Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

As Wage Gap Persists, Maybe Women Should Marry for Money

$
0
0

Filed under:

outdoor|day|adults|mid-adults|mid-adult man|mid-adult woman|25-30 years|30-35 years|caucasian|two people|couple|husband|wife|spo
Jupiterimages
When I was a teenager, my mother gave me advice about finding a man. "That's nice if he's good-looking and you love him," she said, "but make sure he is smart. If he's smart, you'll have smart children, and he'll be able to get a good job and support the family."

Was this my mother's version of marrying for money, not love?

My mother died two months after my wedding, but she lived long enough to see her advice come to fruition: I married a smart man who came with a very smart daughter. Despite that, I had always felt my mother's advice was antiquated. Nearly seven years ago, I married my husband for love (his good looks didn't hurt), and money had nothing to do with it. At 39, I had already become financially independent through climbing the corporate ladder, using retirement accounts to shield as much as my income as possible from taxes and actively managing my investments so they would grow.

I recognize I'm in the minority of American women who feels financially empowered. I know what my skills and talents are worth in the business marketplace, and I feel confident that I'll be able manage my assets throughout retirement and not outlive my money (with or without my husband). But after reviewing the data on women's salaries and retirement account balances three decades after she made her remarks, my mom seems wiser than ever. Not only are women on average still paid less than men for the same work, but women have significantly less saved for retirement than men.

Paid Less, with Less Saved

A recent Vanguard study finds that although women tend to invest a higher percentage of their income than men in their 401(k), their male counterparts often end up with higher balances as retirement approaches. The average 401(k) balance for the men surveyed was $121,201 -- but only $78,007 for women. (Though the wealthy folks at the high end are apparently skewing that in a far too optimistic direction for both genders. The median numbers -- half of those survey have more, half have less -- are just $38,543 for men, and $25,737 for women. The gaps, though are fairly proportional.)

In terms of retirement assets, the wage gap plays a significant role, confirms Nicole Mayer, an accredited investment fiduciary and certified divorce financial analyst at RPG - Life Transition Specialists. Although he later apologized for his gaffe about women not having to ask for raises, Microsoft (MSFT) CEO Satya Nadella's recent comments reminded everyone that women on average make 23 percent less than men. "Women still earn less than 80 cents to every dollar a man earns," Mayer says. "But they also tend to take more time off work to raise their children and care for elderly parents."

For Richer or Poorer

In advocating for equal pay for women, Gloria Steinem has pointed out that closing the wage gap would be the greatest economic stimulus our country could ever have. But despite the valiant efforts of such feminist leaders, should women finally throw in the towel and marry for money rather than love? Therapist and author Susan Pease Gadoua argues that co-parenting, companionship and financial stability are often more important marriage considerations than love. As an ambitious, independent woman, I find Pease Gadoua's arguments hard to swallow, but I have friends and colleagues who stay in loveless marriages because they don't believe they can have financial stability or live the lifestyle they want on their own.
Susan Dunhoff

Other relationship experts believe love in a marriage is more important than money. Susan Dunhoff, president of The Modern Matchmaker, has been helping clients find lasting love for 21 years. "Money comes and goes," says Dunhoff. "There is no such thing as job security. A husband can make a fabulous living until he walks into work one morning to find a pink slip on his desk."

Dunhoff advises women to strive to reach financial independence long before they walk down the aisle. That way they can focus on meeting and marrying the love of their life. "We consider similar lifestyles and financial behaviors important in making a match. We would not match a client who jets off to Paris on a regular basis with a client who makes less than a six-figure income."

If women want to marry for love (and I think they should), they must overcome the challenges of the gender wage gap. They can't be afraid to tout their accomplishments and ask for raises, bonuses and promotions. And as long as women are making less than men, they must be disciplined and tenacious about spending less and contributing more to their retirement accounts. I followed five rules to become a millionaire before I got married, and I encourage young women to do the same before they search for Prince Charming.

Who knows? Perhaps in a few generations, it will be fathers advising their sons to marry for money instead of love.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


High Rates Make SolarCity Bonds Shine, but Beware the Clouds

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

SolarCity Tesla Batteries
Mark Lennihan/AP
In recent years, people who need to earn income from their investments have faced a dilemma. Low interest rates have crushed returns on traditional safe investments like bank savings accounts and certificates of deposit, making it tough to make ends meet with a conservative portfolio. To get better yields, some used more aggressive investments like dividend stocks to get the cash they need.

Recently, solar installation specialist SolarCity (SCTY) stepped up with solar bonds -- but before you run out to try to harvest these attractive rates, you need to understand some things about risk.

The Appeal of Solar Bonds

It's not hard to understand why investors would be attracted to these solar bonds. Most bank savings accounts pay less than 1 percent currently, and one-year CDs don't pay much above 1 percent. Even if you're willing to lock up your money for five years, it's tough to find rates above 2.5 percent.

By contrast, a one-year SolarCity bond will yield 2 percent. Two-year bonds pay 2.5 percent; three-year bonds pay 3 percent; and seven-year bonds hit 4 percent.

Those figures are well above what you'd get from Treasury bonds, bank CDs, and similar investments from other corporations. Highly regarded companies like American Express (AXP), Amgen (AMGN) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) all have three-year bonds outstanding that have yields in the 1 percent to 1.5 percent range -- less than half what SolarCity is offering.

The Risks of Corporate Bonds

However, there's a big caveat. Solar bonds don't have the same protections as bank products. Savings accounts and CDs are protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. up to $250,000, meaning that if an issuing bank goes out of business, you'll get every penny of your deposit back. Similarly, Treasury bonds are backed by the U.S. government, which means that it would take a default of the federal government for you not to get repaid on a Treasury bond.

By contrast, solar bonds are only obligations of SolarCity. The notes are unsecured, meaning that in the event of default, bondholders wouldn't have the right to make claims against the solar-panel systems that the company has installed in homes across the country. As the risk factors in the prospectus indicate, there are further limits on bondholders' ability to make claims against SolarCity, and some of SolarCity's other creditors would have priority in getting repaid for their obligations ahead of ordinary investors.

Mosaic Solar has offered similar opportunities in California and New York for a year and a half, with rates in the 4.5 percent range on longer-maturity bonds of about nine years.

The Case of Ford and GM

In the past, other corporations have issued bonds directly to investors, with mixed results. Historically, automakers Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) both issued fixed-rate notes through their finance arms that carried interest rates above the prevailing rates on CDs and savings accounts. As investors discovered during the financial crisis, though, these bonds are subject to the default risk of the underlying company, and for a long period, GM SmartNotes traded at high yields as distressed debt. Currently, Ford has stopped issuing new notes, and with GM's financing arm now known as Ally Financial (ALLY), it now offers its corporate notes in periodic offerings rather than on an ongoing basis through its website.

In the end, investing in SolarCity bonds is a bet that it will sustain its leadership position in the solar industry. Yet even with attractive interest rates, SolarCity's solar bonds involve a degree of risk that many income-seeking investors simply won't feel comfortable taking on.

Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger isn't sure about solar bonds for his own portfolio, but he does own shares of SolarCity and Ford. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google+. The Motley Fool recommends American Express, Ford, General Motors, and SolarCity. The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford, JPMorgan Chase, and SolarCity. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

To See How the Recession Is Lingering, Look at All the Renters

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Horizontal|Photography|Color Image|Two People|Indoors|Loft Apartment|Young Men|Displeased|Caucasian|Serious|Worried|20s|Apartmen
Getty Images
Ever since the housing crisis and financial collapse of 2008, more Americans have been renting their homes rather than buying them, and a new report finds these renters are "financially fragile" compared to homeowners.

The FINRA Investor Education Foundation study finds that renters are twice as likely to say it is "very difficult" to cover their monthly bills. It defines financially fragile as the inability to respond to an economic shock. Could you come up with $2,000 in 30 days to respond to an emergency? The FINRA study shows that 58 percent of renters say they probably or definitely couldn't.

The renter population is generally younger, lower income, single and more likely to be more racially diverse than the overall population, according to Gary Mottola, research director of the foundation and author of the report. "What jumps out at me," he said, "is the magnitude of the differences. Look at race, look at gender, look at age. We see big differences in the ability of renters to handle a financial crisis."

It's Not a Pretty Picture on That Rented Wall

It's certainly not a surprise. In many cases, if people had the money to buy a home, they would. "We know that renting and low income is highly correlated," Mottola said, "but we can't say one is driving the other." But he said the study of more than 25,000 people paints a troubling portrait.

Renters have lower rates of financial literacy and are more likely to experience a large drop in income. Only 22 percent of renters say they have saved enough money to cover their expenses for three months if they lost their job or had a medical or other emergency. By comparison, half of all homeowners had such an emergency fund. Renters are also more likely to carry credit card debt, student loans and medical debt.

The effects of the Great Recession forced millions of American homeowners out of homes lost to foreclosure. Real estate marketing website Trulia (TRLA) estimates an additional 875,000 households now rent their homes than would have been the case has the 2008 housing crisis never occurred. As a result, there are fewer apartments available, and the rental prices have been increasing at a faster rate than home prices. Real estate research firm Reis (REIS) recently reported that the tight market for apartments has sent rental costs up for 23 straight quarters -- ever since the recession officially ended in 2009. Prices have jumped by 15 percent and are likely to continue to rise over the next year or so.

According to the FINRA report, 74 percent of renters have household incomes below $50,000, compared to 41 percent of homeowners. Renters are also twice as likely to be unemployed or temporarily laid off. "There's a troubling combination of factors," according to Mottola. "You have a population with a low level of financial literacy, more likely to encounter problems and less likely to be able to handle them."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Best of DailyFinance: The Week in Review (Oct. 20 - 26)

$
0
0

Filed under:

Samaruddin Stewart/AOL
From homeowners facing soaring premium increases after filing claims on their home insurance to the announcement that social security monthly payments will rise only 1.7% next year, here are this week's most-shared stories. We've also got several must-reads here, in particular our piece on IRA and 401K fees that you may not know you're paying. Don't miss it!

1. Just One Claim Could Raise Your Homeowners Insurance 32%
2. Social Security Benefits to Rise Less Than 2% for Third Year
3. Apple Warns Users Over iCloud Security
4. Half of Baby Boomers Don't Know They Pay IRA, 401K Fees
5. Toxic Chemicals Taint Many Halloween Costumes
6. Ben & Jerry's Keeps 'Hazed & Confused' Name Over Protests
7. Top 5 Money Management Tips for 30-Somethings
8. One Simple Act Can Protect You From Credit Card Fraud
9. How to Handle Finances With Your Boomerang Kid
10. Evenflo Recalls Infant Car Seats to Fix Sticky Buckles


 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks End Mixed as Oil, Europe Woes Dominate

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Pump jack 2
Douglas Knight/Getty Images
By MATTHEW CRAFT

NEW YORK -- Lower oil prices and more gloomy economic news from Europe tugged the S&P 500 to a slight loss on Monday.

Companies whose fortunes tend to follow global economic growth fared the worst, as shares of oil companies and material producers dropped 2 percent. Those industries that depend on the U.S. economy, including telecoms, held steady.

"What we're seeing is a market trying to find its footing right now," said Kevin Mahn, president and chief investment officer of Hennion & Walsh Asset Management.

The Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) closed with a loss of 2.95 points, or 0.2 percent, at 1,961.63. The Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) rose 2.22 points, a fraction of a percent, to 4,485.93, while the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) picked up 12.53 points, or 0.1 percent, to 16,817.94.

The news out Monday was mostly glum. Business confidence in Germany, Europe's largest economy, declined for a sixth straight month, and Goldman Sachs said slowing economic growth around the world led it to lower its forecast for crude prices.

The European Central Bank released the results of its stress tests of Europe's 130 biggest banks and said 13 of them still needed to raise more capital to survive a severe downturn. The bank that did worst in the tests, Italy's Monte dei Paschi di Siena, saw its shares plunge 18 percent. Those that passed, however, traded higher.

Germany's DAX lost 0.9 percent. France's CAC 40 dropped 0.8 percent, and Britain's FTSE 100 dipped 0.4 percent.

Last week, the U.S. stock market turned in its best performance in nearly two years. The rise helped the S&P 500 regain ground from four weeks of losses. The benchmark index had dropped almost 6 percent by mid-October, but is now down just a fraction -- 0.5 percent -- for the month.

What's behind the recent turbulence?

David Joy, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial, thinks the volatility is tied to actions by the world's central banks. The Federal Reserve is winding down its $4 trillion bond-buying program -- known as QE3 -- this month. And many investors expect the European Central Bank to launch its own program on a similar scale.

"We're approaching the end of QE [quantitative easing], and I think the market is going through a period when people are asking, how important is it to lack that support?" Joy said. "The open question is how robust is the economy you're left with. Is it strong enough to sustain earnings growth?"

Rising supplies and weak global demand continued to weigh on the price of crude oil on Monday, which has tumbled from a high of $107 a barrel in June. Goldman Sachs (GS) was the latest Wall Street bank to lower its forecast for prices in a report, saying OPEC was unlikely to cut exports to try and push prices back up. Benchmark U.S. crude fell 1 cent to close at $81 a barrel in New York after trading much lower earlier in the day.

Oil and gas companies sank. Halliburton (HAL) and Nabors Industries (NBR) both dropped more than 6 percent.

Among other companies making big moves, Micron Technology (MU) surged 4 percent after the chip maker announced plans to spend as much as $1 billion to buy its own shares. Micron jumped $1.24 to $32.30, extending a rally that has pushed the stock up 48 percent this year.

Merck (MRK) said its earnings and sales fell in the third quarter, and the pharmaceutical company also scaled back its most optimistic forecasts for full-year profits and revenue. The news knocked Merck's stock down $1.16, or 2 percent, to $56.45.

In other trading on Monday, prices barely budged in the market for U.S. government bonds. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note slipped to 2.26 percent from 2.27 percent late Friday.

