Americans, the responses would probably diff. However, the recent drop in gas prices and the resulting spending patterns do suggest a more conservative trend. People are applying their gas savings toward increasing their savings accounts and paying down debt instead of simply going on spending sprees, so it is logical to assume the same thing will occur with tax refunds.

In any case, to us this poll reflects good news. Reduction of debt is almost always a positive thing. Let's hope debt reduction really is a trend.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Some Firms Already Using Wearable Tech in Cool Ways

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

AOL
By Arjun Kharpal

Cloud consulting firm Appirio and Blueberry Home Solutions, a plumbing, heat and air-conditioning company, are two very different firms with one thing in common: They have both started using wearables in the workplace.

Wearable technology has been the focus of intense attention recently, from Google Glass to the April launch of the Apple Watch. And businesses have begun seeing uses for the devices, but in many different ways.

British company Blueberry Home Solutions manufactures a hub that can monitor gas and oil consumption and provide you with the bill in real-time. It is developing a device called the Blueberry Hub which can be used to control the home's boiler and other appliances via a smartwatch.

But for now, the company has been using smartwatches in-house for research and development. The company's lab is about 10 miles away from their office just outside of London. Blueberry Home Solutions has made an app that can control lab testing remotely and be controlled via the smartwatch removing the need for an engineer to be onsite.

"The wearable was just an exciting new avenue for us because ultimately a wearable is again about flexibility. ... Wherever they are and whatever time of the day it is (they) ... are able to interact," Alistair Smith, managing director of Blueberry Home Solutions, said.

A number of major technology companies tout the benefits for business of their wearable tech, includingMicrosoft's augmented reality headset called HoloLens to Sony's SmartEyeglass. Developers have even started working on enterprise apps for devices such as the Apple Watch.

How Do Employees Benefit?

Studies suggest that workers are open to the idea of being provided wearables by their employer, provided there was some sort of benefit for them. Just under half (44 percent) of U.K. employees would be happy to use a piece of wearable technology provided by their employer and allow the employer to collect data from it, according to a study of 2,023 adults by PwC. This figure rises to 56 percent if there are benefits such as flexible working hours and free health screenings.

One company is trying to do just that. U.S.-based Appirio, a firm which helps companies transition to the cloud, has provided Fitbits to those employees that want one. Through this, employees can track their fitness, upload the data onto the company's internal social media platform, see their peers' fitness goals and issue challenges.

Tim Medforth, senior vice president of Appirio, claims the scheme has helped productivity as well as maintain the company's reputation as a cutting-edge tech firm. "We're a fast-growing services company and we want to attract the best and brightest technologists on the planet and to do that we want to be a great place to work so that's a lot about having a fun employee experience," he said, adding that about 50 percent of the company's global workforce is using Fitbits and because health data can be tracked, it has led to a reduction in the firm's insurance premium.

Privacy and Security Concerns

But along with this comes privacy and security concerns. Around 40 percent of U.K. workers don't trust their employer to not use the data collected against them in some way, PwC's study found. And experts told CNBC that wearables have introduced a further cybersecurity threat into the business, opening a new hacking front for attackers.

Vincent Geake, a technology specialist at Deloitte, said companies could find fitness schemes "short-lived" due to "substantial" privacy issues and "less clear" benefits. He said workers are more likely to bring in their own devices which are more private rather than accept a company device.
Geake added that virtual reality technology might have a bigger impact on businesses than wrist wearables.

"Virtual reality is going to be essential when we see robotics and autonomous vehicles making an impact in the workplace," Geake said. "There is a real benefit to those devices. They will come through and that will be more transformational."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Would Concierge Medicine Offer the Right Health Care for You?

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Doctor In His Office Holding A Clipboard
Valpazou
When my stepfather passed away at home late last year, his primary care physician, Dr. Stephen Cornwell, was the first person I called. That's not all that unusual, but here's what was.

Not only did the doctor answer right away -- I had dialed his personal mobile number -- but he was at the house a short time later to help with the necessary arrangements, and he stayed late into the night to make sure my mother was OK. He didn't need directions -- he had already been by once that day and had visited weekly in the months prior.

Direct phone access to your physician? Frequent house calls? My own doctor has a three-month wait for annual check-ups, so it got my attention.

The personalized, in-home care my stepfather received during his illness was invaluable, and a lifesaver for my mother -- and it's all thanks to a relatively new trend in medical care: concierge medicine.

What Is Concierge Medicine?

There are a number of different related terms, all with varying levels of service and cost -- you may have heard about direct primary care or retainer medicine -- but basically, concierge practices charge an annual or monthly fee in exchange for increased access to the physician and other services.

These vary by practice. For example, Dr. Cornwell's practice, Northern Virginia Family Practice, charges $1,250 to $1,500 a year for a range of benefits that include an annual wellness exam, same-day or next-day appointments, access to your doc via cellphone and online and even medical care for visiting family.

Some practices work much like what you are probably used to -- each visit requires a co-pay and is then billed to your insurance company or to Medicare. Others do not work with insurance and require patients to pay out of pocket for visits. These costs are often discounted or covered at least in part by the membership fee.

What Are the Benefits?

How long did you spend with your doctor on your last visit? According to The Atlantic, on average, new doctors might spend as little as eight minutes with each patient. And in addition to being rushed, your doctor is likely stressed-out and unhappy -- according to Concierge Medicine Today, more than half of the doctors surveyed have considered quitting.

Concierge medicine offers a better solution for many physicians. Thanks to the fee they charge, concierge doctors are able to limit the number of patients they accept to provide better service. This can include longer appointment times, house calls, and closely coordinating with specialists.

"Now I practice medicine the way I did in the 1980s when my visits were 30 minutes long," Kansas City doctor Marie Delcambre, MD, tells Concierge Medicine Today. Atlanta-based physician Daniel Jaul, MD, enjoys treating patients outside the office: "Seeing patients in their own home has great value in and of itself, especially when you see kids."

Patients benefit from the short wait times, more face time with their doctor, and when necessary, home visits and phone or online consultations. Coordinated care is a definite bonus for those who also see specialists. During my stepfather's illness, he saw two oncologists and required several hospital stays, all overseen by Dr. Cornwell's office.

Is a Concierge Doctor Right for You?

For the relatively healthy, concierge practices don't make much sense. I only see my physician once a year, if that, and my kids haven't needed much more than an annual checkup so far, so for our family, the cost of a concierge doctor just isn't worth it.

Those who have chronic illnesses, frequent injuries, or are simply getting older and need more care may want to consider it if they can swing the fee. The same goes for those who are relatively well-off and are willing to pay up for convenience.

If you're interested, MDVip.com, a network of physicians who offer this type of care, is a good place to start. You can search by ZIP code to find doctors in your area who are accepting patients. Concierge Choice Physicians offers searches by state.

Here are a few key questions to ask:
  • How much is the membership fee and what is included?
  • Does the practice bill insurance and/or Medicare or do patients pay for services out of pocket? If it's out of pocket, ask to see a list of common charges.
  • How many patients does the practice have?
  • What options are available for you to communicate with your doctor -- email, cellphone, etc.?
You will also want to consult with a tax adviser -- fees paid to concierge doctors are sometimes tax-deductible or can be covered by a Flexible Savings Account, depending on what services are included.

Robyn Gearey is a Motley Fool contributor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Click here to check out The Motley Fool's free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Meet Your New Travel Partner: Google

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

takeoff plane in airport
Policas/Shutterstock
We're used to visiting Google's (GOOG) (GOOGL) search engine to hunt for information about nearly everything -- how to say "thank you" in Mongolian, the latest happenings with the Kardashians, the marital status of our first girlfriend or boyfriend, etc.

But with a recent revamp to one of its sites, the Internet giant is fast becoming part of the conversation about another busy corner of the online world -- travel.

Gflights

Google took the wraps off its new Flights site this past February, revealing a spiffy offering loaded with features for would-be travelers.

