Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Baby Boomers Creating Their Own Retirement Communities

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Older women using digital tablet on sofa
Caiaimage/Getty Images
By Teresa Mears

A few years ago, Marianne Kilkenny's elderly parents moved into an assisted living community. That got her thinking about her own plans because she didn't want to end up in a similar community or a facility run by a company.

Kilkenny, 65, the founder of Women For Living in Community, is among a growing number of baby boomers who are taking matters into their own hands by creating their own retirement communities. "I'm part of a movement," says Kilkenny, who lives in Asheville, North Carolina, and is the author of "Your Quest for Home: A Guidebook to Find the Ideal Community for Your Later Years." She says the focus of the movement is "aging in community as opposed to aging in place."

These resident-created retirement solutions, or intentional communities, are taking different forms, from shared homes to cohousing communities to "pocket neighborhoods" of people who choose to live in the same area and watch out for each other, which includes cooking and doing errands together and taking care of people when they are sick.

Charles Durrett, an author and architect who designs cohousing communities, and his wife, Kathryn McCamant, who is also an architect, live in a multigenerational cohousing community of 34 households they developed in Nevada City, California, a town of 3,000 people 60 miles northeast of Sacramento.

It All Began in Denmark

While this shared housing model started in Denmark, Durrett and McCamant coined the English term cohousing and brought the concept to the U.S. in the 1980s, publishing "Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves." In 2009, Durrett published the second edition of "Senior Cohousing: A Community Approach to Independent Living -- The Handbook," reflecting the increased interest in cohousing among aging baby boomers.

"Cohousing, by design, is a social agreement where people know about you, care about you and support you," says Durrett, 59. He recently experienced the benefits of a caring community when he had major surgery and needed help. Without that support, he would have had to spend time in a rehab home, a setting where he "would have gone crazy," he says. "If you don't have a community at some level, you're going to be institutionalized."

Bonnie Moore created another version of shared housing when a home renovation and a divorce in 2008 left her with a five-bedroom house and not enough money to pay for it. She started taking in roommates, all single, middle-age women. A few years into her experiment, she created the Golden Girls Network, named for the TV show in which four women shared a house in Miami. The network helps both men and women find shared living arrangements. "You have a house to come home to. You're not living with your kids," she says.

Moore says her situation is clearly a landlord-tenant arrangement and not an intentional community. The women in her home don't spend a lot of time together, though they try to organize at least one shared meal a month. But it is different from living alone. "The best thing is, I come in at night and somebody says, 'Hi, how was your day?'" Moore says.

Her Pocket Neighborhood

Kilkenny is still experimenting. She and two neighbors have developed a pocket neighborhood. When she goes to bed at night, Kilkenny turns on an outside light, and when she gets up, she puts a sticker in her window. Her neighbor does the same, letting each other know that they're OK.

The journey toward community begins with knowing yourself and then reaching out.

She says the journey toward community begins with knowing yourself and then reaching out. "You can, in the neighborhood you live in now, say, 'Can we make this into a community?'" she says. "It's taking the step forward to say, 'I intentionally want to get to know you, and I want you to get to know me.'"

Building a cohousing community is a more deliberate process, and that is part of its strength, says Durrett, who has built more than 50 such communities throughout the U.S. Before building the Nevada City community, which was completed in 2006, he and his wife offered a presentation to find interested people. They chose the site for the community, paid $5,000 for the land and started working on the community in 2002.

Organizers typically form a limited liability company, and participants end up putting up about 20 percent of their home's cost in cash to cover land, hire architects and organize the project. Design is a group project, which helps unify the community as it forms. Once the design is finished, each person gets a construction loan to build his or her own home, transitioning to a permanent loan once it's completed. "The individuals pick the community. The community doesn't pick them," Durrett says. "There is no such thing as like-minded people. Wait until you get into a discussion about cutting a tree down."

Elements of a Cohousing Community

Cohousing communities usually have a common house, where people can meet formally or informally, and a senior community might build a caretaker apartment as well. Residents contribute to the community, and those who are interested share meals several times a week.

The recent intentional retirement community trend might sound as if baby boomers are moving back to the communes they created in the 1960s. But Moore, who lived in a commune in San Francisco in 1972, says the new communities are different. "What I learned is nothing happens unless you have a leader," she says. "In the commune lifestyle, the whole idea was to have an equal playing field. ... and you never got any decisions made, and things did not get done."

Baby boomers are experimenting with numerous models for retirement living, including what are known as "naturally occurring retirement communities" - neighborhoods that were not designed as retirement communities but that have a large population of older people. Communities that require residents to be at least 55 are common. The Villages, a town of 104,000 people in Florida, was the fastest-growing city in the U.S. over the last two years. The unrelated Village to Village Network seeks to help older Americans find community and resources to stay in their own homes. But in those types of communities, residents still have to build their own support systems or hope they create one organically with friends.

Here are seven things to consider if you want to create an intentional retirement community:
  • Architecture matters. Cohousing places a strong emphasis on community design, with garages to the backs of homes, common areas and elements such as front porches that require neighbors to see each other. "If I have to walk out and get my mail, I'll see my neighbors," Kilkenny says.
  • Someone has to take control. Durrett has a consulting business that helps groups get from cohousing idea to reality. It's unlikely a community will get built completely through consensus.
  • The place may precede the people. Many people start out believing they'll find a group of like-minded people and then choose a place. But the group often falls apart over disagreement on where to live. "You don't know who you're going to like," Durrett says. "There's plenty of my best friends I would not want to live in my cohousing community."
  • Build the community while you're still young. Starting now enables people to develop bonds before anyone needs help. "You don't wait until you're 82," Kilkenny says. "At some point, you have to take this giant leap of faith to say 'I'll buy the house.' "
  • Expect rules. An intentional community operates a bit like a homeowners association. As she gained experience as a landlord, Moore created a six- or seven-page policy manual outlining everything from how to handle recycling to who should clean the kitchen. You'll also need procedures to admit new members if residents move or die.
  • Build to age in place. This could mean building a cottage for a future live-in caretaker, putting grab bars in bathrooms or minimizing steps.
  • Know yourself and be prepared to compromise. Not everyone is cut out for a communal environment or wants to interact with neighbors when they take out the trash. Sharing your life with others is inevitably messy. Be prepared for relationship issues to arise, and be willing to compromise.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Buffett Celebrates 50th Year at Berkshire, Defends 3G Ties

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Berkshire
Nati Harnik/APBerkshire Hathaway Chairman and CEO Warren Buffett is presented with 50th anniversary boots as he tours the Justin Boots display before presiding over the annual shareholders meeting in Omaha, Neb., on Saturday.
By Luciana Lopez and Jonathan Stempel

OMAHA, Neb. -- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) shareholders celebrated Warren Buffett's 50th anniversary running the conglomerate Saturday, as the billionaire fielded questions about the company and its future, and explained some business practices.

Berkshire owns more than 80 companies including the Burlington Northern railroad, Geico car insurance, Benjamin Moore paint, Dairy Queen ice cream, Fruit of the Loom underwear, and See's candies, and owns more than $115 billion of stocks.

But Buffett's status as an investing legend, and his plain talk and humor, are key reasons why people trek to Omaha for what Buffett calls "Woodstock for Capitalists."

Berkshire's annual meeting is Omaha's top annual draw other than baseball's College World Series - reflected in hotel rooms that can fetch more than $400 a night and often sell out nearly a year in advance.

The 3G people have been successful in building marvelous businesses. I don't know of any company that has a policy that says we're going to have a lot more people than they need.

Buffett, 84, and his second-in-command Charlie Munger, 91, spend hours at the annual meeting in a downtown arena answering questions from shareholders, analysts and journalists about business, the economy, current events and life.

As is usually the case, no major controversy has been hanging over Berkshire despite its sprawl.

But Buffett did offer a defense of Berkshire's partnerships with Brazil's 3G Capital, which critics say ruthlessly cuts jobs at companies it acquires. In 2013, Berkshire and 3G bought H.J. Heinz Co., which in turn is now buying Kraft Foods (KRFT).

"The 3G people have been successful in building marvelous businesses," Buffett said. "I don't know of any company that has a policy that says we're going to have a lot more people than they need."

Buffett also offered a defense of Berkshire's Clayton Homes manufactured homes unit, which was criticized in a recent Seattle Times article for predatory sales practices that can trap low-income borrowers in homes they cannot afford.

"I make no apologies whatsoever for Clayton's lending terms," he said, adding that Clayton itself faces losses when borrowers default.

Loyal Shareholders

Devoted and sleep-deprived shareholders began lining up outside the venue hours before doors opened at 7 a.m. Central time. Kyle Cleeton, a research analyst for an investment firm, may have gotten there first, saying he showed up at 10 p.m. the night before.