In the commodity markets, gold fell $2.50 to settle at $1,229.30 an ounce, silver fell 2 cents to $17.16 an ounce and copper edged up 2 cents to $3.06 a pound.

Brent crude, a benchmark for international oils used by many U.S. refineries, fell 30 cents to close at $85.13 in London.

In other trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange:

o. Wholesale gasoline fell 1.2 cents to close at $2.170 a gallon.
o. Heating oil fell 0.7 cents to close at $2.475 a gallon.
o. Natural gas fell 6.2 cents to close at $3.561 per 1,000 cubic feet.

What to Watch Tuesday:
  • The Commerce Department reports durable goods orders for September at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time.
  • Standard & Poor's releases the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index for August at 9 a.m.
  • The Conference Board releases its consumer confidence index for October at 10 a.m.
These major companies are scheduled to release quarterly financial results:
  • Aetna (AET)
  • AMC Entertainment (AMC)
  • American Financial Group (AFG)
  • Ameriprise Financial Services (AMP)
  • AutoNation (AN)
  • Boston Properties (BXP)
  • Cabot (CBT)
  • Centene (CNC)
  • Cincinnati Financial (CINF)
  • CIT Group (CIT)
  • Coach (COH)
  • Corning (GLW)
  • Cummins (CMI)
  • DuPont (DD)
  • Ecolab (ECL)
  • Edison International (EIX)
  • Electronic Arts (EA)
  • Equity Residential (EQR)
  • Express Scripts (ESRX)
  • Facebook (FB)
  • Fiserv (FISV)
  • Fresh Del Monte Produce (FDP)
  • Gilead Sciences (GILD)
  • Harris Corp. (HRS)
  • HCA Holdings (HCA)
  • Honda Motor Co. (HMC)
  • Kimco Realty (KIM)
  • Laboratory Corp. of America (LH)
  • Marriott International (MAR)
  • Marsh & McLennan (MMC)
  • Martha Stewart Living (MSO)
  • Martin Marietta Materials (MLM)
  • McKesson (MCK)
  • Meadwestvaco (MWV)
  • Newfield Exploration (NFX)
  • Owens-Illinois (OI)
  • Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG)
  • Panera Bread (PNRA)
  • Parker-Hannifin (PH)
  • Pfizer (PFE)
  • Plantronics (PLT)
  • PriceSmart (PSMT)
  • Sanofi (SNY)
  • Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
  • Sirius XM (SIRI)
  • Spirit Airlines (SAVE)
  • Starwood Hotels & Resorts (HOT)
  • Tanger Factory Outlet Centers (SKT)
  • TD Ameritrade (AMTD)
  • Timken (TKR)
  • UBS (UBS)
  • U.S. Steel (X)
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX)
  • Whirlpool (WHR)
  • Wynn Resorts (WYNN)

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

IRA and 401(k) Changes Coming in 2015

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Investment portfolio eggs
Geri Lavrov/Getty ImagesThe new year will bring new account options for workers saving for retirement.
By Emily Brandon

Retirement savers will have a new retirement account option in 2015. Investors will also be eligible to contribute $500 more to a 401(k) next year. Here's a look at how retirement accounts will change in 2015.

Introducing the myRA. The Treasury will offer a new type of retirement account, the myRA, beginning in late 2014 that is guaranteed by the government to never lose value. Deposits will be made via payroll deduction, and accounts can be opened with an initial deposit of as little as $25 and then direct deposits of $5 or more each payday. But these accounts are not tied to your job and are portable if you change jobs. Savers with an annual income of less than $129,000 for individuals and $191,000 for couples will be eligible to participate. These new accounts "target low- and middle-income Americans who don't currently have access to an employer-sponsored plan," says Mikio Thomas, a senior tax analyst for the Internal Revenue Service.

The myRA is a Roth account, which means contributions can be withdrawn tax-free at any time, and earnings can be distributed without triggering an additional tax once the account is five years old and the account owner is at least age 59½. However, myRAs differ from Roth IRAs in that myRAs will hold a new retirement savings bond backed by the U.S. Treasury that is guaranteed not to lose value, and there are no fees. Savers can use the accounts for up to 30 years or until their balance grows to $15,000, at which point the balance will transfer to a private-sector retirement account.

Higher 401(k) contribution limits. Taxpayers will be able to contribute up to $18,000 to their 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans and the federal government's Thrift Savings Plan in 2015, which is $500 more than in 2014. "You can increase your contribution percentage at the start of the year," says Andrew Jamison, a certified financial planner for Main Avenue Financial Services in Beaverton, Oregon. The catch-up contribution limit for employees age 50 and older will also grow by $500 to $6,000 in 2015.

IRA contribution limits unchanged. The IRA contribution limit will remain $5,500 in 2015. Investors age 50 and older can contribute an additional $1,000 to an IRA, an amount that is not eligible for an annual cost-of-living adjustment.

Bigger IRA income limits. The tax deduction for making a traditional IRA contribution is phased out for investors who have a workplace retirement plan and a modified adjusted gross income between $61,000 and $71,000 for individuals and $98,000 to $118,000 for couples in 2015, up $1,000 and $2,000, respectively, from 2014. For individuals who don't have a workplace retirement plan but are married to someone who does, the tax deduction for an IRA contribution is phased out if the couple's income is between $183,000 and $193,000 in 2015.

Increased Roth IRA income cutoffs. The income limits for contributing to a Roth IRA will increase by $2,000 in 2015 to between $116,000 and $131,000 for individuals and $183,000 to $193,000 for married couples. "If you are eligible for a Roth, I would put the full amount in a Roth IRA," says Ann Coulson, a certified financial planner and personal financial planning professor at Kansas State University. "Then you can pull out tax-free income so you have money to live on in retirement." Individuals who earn more than these income cutoffs may still be able to convert traditional IRA assets to a Roth IRA.

Larger saver's credit threshold. Low- and moderate-income workers who contribute to a 401(k) or IRA are eligible for the saver's credit, a tax credit that can be worth as much as $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for couples. Workers are eligible for the saver's credit until their AGI reaches $30,500 for singles, $45,750 for heads of household and $61,000 for married couples in 2015. These limits are between $500 and $1,000 higher than in 2014.

IRA one rollover rule. Beginning on Jan. 1, 2015, investors can make only one rollover from one IRA to another in any 12-month period. A second IRA-to-IRA rollover in a single year could result in income tax becoming due on the rollover, a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty and a 6 percent per year excess contributions tax as long as that rollover remains in the IRA. "Individuals can only make one IRA rollover during any one-year period, but there is no limit on trustee-to-trustee transfers," Thomas says. Multiple trustee-to-trustee transfers between IRAs and conversions from traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs will continue to be allowed in the same year.

Emily Brandon is the senior editor for Retirement at U.S. News. You can contact her on Twitter @aiming2retire, circle her on Google Plus or email her at ebrandon@usnews.com.






 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Sony Harnesses 'Powers' to Sell PlayStation Plus Subscriptions

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Powers
Sony Pictures
Comic book-themed entertainment has taken over at the box office with Marvel movies and on television with "The Walking Dead." We've yet to see a limit to the genre's superpowers. That could all change come December, when Sony (SNE) debuts "Powers" exclusively to PlayStation owners with a PlayStation Plus subscription.