Among other things, there's an expandable map tagged with a series of ticket prices, which change when dates in a pair of calendar dropdowns above are modified. Once you choose a destination, clicking on a calendar itself displays the lowest-priced ticket for that destination on every day in the selected month.

Once destination and dates are selected, Google's engine often displays tips on how to get a lower price.

On the home screen, bordering the map, is a series of attractively-priced deals on tickets for popular destinations from the user's nearest airport (assuming you have location sharing turned on).

The usual filters for trip searches (number of stops, price limit, duration of trip, etc.) are readily available. All in all, Google has done a good job with Flights; it's clean and uncluttered, very intuitive, and quick to provide the needed information.

An Expensive Ticket

Google Flights has been evolving for quite a while. In 2010, Google inked a $700 million deal to acquire ITA Software. The company's flagship software solution QPX, in ITA's words, allows clients to "quickly, consistently and accurately identify the best available airfares."

The acquisition was controversial at the time, not least because Google already had an irritating tendency to feature its own ITA-powered results at the top of searches for flights made through its famous search engine. At least, that was the contention of several big players in the online travel industry, including Expedia (EXPE), Kayak -- now owned by Priceline Group (PCLN) -- and Sabre Holdings (SABR). These companies formed a lobbying group, FairSearch.org, in part to fight the acquisition.

Although they didn't win the battle, they might have influenced the Department of Justice's ruling on the matter. The DOJ approved the merger, but required Google to continue to license ITA's software to rivals "on commercially reasonable terms," and mandated that the Internet giant put safeguards in place to prevent it from accessing competitors' "sensitive information."

These days, Kayak is still listed as a client on the rechristened ITA Software by Google's website, as is Orbitz Worldwide (OWW) -- soon to be a unit of Expedia if a recent buyout clears antitrust approval by the DOJ. Carriers such as Alaska Airlines (ALK), American Airlines (AAL), United (UAL), and Delta (DAL) are also ITA customers.

Crowded Skies

Google's new and improved Flights is yet another competitive hurdle that competing online travel agencies will have to clear.

At the moment, the two big companies are Priceline and Expedia, both of which have been busy acquiring assets. Expedia's aforementioned deal to acquire Orbitz -- announced earlier this year -- will cost it a princely $1.6 billion, while Priceline paid $2.6 billion to acquire restaurant reservation site OpenTable last year in the latest of a series of buys.

The shopping sprees are due to recent developments in the market. Over the past few years, it's come under pressure from the very suppliers the agencies use to provide the flights, hotel rooms, and travel packages they offer. The suppliers have become adept at getting customers to book directly on their websites, luring them with exclusive deals and promotions not available through the agencies. Effectively, they're cutting out the middlemen.

At the same time, every week seems to witness the birth of a new niche travel website or mobile app. Look at the success of slick DIY lodging booker AirBnB, for example, or state-of-the-art online agency Hipmunk.

Billions in the Air

Companies like Google are spending a great deal of time, effort and money on their online travel efforts because there's a lot at stake. According to comScore, the overall e-travel industry now brings in over $100 billion annually. Even a small increase in market share can be worth billions.

The new Google Flights site is very clearly designed with the end user in mind. It isn't perfect -- its alert system for price changes is fairly clunky, for instance -- but it's fast, powerful, and convenient. And it will certainly give the Pricelines, Expedias, and smaller agencies in the online travel business a real run for their money.

Motley Fool contributor Eric Volkman has no position in any stocks mentioned, and misses the days when he traveled frequently. The Motley Fool recommends and owns both Google (A and C shares) and Priceline Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Ask Stacy: Should I Try Multilevel Marketing?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Shutterstock
Jirsak/Shutterstock
By Stacy Johnson

Ever consider trying to make some extra money -- or even a living -- working with Amway, Nu Skin, Herbalife or some other multilevel marketing company? If so, you're not alone. Here's this week's question:

"I've recently seen a renewal of direct selling -- specifically Amway and it's products. What intrigues me is that this isn't the same Amway that I was approached by about 20 years ago -- it's online shopping, shipping directly to the consumer. While the organization appears to function the same, I'm wondering if this new method of product delivery would lend to a more successful business?

"Can you recommend specific things that people should be looking for, or asking (and what answers denote good vs. bad opportunities) when considering joining something like this? Any other advice or reality checks that people should give thought to before jumping on the MLM, direct-sell or IBO (independent business owners) bandwagon?" - Jade

In multilevel marketing, Wikipedia says, "the sales force is compensated not only for sales they personally generate, but also for the sales of others they recruit, creating a downline of distributors and a hierarchy of multiple levels of compensation. Other terms for MLM include pyramid selling, network marketing and referral marketing."

The Benefits of the Pyramid

In short, the ultimate goal of network marketing isn't to sell products. It's to recruit enough people for your downline so you'll make a living from their efforts rather than your own.

I've been solicited for various multilevel marketing programs many times over the years. Most recently, an acquaintance tried to get me to attend a meeting for a network marketing company offering a cash-back shopping card. Because I could theoretically use TV and the Web to reach and recruit hundreds of thousands of people -- and he'd be making money from all of them -- I guess he figured I'd be the perfect person to have in his downline.

But I've never considered joining any network marketing company and never will. That doesn't mean you shouldn't; do whatever makes you happy. But tread cautiously, because there's a lot of hype and broken promises in these businesses. I'm not going to speak to Amway or any other specific company, but here are some things to consider:

Do You Love Sales?

Many people consider sales a sleazy way to make money. That's understandable, because there are a lot of sleazy salespeople who employ sleazy sales tactics to separate you from your money. As far as I'm concerned, however, sales is an honorable profession. I've been a salesman for more than 30 years: 10 as a stockbroker and 25 selling my news series to TV stations.

If you've never tried sales, let me assure you it's not easy. You have to reach people, then convince them they need what you're offering. You'll be regarded skeptically, because some on the receiving end of your pitch will think you're trying to enrich yourself at their expense.

So if you're going to sell something, make sure you can take rejection. But most important, make sure what you're selling really has value. Because unless you're a sociopath, you'll never be successful selling something that doesn't.

Are You Willing to Approach Your Friends?

While network marketing doesn't require you to sell to friends and acquaintances, it's often done that way. This is the chief reason I'll never do it. In my opinion, attempting to sell anything to your friends is sleazy, plain and simple.

Back in my stockbroker days, I became friends with one of my co-workers who wasn't a good enough salesman to make it. Months after he left the firm, he called and invited me to lunch. Looking forward to catching up, I agreed to meet him at a local Denny's. But as soon as pleasantries were exchanged and lunch ordered, he launched into a spiel for Amway. It continued uninterrupted until I slammed my car door. I never saw or spoke to him again.

If you're looking to reduce your list of friends, treat them like marks. Try to persuade them to become salesmen who work for you.

Are the Promises Realistic?

One reason that people hold salesmen in low regard is they tend to make self-serving statements and false promises.

I once attended a big multilevel marketing meeting at the behest of one of my stock brokerage clients. It was more like a tent revival than a business meeting, with person after person taking the stage to wild applause after waving around the giant checks they were receiving monthly, courtesy of their downline.

The next day, the visiting head of the organization called me at my office. The pitch: Because he had directly and indirectly enrolled so many people in his downline, he was now getting $100,000 monthly checks with no effort. Didn't I want to make that kind of money? I replied by asking him exactly how many people he needed in his downline to make that much. When he told me, I whipped out my calculator.

The details are sketchy -- it was a long time ago -- but as I recall, in order for all the people in this guy's downline to make the same money he was making, they would have had to enroll more people than there were in the state. And if those new recruits used the same $100,000 promise when they signed up their recruits, they'd be required to enroll more people than there were in the United States. And if the next layer down wanted to make $100,000 a month, they'd have to sign up more people than there were on the planet.

Network sales often involves those at the top of the pyramid convincing the newcomers at the bottom they can make the same money they do, something that's highly unlikely.