"I wanted to be first in line," he said. "You're not sure how many more years you're going to have."

Bill Guenther, a state forester from Brattleboro, Vermont, said, "I'm one who likes a good seat." He arrived at 1:04 a.m. despite having last year suffered a major foot injury requiring crutches when he collided with another shareholder as he tried to get that good seat.

"My girlfriend said, 'You're not going to do this again,' and I said, 'I have to, it's the 50th year.' "

Many at the meeting wondered about Buffett's future with the company but he was not expected to give any hint about who might replace him as chief executive.

"Doing so would limit his options going forward and he doesn't usually give up free options to satisfy the curiosity of the outside world," said Ken Shubin Stein, founder of Spencer Capital Management in New York.

The meeting was preceded by the company movie overseen by Buffett's daughter Susie, part celebration of Berkshire and its culture and part entertainment.

This year's film featured, among other things, chats between Buffett and some of Berkshire's earliest employees, and a spoof championship boxing match directed by John Landis between Buffett, billing himself as "The Berkshire Bomber," and the undefeated welterweight champ Floyd Mayweather.

But the weekend is mainly about commerce. Shareholders at the arena bought 10,000 frozen bars and 2,000 Blizzards at Dairy Queen on a Friday shopping day. They could also buy an array of products as varied as blindingly yellow "new and improved" "Berky" boxer shorts for men and "Berky Bras" for women (both $6), or carpet cleaner from Berkshire's Kirby unit (also $5).

Buffett as usual milled about the displays prior to the meeting, trailed by dozens of print and TV journalists, where he ate (and paid for) a Dairy Queen vanilla orange bar, and tossed newspapers as he once did as a boy. Bill Gates, the Microsoft (MSFT) chairman and Berkshire director, tossed one too

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Social Sell-Off: How Experts Are Trading the Carnage

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

computer key   unfriend
Shutterstock
By Michael Newberg

The Nasdaq composite index (^IXIC) traded to its highest level ever last week, finally regaining the mark it last hit before the 2000 dot-com bubble burst. Underneath the tech landscape's facade, however, are massive cracks forming in the social media space.

After a slew of rough quarterly earnings reports, shares of social media stocks LinkedIn (LNKD), Yelp (YELP) and Twitter (TWTR) found themselves down by more than 20 percent on the week. Those huge drops have wiped out roughly $15 billion in market value from the three companies combined.

As investors indulge in a mass unfriending of social names, traders are wondering if it's time to pack it in, or will the huge sell-off present an opportunity to buy at a discount?

According to the "Fast Money" traders and Wall Street analysts, it still comes down to the fundamentals of each individual company.

Tweet This; Yelp! I Need Some Investors

Twitter's stock plunged around 20 percent following its early earnings release Tuesday, wiping out gains achieved in the past year. The move amounted to the microblogging site's second all-time worst day of trading, and the stock has continued to sink ever since.

Brian Kelly of Brian Kelly Capital said that while the drop presented an interesting trading opportunity, the company is still struggling with an "execution problem. It's probably going to be a quarter or two before this is an investment again," he said.

Triogem Asset Management's Tim Seymour was more bullish and said the Street isn't focused on the right areas when it comes to Twitter's growth prospects.

Seymour said initiatives like live-streaming service Periscope and a partnership with Google (GOOGL) should be given more time to play out. "Seventy-five percent growth is still much better than their peers," he added.

Social review site Yelp faced a similar fate as Twitter on Wednesday, when it sank by more than 15 percent after reporting quarterly revenue and guidance that missed analyst estimates.

RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Mahaney had called Yelp his top pick among small-cap internet stocks into earnings, but said on "Fast Money" on Wednesday that he'd have to "figure out" whether he'd be changing his tune on the name. By Thursday morning, Mahaney had downgraded Yelp to "sector perform" and slashed his price target by to $50 from $82 a share.

Steve Grasso of Stuart Frankel said Yelp's lack of a competitive advantage could be its downfall, as more players enter the online review space. "The barriers to entry are nothing here. Amazon's already there," he said.

Brian Kelly said not to buy Yelp's drop, and called the company "a broken story."

LinkedIn Not Connecting?

LinkedIn was the third social stock to suffer this week, sinking more than 25 percent on Thursday after giving weak full year guidance.

BGC Financial analyst Colin Gillis said on "Fast Money" that nothing is fundamentally broken in the company, and that the stock tends to perform better in the second half of the year. But he added that he's not in any rush to upgrade his "hold" rating on the stock.

Regarding the social media landscape as a whole going forward, Jon Najarian of OptionMonster.com said the next few weeks of trading will be crucial. "You'll really know the party's over if they don't bounce," he said. "If they take another leg down, they're dead."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Put Down That Wrench! 7 Reasons Against DIY Projects

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Should You Really Do That Home Improvement Project Yourself?

By Maryalene LaPonsie

HGTV makes everyone feel as if they're only a couple of power tools away from being home renovation masters. But don't be fooled. There's a reason building and construction trades are considered skilled jobs.

Tackling a home renovation project requires more than an eye for design and the ability to match colors. You also need to understand how the various parts of a structure fit together, and you may even have to (gasp) do some math.

What's more, a home improvement project done wrong can be expensive to fix or even downright dangerous. Before you end up with a DIY disaster, here are seven times when you should probably call in a pro.

1. You Don't Understand What You're Doing

Yes, this seems so obvious, doesn't it? And yet, some people try to do projects where they really don't understand the mechanics of what they're trying to do. Perhaps they mistakenly think it will all simply fall into place once they get a bit further into the project.

Don't assume project instructions will make sense later. You need to know what you're doing right from the start. Otherwise, you won't be able to identify potential problems as they arise or, worse, you could get halfway through and find you can't figure out how to finish.

2. You Aren't Sure How to Use the Necessary Tools

The same thing goes for tools, especially power tools. If you don't know how to work something, maybe you shouldn't be using it. Failing to heed this advice could result in shoddy work or personal injury. Neither is a good outcome for a DIY project.

3. Someone Knowledgeable Advises You to Get a Pro

Maybe you go to the hardware store, explain the project and the workers raise their eyebrows and say, "really?" When someone familiar with the project says you're crazy for attempting it, that should be a cue to reconsider. Now, you don't necessarily have to give up on every project simply because someone is skeptical, but you should ask yourself these questions:
  • Has this person done the project themselves?
  • Has this person heard from multiple people who have tried the project?
  • Does this person have a vested interest in discouraging you from doing the project?
Contractors may play Negative Nellies because they want your business, so you may not want to rely on their advice alone. However, if your best friend who is handy says the project is a nightmare, you might want to give some thought to his or her words.

4. Your Time Is Limited

Sometimes, you might be completely capable of finishing a home renovation on your own, but that still doesn't mean you should attempt the project. If you already have a full schedule of work and family obligations, how much time are you really going to be able to devote to the renovation? And will you really want to live with your kitchen being a construction site for months on end? If your answers are "not much" and "no," then you should call a pro.

5. It Will Be Obvious That You Did It Yourself

It might not matter if the shelves in your closet are crooked or the paint in your bedroom is uneven. No one except you and your immediate family will probably see those anyway.

However, if your kitchen cabinets are misaligned, it may be obvious to everyone who walks into your house. Consider who will see the project, the likelihood you'll mess it up and how embarrassed you'll be when a visitor notices your mistakes. Consider, too, that a visibly botched job -- done badly or not to code -- can affect the value of your home if you decide to sell it. Then, decide whether it's worth continuing on your own.

6. It Involves Major Electrical or Plumbing Work

Anything involving major electrical and plumbing work needs to be left to the pros. Poor plumbing could lead to a messy situation and water damage that will end up costing you more than what you would have paid to have the job done right in the first place. As for the electrical, we're talking house fires and putting your family's safety in jeopardy if you do it wrong. In my book, that sort of risk isn't worth saving a few bucks to do it yourself.

7. Serious Injury Is a Possibility If Something Goes Wrong

Along the same lines, you should think twice about any project that could result in serious injury. Re-shingling a house with a steeply sloped roof comes to mind. According to DoitYourself.com, about 170,000 people go to the hospital each year because of injuries related to ladders alone.

Another peril is knocking down walls when you're not sure which beams are supporting the roof. Cable TV makes us all think we can be DIY superstars, but there's a lot that goes on behind the cameras. By all means undertake small projects or ones that are strictly cosmetic. But tread carefully if the renovation project affects the structure of your home or could put your safety in jeopardy.