For Sony, it's a new spin on an old model. Video games are often tied to a single platform initially in hopes of juicing sales of a new console. Microsoft (MSFT) took this approach with the Xbox One and the giant-robot shooter "Titanfall," and enjoyed a jump in U.K. sales as a result. Roughly 70 percent of console purchases were made in conjunction with a download code for "Titanfall."

Every new generation of consoles gets its share of exclusives. For the Xbox, "Halo" has been a particular catalyst over the years. For the PS3, new entries in the "Uncharted" and "Gran Turismo" games proved especially popular. For the PS4, "Killzone: Shadow Fall" sold more than 2 million copies in the first five months of release. Good titles help sell consoles, and vice versa.

Television tends to work a bit differently. While exclusive programming is par for the course -- think of Netflix's (NFLX) "House of Cards" or HBO 's "Game of Thrones" -- programs rarely sell anything other than the brand of the network airing the show. You may wish to sign up for unfettered access if the programming is appealing enough.

But in those cases, you're only committing to $8 to $15 extra per month out of pocket. "Powers" demands a PlayStation Plus subscription, which costs either $9.99 monthly, $17.99 quarterly or $49.99 annually. Adding a new console -- in this case, a PS3 or PS4 -- will run another $200 to $400 if you're buying from Amazon.com (AMZN). That's a steep toll, especially if you don't know what to expect from "Powers."

Here's What to Expect ...

IMDb bills the show as a sort of police procedural in which "a homicide detective is tasked with investigating crimes involving superhuman powers." That's not quite right. What makes the pairing of Christian Walker (played by Sharlto Copley) and Deena Pilgrim (Susan Heyward) interesting is their backgrounds: Walker is a former superhero who lost his powers while Pilgrim is a trained detective. Together, they're tasked with investigating crimes involving men and women with fantastic abilities.

For now, Sony is committing to just 10 episodes, which might not sound like much if "Law & Order" is your idea of the prototypical police procedural. It's still the right move -- we've seen "Powers" fail before. Twenty-First Century Fox (FOXA) originally teamed with Sony for a pilot that was to air on FX. Multiple scripts were ordered, shoots and reshoots took place, yet none of it resulted in a finished pilot. Fox moved on, and Sony stepped in.

Whether that history creates pent-up demand or stigma is tough to know at this point. The good news for Sony? As an independent comic book, "Powers" has done well -- generally selling 25,000 to 40,000 copies per issue. That's about in line with a midrange book from Marvel or DC and a little less than half what "The Walking Dead" sells on a monthly basis.

On TV, "Powers" is unlikely to get anywhere near the tens of millions who tune into AMC Networks' (AMCX) zombie drama. A more realistic (if still ambitious) result might be 2 million new PlayStation Plus subscribers here in the U.S., on par with what "House of Cards" brought to Netflix in the quarter it debuted.

"Powers" gets its chance to break that record two months from now. Watch an unfiltered version of the trailer -- "Powers" isn't a kids show -- and then leave a comment to let us know your plans.

Motley Fool contributor Tim Beyers' superpower is still falling asleep early after an evening cup of coffee. He owns shares of Netflix, and you can find him on Twitter as @milehighfool. The Motley Fool recommends Amazon.com, AMC Networks and Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com, AMC Networks, Microsoft and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to harness your financial powers? Check out our free report on our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Scared of the Stock Market? Try Investing in Consumer Debt

$
0
0

Filed under:

adults; beanie; bills; boys; cash; cool; count; currency; deal; dealer; dollars; drugs; dude; face; fashion; finances; financial
Jason Stitt/Shutterstock
October has reminded us that stock prices do not always go up. When volatility returns, some people panic, and others look for alternative places to park their money.

One asset class that has become increasingly popular -- and more accessible to everyday investors -- is consumer credit. I've spent my entire career in consumer banking, and I find the democratization of credit fascinating, game-changing and mostly a good thing. While I certainly do not recommend panicking over the stock market's recent moves, I do think this emerging asset class should be considered by ordinary investors -- and people in credit card debt.

Why Consumer Credit?

Americans like to borrow. And when we do, most of us pay high interest rates and pay on time. There is currently $880 billion of revolving credit in this country (credit card, store card and revolving lines of credit). The average interest rate on this debt is well above 15 percent.

And loss rates are low. At JPMorgan Chase (JPM), the loss rate on the credit card business is 2.52 percent in its latest earnings announcement.

To oversimplify the equation: If you charge 18 percent in interest, and only write off 2.5 percent in credit losses, than you've made a tidy profit. During my career, credit card businesses regularly had higher returns than investment banks.

A Very Lucrative Business -- for Banks

To lend money, you need money. And banks are uniquely positioned to borrow a lot of money at very cheap rates. Wells Fargo (WFC) has $1.1 trillion of deposits, and it pays only 0.1 percent for those deposits, held in a variety of accounts.

Most banks pay close to nothing on savings accounts. The Big 4 -- Citi (C), Wells Fargo, Bank of America (BAC) and Chase -- pay 0.01 percent on consumer savings accounts. So, they borrow from us at 0.01 percent, and then lend it back to us at double-digit interest rates.

No wonder credit card lending generates such outsized returns.

Until Now

Some very smart people thought the equation did not make sense. Why were borrowers paying such high interest rates on their credit cards? And why were savers receiving such low interest rates on their deposits? The difference between the interest rate charged on cards and the interest rate paid on deposits went to the bankers. The banks' primary purpose is to serve as an intermediary between borrowers and savers. But they seemed to be receiving too much money for this role.

Businesses like Prosper.com and Lendingclub.com are looking to change the game completely. Borrowers can apply for a loan on their platforms. The interest rates they will receive will be much lower than from traditional credit cards.

Everyday investors can fund these loans, building up a diversified portfolio. The lending platform will take 1 percent, and the rest goes to the investor.

So, the bet being made by LendingClub and Prosper is that they can do the job of a bank at a much lower cost. And the early results are promising. LendingClub alone has helped to originate more than $5 billion of loans, and it is heading towards an initial public offering.

A Guide for Borrowers

If you have credit card debt, you should consider refinancing with a personal loan from one of these new lenders. A personal loan can offer a fixed amount of money, at a fixed interest rate over a fixed period. It is a relatively straightforward contract, making it difficult to hide tricks, fees and traps in the fine print. The simplicity of a personal loan is a stark contrast to the complexity of a credit card.

And the best part of online personal loans: you can see if you are approved (including the amount you can borrow and the interest rate) without having a hard credit inquiry hit your credit score. Most personal loan companies use a "soft credit pull." At MagnifyMoney (my website), we have put together a list of online personal loan companies to help you compare and see how much you could save. Reducing your interest rate can take years off your debt repayment.