More Questions to Ask

The FTC has a page about multilevel marketing that has some additional questions you should ask:
  • How many people have you recruited?
  • How long have you been in the business?
  • How much time did you spend last year on the business?
  • How much money did you make last year -- that is, your income and bonuses, less your expenses?
  • What were your expenses last year, including money you spent on training and buying products?
  • What percentage of your sales were made to distributors?
  • How much product did you sell to distributors?
  • What are your annual sales of the product?
  • What percentage of the money you've made -- income and bonuses less your expenses -- came from recruiting other distributors and selling them inventory or other items to get started?
The Bottom Line

There are a lot of passionate believers in network marketing, and as a result I expect a lot of negative comments to this article. So let me reiterate: I'm just listing reasons I personally don't like this method of selling and suggesting you invest thought and research before you invest time and money. Recruiting meetings are pumped with emotion, and it's easy to get swept up. Use your head, not your heart.

At the end of the day, network marketing is just another way to distribute products and services. It's sales. There are tons of companies doing it, and there are no doubt tons of people who have had positive experiences with it. But because this road is littered with hype and broken promises, tread very carefully.

This column originally appeared on Money Talks News. Got a question you'd like answered? You can ask a question simply by hitting "reply" to our email newsletter. If you're not subscribed, fix that right now by clicking here. The questions I'm likeliest to answer are those that will interest other readers. In other words, don't ask for super-specific advice that applies only to you. And if I don't get to your question, promise not to hate me. I do my best, but I get way more questions than I have time to answer.

Stacy Johnson founded Money Talks News in 1991. He earned earned a CPA (currently inactive), and he has also earned licenses in stocks, commodities, options principal, mutual funds, life insurance, securities supervisor and real estate. Got some time to kill? You can learn more about him here.

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Top 1% Pay Nearly Half of Federal Income Taxes

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

AARM94 Wedge of one hundred dollar bills  Money; Casinos; Gamble; Gambling; Winnings; Losing; Stakes; Pot; Jackpot; Dollars; Cur
Alamy
By Robert Frank

The top-earning 1 percent of Americans will pay nearly half of the federal income taxes for 2014, the largest share in at least three years, according to a study.

According to a projection from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the top 1 percent of Americans will pay 45.7 percent of the individual income taxes in 2014 -- up from 43 percent in 2013 and 40 percent in 2012 (the oldest period available). The bottom 80 percent of Americans are expected to pay 15 percent of all federal income taxes in 2014, according to the study. The bottom 60 percent are expected to pay less than 2 percent of federal income taxes.

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.

Progressive Tax Code

The high share of taxes paid by 1 percenters is due partly to their share of income, but also to the progressive tax code, in which higher earners generally pay higher rates. The 1 percenters' share of taxes is 2.7 times their share of income in taxes.

There is no comparable historical data for the 1 percenter tax payments prior to 2012. Yet the Congressional Budget Office, using a different calculation than the center, found that the share of federal taxes paid by the top 1 percent of earners has increased dramatically since 1979 as the 1 percenter's share of earnings has also gone up. In 1979, the top 1 percenters earned 8.9 percent of pretax income and paid 18 percent of federal income taxes. In 2011, the top 1 percent earned 14.6 percent of income and paid 25.4 percent in 2011 of federal income taxes. The CBO said that the average federal income tax rate paid by the top 1 percent has also dropped since 1979 -- falling from 22.7 percent in 1979 to 20.3 percent in 2011.

Whatever the measure, the numbers show just how dependent the U.S. has become on the earnings of the wealthy. The U.S. is more dependent on the income tax than other countries, with 37 percent of total government revenue coming from the income tax, compared with 24 percent in other countries. Those countries depend more on consumption taxes and other sources of revenue.

With U.S. income taxes more dependent on the wealthy -- and those incomes more dependent on the stock market -- the U.S. government should hope for a continued rise in stocks to keep its coffers full.

The story originally appeared on CNBC.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Government Proposes Rules for Brokers on Retirement Accounts

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Couple signing contract
Rob Daly/Getty Images
By MARCY GORDON

WASHINGTON -- Brokers who manage Americans' retirement accounts may soon be required to put investors' interests first under new restrictions proposed by the U.S. government.

The Labor Department on Tuesday opened the rules to public comment for 75 days. The Obama administration has put its weight behind the move. Against a backdrop of intense opposition from the financial industry on an earlier proposal, administration officials took pains to reassure the industry that the new framework wouldn't end the way brokers do business or prohibit them from receiving commissions or other fees.

The proposal would provide "guardrails but not strait jackets" for protecting Americans' retirement investments, Labor Secretary Thomas Perez said in a conference call with reporters.

The changes would put brokers -- who sell stocks, bonds, annuities and other investments -- under the stricter requirements for registered financial advisers.

Fierce debate and lobbying over the proposal is expected.

The stricter rules could alter the types of investments a broker recommends to you for your retirement account. Their advice could move away from riskier investments. And a broker will have to tell you when they have a conflict of interest regarding a financial product -- like receiving fees -- that could prevent them from putting your interest first in recommending it.

'Flexibility'

A legally binding contract with customers would require brokers to act in their best financial interest. Officials said brokers would have "flexibility" in how they're paid, so long as they exercise a fiduciary duty toward their clients. If an investor believed that their broker or investment adviser violated the contract, he or she would be entitled to pursue action in arbitration.

Fiduciaries, such as doctors or lawyers, are obligated to put their clients' interests first.

Brokers buy and sell securities and other financial products on behalf of their clients. They also can give financial advice, with one key requirement. They must recommend only "suitable" investments based on the client's finances, their age and how much risk is appropriate for him or her. So they can't pitch penny stocks or real estate investment trusts to an 85-year-old woman living on a pension, for example. But brokers can nudge clients toward a mutual fund or variable annuity that pays the broker a higher commission -- without telling the client. Brokers don't have to disclose that potential conflict of interest.

Registered investment advisers, on the other hand, are fiduciaries, considered by law to be trustees for their clients. That means disclosing potential conflicts as well as fees they receive and any previous disciplinary actions against them. They must tell a client if they, or their firm, receive money from a mutual fund company to promote a product. And they have to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission, opening them to possible close inspections and supervision.

'Important Step'

The proposal "updates the rules to crack down on ... conflicts of interest in retirement advice that are costing working and middle-class families billions of dollars every year," Obama said in a statement. "A central goal of middle-class economics is helping responsible American families retire with security and dignity after a lifetime of hard work, and today's action by the Department of Labor is an important step toward that goal."

The new requirements wouldn't apply to brokers taking direct buy or sell orders from customers without providing advice.

Without time to have pored over the fine print of the proposal, Wall Street's lead lobbying group reserved judgment.

"We want to ensure it protects investor choice and doesn't unnecessarily reduce access to education or raise costs, particularly for low- and middle-income savers," Kenneth Bentsen, president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said in a statement.

A coalition of consumer, labor and civil rights groups called SaveOurRetirement called the proposal "a major victory for consumers that will help bring millions of Americans one step closer to a secure, dignified retirement."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


5 Things to Know About Tax Day: For Most, It's Not That Bad

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

tax day concept. 15 april 2015...
Shutterstock
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON -- Wednesday is the deadline for filing income tax returns, a day long associated with the dread of rushing to fill out complicated forms and, perhaps, making a payment to Uncle Sam. But for most, it's not that bad. Aside from the complicated forms, tax season generates $300 billion in tax refunds each year, a significant boost to the U.S. economy. Five things to know about Tax Day:

1. Majority of Taxpayers Get Refunds

The Internal Revenue Service has received more than 99 million tax returns as of April 3, and about 78 percent of them have qualified for refunds. Average refund: $2,815. The IRS expects to process 150 million returns by the end of the tax season. So far, more than 90 percent have been filed online.