What home improvement projects have you completed on your own? Would you recommend them to others? Tell us on our Facebook page. Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Wall Street This Week: GoGo Soars, Game Firms Lose

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Games E3 Activision
Jae C. Hong/APModels promote Activision's "Call of Duty" franchise at a trade show.
From a struggling burger chain offering up its plan for a turnaround to the country's two top video game publishers hitting "continue" on their latest quarterly reports, here are some of the things that will help shape the week that lies ahead on Wall Street.

Monday -- Let's Send the Hamburglar to Jail

The new trading week kicks off with McDonald's (MCD) hosting a conference call to discuss its new turnaround strategy. Armed with a new CEO, the struggling chain will detail its plan to reverse the negative traffic trend.

McDonald's has posted six consecutive quarters of declining year-over-year comparable-store sales at its U.S. burger joints. Its brand is also getting slammed. A Consumer Reports poll last year found it dead last among the country's leading chains in terms of burger quality.

Tuesday -- Clipping Coupons

Groupon (GRPN) reports fresh financials on Tuesday afternoon. The leading online provider of discounted vouchers has been a disappointment for investors. The stock has shed nearly two-thirds of its value since the company went public at $20 four years ago.

Analysts expect a small profit out of Groupon on a 5 percent uptick in revenue. It may not seem like much, but it's at least taking baby steps in the right direction.

Wednesday -- Take the Joy Out of Joystick, and It's Just a Stick

One of the dozens of notable companies reporting on Wednesday will be Activision Blizzard (ATVI). The video game giant reports a day after Electronic Arts (EA), giving the market a great snapshot of the industry.

It won't be pretty. Analysts see both companies reporting lower revenue and profits than they did during the first three months of last year. Despite the success of new consoles that were introduced in late 2013 and the high-margin promise of digital delivery, it's been a challenge to get die-hard gamers to pay up for new releases.

Thursday -- Wi-Fi at 30,000 Feet

Gogo (GOGO) shares have nearly doubled over the past year. Investors have been warming up to the leading provider of airplane Wi-Fi after initial concerns that competition was going to heat up in this fast-growing niche.

Analysts see another quarter of growth. They expected revenue to climb 17 percent since the prior year's performance. Wall Street's also bracing for another quarterly deficit, but that's not a surprise at this phase of Gogo's growth cycle, where it's investing in growth.

Friday -- All We Need Is a Dolly

The latest original series on Netflix (NFLX) -- "Grace and Frankie" -- debuts on Friday. It stars Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin, two-thirds of the trio from "9 to 5," a 1980 comedy. The new show is a comedy, a genre that Netflix has started to mine since the success of "Arrested Development" last year and "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt" last month.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends Activision Blizzard, McDonald's and Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Is your portfolio ready for what this year has to offer? Click here to check out our free report for one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

We Should Pay More for Cage-Free Eggs - but Not Much More

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Tainted Eggs
John Raoux/AP
Three years ago, Burger King (BK) shocked the conscience of capitalism by showing that capitalism has a conscience.

Burger King announced a five-year plan to move 100 percent of its egg purchases from suppliers who practiced "factory farming" to more animal-friendly producers. Henceforth, Burger King would only buy from companies that gave their hens room to roam, places to perch, and nesting boxes in which to lay their eggs. The U.S. Humane Society was quick to voice support: "For every cage-free egg ... that Burger King sells, animals have been spared lifelong confinement in a cage so small they can barely even move," its food policy director told The Associated Press at the time.

It's Not Just BK -- or Even Just Restaurants

In 2010, Subway arguably sparked this trend with a plan to phase in purchases of cage-free eggs for its fast-food restaurants. One year later, McDonald's (MCD) jumped on the bandwagon, announcing it would begin buying 1 million cage-free eggs a month (and 1 million more eggs from producers who raise their hens in cages larger than the industry norm). Most recently, Dunkin' Donuts (DNKN) joined the movement, declaring a "commitment" to cage-free last month, and saying it will double purchases of cage-free eggs (to 10 percent of purchases) by the end of next year, en route to going "100% cage-free."

Mega-grocers Walmart (WMT) and Costco (COST) have gone cage-free, too, on their private-label eggs. And in grocery aisles around the land, by 2020, all Hellmann's mayonnaise made by Unilever (UL) will be made using cage-free eggs.

But at what cost to you?

Which Came First, the Price Hike or the Cage-Free Egg?

Last month, The Wall Street Journal cited a study by the Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply (an industry trade group also known as CSES) that found "little difference in egg quality" between chickens confined to industry-standard cages (which provide less living room than a piece of 8 1/2" x 11" printer paper) and those raised in larger "colony cages" such as are now mandated in California, or in chickens allowed to roam free in a barn.

CSES did find one big difference between these alternative systems, though: cost. Specifically, it says it costs 13 percent more to run a chicken farm with "California cages." And it costs 36 percent more to run a cage-free farm.

And whether you buy them as part of an Egg McMuffin, or buy them by the carton at the grocery store, this means these eggs are going to cost you more, too.

Don't Sugar-Coat the Easter Egg. How Much More?

Well, logically, 13 to 36 percent more, if wholesalers simply pass along their cost of doing business, and retailers then pass along the higher wholesale cost they must pay, in similar proportion. That would suggest that if the average retail price of a dozen eggs (Grade A, large) in your local supermarket is $2.13 (per U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics data), then cage-free eggs might need to cost as much as $2.90.

Now granted, some grocers have been reported to be charging as much as $5 a dozen for cage-free eggs. But according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, prices are already turning back around.

This time last year, the retail price of a dozen large, white, cage-free eggs in American supermarkets was averaging $3.99 per dozen. At one point in April 2015, however, average prices hit $2.90 on the nose -- precisely 36 percent more than the average cost of a dozen "ordinary" eggs. And they could move lower still.

The Mathematics of Egg Production

Consider: A 36 percent increase in retail prices is enough to push a $2.13 carton of eggs up to $2.90. But back at the farm, the original cost to produce those eggs was only 84 cents (on average, and according to the USDA). The 36 percent increase to that production cost, therefore, only added about 30 cents.

If that extra 30 cents gets passed from producer to wholesaler, then from wholesaler to retailer, and finally from retailer to consumer, then cage-free eggs might only need to cost $2.43 per dozen. (To be clear, that's $2.13 for the ordinary retail cost, plus 30 cents in added cost to raise hens cage-free.) So if retailers are selling cage-free eggs for $5, or $3, or even just $2.90 -- chances are, those retailers (and perhaps the wholesalers and producers as well) are charging more than they need to, to just cover the added cost of converting egg production to cage-free.

So why are retailers charging $2.90, $3, and $5 for cage-free eggs? Simply put, because it seems customers are willing to pay that much more for the moral satisfaction of knowing the eggs they eat come from chickens who were raised right.

And that's not necessarily a bad thing, even if prices are higher than they need to be. These higher-than-necessary prices give customers satisfaction. They give retailers higher profit margins. And they cover the added production costs egg producers must pay to accommodate cage-free chicken farms. Sure, the prices are probably a bit higher than they need to be, and maybe they'll continue to trend down over time. For now, though, as CEO Marcus Rust of Rose Acre Farms -- one of America's largest egg producers -- told The Wall Street Journal: "Farming is about making a profit, and if someone is willing to pay us extra, we're going to do that."

So long as that profit is fair, cage-free eggs could turn out to be a win-win-win for producers, consumers, and chickens alike.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith would cross the road for a cage-free egg -- if the price was right. He does not own shares of any company named above. The Motley Fool recommends Costco Wholesale, McDonald's and Unilever. The Motley Fool owns shares of Costco Wholesale. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Cord-Cutting: The Real Story Behind the Myth

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

young couple preparing to watch ...
Minerva Studio/Shutterstock
It's an appealing idea to ditch your cable TV provider for much cheaper alternatives. Since there are now a host of such plans, there has been much talk of "cord cutting," or the symbolic severing of that cable in favor of alternatives.

Conventional wisdom has it that customers who ditch cable replace it with video streaming services like Netflix (NFLX) or Hulu Plus. Surprisingly, however, that's not necessarily where the lost subscribers end up.

Staying Tuned

Contrary to popular opinion, the wider pay-TV universe isn't really losing much business to the Netflixes and Hulus of the world.

According to data compiled by Leichtman Research Group, the top 13 pay-TV purveyors in this country -- including cable, satellite TV and telecom companies -- saw a net loss of approximately 125,000 video subscribers in 2014.

At first glance, 125,000 is a big number. But the surveyed companies collectively broadcast their product to over 95 million customers. So the net loss was barely over 0.1 percent of the total. So the overall migration away from traditional pay-TV services is fairly limited.