For Investors, It's a Bit More Complicated

Investing in a personal loan on one of these marketplaces is very different from putting your money into a savings account. Here are some of the most important differences:
  • Your money is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. In fact, you can lose it all. This is a speculative investment, not a safe place to park cash.
  • It is not liquid. When you lend the money to another individual, your money has literally been transferred from your wallet to the borrower's wallet. Banks keep liquidity to fund early withdrawals; no such liquidity exists here. There are opportunities to sell the debt in a secondary market, but this is new and there is no guarantee on the price you can receive.
And consumer lending provides good returns when you have a well-diversified portfolio. If you only invest in a few loans, you are gambling. If you decide to take a bet, here are some tips:
  • If you can't invest in at least 100 notes (at a minimum ticket size of $25, that is $2,500), then you really shouldn't invest. Personally, I prefer to have at least 250 notes to further reduce potential risk clustering.
  • Beware loans that run longer than 36 months. During my lifetime of consumer lending, I have observed the performance of many personal loan portfolios. And the longer the duration, the more likely that the consumer stops paying. Five years is a long time, and there is limited data for any loan originated on the platform over a five-year horizon.
  • If you don't want to spend a lot of time, consider signing up for automated investing, which builds a diversified portfolio for you (and you can specify the maximum tenor of those loans).
  • Don't invest more than you are willing to lose entirely. The asset class (personal loans) is not new. But the companies originating the loans (LendingClub, Prosper and others) are new. The true risk profile of customers attracted to these websites is not yet clear and can have a material impact on the returns. And, with aggressive growth planned going forward, it is not clear how the targeting and risk underwriting will evolve. (Even small things -- like the marketing message used to attract a consumer -- can have a huge impact on the credit risk of the borrower, regardless of score. As an investor, you have no control over the marketing and scoring).
If this market evolves properly, then it can create a great opportunity for borrowers to pay less interest, and for investors to earn more. For borrowers, there is no real risk. If you have credit card debt at high rates, you should see if you can get a better deal today: There is no downside.

For investors, this is still relatively new territory. It is worth exploring, but with caution. I have my own humble portfolio with LendingClub, and it is generating a 6 percent risk-adjusted return. But I am still going to wait a few more years before I meaningfully increase my exposure.

Nick Clements is a consumer advocate and the co-founder of MagnifyMoney.com, a website that makes it easy to understand the true cost of financial products. He spent nearly 15 years in consumer banking, and most recently he ran the largest credit card business in the U.K.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


When My Relationship Got Serious Enough for the Money Talk

$
0
0

Filed under:

dv1693022Couple Sitting at a Table With a Jar Full of Coins in Front of ThemCasual Clothing, Table, Jar, Finance, Coin, Vertical
Getty Images
Every one of us has had "aha! moments." Epiphanies. Days when we reach a crossroads and realize that we have to make some changes. For the next two months, we're sharing moments like those in our Life Stage Lessons series: Real stories straight from the financial lives of our DailyFinance contributors about times when they realized they were due for a serious course correction. So read on, learn from our mistakes, and get inspired to improve your relationship with your money.

A lot changes when your relationship turns from "casual" to "serious." You talk about moving in together. You talk about your future. You talk about who gets primary custody of the TV remote, now that you're no longer in "I need to impress this person" mode, and you're done enduring "Modern Family" marathons.

(I kid, but only partly.)

But one thing I hadn't bargained for when my boyfriend and I started getting serious? Having the money talk.

Money Is a Part of Your Future Together

When you're contemplating spending your future with someone, money needs to be a serious part of your discussion. After all, money is one of the issues couples fight about the most, and it can get ugly if you're not both on the same page.

I know from experience. My partner and I don't fight much anymore now that we've settled into our relationship. We know each other really well. We know what works for us, and we've already worked out most of the major issues that tripped us up early on. But when we started thinking about finances in terms of "ours" instead of "mine" and "yours," things got messy.

Money is the Root of Many Problems

Suddenly, it really bugged me that he didn't contribute much to his retirement accounts, and I hated the fact that he lent money to family and friends who never paid it back. For his part, he didn't like the fact that I love high-end restaurant dining -- which adds up to hundreds of dollars each month.

We realized we needed to just be honest and clear with each other about our financial priorities. We figured out that we were going to treat our cash as a team instead of two separate entities. And like any good team, we needed to start with a clear "mission" or vision.

For example: We agreed that our retirement savings came first. We needed to max out our 401(k) and individual retirement account contributions before we'd even consider upgrading to a nicer apartment or taking vacations together. I agreed to cut back on my restaurant dining; he stopped lending money to friends and family.

Committed Together to Entrepreneurship

Then we took an extra step: We decided to commit to entrepreneurship as a path to wealth, despite its risks. We found ways to save time and money as small business owners, and worked side-by-side to nurture our small enterprise from an idea to a thriving income.

So while you're hashing out things like whose family you're spending the holidays with this year, make sure you also have some serious, honest talks about money. Here are the big things you need to discuss:
  • Savings vs. spending. If one of you has a you-only-live-once attitude toward your cash and the other is terrified to spend a dime, you're heading toward trouble. Ask yourselves what money means to you -- is it meant to be enjoyed right now, saved as much as possible or some combination? What will that look like in action?
  • Lifestyle standards. How much "stuff" do you need to be happy? What do you like to spend your time doing? What do you want your home to look like? If you're planning on spending your life with someone, you need to have similar expectations when it comes to how fancy or bare-bones that life will be. Compromise can be reached, but only if you're upfront with each other.
  • Long-term goals. In terms of your career and your life, where do you want to be in five years, 10 years, 20 years? Do you want a job that lets you live the high life or one that fulfills you even if it doesn't pay much? Do you want to settle down in a cozy suburb with 2.5 kids and a dog, or would you rather travel the world and seek out adventure? There is no right or wrong answer to these questions; the important thing is that you're honest with yourself -- and your significant other -- about what will make you happy and that you're both working toward the same things.
  • Household budget. Whether you decide to combine finances or divvy up expenses and each have your own spending money, you need to get clear on who will pay for what and what your household priorities are. You're in this together, and that includes how you spend your money, whether you have joint or separate accounts.
  • Debt. Being with someone involves accepting any baggage that might come with them, and that includes financial baggage. If you're struggling with debt, you need to come clean and work out a plan to take of it. Don't keep this deep dark secret from your partner. It will come out eventually.
  • Investment styles and risk tolerance. You've worked out some savings goals, but how are you going to get there? Do you have a conservative investment style or would you rather pursue some riskier ventures in the hopes of a bigger payout? Again, there's no right or wrong answer; the key thing is that you're both operating by the same play book and you're both comfortable with your decisions.
The money talk can be awkward, but it's absolutely necessary to ensure a happy future together. So suck it up, lay your cards on the table, and start working together when it comes to your cash. I'll leave it to you to work out the who-gets-the-remote debate.

Paula Pant ditched her 9-to-5 job in 2008. She's traveled to 30 countries, owns seven rental units and runs a business from her laptop. Her blog, Afford Anything, is a gathering spot for rebels who want to ditch the cubicle, shatter limits and live life on your own terms -- while also building wealth, security and freedom.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Walmart Doesn't Support Apple Pay and Here's Why

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Exterior of Wal-Mart store with two customers walking in
Mark Scheuern/Alamy
By JAY YAROW

Walmart (WMT) and Apple (AAPL) are in a bit of a tussle over Apple Pay, Apple's mobile payment system on the iPhone 6.