2. Chances of Getting Audited Are Slim

Last year, the IRS conducted the fewest number of tax audits in a decade, and the number could be even lower this year, said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. He blames budget cuts. Congress has cut the agency's budget by $1.2 billion since 2010.

The number of audits dropped even as the number of tax returns went up. As a result, fewer than 1 percent of tax returns were audited last year. But rich people beware: Your chances of getting audited go up as your income rises. Last year, the IRS audited 7.5 percent of returns filed by taxpayers making more than $1 million.

3. April 15 Isn't Much of a Deadline If You're Owed a Refund

The IRS doesn't like to talk about it, but penalties for filing late federal tax returns apply only to people who owe money. The penalty is a percentage of what you owe. If you owe nothing, there is no penalty.

But it doesn't make much sense to file late if you are owed a refund. And beware -- if you have unpaid taxes, the late fees add up quickly. The failure-to-file penalty is generally 5 percent of your unpaid tax bill for every month, or part of a month, you are late. It kicks in on April 16. In general, the maximum penalty is 25 percent of your original tax bill.

There also is a penalty for failing to pay your tax bill, separate from the penalty for failing to file at all, but it's much smaller. That's because the IRS wants you to file a return even if you don't have enough money to pay your bill. The failure-to-pay penalty is 0.5 percent of your unpaid taxes for every month, or part of a month, you don't pay.

4. Health Law Makes Tax Day More Complicated for Some

This was the first tax season that regular folks grappled with the complicated connections between President Barack Obama's health care law and the tax system. For about three-quarters of taxpayers, all they had to do was check a box on their tax return indicating they had health coverage for all of 2014. For the rest, there was some head-scratching.

This was the first year uninsured people faced fines collected by the IRS. And those who got tax credits to help pay premiums last year had to file a convoluted new form to show they got the right amount.

The Obama administration fumbled when the Department of Health and Human Services sent out tax reporting forms with erroneous information on premiums to hundreds of thousands of people. Officials disclosed the problem and set about correcting the mistakes.

5. Looking Ahead

The end of tax filing season doesn't mean everyone can relax. Tax preparation company H&R Block says many people who received tax credits to help pay for health insurance premiums apparently are unaware that they need to file a return. If they don't, they may not be able to renew their tax credits this fall for health coverage in 2016.

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

EU Charges Google in Internet Search Antitrust Case

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Europe Google
Virginia Mayo/APEuropean Union's competition chief Margrethe Vestager speaks Wednesday at a media conference regarding Google at EU headquarters in Brussels.
By Julia Fioretti and Alastair Macdonald

BRUSSELS -- The European Union accused Google on Wednesday of cheating competitors by distorting Internet search results to favor its shopping service, and launched another antitrust investigation into its Android mobile operating system.

Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said the U.S. tech giant, which dominates Internet search engines worldwide, had been sent a Statement of Objections -- effectively a charge sheet -- to which it can respond. She also said other probes into Google's business practices would continue.

I am concerned that the company has given an unfair advantage to its own comparison shopping service, in breach of EU antitrust rules.

"I am concerned that the company has given an unfair advantage to its own comparison shopping service, in breach of EU antitrust rules," she said. "If the investigation confirmed our concerns, Google would have to face the legal consequences and change the way it does business in Europe."

The Commission, whose control of antitrust matters across the wealthy 28-nation bloc gives it a major say in the fate of global corporations, can fine firms up to 10 percent of their annual sales, in Google's case up to $6.6 billion.

If it finds that companies are abusing a dominant market position, the EU regulator can also demand sweeping changes to their business practices, as it did with U.S. software giant Microsoft (MSFT) in 2004 and chipmaker Intel (INTC) in 2009. Its record antitrust fine was 1.09 billion euros on Intel.

Asked whether she was ready to go as far as fining Google, Vestager told a news conference: "It is very important that every road is open -- first when it comes to commitments but also when it comes to the other road, at the end of which is a fine."

Google (GOOG)(GOOGL) now had an opportunity to explain itself, she said, and the case might be settled by the company making further commitments to change its products.

Of the formal investigation into Android, used on smart phones and tablets, Vestager said: "I want to make sure the markets in this area can flourish without anticompetitive constraints imposed by any company."

'Key Player'

In its first reaction, the Mountain View, California-based company said in a blog post that it strongly disagreed with the EU's statement of objections and would make the case that its products have fostered competition and benefited consumers.

"Android has been a key player in spurring this competition and choice, lowering prices and increasing choice for everyone (there are over 18,000 different devices available today)," it said of its free operating system for mobile devices.

Vestager, a Danish liberal who took over the politically charged EU competition policy dossier in November, announced the moves on the eve of a high-profile visit to the United States. Her findings following nearly five years of investigation and abortive efforts by her Spanish predecessor, Joaquin Almunia, to strike a deal with Google.

The focus on the ranking of searches for shopping sites -- Google has its own service called Google Shopping -- didn't address all complaints lodged with the Commission by competitors, large and small, in Europe and the United States, which say Google has hurt their business.

Vestager stressed her antitrust staff would continue to investigate other areas of concern, including alleged "web scraping" to copy rivals' content, and restrictive practices on advertising.

She stressed the EU regulator didn't seek to change Google's screen design nor the mathematical algorithms it uses.

Google initially has 10 weeks to respond to the charges and can demand a hearing. A final resolution -- quite possibly involving court action if Google doesn't choose to settle -- is likely to take many months and probably years.

Critics Welcome

Google's critics welcomed the decision to pursue the U.S. giant, though many industry experts believe the action is unlikely to markedly shift existing business their way. Rather, by firing a hefty shot across Google's bows, it may favor competitors in new areas as technology develops.

That has been a priority for the new European Commission led by Jean-Claude Juncker, which wants to promote a more dynamic digital market in Europe and foster home-grown enterprises.

Juncker is also pressing for a free-trade treaty with Washington to bolster growth and Vestager has stressed she isn't seeking to penalize American firms or large companies -- merely to avoid abuses of dominant market positions.

Vestager's action won cross-party endorsement in the European Parliament. In a statement headlined "Even Uncle Google must play fair," German lawmaker Manfred Weber, floor leader of the largest conservative group, said: "Internet is not the Wild West -- there are rules on the web that must also be respected."

Long Time Coming

French Socialists Pervenche Beres and Virginie Roziere applauded the Commission for "at long last" taking action against "the threat posed to the European economy" and renewed their call for the breakup of Google.

President Barack Obama accused the EU in February of taking a protectionist stance against the U.S. tech industry.

American domination of the Internet and other new technology sectors has prompted a mixture of admiration and anxiety in Europe in an echo of similar mixed feelings about reliance on U.S. military might for security against a resurgent Moscow.

However, many of the firms that have complained to Brussels to challenge Google's business practices in Europe are themselves U.S. companies, such as Microsoft and Expedia.

The Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace, an alliance of businesses, applauded the Commission for taking what it called "decisive action to end Google's years of abusive behavior in its long-running antitrust case."

Germany, backed by major companies in the EU's biggest economy, has been particularly vocal in pressing the Commission to act against Google.

'Shoddy Compromise'

Axel Springer chief Mathias Doepfner told the German media group's shareholders in Berlin on Tuesday that Almunia's efforts to negotiate a deal with Google would have been a "shoddy compromise" and praised Vestager for being "more determined, quicker and more true to the facts."

Almunia, who launched the initial probe in 2010, last year yielded to pressure from Germany and others to abandon a deal he had been favoring to settle the case.

Google has put forward three proposals to resolve the case. Most recently, just over a year ago, it offered to give competing products and services bigger visibility on its website, let content providers decide what material it can use for its own services and make it easier for advertisers to move their campaigns to rivals.

Almunia initially accepted that deal, only to reverse his decision six months later and demand more concessions, leaving the ultimate decision to his successor.

Microsoft has been hit with total EU fines of more than 2.2 billion euros ($2.34 billion) over the past decade.