See You Later, Cable

However, the picture shifts when we look just at cable companies. They're shedding subscribers in notable numbers (nearly 1.2 million net in 2014, leaving a total of just over 49 million). Meanwhile the TV service bundles provided by telecom incumbents AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) added them at a rapid clip, according to Leichtman. All told, the two companies took on just over 1 million new subscribers last year, padding their combined total to almost 11.6 million. Meanwhile, satellite TV companies DirecTV and Dish added a combined 20,000 subscribers last year.

Cable customers are ripe for the poaching, not least because the cost of such services keeps rising. That isn't necessarily because the cable companies are getting greedy, however.

Retransmission fees -- effectively, the cost of content from popular cable channels like AMC Networks' (AMCX) flagship AMC or Disney's (DIS) king of sports, ESPN -- have been increasing significantly over the past few years. Those expenditures are being passed along to end users, at least according to the cable providers.

But a rapid upward climb in costs isn't the only problem. After all, the satellite services have to cope with it, too. Compounding the issue for cable is its abysmal record in customer satisfaction, the rates of which are stubbornly low. A recent article in The Washington Post revealed that 53 percent of surveyed cable subscribers would abandon their service if they had a viable alternative.

Hard to Say Goodbye

That's a big "if." One major reason that the adoption of phone company and streaming services hasn't been higher is that switching from cable to either is not particularly easy to do.

The telecom offerings -- AT&T's U-Verse and Verizon's FiOS -- are run on fiber-optic cable networks. Compared to traditional cable, this technology is younger and less built-out. Fiber services are available in far fewer markets, typically metropolitan areas of selected cities.

U-Verse, for example, is an option in only nine municipalities, typically locales with a strong tech industry presence. These include San Jose, Caliornia, and Austin, Texas. People in New York or Los Angeles are out of luck at the moment.

Streaming services would appear to have the advantage, then, as they require only a strong Internet connection. The problem is that there are many streamers, and they usually have different price points. So planning a "menu" of services that both covers the needed viewing choices and is sufficiently cost-effective can be a challenge.

Considering that a host of streaming subscriptions probably requires more management than a one-stop, single-price cable package, the savings achieved might not be worth it for many people.

Snip, Snip

Until a clever someone or company devises a product that's both highly convenient, compellingly inexpensive, and packed with every one of a viewer's favorite channels, cord-cutting will probably remain limited to cable-to-satellite defections.

In the meantime, those interested in untethering entirely from cable and satellite can avail themselves of a host of online resources to help them choose the appropriate services for their tastes. Time magazine has a good resource, as do PBS and The Verge, which offers a convenient interactive guide.

Motley Fool contributor Eric Volkman owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends AMC Networks, Netflix, Verizon Communications, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of AMC Networks, Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Amazon Wants to Book Your Hotel Rooms, Too

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

interior of a hotel room
Ventura/Shutterstock
There's a familiar player trying to make a splash in the dynamic online travel industry. Amazon.com (AMZN) is rolling out Amazon Destinations, a hub that hopes to hook up getaway seekers with hotels and other vacation destinations.

Right now, Amazon Destinations is limited to hotels and inns in Southern California, the Northeast and Amazon's home turf of the Pacific Northwest. It's part of the Groupon-like Amazon Local site, listing area hotels that would be ideal for weekend getaways in a sea of vouchers for discounted meals, shows, and spinning classes. In fact, Amazon Local has been offering up marked-down lodging options for years. (It's mostly independent hotels, one writer noted in March.)

However, Amazon Destinations is different in that it's offering up hand-selected hotels even if they are only booking at the published rates. This is Amazon's first step toward being a traditional travel portal, and that has to leave market leaders Expedia (EXPE) and Priceline (PCLN) more than a little concerned.

Happy Trails

The heavyweights of online travel may not be publicly nervous about Amazon invading their turf. Expedia and Priceline generated a combined $14.2 billion in revenue last year, and it will take a long time before Amazon's new local getaway guide gains that kind of traction.

Expedia and Priceline have traditionally taken care of disruptors or smaller upstarts by snapping them up. When Kayak threatened traditional booking sites as an aggregator of all deals, Priceline bought it out two years ago. Even the smaller Orbitz Worldwide (OWW) is in the process of being picked up by Expedia in a $1.34 billion deal, just months after Expedia acquired Travelocity.

Amazon Destinations is different because neither company could afford to buy out its parent. Amazon doesn't sell off its appendages, and if anything it would be Amazon doing the buying if it felt a transaction was necessary. The real question is whether the leading online retailer is committed enough to online travel to make it a force in this space.

All Around the World

Consumers and investors alike will want to bookmark the Amazon Destinations page. It's certainly a modest destination itself right now. There are brief area guides, and historical weather averages through the next few months. However, it wouldn't be a surprise if this becomes a bigger part of the Amazon story in the coming months and years. Let's go over some of the reasons to take Amazon Destinations seriously.

The hand-picked hotel listings encourage user reviews. We've seen Amazon use its perpetually growing catalog of merchandise reviews to influence shoppers and personalize recommendations. Amazon's good at this.

Amazon is guiding visitors to book travel through its proven shopping cart platform. Consumers trust Amazon, and many already have credit card information stored away with the e-tail giant.

If Amazon wants this to be big, it's not beyond promoting it on its heavily trafficked front page. We've seen Amazon do this with everything from the Kindle e-reader to its trade-in exchange. If Amazon sees an opportunity to forge a deeper relationship with its shoppers through travel, it will shout it from the rooftops.

Amazon is here, and now it wants to take you places.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Amazon.com and Priceline Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


American Express to Roll Out Loyalty Program Plenti

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

This undated photo provided by American Express shows the American Express Plenti card, for participants in the company's new loyalty program being launched, on Monday, May 4, 2015. (American Express via AP)
American Express via AP
By KEN SWEET

NEW YORK -- American Express (AXP) will roll out a new loyalty program, Plenti, on Monday, allowing U.S. shoppers for the first time to earn rewards points through a variety of purchases, from paying a phone bill to filling up at the pump.

Unlike other loyalty programs, such as frequent flyer plans, Plenti isn't tied to a single company or credit card issuer. Users can join for free and don't have to be American Express members.

It will really be the first time where U.S. consumers, on a single program, can take the rewards they've earned in one industry and take it to another.

Customers will be able to accumulate points through purchases at Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Rite Aid (RAD), Macy's (M) and a number of other companies, which can then be used for discounts at any participating vendor. Plenti points built up by buying gas or a Nationwide insurance policy, for example, could earn discounts on an electric bill from Direct Energy or milk from Rite Aid.

"It will really be the first time where U.S. consumers, on a single program, can take the rewards they've earned in one industry and take it to another," said Abeer Bhatia, chief executive of US Loyalty at American Express.

Loyalty programs aim to keep customers coming back by allowing them to earn points toward discounts or other rewards. But these programs are often tied to one or two retailers and limited in how they can be used.

Plenti's program is straightforward. A customer signs up at a participating merchant, on the Plenti app for smartphones, or on Plenti.com. Every time a customer spends money, either cash or by using a debit or credit card, they will earn "Plenti Points" after giving their Plenti account number. The number of points a customer earns on a transaction will vary from merchant to merchant.

Plenti Points can be redeemed in 1,000-point increments for $10 in savings, so 1,000 points earned at Exxon could be used for $10 in savings at Macy's or RiteAid.

Plenti is part of American Express' push to broaden its reach of customers, which have traditionally been the affluent, the well-traveled and people who have a lot of business expenses. American Express lost its exclusive deal with Costco (COST) in January, which was considered a major blow to the company. JetBlue (JBLU) is also reportedly planning on ending its relationship with AmEx later this year.

AmEx already operates loyalty programs in Italy, Germany, Poland, India and Mexico that, like Plenti, have partner merchants across a wide variety of industries. The programs, like Germany's PayBack, have proved hugely popular. In some cases half of the country's eligible population participates in the programs.

Some other features of the program:

Who's in it: Companies participating in the Plenti launch include AT&T (T), Exxon Mobil (XOM), Macy's, Nationwide, Rite Aid, utility company Direct Energy and video streaming service Hulu.com. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, which includes the rental car brands Enterprise, Alamo and National, is also joining. American Express expects the network to expand.

A credit card: AmEx is launching a co-branded credit card, known as the Plenti Credit Card by American Express, that will allow customers to earn one Plenti point for every dollar they spend, regardless of whether the merchant is part of the Plenti network or not. American Express cardholders who are part of the Membership Rewards program will be able to convert Membership Reward points into Plenti points.

Grocery stores: Customers will be able to link their grocery store loyalty program to Plenti, and earn points for Plenti through everyday spending at stores.