Walmart is a leader of MCX, a group of merchants working on their own mobile payment system.

Walmart isn't accepting Apple Pay right now. Members of MCX, including Rite Aid (RAD) and CVS (CVS), shut down support for Apple Pay after a few days of accepting it, likely out of a contractual obligation to MCX to only use MCX's mobile payment solution.

MCX's alternative to Apple Pay is called CurrentC. It's been in development since 2012, and it's a much clunkier solution. The user has to open the CurrentC app, then use a camera to scan a QR code, which is a boxy, bar code type of thing. Or, they unlock the phone, open the app, then have a QR code generated that gets scanned by the retailer.

After we wrote about CurrentC earlier, a Walmart PR rep reached out.

During a back-and-forth, we asked why Walmart doesn't accept Apple Pay, which is a pretty elegant solution to mobile payments. An iPhone owner simply holds their phone to a payment terminal, then uses her fingerprint to confirm payment.

Here's what we were told:

There are certainly a lot of compelling technologies being developed, which is great for the mobile-commerce industry as a whole. Ultimately, what matters is that consumers have a payment option that is widely accepted, secure and developed with their best interests in mind. MCX member merchants already collectively serve a majority of Americans every day. MCX's members believe merchants are in the best position to provide a mobile solution because of their deep insights into their customers' shopping and buying experiences.

Our emphasis is added in there. These are mega corporations fighting for billions of dollars -- Apple, the banks, Walmart, etc. -- so it's hard to know who to really trust.

But, we would trust that Apple is working with consumers in mind.

And we would guess that Walmart is less concerned about consumers. It is more concerned with eliminating the 2 percent fee that comes with credit card purchases. CurrentC bypasses credit card fees, which will save Walmart money in the long run.

In fact, Ron Shevlin, a retail banking analyst, says he asked former Walmart CEO Lee Scott why MCX could succeed when so many other consortium had failed. Scott's answer tells you a lot about CurrentC, and MCX. He said, "I don't know that it will, and I don't care. As long as Visa suffers."

The Cost of Saying No Way to Apple Pay

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Nearly 60,000 Pounds of Chicken Parts Recalled Nationwide

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Meat Company Recalls Nearly 32,000 Pounds Of Breaded Chicken

By Marcy Kreiter | @marcykreiter | m.kreiter@ibtimes.com

Two food production companies recalled nearly 60,000 pounds of chicken products because of possible staph and Salmonella contamination, the Agriculture Department's Food Safety and Inspection Service said. A third company recalled 377 pounds of broccoli kale salad with chicken.

Murray's Inc. of Lebanon, Pennsylvania, on Sunday recalled 31,689 pounds of gluten free breaded chicken products that may be contaminated with Staphylococcal enterotoxin, the FSIS said. The products are dated Aug. 9 and were packed in 12-ounce and 10.5-ounce boxes under the Bell & Evans brand. The problem was discovered by the Colorado Department of Agriculture during a retail surveillance and sampling program. Staphylococcal food poisoning is a gastrointestinal illness.

Aspen Foods Division of Koch Meats of Chicago on Saturday recalled 28,980 pounds of chicken products that may be contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis, FSIS said. The chicken was sold under the Antioch Farms brand name in five-ounce packets with sell-by dates of Oct. 1 and Oct. 7. Salmonellosis produces diarrhea, abdominal cramps and fever within 72 hours of consumption.

Taylor Farms of Swedesboro, New Jersey, on Saturday recalled 377 pounds of Signature Cafe Broccoli Kale Salad with chicken for misbranding that neglected to list walnuts among the ingredients. The salads were sold in 9.75-ounce plastic clam shell packages with use-by dates of Oct. 23, 25 and 27.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

GM to Build More Chevy Volt Parts in Michigan

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Autos Contract Talks GM
Paul Sancya/AP
By Paul Lienert

DETROIT -- General Motors (GM) will shift production of the transmission on the 2016 Chevrolet Volt to Michigan from Mexico, the automaker said.

Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra plans to make the announcement Tuesday at the Detroit Economic Club.

The redesigned 2016 Volt gasoline-electric hybrid car goes on sale in the second half of 2015.

GM also plans to keep Volt engine production in Michigan, the company said. The 2016 model will get a new 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine that will be built in Flint, which also builds the 1.4-liter engine in the current Volt.

The new Volt transmission or, more accurately, the electric drive unit will be built next year at GM's Warren transmission plant outside Detroit.

By 2016, GM said 70 percent of the Volt's parts will be sourced in the United States. When the car was introduced in late 2010, more than 50 percent of its parts came from outside the country.

The Volt and its pricy two-door companion, the Cadillac ELR, are assembled at the Detroit-Hamtramck plant.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Apple and Internet Behemoth Alibaba Could Soon Be Partners

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Apple Inc. Reveals Bigger-Screen iPhones Alongside Wearables
David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
By Josh Lipton and Betsy Cline

Apple (AAPL) and Alibaba (BABA) could soon be collaborators.

At The Wall Street Journal's WSJD live event, Alibaba's founder and Executive Chairman Jack Ma was asked whether he would consider a partnership between Apple Pay and Alipay, Alibaba's payments company.

"I am very interested in that," Ma said. "A good marriage needs both sides to work."

When asked about such a partnership Apple CEO Tim Cook said, "We are going to talk about getting married later this week," adding, "I have the utmost respect for Jack."

It's been just over a week, but Cook says Apple Pay is already a big success. Within the first 72 hours of Apple Pay's debut, the new mobile payment service had already exceeded more than one million card activations, he said.

"We are just getting started," Cook said. He expects more merchants to adopt the service because he believes it's an easier, faster and more secure way to buy goods.

However, some merchants such as CVS (CVS) and Rite Aid (RAD) have refused the service. Cook called the tension between Apple and these merchants a "skirmish." Apple Pay is currently available at 220,000 locations around the country.

Cook went on to talk about a wide range of subjects including activist investor Carl Icahn's call for Apple to boost its buyback program.

Cook defended Apple's current capital return program, noting that the company bought back $17 billion of stock last quarter alone.

"I don't spend a lot of time talking to Carl," Cook said.

Apple recently reported quarterly results that beat analyst estimates, selling nearly 40 million iPhones. iPad shipments, however, missed wall street's expectations.

Cook remains confident in that product, however, noting that the tablet is now used in a variety of markets, from education to enterprise.

"I am very excited about that business," Cook said.

Apple's CEO also made a point of saying that the tech titan isn't in the business of collecting, storing or selling data about its users, a possible shot at its rival Google (GOOG) (GOOGL).