-With Additional reporting by Francesco Guarascio, Tom Koerkemeier, Robert-Jan Bartunek, Robin Emmott and Paul Taylor in Brussels, Klaus Lauer in Berlin, Eric Auchard in Frankfurt and Foo Yun Chee; writing by Alastair Macdonald and Paul Taylor.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Industrial Production Posts Biggest Drop Since 2009

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Industrial Production
Keith Srakocic/APA worker welds parts in fans for industrial ventilation systems at the Robinson Fans plant in Harmony, Pa.
By Lucia Mutikani

WASHINGTON -- U.S. industrial output posted its biggest drop in more than 2½ years in March in part as oil and gas well drilling plummeted, highlighting the negative impact of lower crude prices and a strong dollar on the economy.

The dour report Wednesday from the Federal Reserve was the latest sign that growth slowed sharply in the first quarter and suggested the U.S. central bank could delay raising interest rates until later this year.

Snowy winter weighed on activity early in 2015. Labor disruptions at normally busy West Coast ports, as well as the dollar and softer global demand have been a constraint.

This provides some confirmation on the disappointing growth performance in the first quarter.

"This provides some confirmation on the disappointing growth performance in the first quarter. The absence of a lift in the other forward-looking indicators suggests that the U.S. economic recovery is struggling to regain any traction," said Millan Mulraine, deputy chief economist at TD Securities in New York.

Industrial production fell 0.6 percent after edging up 0.1 percent in February, the Fed said. March's decline was the largest since August 2012 and was worse than economist expectations for only a 0.3 percent drop.

A 17.7 percent plunge in oil and gas well drilling pulled mining production down 0.7 percent in March, marking the third straight month of declines in mining output.

Crude oil has lost more than half of its value since last June, resulting in a sharp drop in well drilling activity. Companies in the oil field are also either postponing or cutting back on capital expenditure projects.

Separately, the Fed in its Beige Book report of anecdotal information on business activity collected from contacts nationwide said investment in oil and gas drilling had declined and related layoffs were reported by "multiple" regions.

Caterpillar (CAT) early this year cut its 2015 profit outlook and warned lower oil prices would hurt its energy equipment business.

Last month, utilities production tumbled 5.9 percent, also weighing on industrial production.

"We do not see the emerging picture as supporting the hand of those who have been arguing for an earlier Fed rate hike," said Anthony Karydakis, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak in New York.

Most economists have pushed back their expectations for the first rate hike to either September or October from June. Others believe monetary policy will only be tightened in 2016. The Fed has kept interest rates near zero since December 2008.

Data including for retail sales, housing starts, inventories, trade and manufacturing suggest the economy grew at a sub-1.5 percent annual rate in the first quarter after a 2.2 percent pace in the October-December quarter.

U.S. Treasury prices rose as the data supported bets the Fed was likely to wait longer to raise rates. Stocks rose while the dollar fell against a basket of currencies.

Weak Manufacturing

For the first quarter, industrial production declined at an annual rate of 1.0 percent, the first quarterly decrease since the second quarter of 2009.

Oil and gas well drilling and servicing, which tumbled at a 69.8 percent rate, accounted for the bulk of the drop in industrial output in the first quarter.

While manufacturing output ticked up 0.1 percent in March, the first gain since last November, it fell at a 1.2 percent rate in the first quarter, the first decline since the second quarter of 2009.

The soft trend could persist for a while. In a separate report, the New York Fed said its Empire State general business conditions index fell to -1.19 in April from March's 6.90. This was the first negative read for the index since December.

The weakness in manufacturing, which accounts for about 12 percent of the economy, has been attributed to the buoyant dollar, bad weather and supply chain disruptions from the ports dispute.

Softer growth in Europe and Asia, especially China where the economy expanded at its slowest pace in six years in the first quarter, has also been a drag.

The dollar has gained 13 percent against the United States' main trading partners since last June, which economists say is equivalent to a 0.5 percentage point interest rate hike.

"The dollar's strength may be taking some of the oomph out of factory production, which had been on a tear until December last year," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank in New York.

"Time will tell whether this is real weakness or simply a bump on the road to prosperity. Our guess remains the economy comes back strong later on this spring."

Companies such as Microsoft (MSFT) and Procter & Gamble (PG), the world's largest household products maker, and healthcare conglomerate Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) have warned the dollar will hit sales and profits this year.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How to Make Your Workout Gear Last -- Savings Experiment

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Make Your Workout Gear Last
Attention, exercise lovers. There are ways to wash your workout gear that will help them smell better and last longer. Here's how.

The first thing to do is use less detergent. While this may sound counterintuitive, excess soap can build up on tech fabrics like Spandex and Lycra and develop a coating over time. This residue can make them even more water resistant and harder to get fully clean.

Usually, filling the cap one-third to one-half of the way is more than enough to get the job done. Fabric softener creates build-up as well, so skip it entirely.

When it comes to drying, avoid using your dryer if you want to preserve the integrity of your tech fabrics. Instead, turn them inside out and hang dry them, preferably in the sun, which acts as a natural bacteria deterrent.

Give these tips a try, to keep your workout gear fresh and clean, without straining your budget.

View Poll

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Beech-Nut Baby Food Recalled Over Fear of Glass Fragments

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Mother feeding baby, close-up
Steven Errico/Getty Images
By Ellen Wulfhorst

NEW YORK -- Federal food inspectors have announced the recall of 1,920 pounds of sweet potato and chicken baby food made by Beech-Nut Nutrition, saying it may be contaminated with small pieces of glass.

The problem was discovered after Beech-Nut received a complaint from a consumer who found a small piece of glass in the product, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service said Tuesday in a statement.

Outside of this single report, we have no indication that any other jar of our Classics Stage 2 Sweet Potato & Chicken is affected...

Beech-Nut, based in Amsterdam, New York, also learned of an oral injury associated with consumption of the product, it said.

"Outside of this single report, we have no indication that any other jar of our Classics Stage 2 Sweet Potato & Chicken is affected, but as a company of parents and families we are acting with an abundance of caution," Beech-Nut said in a statement.

The 4-oz. glass jars containing "Stage 2 Beech-Nut CLASSICS sweet potato & chicken" were produced on December 12, 2014.

They bear the establishment number "P-68A" inside the USDA mark of inspection, show an expiration date of "DEC 2016" and include product numbers "12395750815" through "12395750821."

Beech-Nut, which is owned by Swiss-based Hero Group, said it was encouraging customers to return the recalled product to the store where they purchased it for a refund or exchange.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Seattle CEO to Cut His Pay So Every Worker Earns $70,000

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Facebook, Dan PriceGravity Payments CEO Dan Price.
SEATTLE -- For some companies, Seattle's new $15 minimum wage law isn't doing enough to help workers.

The CEO of Gravity Payments, a Seattle-based company that processes credit-card payments, told his employees this week that he was taking a pay cut so they would earn a base salary of $70,000, to be phased in over three years.

Dan Price's announcement surprised everyone at a company meeting, Seattle television station KING reported. He says his pay cut is worth it to make the company's more than 100 employees happy and to build loyalty.

"I think this is just what everyone deserves," Price told workers.

Earlier this month, Seattle's minimum wage law went into effect, which will eventually raise base hourly pay to $15. It's phased in more quickly for big companies than small ones: Large businesses and national chains had to raise their minimum wage to at least $11 an hour when the law took effect April 1, while smaller businesses now must pay at least $10.

Washington state already has the nation's highest minimum wage at $9.47 an hour.

People in the Seattle area rallied Wednesday for wage increases as part of national protests. Drivers for Uber and Lyft -- the app-based car-hailing services -- planned to gather in the Pioneer Square neighborhood, while airport workers were expected to rally at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

For Gravity Payments employee Alyssa O'Neal, who will more than double her salary once the company's policy is implemented, says she will use the extra money to buy a house for her young family.