Privacy: Plenti won't share transaction data between retailers. Rite Aid won't know you what you bought at Macy's and vice versa. Plenti members will be allowed to opt-out of marketing offers.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

McDonald's to Simplify Structure, Focus on Customers

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

McDonalds Turnaround
Eugene Hoshiko/AP
By CANDICE CHOI

NEW YORK -- McDonald's wants to simplify, simplify, simplify -- but also add a bunch of choices for customers to avoid growing stale.

CEO Steve Easterbrook said Monday that he will strip away the bureaucracy at McDonald's so the company can move more nimbly to keep up with changing tastes. The overhaul comes after McDonald's saw its profit drop 15 percent last year, with sales falling in regions around the world.

The reality is our recent performance has been poor. The numbers don't lie.

"The reality is our recent performance has been poor. The numbers don't lie," said Easterbrook, who took charge of the world's biggest hamburger chain March 1.

To help make the right changes more quickly, McDonald's said it's restructuring its business into four units led by lean management teams.

The U.S. market, which accounts for more than 40 percent of operating profit, recently stripped away a level of field oversight and will be its own unit.

Another unit will be made up of established international markets such as Australia and the United Kingdom, and another with high-growth markets such as China and Russia. The countries where McDonald's has a smaller presence will be grouped separately.

Previously, the units were segmented by geography rather than market type.

Already, McDonald's has acknowledged the need to simplify food preparation as well. The company has already trimmed its menu to reduce complexity for workers and make it easier for customers to decide what they want.

'Create Your Taste'

Even as it embraces the mantra of simplification, however, McDonald's is eyeing a host of new options to prevent its image from growing stale.

The company is testing an all-day breakfast menu in San Diego and a "Create Your Taste" option that lets people build their own burgers. Janney analyst Mark Kalinowski has also noted the company is testing a scaled down version of that program called "Taste Crafted" that is available at drive-thrus.

And on Monday, McDonald's launched delivery in New York City in partnership with delivery service Postmates. It plans to offer a mobile app in the U.S. later this year as well.

In a call with reporters, Easterbrook said such moves are about offering more choices and not adding complexity.

"This is about being a better McDonald's, not a different McDonald's," Easterbrook said.

Larry Light, who served as chief marketing officer of McDonald's between 2002 and 2005 and now runs a brand consulting firm, said Easterbrook offered little in the way of what matters to customers.

'Less Bureaucracy'

"Being more efficient, having less bureaucracy will buy you time, but will not buy you enduring success," he said.

When McDonald's was trying to turn around its business in 2002, Light said it focused on addressing the quality of the food, which had degraded over time. For instance, he said the company had stopped toasting Big Mac buns to speed up service.

Changing that helped the company reconnect with its existing fans.

"Now McDonald's is more concerned about the customers that go to Chipotle," Light said.

McDonald's, based in Oak Brook, Illinois, also said Monday that 90 percent of its more than 36,200 restaurants around the world will be franchised over the next four years. That's up from 81 percent, and will mean the company will rely more heavily on franchising fees and move away from the daily work of running restaurants.

The organizational changes will contribute to $300 million in cost-cutting targeted by McDonald's, most of which will be realized by 2017. Without providing details, Easterbrook said the cost-cutting will affect jobs.

Wall Street wasn't impressed with the presentation. McDonald's (MCD) stock fell 1 percent to $96.65.

Easterbrook, who previously headed up the U.K. business, has described himself as an "internal activist" and says he wants to turn McDonald's into a "modern, progressive burger company."

McDonald's annual shareholder meeting is May 21.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

It's Time to Kill Wide Use of Your Social Security Number

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

blue social security card macro ...
Shutterstock
By Adam Levin

It's time to face the music about tax-related identity theft. Experts project the 2014 tax year will be a bad one. The Anthem breach alone exposed 80 million Social Security numbers, and the Premera breach that exposed yet another 11 million Americans' SSNs. So why are we still using Social Security numbers to identify taxpayers?

From April 2011 through the fourth quarter of 2014, the IRS stopped 19 million suspicious tax returns and protected more than $63 billion in fraudulent refunds. Still, $5.8 billion in tax refunds were paid out to fraudsters -- and it's expected to get worse. How much worse? In 2012, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration projected that fraudsters would net $26 billion into 2017.

While e-filing and a lackluster IRS fraud screening process are the openings that thieves exploited, and continue to exploit, the IRS has improved its thief-nabbing game. It now catches a lot more fraud before the fact. This is so much the case that many fraudsters migrated to state taxes this most recent filing season because they stood a better chance of slipping fraudulent returns through undetected. Intuit even had to temporarily shut down e-filing in several states earlier this year for this reason. While the above issues are both real and really difficult to solve, the IRS would have fewer tax fraud problems if it kicked its addiction to Social Security numbers and found a new way for taxpayers to identify themselves.

Naysayers will point to the need for better data practices. Tax-related fraud wouldn't be a problem either if our data were more secure. Certainly this is true. But given the nonstop parade of mega-breaches, it also seems reasonable to say that ship has sailed. No one's data is safe.

Identity thieves are so successful when it comes to stealing tax refunds (and all stripe of unclaimed cash and credit) because stolen Social Security numbers are so plentiful. Whether they are purchased on the dark web where the quarry of many a data breach is sold to all-comers or they are phished by clever email scams doesn't really matter.

A History of These Numbers

In a widely publicized 2009 study, researchers from Carnegie Mellon had an astonishingly high success rate in figuring out the first five digits for Social Security numbers, especially ones assigned after 1988, when they applied an algorithm to names from the Death Master File. (The Social Security Administration changed the way they assigned SSNs in 2011.) In smaller states where patterns were easier to discern the success rate was astonishing -- 90 percent in Vermont. Why? Because SSNs were not designed to be secure identifiers.

That's right: Social Security numbers were not intended for identification. They were made to track how much money people made to figure out benefit levels. That's it. Before 1972, the cards issued by the Social Security Administration even said, "For Social Security purposes. Not for Identification." The numbers only started being used for identification in the 1960s when the first big computers made that doable. They were first used to identify federal employees in 1961, and then a year later the IRS adopted the method. Banks and other institutions followed suit. And the rest is history.

In fact, according to a Javelin Research study last year, 80 percent of the top 25 banks and 96 percent of the top credit card issuers provide account access to a person if they give the correct Social Security number.

India Goes for Biometrics

There are moves to fix related fraud problems elsewhere in the world, in particular India where, in 2010, there was an attempt to get all 1.2 billion residents to use biometrics as a form of identification. The program was designed to reduce welfare fraud, and according to Marketwatch, 160 similar biometric ID programs have been instituted in other developing nations.

In 2011, President Obama initiated the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, a program that partnered with private sector players to create an online user authentication system that would become an Internet ID that people could use to perform multiple tasks and aid interactions with the federal and state governments. There may be a solution there -- but not yet.

The first Social Security card was designed in 1936 by Frederick Happel. He got $60 for it. It was good enough for what it had to do (and was clear that the card wasn't a valid form of identification). That is no longer the case. That card is nowhere near good enough. Perhaps one solution is a new card design -- one with chip-and-PIN technology. Just how something like that might work -- i.e., where readers would be located, who would store the information & support authentication, etc. -- would have to be a discussion for another day. The point is, we need to do something.

This Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com doesn't necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners. Adam Levin is chairman and co-founder of Credit.com and Identity Theft 911. His experience as former director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs gives him unique insight into consumer privacy, legislation and financial advocacy. He is a nationally recognized expert on identity theft and credit.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Last Week's Biggest Stock Movers: Carbo Pumps Up, Etsy Slips

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Markets React To Fed Announcement On Interest Rates
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Plenty of stocks go up and down in any given week. The gainers inspire us to keep investing. The decliners keep greed in check while reminding us about the risks of the equity markets.

Let's go over some of last week's best and worst performers.

Carbo Ceramics (CRR) -- Up 39 percent last week

The biggest gainer on the New York Stock Exchange last week was Carbo Ceramics. This isn't a good time to be an oilfield services provider, and Carbo saw its quarterly revenue shaved in half since the same period a year earlier. It also posted a loss, its first quarterly deficit in more than two decades.

With fuel prices so low, we're finding oil exploration and production companies scale back, and that naturally hurts Carbo. The good news here is that Wall Street pros were forecasting a much larger loss. The bad news is that even after last week's market-leading surge, the stock is trading 72 percent below last year's highs.

Ellie Mae (ELLI) -- Up 16 percent last week

Another big mover on earnings news was Ellie Mae. The provider of cloud-based software solutions for the residential mortgage industry had a blowout quarter, with revenue soaring 68 percent and profitability growing even faster.