Cook said that Apple isn't interested in knowing the temperature of its users' homes, a dig at Google, which completed its acquisition of Nest, a smart thermostat maker, for $3 billion in February.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Durable Goods Orders Fall for Second Straight Month

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Ford Motor Co. Begins Production Of First Mustang To Be Sold Worldwide
Jeff Kowalsky/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesA 2015 Mustang moves along the production line at a Ford Motor Co. plant in Flat Rock, Michigan.
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER

WASHINGTON -- Orders to U.S. companies for long-lasting manufactured goods fell for a second month in September, while a key category that signals business investment plans dropped by the biggest amount in eight months. The declines, however, were likely a temporary soft patch that will likely be followed by a resumption of stronger growth.

Orders for durable goods retreated 1.3 percent in September after a record 18.3 percent tumble in August, the Commerce Department reported Tuesday. The August drop followed a record 22.5 percent increase in July. The wide swings in both months were driven by the volatile aircraft category, which saw orders soar in July only to plunge in August.

A key category that serves as a proxy for business investment fell 1.7 percent in September, the biggest drop since January.

Manufacturing has been a cornerstone of strength for the economy this year, and the recent weakness isn't expected to be long-lasting.

Economists expect businesses to boost spending as they expand and modernize their operations. Business investment was a key source of growth in the April-June quarter, and analysts are looking for a solid gain in the July-September period.

For September, there was weakness in a number of areas. Demand for transportation goods fell 3.7 percent, with orders for commercial aircraft falling 16.1 percent. Demand for motor vehicles and parts slipped 0.1 percent. Orders for machinery fell 2.8 percent, and demand for computers declined 5.3 percent.

Demand for primary metals such as steel rose 2.2 percent, while orders for appliances rose 1.8 percent.

On Thursday the government will release its first estimate for overall economic growth for the third quarter as measured by the gross domestic product. Analysts project that the economy grew at a 3 percent annual rate, and many believe growth will continue at that healthy clip in the final three months of this year.

The first half of the year was much more of a roller coaster, with the economy shrinking at an annual rate of 2.1 percent in the first quarter, reflecting the impact of a harsh winter and other adverse factors, and then bouncing back to growth of 4.6 percent in April-June period.

The Institute for Supply Management reported that its closely watched barometer of manufacturing performance fell to 56.6 in September from 59 in August.

Analysts said that the slowdown was consistent with a recent drop-off in global demand due to economic weakness in Europe and China and the rising value of the dollar, which makes American goods more expensive overseas.

But economists believe that American companies will still see enough in export gains in coming months which, when combined with strong domestic demand, will keep U.S. factories humming.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

IRA and 401(k) Changes Coming in 2015: Make the Most of Them

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

dv056045a Collection:   Title:  Senior couple dining License type:  (Royalty-free) Retire big, wealthy, happy, vacation,
Getty Images
Good news, savers: The Internal Revenue Service this month announced the amounts you can contribute to your 401(k), IRA and other retirement accounts for 2015.

401(k) Contribution Limit for 2015
  • You are younger than 50: The maximum you can contribute from your paycheck is $18,000, up from $17,500.
  • You are 50 years old or older: The IRS lets you contribute more since you are closer to retirement. The maximum catch-up contribution has increased from $5,500 to $6,000. This means you could contribute up to $24,000 in your 401(k) for 2015 (base amount of $18,000 plus the $6,000 catch-up).
Traditional/Roth IRA Contribution Limit for 2015
  • You are younger than 50: Strangely, the IRS kept this amount at $5,500.
  • You are 50 years old or older: Again, the IRS kept the catch-up contribution at $1,000. So if you are 50 or older, the maximum you can contribute to your IRA for 2015 is the base $5,500 with the $1,000 catch-up amount for a total of $6,500.
Can You Contribute to a Roth IRA?
  • You file taxes as single or head of household: If you have an adjusted gross income of less than $116,000, you can contribute the maximum; however, if your AGI is more than $131,000, you cannot contribute anything. If your AGI is between $116,000 and $131,000, you can contribute a reduced amount.
  • You file taxes as married filing jointly: If you and your spouse have an AGI less than $183,000, you can contribute the maximum; however, if your AGI is more than $193,000 you cannot contribute anything. If your AGI is between $183,000 and $193,000, you can contribute a reduced amount.
The New Kid on the Block: myRA

Another option for savers without an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan is the new myRA. You may have heard President Obama talk about this savings program back in his January 2014 State of the Union address. There hasn't been much talk or press about the program since then, and after digging into the details, I can see why.

Here are the basics. The myRA is being described as a "starter retirement savings account." It's basically a Roth IRA for lower- to middle-income earners. Through payroll deductions (yes, your employer has to agree to provide this), you can contribute money after tax -- as little as $5 at a time -- and it will grow tax free. The advantages are that there are no fees, and you can't lose your principal. Yes, you read that correctly: Unlike many other investments that may experience wild swings in value, the account balance in a myRA will never go down, because contributions are invested in Treasury securities backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. So think of a myRA as more of a savings account and less of an investment account.

Individuals earning up to $129,000 and couples earning up to $191,000 are eligible to contribute up to a maximum of $5,500 a year ($6,500 a year if you are 50 or older). But once your myRA account balance reaches $15,000, you'll be required to move it to a Roth IRA.

I don't get it. If you want to save for retirement, I think a traditional IRA or Roth IRA, which gives you access to higher growth investments, makes a lot more sense in the long run. Plus, there are many low-cost options for you to invest in mutual funds with no transaction fees through the major discount brokerage firms, and you can do that without any help from your employer.

What Question Really Matters?

The great majority of 401(k) and IRA participants do not contribute the maximum each year, so increasing the limits won't affect most savers. The question for many is not, "What is the most I can save?" but "How can I save more?"

The best answer is to simply start, but to start slowly. Tell your human resources department you want to increase your contribution percentage by 2 percent. Set a calendar reminder in three months to have it increased by another 2 percent. Keep doing this every three months until you start to feel the pinch in your household budget. I've found that most people can save between 4 percent and 10 percent more each year without experiencing any noticeable difference in their lifestyles.

If you bump up against the maximum contribution limits, well done. But even if you don't get close to those limits, every extra amount you can save inside a retirement plan such as a 401(k) or an IRA or outside a retirement plan is going to help.

Robert Pagliarini is a best-selling author and Mission Viejo, California, financial planner who focuses on sudden wealth recipients. Connect with him on Twitter at @rpagliarini.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


What's Keeping Americans From Buying Homes? Try College Debt

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Man stamping denied on mortgage application
Tetra Images/Alamy
By Brian O'Connell

NEW YORK -- Housing prices are rising -- by 3 percent over the past year -- but that's just the leading edge of the problem for Americans struggling to afford a home.

Finding money for a down payment and monthly payments is proving difficult for a growing number of would-be homeowners, many of whom can't afford a new home for one specific reason: They owe too much in student loan debt.

According to NeighborWorks America, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit, roughly 25 percent of Americans know a family member, friend or co-worker who can't buy a home due to student loan debt.

Average student loan debt in the U.S. stands at $29,400, and that figure should continue to escalate given the steady and continuing rise in college costs in recent years.