"House, absolutely. I have this goal of being a 21-year-old homeowner, and I'm going to reach that now, and I'm stoked," O'Neal said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Neiman Marcus Sells Real Fur as Fake, Complaint to FTC Says

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Exteriors Of A Neiman Marcus Store As Company Files Files An IPO
David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Looking for a woman's boot with a faux fur trim? Neiman Marcus had a model called the Taryn Rose, at least in March, for $213, according to a screen grab provided by the Humane Society of the U.S. Just one problem: The faux fur was anything but. The boot came with a label that indicated the trim as "dyed and treated real fur from rabbit," according to an image sent to DailyFinance from the society.

The purchase was the latest in a series of market checks that the organization conducts. Earlier this year, Amazon was caught treating real fur as fake, as DailyFinance reported. Now the online operations of upscale retailer Neiman Marcus have come under the spotlight. The organization this week filed a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, claiming the company has violated a consent order it earlier entered into with the FTC over previous incorrect labeling of real fur as faux.

The HSUS has amassed evidence that Neiman Marcus has recently sold fur garments that are falsely and misleadingly advertised and labeled as faux fur when, in fact, the garments include real animal fur. This evidence indicates that Neiman Marcus engaged in these practices after the date of entry of the [previous] Consent Order, which "permanently restrained and enjoined" Neiman Marcus from ... "falsely or deceptively advertising any fur product by misrepresenting...[t]hat the fur in any fur product is faux or fake."

DailyFinance requested an interview with Neiman Marcus but did not receive a response before publication.

HSUS had delayed in publicizing Amazon's issue to give the retailer "ample opportunity to rectify the problem and demonstration how they intended to prevent such misrepresentation in the future." There was no such delay in this case between allegedly detecting the problem and going to the FTC.

Long History Between Society and Neiman Marcus

"Neiman Marcus is such a notoriously bad actor when it comes to selling real fur as faux that as this point we go straight to the Federal Trade Commission," Pierre Grzybowski, research and enforcement manager of the society's fur-free campaign, told DailyFinance. According to Grzybowski, the society's interactions with Neiman Marcus go back to at least 2007 and cover a series of incidents in which the retailer supposedly represented real fur as fake.

In 2013, the FTC ordered that retailers Neiman Marcus, DrJays.com and Eminent were "prohibited, for 20 years, from violating the Fur Act and the Fur Rules, including misrepresenting that real fur is fake or faux." Neiman Marcus neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

Grzybowski said that one reason manufacturers substitute real fur for fake is cost. "Animal fur trim especially, can easily cost less to the manufacturer than high-quality faux fur," he said. "It's impossible for us to say in any given instance why real fur is being misrepresented as faux fur, but generally speaking it's likely a combination of some intentional misrepresentation, especially at the manufacturing level, and a great deal of sloppy or non-existent quality control at the retail level."

There are multiple problems with selling real fur as faux. One is that many people under principle object to purchasing products with fur. Another is the potential for an allergic reaction.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Market Wrap: Stocks Rise as Jitters Over Earnings, Oil Wane

$
0
0

Filed under:

Tribeca Film Festival Rings The NYSE Opening Bell
Slaven Vlasic/Getty ImagesTribeca Film Festival executives ring the opening bell Wednesday at New York Stock Exchange.
By Noel Randewich

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks closed higher Wednesday, fueled by gains in oil companies and speculation that upcoming first-quarter earnings reports might not be quite as weak as previously thought.

All 10 major S&P 500 sectors gained, with the energy index leading, up 2.3 percent. U.S. crude jumped more than 5 percent after a lower-than-expected build of U.S. crude stockpiles.

Intel (INTC) jumped 4.25 percent to $32.83 after the chipmaker said late Tuesday it expects flat revenue for the entire year despite some weakness in the first quarter.

Investors have feared the March-quarter earnings season, just getting under way, would be crippled by low oil prices, a strong dollar and extreme weather in the eastern United States. First-quarter profits for S&P 500 companies are seen dropping 2.6 percent, according to Thomson Reuters (TRI) data.

"Companies can jump over a bar that's about as low as a limbo stick," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at BMO Private Bank in Chicago. "Beating expectations should be relatively easy."

Of the 36 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported so far, 81 percent beat expectations, better than the 63 percent of companies exceeding expectations in a typical quarter.

But just 47 percent of companies exceeded revenue expectations, worse than 61 percent seen in a typical quarter. That suggests companies are bolstering their bottom lines by cutting costs instead of by expanding their businesses.

Eurozone Revival

U.S. shares also benefited after the European Central Bank said it remained committed to its full asset-buying program to revive the eurozone economy.

The strong dollar hurts U.S. companies dependent on overseas sales, while slumping oil prices erode the profits of energy companies.

But many industrial and transportation companies benefit from cheap oil and its derivatives. Delta Air Lines (DAL) posted first-quarter profit above analysts' expectations and its stock rose 2.60 percent to end at $44.20.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) rose 75.91 points, or 0.42 percent, to close at 18,112.61. The Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) gained 10.79 points, or 0.51 percent, to 2,106.63 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 33.73 points, or 0.68 percent, to end the day at 5,011.02.

Wednesday's gains bring the Nasdaq to within striking distance of its record-high close of 5,048.62 points set in 2000 during the dot-com boom.

Bank of America (BAC) shares ended down 1.14 percent at $15.64. First-quarter profit at the No. 2 U.S. bank by assets narrowly beat analyst estimates.

After the bell, video streaming company Netflix (NFLX) posted quarterly results that sent its shares 12 percent higher.

On Wednesday, advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by 2,037 to 1,011, for a 2.01-to-1 ratio; on the Nasdaq, 1,821 issues rose and 928 fell for a 1.96-to-1 ratio.

The S&P 500 posted 18 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq composite recorded 107 new highs and 18 new lows.

About 6.7 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, above the 6 billion daily average for the month to date, according to BATS Global Markets.

What to watch Thursday:
  • At 8:30 a.m. Eastern time, the Labor Department releases weekly jobless claims, and the Commerce Department releases housing starts for March.
  • The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia releases its survey of manufacturing conditions in the Mid-Atlantic region for April, and Freddie Mac release weekly mortgage rates.
Earnings Season
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)
  • American Express (AXP)
  • BlackRock (BLK)
  • Blackstone Group (BX)
  • Citigroup (C)
  • Goldman Sachs (GS)
  • KeyCorp (KEY)
  • Mattel (MAT)
  • Philip Morris International (PM)
  • Schlumberger (SLB)
  • UnitedHealth Group (UNH)
  • PPG Industries (PPG)
  • Sherwin-Williams (SHW)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

10 Tips for Spring Cleaning Your Finances

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Spring Cleaning Your Finances

By Marilyn Lewis

Spring, with new life popping up everywhere, is the source of many an impulse to start afresh. The spring cleaning tradition reaches back a long way, as Country Magazine's readers' tales of spring cleaning with their families attest. Apply the tradition to the mess of files and financial records -- paper and virtual -- that have piled up in your life. Here's how to get going:

1. Set Goals

A project like spring cleaning can eat you alive, unless you set some limits. Decide what you want to accomplish. You can always return to the job next week or next year, so make it manageable. Some ideas:
  • Clear out two years' worth of old tax documents.
  • Sort through one or two boxes of old papers or file cabinet drawers.
  • Clean out the closet that's stuffed with old papers.
2. Know How Long to Keep Paperwork

Don't get carried away and toss absolutely everything. To help substantiate an insurance claim should you ever need to make one, ask your home-, rental- or auto-insurance companies or agents which documents you should keep and how long to hold them.