There have always been concerns about how Ellie Mae will hold up when interest rates move up, cooling off the refinancing and new mortgage markets. However, Ellie Mae's guidance also had an encouraging tone.

Rent-A-Center (RCII) -- Up 14 percent last week

Widening its offerings has resulted in broader appeal for Rent-A-Center. The chain that specializes in furniture and appliance rentals saw its stock move higher after posting better than expected quarterly results.

Comparable sales moved higher, fueled partly by its move to offering smartphone rentals. Its Acceptance Now chain is also helping pick up the slack as Rent-A-Center closes down some of its namesake stores. Its quarterly profit of $0.52 a share may have been roughly in line with what it rang up a year earlier, but analysts were settling for $0.49 a share.

Celladon (CLDN) -- Down 81 percent last week

Last week's biggest loser was Celladon, and it wasn't even close. The fledgling biotech shed more than four-fifths of its value after terrible news on a clinical trial for its top drug candidate. Celladon's potential treatment for advanced heart failure patients failed to meet the the study's endpoints.

The market was stunned at the treatment's ineffectiveness, and at least one analyst -- Wedbush -- slashed its price target for the shares from $29 all the way down to $3. That's essentially the liquidation cash value of Celladon.

Constant Contact (CTCT) -- Down 30 percent last week

Shares of the mailing list manager shed nearly a third of their value after posting weak revenue growth in its latest quarter. Constant Contact had 645,000 customers as of the end of March -- and the average customer is paying more for Constant Contact's Internet-based platform -- but it failed to drum up as many new customers as it was expecting. Constant Contact is now adjusting its top-line outlook for the entire year lower.

Etsy (ETSY) -- Down 15 percent last week

One of last month's hottest IPOs was Etsy. The arts and crafts online marketplace went public at $16, nearly doubling to close at $30 on its first day of trading. There was no material news to drive the shares lower last week, but the stock has likely fallen over the past four trading days on valuation concerns following its initial pop.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Ellie Mae. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Naturally Cheap Beauty Tips -- Savings Experiment

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Naturally Cheap Beauty Tips
There's a grocery item that can replace several of your beauty products, and chances are you already have it in your pantry. It's coconut oil!

There are so many things you can do with this versatile ingredient. For example, you can use it as a face wash. Just massage the oil into your skin for about 30 seconds, apply a warm towel to open up your pores, wait 15 to 30 seconds, then remove the oil with a washcloth.

Not only is it a great cleanser, but it has hydrating properties, too. That means you won't have to apply additional moisturizer, which equals double the savings!

Coconut oil can also be used as a makeup remover, under-eye cream, lip balm, body scrub, breath freshener, itch reliever, hair conditioner and even as shaving cream. Why spend all that money on those products when you have everything you need right here?

Try adding coconut oil to your daily regimen so you can look your best without going broke.

View Poll



 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Buffett Defends Core Holdings Including IBM, Coca-Cola

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Berkshire
Nati Harnik/APWarren Buffett attends the annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway shareholders in Omaha, Neb., on Saturday.
By Ryan Vlastelica

NEW YORK -- Billionaire investor Warren Buffett defended some of his core holdings in a televised interview Monday, but reiterated that equities in general would look expensive in an environment with normal interest rates.

The remarks from Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), come as several of his core holdings, including IBM (IBM) and Coca-Cola (KO), have showed declining revenue trends in recent years.

Buffett told CNBC that Berkshire had bought more shares of IBM during the first quarter, and forecast higher earnings at the company over the next 10 years.

He also praised IBM's stock buyback program, which he said had been "enormously beneficial" for shareholders, though he stressed that in general, buyback programs should be done based on share price and not as an all-purpose strategy.

Coca-Cola continues to have a "strong competitive position," he said.

Referring to the broader market, Buffett said equity valuation would appear "on the high side" if interest rates were normalized from their currently low levels, while U.S. bonds currently appear "very overvalued."

The comments on equity valuation repeated remarks he had made over the weekend at an annual Berkshire Hathaway meeting.

While he acknowledged that investors expect interest rates to rise this year, Buffett said it would be difficult for the United States to raise rates "significantly" if European rates remain low.

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen's "hands are somewhat tied" by European Central Bank President Mario Draghi with respect to interest rates, he said.

Buffett also commented on the recent strength in the U.S. dollar, as well as the state of the eurozone, two key issues for Wall Street investors.

He predicted that the European Union "more likely than not" would exist in 20 years, though it could have different members than it currently does, a possible reference to Greece's current difficulties.

Speaking about the dollar, Buffett said that given a choice between the U.S. dollar and a basket of other currencies, he would prefer the dollar over the next 10 years.

Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft (MSFT) and a Berkshire director, told CNBC he would prefer the Chinese yuan over the same period of time.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How to Save for Retirement Without a 401(k)

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

savings  male hand stacking...
Shutterstock
By ​Emily Brandon

A 401(k) plan makes it convenient to save for retirement. The money is automatically withheld from your paychecks before you ever get a chance to spend it. You immediately get a tax break on your traditional 401(k) contributions, and sometimes your employer contributes money to the account as well. Some workers are even automatically enrolled in the plan without having to fill out any paperwork or make saving and investment decisions.

Saving for retirement without a 401(k) plan takes a little more effort. But if you are willing to take some initiative, you can still enjoy many of the tax breaks and investment gains that workers with 401(k) plans enjoy. Here's how to save for retirement when you don't have a 401(k) plan.

Fund an IRA

You can defer paying income tax on up to $5,500 that you contribute to an IRA. And investors age 50 and older can save as much as $6,500 in an IRA. Couples can contribute $5,500 to an IRA in each of their names, even if only one spouse works, for a total of $11,000 in tax-deferred savings. And if both spouses are age 50 or older, they can shield as much as $13,000 from income tax in a traditional IRA in 2015. Income tax won't be due until you withdraw the money from the account.

IRAs also give you a greater variety of investment options than 401(k) plans, and you can shop around for accounts and funds that charge especially low fees. "When you don't have a 401(k) plan, you have to pick a brokerage firm and open up the account," says Paul LaViola, a certified financial planner for Foundation Wealth Management in Media, Pennsylvania. "We would suggest a discount brokerage firm and no-load funds."

Open a Roth IRA

Roth IRAs have the same contribution limits as traditional IRAs, but they are taxed differently. You contribute after-tax dollars to Roth IRAs, and then you can withdraw the money, including investment earnings, tax-free in retirement. "With a Roth, you don't get a tax deduction, but you don't pay any tax on the earnings, and the withdrawals are tax-free," says Jon King, an accountant and certified financial planner for Pegasus Financial Solutions in Austin, Texas. To qualify for tax-free distributions, you must be age 59½ or older, and the account needs to be at least five years old. You can contribute to both a traditional and Roth IRA as long as your deposits to both types of accounts don't exceed the annual contribution limits.

Set Up Direct Deposit

One of the major perks of 401(k) plans is that the deposits are withheld from your paychecks, which prevents you from spending the money or having to take action to save. You can replicate this by setting up a direct deposit from your paycheck to an IRA or other type of investment account. You can max out an IRA by contributing $458 per month or $229 per semimonthly paychecks. If you're 50 or older, you will need to contribute $542 monthly or $271 semimonthly to get the maximum possible tax perks.

Save Your Tax Refund

Another way to fund an IRA is to use part of your tax refund. IRS Form 8888 allows you to directly deposit your tax refund into up to three different saving or investment accounts, including an IRA.

Consider the MyRA

A new type of Roth retirement account, the myRA, was created by the Treasury Department in 2014. Investors who earn less than $129,000 for individuals and $191,000 for married couples can save $5,500 per year, up to a maximum account balance of $15,000 in a myRA, where it will be invested in government securities that are guaranteed not to lose value. MyRAs are funded with after-tax dollars via direct deposit through an employer.

Claim the Saver's Credit

Contributing to a traditional or Roth IRA could qualify you for the saver's credit. This tax credit is worth between 10 percent and 50 percent of the amount contributed, up to $2,000 for individuals and $4,000 for couples, with the largest credits going to people with the lowest incomes. Retirement savers with adjusted gross incomes below $30,500 for singles, $45,750 for heads of household and $61,000 for married couples are eligible for the saver's credit in 2015.

Use a Taxable Investment Account

If you are able to save more once you max out an IRA, you can contribute to a taxable investment account. While you won't be able to defer taxes on this account, you can minimize taxes by putting highly taxed investments in your retirement account and holding investments taxed at a lower rate in your taxable accounts. "If you have investments in your taxable account, you in many ways can qualify for more favorable tax treatment than with an IRA," says David Gardner, a certified financial planner in Boulder, Colorado. "When you sell investments that you have purchased in your taxable account, you are paying taxes at a much lower long-term capital gains tax rate." All withdrawals from your traditional IRA are taxed at the often much higher regular income tax rate, regardless of what you invested in inside the IRA.