Collegeboard.com says costs rose by 2.9 percent for tuition and fees for in-state students at public four-year colleges and universities in 2013-14, following increases of 4.5 percent in 2012-13 and 8.5 percent in 2011-12 (before adjusting for inflation).

NeighborWorks reports that most Americans (60 percent) want to own a home, but big issues such as student loan debt and a tight lending environment work against them, keeping otherwise credit-worthy buyers out of the market.

Nearly half of Americans (49 percent) who have student loan debt call their college loans the biggest obstacle to buying a home, even over "lack of a down payment" and "lack of job security." Women are particularly affected, as they represent 58 percent of all student loan debt holders.

"Earning a postsecondary degree is increasingly critical in the United States, but student debt is preventing some Americans from purchasing a home and fully fulfilling this 'American Dream' aspiration," says Chuck Wehrwein, chief executive at NeighborWorks America.

Burdensome student loan debt has a "spider web" effect that hurts the entire U.S. economy, he says.

"If we don't mitigate the effect student loan burden is having and will have for years to come on homeownership, the country will lose a significant amount of economic activity, and hundreds of thousands of people will be unable to benefit from the stability and financial value that homeownership has been proven to offer," Wehrwein says.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Frugal Flu Shots -- Savings Experiment

$
0
0

Filed under:

Frugal Flu Shots
Between medicine, doctor's visits and missing work, being sick with the flu can be expensive. So, if you're looking to get vaccinated this season, don't wait until it's too late. Here are a few options that will help keep your body, and your budget, healthy.

A good place to start is at work. Many companies have started providing free flu shots in the office to help minimize sick days. And if they don't, they may offer reimbursement incentives instead.

Another free option is to call your health insurance provider or local pharmacy. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, most insurance companies are now required to cover preventive care, which includes vaccinations with no co-pay and no deductible. As long as you go to an in-network provider, and this includes certain participating pharmacies, you are entitled to a flu shot at no extra cost.

If neither of those options are available to you, vaccinations are also offered at your local pharmacy for $30 or less. Costco leads the pack when it comes to price, with flu shots ranging around $16. Target is runner up. Flu shots here cost $24.99 and include a 5-percent-off day shopping pass. Finally, flu shots at CVS cost $31.99 plus a 20-percent-off all day shopping pass for in-store purchases up to $100.

So, whether it's through your employer, health insurance or retailer next door, you're taken care of when it comes to budget-friendly flu shots. Select the option most convenient option and stay healthy all winter long.

View Poll

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Gains in Home Prices Slow for Fourth Straight Month

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

case shiller home prices
Nick Ut/AP
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

WASHINGTON -- U.S. home prices grew more slowly in August amid modest sales, a trend that could help make homes more affordable in the months ahead.

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index, released Tuesday, rose 5.6 percent in August from 12 months earlier. That's down from 6.7 percent in July and the smallest gain since November 2012. Home prices were rising at a double-digit pace as recently as March.

The rapid slowdown has been most pronounced in many of the western cities that have seen the biggest price gains in recent years. The annual price gain in Las Vegas braked sharply to just 10.1 percent from 12.8 percent in July. Prices rose 9 percent in San Francisco from a year earlier, down from 10.5 percent.

The smaller price gains, combined with a recent drop in mortgage rates, could spur more sales. Home sales rose in September to their fastest pace this year, but still remain slightly below the pace reached 12 months earlier. The number of homes for sale is rising, which helps keep prices in check.

"We're transitioning away from a period of hot and bothered market activity, characterized by low inventory and rapid price growth, onto a more slow and steady trajectory, which is great news," Zillow chief economist Stan Humphries said. "As appreciation cools and more inventory comes on line, buyers will start to gain a more competitive advantage."

The Case-Shiller 20-city index covers roughly half of U.S. homes. The index measures prices compared with those in January 2000 and creates a three-month moving average. The August figures are the latest available.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

10 Brands of Baby Wipes Recalled for Bacterial Contamination

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

A Newborn Baby Asleep on Stacked Towels
Paula Showen/Alamy
Baby wipes being sold under 10 different brand names have been voluntarily recalled by the manufacturer, Nutek Disposables, according to a Food and Drug Administration press release. The concern is the possible presence of bacteria that could pose problems for people with weakened immune systems or chronic lung disease.

Nutek has supposedly received "numerous reports" of complaints, including rashes, irritation, infections, fever, gastro-intestinal issues, and respiratory issues. However, there is no confirmation that the problems were caused by use of the wipes.

The affected brand names are Cuties, Diapers.com, Femtex, Fred's, Kidgets, Member's Mark, Simply Right, Sunny Smiles, Tender Touch, and Well Beginnings. Nutek shipped the wipes before Oct. 21, 2014 to Diapers.com, Family Dollar (FDO), Fred's, Sam's Club (WMT), Walgreens (WAG), and various Internet sites and other retailers.

Nutek had initially received a "small number" of complaints about discoloration and odor in wipes. Tests showed the presence of bacteria, Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia), in some of the packages. The FDA explains:

B. cepacia poses little medical risk to healthy people. However, people who have certain health problems like weakened immune systems or chronic lung diseases, particularly cystic fibrosis, may be more susceptible to infections with B. cepacia. If you believe you have a weakened immune system or chronic lung disease and you have used one of the affected wipe products, you should call your doctor promptly for medical advice.

On Oct. 3, 2014, the company initiated a voluntary product withdrawal. Then wider reports of problems came in, although there is no confirmation that those issues were due to exposure to contaminated wipes.

Nutek has not yet identified the cause of the contamination, and has stopped manufacturing and shipping wipes from the facility involved for the time being.

Consumers who purchased products from the affected batches can return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. If you have questions, you can contact the company at 855-646-4351, weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern time.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Lowe's Enlists Robots in Bid to Boost Customer Service

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

lowes robots
Lowe's via APA woman holds a nail up to be scanned by an OSHbot robot. The robots are equipped with 3D cameras so they can scan and identify items.
By MAE ANDERSON

NEW YORK -- The robots are coming. Lowe's is testing whether new bots on wheels can improve its customer service, such as helping a shopper find a match for something as simple as a nail.

Four robots are being tested an Orchard Supply Hardware store owned by Lowe's Cos. (LOW) in San Jose, California.

They're based on making a science fiction story a reality.

The robots dubbed OSHbots look like white columns with two large black screens on either side of them, and wheels to help them move. They are equipped with 3D cameras so they can scan and identify items. And customers can research items they want to buy on their screen. Then the robot can lead them to the aisle where an item is located.

"They're based on making a science fiction story a reality," said Kyle Nel, executive director of Lowe's Innovation Lab.

The robots also have a database of what inventory is in stock at the store, so they can let customers know if something is out of stock or not.

"People can come in with a random screw and say Mr. Robot, I need more of these, and if we do have it in the store, they can find it," Nel said. The robots can speak in English and Spanish.

Lowe's started working with Fellow Robots, a technology company in Silicon Valley, in November to develop the robots. The cost of the project is undisclosed.

Lowe's has been working on infusing more technology into its customer service. It has also developed a "holoroom" that can let users see what different pieces of furniture look like in different rooms in a virtual-reality environment.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images