Keep copies of your tax returns forever. "They help in preparing future tax returns and making computations if you file an amended return," the IRS says. Also, old tax returns offer proof, should you ever need it, that you filed taxes in those years. The IRS recommends that you keep supporting documents for as long as you can be audited or held responsible for the filings. Here are a few rules of thumb:
  • The IRS says it generally audits taxes back three years, so keep records supporting deductions at least three years after a return was due or filed. However, the IRS also says, "Generally, if a substantial error is identified, the IRS will not go back more than the last six years." So you may want to hold onto records for six years to be sure you're covered.
  • Keep payroll tax records six years.
  • If you filed a fraudulent tax return, you're on the hook forever, so hold onto supporting documents.
  • If you failed to report income worth more than 25 percent of the gross amount you reported, you're liable to the IRS for six years.
3. Discard Papers If You Have Electronic Copies

Before tossing documents, check with banks and financial services companies, including your 401(k) provider, to learn how long they retain electronic copies of your records. Download electronic copies of bank and insurance records and other important documents to your computer and back them up onto a separate hard drive or cloud storage. It's smart to have backups for your backups. Use a second hard drive or buy a subscription to an always-on backup service that constantly copies your entire computer's contents to a secure cloud storage for a minimal fee.

The Wirecutter's review of backup plans recommends Crashplan first and Backblaze second. "Both allow for unlimited storage of one or more computers for roughly $4-5 a month, depending upon how far in advance you pay," the article says. For more on backups and paring back files on your personal devices, read 5 Steps to Spring Clean Your Tech.

4. Decide What to Shred

Toss instruction manuals for things you no longer own, utility bills, receipts, reconciled bank statements, canceled checks, old newspapers and correspondence unless it's really precious. After refinancing your mortgage you can get rid of most of the paperwork. Keep the entire set of documents from your last refinance. Otherwise, "you only need to keep the closing summary that documents your costs and the paid-in-full letter from the old mortgage," says Consumer Reports

5. Buy a Scanner and Use It Daily

Get into the practice of scanning and then shredding documents you want to retain. Organize your computer files so you can easily drop them into the right folders. The Wirecutter recently tested and reviewed portable document scanners.

6. Shred, Shred and Shred

Don't risk identity theft by throwing personal documents into the trash. If you don't have a shredder, or if yours isn't powerful, safe or easy to use, buy a crosscut (for best security) shredder. Read Good Housekeeping's reviews of 25 shredders.

Or, if your shredding is fairly lightweight (a few things a month), take The Wirecutter's advice -- the site tests products before recommending -- and buy the $50 AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut Paper/CD/Credit Card Shredder. For harder duty, The Wirecutter prefers Fellowes 100% Jam Proof Shredder, 73Ci 12-Sheet Cross-Cut, which sells for around $150.

Few people are willing to shred years' worth of documents at home. But if you are one of them, give your shredder frequent rests to prevent overheating and oil the cutting mechanism often or use shredder lubrication sheets. Read the manufacturer's instructions before testing your shredder's limits.

If you've got lots to shred, find a service you trust. Call first to learn if you can watch (for your own security) as the shredding is done and whether you can take the shredded paper home if you wish.
Angie's List reviews the options:
  • Records management warehouse companies. You bring documents to their facility.
  • Mobile shredding services. They come to your home with a truck and shred on site. (Maybe best for watching the work being done).
  • Retail office supply stores, such as FedEx and UPS. You bring documents to the store (not drop-off depots) for shredding.
  • Office supply box stores, such as Office Max, Staples and Office Depot.
7. Make an Insurance Inventory

Renters and homeowners alike benefit from creating an inventory of possessions. The Insurance Information Institute has a free mobile app and desk software for this purpose, and this institute article tells how to conduct an inventory. Ask your insurer for tips. Some companies recommend their own software. Technology makes the job fairly simple:
  • Use your smart phone (or borrow your friend's or your kid's) to photograph every possession in your home for which you'd want to make an insurance claim if it was stolen or damaged. Even simpler, take a video, walking through the home as you point out items and describe their value.
  • Document room by room. Include the home itself, inside and out, vehicles, car accessories and interior furnishings, sports equipment, outdoor furniture, toys and structures.
  • Record the rough amount you paid for each item and, if possible, when you purchased it. Write it on the back of each photo or connect the information with the photos on your computer.
  • Starting now, photograph new possessions as you obtain them. Save their receipts with your inventory.
8. Scrutinize Your Bank Accounts

Take a yearly look at your bank accounts. If you have too many, close the inactive ones. Shred unused checks and registers from old accounts.

9. Shop for New Bank Accounts

There's no excuse for paying fees when you can find free checking. Read Bank Fees are Rising - Here's How to Escape Them.

10. Make a New Habit

Here's a simple daily routine that prevents mail from piling up. You'll need:
  • A letter opener or serrated butter knife (try Goodwill if you don't have one).
  • A basket for paper recycling.
  • A shredder.
  • A box or bag near your shredder for papers to be shredded.
When you've picked up your mail from the mailbox, go directly to a table or counter and slice open each envelope, separating the material into three piles:
  • Bills and documents you want to use or keep (to pay, act on or store).
  • Papers to discard that contain your name, address, account number or any identifying information (to shred).
  • Papers with no identifying information (to recycle).
Toss the recyclables into their basket, shred paid bills and papers with identifying information or put them next to the shredder, and act on the items in the remaining pile.

Do you have a spring cleaning ritual you can recommend for more security and less clutter? Share it in comments below or on our Facebook page. Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

5 Dangers of Mobile Banking - and How to Avoid Them

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Businesswoman using laptop and texting with cell phone in conference room
Hero Images
By Britanny Lyte

Managing your money has never been so easy. With the rise of mobile banking, paying your bills and checking your balance can be as simple as posting a photo to your Instagram feed. But there's a price to pay for the convenience of depositing checks from anywhere in the world with a simple click of your mobile camera. That price is the increased risk that your private data and access to your accounts could fall into the wrong hands.

"As additional people flock to the mobile channel and transactions multiply, the bad guys are paying attention and deploying more attacks against it," banking fraud expert Julie Conroy warns. The best way to protect yourself, of course, is to know the risks. Read on for our guide to the dangers of mobile banking and foolproof tips on how to avoid them.

1. Wireless Networks Are Hacker-Friendly

Unlike websites, mobile apps don't properly encrypt information, which means it's not a good idea to access your bank account via mobile app when you're on a public or otherwise unsecured Wi-Fi network. As computer science expert Ron Vetter explains, "mobile banking apps are connected to wireless networks, and these networks are inherently insecure as they broadcast their messages into the open air."

If you plan to use a mobile app to conduct a sensitive transaction, you're better off using a secure wireless network or your phone's data network. This will help reduce the risk of your private information being intercepted by a hacker or some other third party.

2. Poor Reception Means Poor Security

Even if you're diligent in accessing your mobile banking app on your phone's data network rather than a wireless network, the security of your financial information could still be at risk if your 4G or 3G data drops into a lower service range. Poor reception invites the chance that the data contained in your banking transaction could misfire and be intercepted by an unauthorized third party.

3. There's More at Stake If You Lose Your Phone

Studies show that nearly 40 percent of smartphone owners don't password-protect their devices. If any of those folks were to lose their phone, anyone could pick it up, log into their banking app, and access their money. Even if you do password protect your phone, you could still be putting yourself at risk by auto-saving your password. For optimal security, select "no" when any of your apps ask to remember your username and password. You can further help protect yourself from fraudsters who gain access to your phone by installing a remote-wiping application that allows you to erase your phone's data even when the device isn't physically in your possession.

4. You May Have to Wait to Access Newly Deposited Funds

Although you can deposit funds into your account instantly via a mobile banking app, there may be a longer lag than normal until you can access those funds. "In many cases, [banks] will protect themselves against fraud by increasing the delay in the availability of funds, as compared to if you'd just deposit that check in an ATM or branch," Conroy says.

5. Fraudulent Apps May Deceive You

Mobile apps can cost you -- even the free ones. Fraudulent apps posing as your official banking institution are lurking throughout the app store, and if you unknowingly start using one, the app creators can access -- and abuse -- your private information. Download your app directly from your bank's website to avoid this scam. And if you use Android, set your security settings to abort installations from sources other than Google Play.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Her Business Is All About Making Money From Your Divorce

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Dividing properties after divorce. Male and female hands. White background.
Getty Images

By Jane Wells

As any couple going through divorce will tell you, breaking up is expensive to do. Sometimes the richer the couple, the harder it is for one party to pay attorneys and track down assets. More money, more problems. Stacey Napp believes she can level the playing field.