Contribute to a Savings Account or CD

Everyone needs some liquid cash in a savings account, certificate of deposit or other Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.-insured account to cover repairs, emergencies or other unexpected costs. You can often withdraw your money at any time without penalties or significant tax consequences. While interest rates are typically low, these accounts are insured by the federal government never to lose value, so the savings will be there when you need it.

Emily Brandon is the senior editor for retirement at U.S. News.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


What Your Tax Dollars Bought in April

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Fiscal Cliff
Jacquelyn Martin/APThe U.S. Capitol
April 15 is history. Your taxes are paid, and your government is flush with your hard-earned cash. Now, wouldn't you like to know how they're spending it?

You can.

Not all government agencies are entirely transparent about how they spend your tax dollars. But there is one arm of the U.S. government that does a really good job of keeping taxpayers in the loop, posting detailed reports not only on how much money it spends, but what it spends this money on -- down to the penny.

Believe it or not, we're talking about the Pentagon.

Despite its reputation as a somewhat secretive organization, the Pentagon is actually one of our most transparent government agencies. Every day of the week, the Department of Defense tells U.S. taxpayers what contracts it's issued, to whom, and for how much -- all right out in the open on its website. Whether its missile defense interceptors, fighter jets, or even rocket ships that the Pentagon's buying, you can read it there first.

Or ... you can read the Cliff's Notes version right here.

What Your Tax Dollars Bought in April

The federal government gets its biggest cash windfall in the month of April. So it's perhaps appropriate that April was also the Pentagon's single biggest spending month so far this year. Pulling out all the stops, and pulling out its checkbook, the Department of Defense awarded a whopping $35.4 billion worth of defense contracts in April. That's nearly as much as it spent in the preceding three months combined.

And what did the generals get for their (read: your) money?

Missiles For Peace

Defense contractor Raytheon's (RTN) Standard Missile-3 Block IB is a cornerstone of national missile defense. Designed to intercept and kill incoming, hostile ballistic missiles, the SM-3 IB has racked up a record of 26 successful "kills" in testing preparatory to its deployment this year.

In April, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency awarded Raytheon a contract to supply it with 44 "all-up rounds" (fully assembled, ready-to-fire units) of the SM-3 IB. Raytheon will be paid at least $599 million -- and potentially more. The Pentagon intends to expand this contract to purchase a total of 52 missiles.

Engines For War(-planes)

Simultaneously with that announcement -- and coincidentally, both of these large contracts were rushed out the door on the last fiscal day of April -- the Pentagon awarded United Technologies a $157 million contract. The purpose of this one was to provide United Tech with the funds needed to begin acquiring parts to build 90 "low-rate initial production Lot X" F-135 engines, of which 55 will go to the U.S. military, and 35 to foreign buyers of the F-35.

The F-135 engine is currently the sole engine used to power Lockheed Martin's (LMT) F-35 Joint Strike Fighter -- and United Technologies is the sole source of this engine.

One Shiny New Rocket

Speaking of Lockheed Martin, that company will share in a $138 million contract awarded to United Launch Alliance, a space tech company jointly owned by Lockheed and Boeing (BA), to purchase one National Reconnaissance Office Atlas V 541 rocket, and to help pay for transportation of two new GPS satellites for the U.S. Air Force.

And these weren't even the biggest contracts awarded last month.

DoD's Own Private(-ly contracted) IT Department

Arguably the biggest contract (by stated value) awarded at the Pentagon last month related to the ongoing Network-Centric Solutions-2, or "NetCents-2" project. This wide-ranging IT contract encompasses the requisition of such services as "network operations," "services-oriented architecture infrastructure," and "telephony infrastructure and services" for the U.S. Air Force, provided by an array of 16 mostly small, privately owned tech companies. In total, the U.S. Air Force plans to spread $5.79 billion worth of contracts around among these 16 contractors over the next seven years.

Everything Else -- and the Kitchen Sink, Too

Big as NetCents-2 is, Navy's 464-contractor SeaPort Enhanced , or "Seaport-e," services contract could become even bigger.

How big, you ask? Here's one hint: Just listing the names of all the companies involved in Seaport-e required four-and-a-half single-spaced pages!

According to the Navy, the Seaport-e contract encompasses some "22 functional service areas," including engineering support, research and development, and "prototyping, pre-production, model-making and fabric support," required variously by the U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command, Naval Air Systems Command, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Naval Supply Systems Command, Military Sealift Command, Naval Facilities Command, Strategic Systems Programs, Office of Naval Research, and the U.S. Marine Corps. And according to the Navy, these ongoing contracts could cost taxpayers up to $5.3 billion per year, over an unspecified term of years.

These contracts of course represent only a small sample of the hundreds of awards your tax dollars funded last month. To see the rest, check out the Department of Defense contracts website.

A fan of the Star Wars movies, Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith owns shares of Raytheon -- which just happens to be building the 21st-century version of Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" missile defense system. How cool is that? The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks Rise on Upbeat Earnings from Berkshire

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Dow Plunges Over 200 Points
Kevin Hagen/Getty Images
By Noel Randewich

NEW YORK -- Wall Street ended higher Monday as corporate earnings came in better than feared, although shares of McDonald's declined after the fast-food chain's turnaround plan left investors wanting more.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) rose 1.62 percent, giving the biggest boost to the S&P 500 after the insurance and investment conglomerate's results beat forecasts.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) rose 46.34 points, or 0.26 percent, to end at 18,070.4, and the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) gained 6.2 points, or 0.29 percent, to 2,114.49, just shy of its record-high close of 2,117.69 on April 24.

The Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 11.54 points, or 0.23 percent, to 5,016.93.

Things in Europe seem pretty calm, we haven't heard anything out of China, and against that backdrop, some of the earnings reports are looking better.

"This is being driven by a lack of substantial negative news," said Peter Jankovskis, co-chief investment officer at OakBrook Investments in Lisle, Illinois. "Things in Europe seem pretty calm, we haven't heard anything out of China, and against that backdrop, some of the earnings reports are looking better."

Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) surged 6.15 percent after the provider of information technology services reported a better-than-expected rise in revenue and raised its full-year forecast.

Seven of the 10 S&P sectors were positive, with the financials index gaining 0.98 percent and the utilities index 0.73 percent higher, with investors attracted by relatively high dividends.

With three-quarters of corporate earnings reports in, Wall Street is now trying to divine when the U.S. Federal Reserve will begin raising interest rates. An April payroll report due Friday could give a hint.

Weak Rebound

While new orders for U.S. factory goods recorded their biggest increase in eight months in March, the underlying trend remained weak against the backdrop of a strong dollar, a further sign that a rebound in economic growth wouldn't be as strong as last year.

Monday's rally in utilities suggested some investors believe the Fed won't raise rates soon and may be looking for yield, Jankovskis said. The S&P utilities index has a dividend yield of 3.7 percent, compared to the S&P 500's 2.4 percent dividend yield.

McDonald's (MCD) closed 1.71 percent lower after its plan to turn the fast-food chain into a "modern, progressive burger company" failed to impress shareholders.

Shares of Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) fell 1.88 percent and the S&P 500 energy index lost 1.39 percent after David Einhorn, the influential head of hedge fund Greenlight Capital, said at a conference that oil fracking companies can "contaminate portfolio returns."

Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by 1,758 to 1,287, for a 1.37-to-1 ratio on the upside; on the Nasdaq, 1,593 issues rose and 1,158 fell for a 1.38-to-1 ratio favoring advancers.

The benchmark S&P 500 index was posting 14 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite was recording 55 new highs and 35 new lows.

About 5.6 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, compared with the 7.2 billion daily average for the last five sessions, according to data from BATS Global Markets.

What to watch Tuesday:
  • The Commerce Department releases international trade data for March at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time.
  • The Institute for Supply Management releases its service sector index for April at 10 a.m.
Earnings Season
These selected companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Allstate (ALL)
  • Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. (ADM)
  • Bloomin' Brands (BLMN)
  • Devon Energy (DVN)
  • DirecTV (DTV)
  • Discovery Communications (DISCA)(DISCK)
  • Electronic Arts (EA)
  • Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)
  • Energizer Holdings (ENR)
  • Estee Lauder Cos. (EL)
  • Fiserv (FISV)
  • Fossil Group (FOSL)
  • Frontier Communications (FTR)
  • Groupon (GRPN)
  • Herbalife (HLF)
  • HSBC Holdings (HSBC)
  • Kellogg (K)
  • Mylan (MYL)
  • Newfield Exploration Co. (NFX)
  • News Corporation (NWSA)(NWS)
  • Office Depot (ODP)
  • Sabre Corporation (SABR)
  • Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (SMG)
  • Sempra Energy (SRE)
  • SolarCity (SCTY)
  • Sprint (S)
  • Sun Life Financial (SLF)
  • Towers Watson & Co. (TW)
  • UBS (UBS)
  • Walt Disney Co. (DIS)
  • Zoetis (ZTS)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Lowest Online Price: Amazon, Best Buy, Target or Walmart?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Apple
Marcio Jose Sanchez/APThe iPad Air was one of the products tracked in the CNBC-NerdWallet survey.
By Courtney Reagan and Sabrina Korber

"Where can I get the lowest price?" should be an easy question to answer. But it's not.

Thanks to a slew of factors ranging from shipping fees, special offers linked to credit cards and price-matching guarantees, it can be difficult for shoppers to find the best possible price on an item. Making things even more complicated are retailers' sophisticated algorithms, which respond to changes in the marketplace and sometimes adjust prices more than once a day.

Excluding these complexities, CNBC teamed up with personal finance website NerdWallet to track base prices on 11 consumer electronics products over 12 consecutive weeks at Target.com, BestBuy.com, Amazon.com and Walmart.com.

For the purposes of the study, which was conducted using NerdWallet's DealFinder tool, the base price was only adjusted when the retailer offered a gift card with the purchase. Products examined included a Fitbit Flex, Sony PlayStation 4 and a 16-gigabyte Apple iPad Air. Prices for the last one is charted below.
CNBC and NerdWallet

According to the findings, Amazon ruled the pricing jungle, with Walmart coming in a close second. In some cases, Amazon noted that its price advantage came from its third-party seller marketplace, where it does not influence pricing. Target and Best Buy most often tied for the highest online prices.

Price-Match Guarantees

NerdWallet senior retail analyst Matt Ong said that Amazon and Walmart have the most advanced pricing software algorithms and that "It looks as if Target is either choosing not to play the [pricing] game, or is just not as advanced in its [pricing] technology."

In response to the study's findings, spokespersons for Target, Best Buy and Walmart all pointed to their price-match guarantees. Rafi Mohammed, founder of pricing strategy consulting firm Culture of Profit, said price-sensitive consumers can almost always get the best price at any retailer by taking advantage of price-match policies available-so long as they're willing to invest the time.

A separate finding from the CNBC/NerdWallet study found Best Buy had the top track record for being in stock. Only one of the items included in the study was out of stock one time during the 12-week tracking period.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Loophole May Gut Proposal on Advisers' Conflict of Interest

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Financial Advisor Talking To Senior Couple At Home
Catherine Yeulet

By Daniel Solin

Washington bureaucrats seem to have a way of making everything complicated. Have you perused the tax code lately? According to The Washington Times, it has 4 million words, making it seven times the length of the novel "War and Peace."

On April 21, the U.S. Department of Labor issued its highly anticipated Conflicts of Interest Proposed Rule. If you thought a rule requiring that all advisers to retirement plans place the interests of their clients above their own was a fairly simple matter, you would be mistaken. An article in InvestmentNews noted the newly minted rule and its exemptions take up more than 300 pages of text.

The Purpose of the Proposed Rule

According to the department, the purpose of the rule is simple. It seeks to require retirement advisers to abide by a "fiduciary" standard, which means they will be obligated to put their clients' best interests "before their own profits." The department believes conflicted advice costs retirement plan participants $17 billion in losses every year.

Most participants are blissfully unaware the advice they are receiving may not be in their best interests. It's often biased in favor of investment recommendations that generate the most profits for the adviser.

The Position of the New York City Comptroller

As I reported in a recent blog post, New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer does not find the "fiduciary" issue confusing at all. Until an appropriate rule is issued by the department to protect retirement plan participants, and by the Securities and Exchange Commission to protect individual investors, he is proposing a New York state law that would require non-fiduciaries (like brokers and insurance companies) to make the following statement to their clients:

"I am not a fiduciary. Therefore, I am not required to act in your best interests, and am allowed to recommend investments that may earn higher fees for me or my firm, even if those investments may not have the best combination of fees, risks, and expected returns for you."

If Stringer was the U.S. secretary of Labor, I suspect his proposed rule might read something like this: "As fiduciaries, retirement plan advisers are required to act in your best interests, and must recommend investments that have the best combination of fees, risks and expected returns for you." That's only 30 words, which is a fraction of the verbiage in the department's proposed rule.

The Exemption That Guts the Rule

The department's proposed rule has a "best interest contract exemption." That exemption would allow broker-dealers and insurance companies to provide plan participants with fiduciary advice while still receiving commissions, revenue-sharing payments and 12b-1 fees. They would still be required to put the interests of their clients before their own. And they would also have to disclose conflicts of interest related to their compensation.

But it's difficult to see how this exemption would work as a practical matter. Revenue-sharing payments are commonly made by mutual funds to plan trustees, record keepers and other investment platform providers. Mutual funds that don't make these payments quickly learn they are the price of admission for inclusion as an investment option in the plan.

Disclosure Is Not Enough

Here's the kind of disclosure concerning revenue-sharing payments formulated by one prominent broker-dealer: "We want you to understand that Edward Jones' receipt of revenue-sharing payments represents a potential conflict of interest in the form of additional financial incentive and financial benefit to the firm, its financial advisers and equity owners in connection with the sale of products from these partners."

The problem with this type of disclosure is that it fails to disincentivize retirement plan advisers from including high-cost, actively managed funds among the investment options in retirement plans. It places a burden on the plan sponsor or participants to demonstrate these funds are not in the best interest of plan participants.

Disclosure of this conflict of interest, and after-the-fact rationalization that the advice was nevertheless in the best interest of plan participants, will engender endless litigation. The securities industry has the resources to stoutly defend its position, likely leaving plan participants no better off than they were before enactment of the fiduciary rule.

A true fiduciary would be prohibited from having its integrity compromised by receiving payments from anyone other than the plan sponsor (who could delegate all or a portion of these expenses to the plan participants).

Permitting "fiduciaries" to accept payments from vendors will gut the proposed rule, likely making it ineffective. It will be bad for plan sponsors and plan participants, and good for costly actively managed funds, brokers, insurance companies and their lawyers.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

To Save More Money, Think in Days, Not Years

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

calendar with dates crossed out
Getty Images

By Robert Ferris

Just thinking of a long-term deadline in terms of days instead of years may help you work toward it more effectively, according to new research by a team of psychologists.

Neil Lewis of the University of Michigan and Daphna Oyserman of the University of Southern California ran seven studies analyzing how groups of people reacted to questions about planning for distant future events. They found that people planned to start preparing for a goal four times sooner if the deadline for that goal was expressed in days, rather than months or years.

"When time is sooner, we use tend to more proximal units, such as days. So we wondered if using days as a unit of time would actually make people feel as though now is the time to act, if there would be more urgency or imminence," Oyserman told CNBC.

The findings -- published in the journal Psychological Science -- may be especially relevant during a time when families are failing by a long shot to save for college and even the rich are worried about their retirement savings.

The Research Explained

The team designed questionnaires for groups of people; the number of participants in the studies ranged from around 80 people to more than 300, with nearly equal numbers of men and women, ranging in age from 18 to 73.

Researchers gave participants a future event or goal that has a fixed date, such as their retiring or paying for college. They were asked to write down when they planned to start preparing for those events. For every scenario, the study participants had two write down a future date measured both in years (or months, in one case), and in days. So 30 years becomes 10,957 days, for example.

In the majority of cases, the participants planned to start saving sooner when they were measuring the amount of time they had in days rather than years. "These are not just subtle yet significant effects," Oyserman said. "The effects are quite large."

Oyserman's previous research has dealt with why people don't prepare soon enough for long-term goals, and she thinks the problem is that people have a hard time making the mental connection between their present selves and their future selves.

Oh, There's Plenty of Time (No, There's Not)

It is natural for people to think that a deadline many years away will leave them plenty of time to prepare, and it is also understandable that people tend to prioritize immediate goals and deadlines over distant ones.

But distant goals typically require action in the near future. Saving money, for example, becomes more and more expensive and difficult as time passes, even without accounting for factors such as compounding interest rates. A 40-year-old person trying to save, say $250,000, will have to set aside a much greater portion of every paycheck than someone who began saving for the same amount 10 or 20 years earlier.

"Americans don't under-save because they don't care. They under-save because they don't start soon enough," said Oyserman, who said the researchers were showing a "mental trick you can use on yourself that allows you to start now, which is the biggest problem the average person has."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images