"I was very fortunate," Napp said of her own divorce, in 2008. "I came from a family that had resources, I went to law school, I had been [working] in debt collection for awhile, so I had all the components that you would want to have in a bad situation like this." After her divorce was final, Napp realized other people weren't as fortunate, and she learned that divorce attorneys are barred by law from working for contingency fees. "That was really the 'aha!' or epiphany moment," she said.

In 2009, she formed Balance Point Divorce Funding, a Beverly Hills, California, company that finances the cost of a divorce in exchange for a percentage of any settlement. If there's no award, Napp not only doesn't make any money, she loses the money she invested. "We haven't lost money on a case yet," she said, literally knocking on wood. "We've funded probably over 25 cases now." Clients include Patricia Cohen, the ex-wife of SAC Capital Advisors founder Steve Cohen. The former Mrs. Cohen believes her ex owes her millions of dollars from their divorce over 20 years ago, according to The New York Times.

How It Works

Napp funded the company with her own divorce settlement, proved that the business model worked, and investors came on board. Here's how Balance Point finances a divorce:

  • Potential clients are asked how long they've been in divorce proceedings, who their lawyers and experts are, and how much they believe they're due from a spouse.
  • Napp asks the client's lawyer to come up with a budget for the total estimated cost of pursuing a divorce all the way through trial -- though most are settled ahead of time.
  • Balance Point does its own due diligence and decides whether a potential settlement is worth an investment. Napp said her return on investment averages in the double digits.
  • If the company funds a divorce, the money is doled out in tranches.
  • Assuming the client wins a settlement, as much as 25 percent of it goes to Balance Point.
Say, hypothetically, that a woman believes she is due $10 million based on a couple's assets, worth $20 million. Taking the case all the way to trial might cost $750,000. Balance Point will fund $750,000 but in $150,000 increments. The more a client draws down, the higher the percentage he or she owes Napp from any eventual settlement.

In determining how much of a percentage to ask for, Napp decided to stay below the 33 percent that's typical of attorneys who operate on a contingency basis (again, divorce attorneys cannot work for contingency fees).

Gender Divide

"We start as low, quite frankly, as a one-digit percentage," she said. "Typically we don't go above 25 percent." Most clients are women. All of its investors are men. Nearly all of the women who've received funding are divorcing men with self-made fortunes. Of the few men who've received funding, all are going up against wives who inherited their wealth.

Balance Point is expanding its services into funding asset recovery, and Napp is considering moving into funding custody battles. Napp won't name names, but she says her craziest case at the moment involves a man who works as a criminal informant for the government. "He's being protected, the assets are being hidden, and there is a level of complicity that you cannot believe," she said.

There are some cases that Napp won't touch, however, like the woman divorcing a man whose money is in Dubai. "I said, 'You're a woman with a judgment going into an Arab country. I think you're going to have a worthless judgment at the end of the day. I can't fund this.'"

She also won't work with people who aren't willing to compromise. "You're not going to get everything. You shouldn't expect to get everything," she said. "Take a haircut, walk away with your sanity, walk away with time in your life, and start over."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Do You Shop Till You Drop? Control That Compulsion

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

woman lying on a couch behind multicolored shopping bags
Getty Images
It's the stuff of many sitcoms: A young woman, stressed-out from work or saddened by a breakup, takes off for the mall to drown her sorrows in a new pair of shoes. I'd venture a guess that many of you reading this right now have done something similar at least once in your life.

Not you? Well, then, have you ever charged something you couldn't afford to pay for in cash? Or understated the cost of a purchase to your significant other? What about impulse buys? Online shopping and "conveniences" like one-click buying make it easy for even the most disciplined shoppers to slip up.

Most of us have overspent at least a few times, maybe more often than we care to admit. But when does this kind of behavior cross the line from a slightly embarrassing vice to a troubling addiction? And what causes it?

According to Psychology Today, like other addictions such as alcoholism, compulsive shopping starts as an attempt to feel better about ourselves. And it works, for a while. But the effects wear off quickly, and compulsive shoppers feel bad about their spending. So what do they do to feel better again? Shop. The cycle continues and can easily lead to debt, conflicts with a spouse, and guilt. More bad feelings, more spending to compensate.

So Are You a Harmless Shopaholic or Compulsive Spender?

If the description above sounds crazy, chances are you're in the clear. But if it resonates with you, even just a little, here's how to tell if you might have a problem.

If you can identify with four or more of the following warning signs, taken from the Illinois Institute for Addiction Recovery, your shopping sprees may have turned into something more serious:
  • Shopping or spending money as result of feeling disappointed, angry, or scared.
  • Shopping or spending habits causing emotional distress in one's life.
  • Having arguments with others about one's shopping or spending habits.
  • Feeling lost without credit cards.
  • Buying items on credit that would not be bought with cash.
  • Feeling a rush of euphoria and anxiety when spending money.
  • Feeling guilty, ashamed, embarrassed, or confused after shopping or spending money.
  • Lying to others about purchases made or how much money was spent.
  • Thinking excessively about money.
  • Spending a lot of time juggling accounts or bills to accommodate spending.
If you're married, pay special attention to your spending habits, especially if you've ever hidden a purchase from your spouse or lied about its true cost. So-called financial infidelity can be devastating for a couple. In a recent survey conducted by CreditCards.com, 20 percent of those in relationships admitted to spending $500 or more without telling their partner. A few -- 6 percent -- even admit to having a secret credit card or account.

One good strategy for partners is to set a "splurge" limit for impulse buys -- say, $100 or $500 -- that fits comfortably into your budget. Any purchase over that amount has to be approved by your partner.

What Can You Do?

If you think you have a problem, don't wait to get help. The Illinois Institute for Addiction Recovery is a good place to start. ShopaholicsAnonymous.org also offers many resources, and DebtorsAnonymous.org can help those whose shopping has put them in dire straits financially. If, like me, you just want to make sure your spending stays in check, here are a few tips that have worked for me.
  • Follow the 24-hour rule. When shopping online, I'll often load up my cart and then close the window. If I am still thinking about the item 24 hours later, I'll go back and reassess. Most of the time, the urge has passed. This is even more effective when shopping at brick-and-mortar stores. I'll put any impulse items on hold, then go back the next day if I really want them.
  • Budget in your sprees. I'm on a budget, but if I don't plan to spend at least a little money on frivolous items, I find that all that fiscal responsibility backfires eventually. Much like with dieting, too much deprivation can lead to a binge. Planning to spend a modest amount on, say, clothing or home decor (my personal pitfalls) each month helps prevent a rash of overspending later.
  • Share your statements. If you know a spouse or friend is going to see how much you're spending, it'll make you think twice before pulling out that credit card. Even a computer can provide accountability. I use the budgeting tool Mint, and just knowing I'm going to have to see my shopping charges pop up on my laptop the next day helps keep me from pressing "buy."
  • Make the Unsubscribe button your friend. I can't tell you how many times I've bought something on a whim because I got a great discount code in my inbox. Unsubscribing from retailers' email lists is probably the most effective deterrent I've tried. Same goes for any shopping blogs you follow.
  • Watch the company you keep. It's fun to shop with friends, but doing so can cost you. One 2013 study reported that 62 percent of women spend more money when they shop with friends. When my super-stylish friend and I hit the stores, it's hard to resist buying that outfit she raves over. I now meet her at a coffeeshop, far away from any tempting boutiques. Even better, resolve to shop only with someone who hates to do so. An impatient spouse or child (I take along my 8-year-old son) makes it very easy to limit your time at the mall.
Robyn Gearey is a Motley Fool contributor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images