Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

The New Money Machine Driving Las Vegas: Club Life

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

2012 iHeartRadio Music Festival - Day 2 - Show
Bryan Steffy/Clear Channel/Getty ImagesCalvin Harris at work in Las Vegas.
The drive east out of Los Angeles on Interstate 15 is not very scenic. Once you pass the desert towns of Victorville and Barstow, a 360-degree panorama of sand, sagebrush and unimpressive beige mountains emerges, broken only intermittently by a boarded-up motel or burned-out dinner.

As you approach the Nevada line, this is contrasted by an increasingly colorful and complex array of billboards. Once solely advertising all-you-can-eat buffets and 50-cent craps tables, they now tell the story of a relatively new industry -- one more profitable than gambling -- changing the way money is made in Las Vegas.

It's Party Time

Adorning these billboards are the faces of superstar DJs like Calvin Harris, David Guetta, Steve Aoki and Tiesto. As giants in the electronic dance music scene, they can command as much as $400,000 a night for pumping convulsive rhythms out to packed rooms of twenty-somethings. Last year the top ten DJs made a combined income of $268 million, with Harris topping even big-name entertainers like Toby Keith and Jay Z.

The premium nightclubs that host these EDM events are becoming increasingly more important to the bottom line of the companies that own them. The Cosmopolitan Hotel, for example, reports that up to 13 percent of its total revenue now comes from its club Marquee.

Wynn Resorts (WYNN), the epicenter for nightlife on The Strip, boasts three of the top 13 clubs in the country with its XS, Tryst and Surrender nightclubs combining for an estimate $170 million in revenues -- more than 10 percent of total company income.

EDM events are driving profits outside the casinos as well. This year, the annual three-day Electric Daisy Carnival -- 10 stages, 200 performers and 400,000 attendees -- pumped more than $322 million in to the local economy.

Pay to Play, Starting with a $10,000 Table

The roots of the EDM explosion in Vegas stretch back to 2005 when entrepreneurs Jason Strauss and Noah Tepperberg opened Tao, the city's first ultra-high-end nightclub.

As veteran Manhattan promoters, Strauss and Tepperberg knew that the normal procedure at hot clubs was to give VIPs easy access and premium service, while keeping the general public waiting outside for hours. With Tao, they changed the rules, ushering in the "pay to play" era -- meaning you no longer had to be cool or famous to get VIP service -- all you had to do was be able to pay for it.

That can run up to $10,000 for a prime table next to the dance floor on a Friday or Saturday night -- and that's before you add in the alcohol. Bottle service -- a bottle of the spirit of your choice, various mixers and ice -- is $750 to $1,200 a pop.

Though that may sound like a lot of money, it doesn't deter thousands of young people each year from making the pilgrimage to Sin City to experience what it's like to be a rock star. Whereas 10 or 20 years ago, a group of friends might go an annual gambling trip, today such groups are partying at mega-clubs like the five-story Hakkasan at the MGM Grand (MGM).

Nightlife Capital

The city's new economic engine doesn't show any signs of slowing, and there are plans for at least five clubs to open in the next 18 months.

"Here's what I think the driving force behind Vegas is," Tepperberg told GQ in 2012. "The people who go there, very few are from New York or L.A. or even Miami, where they have great clubs. Where do they have clubs like the ones they have in Vegas? They have mini versions of them in New York and L.A. But those don't exist in the other 46 states. You can find it, but you have to go to Vegas. That's what's happened to Vegas. It's become kind of the nightlife capital of the world."

Subscribe to my newsletter The Lund Loop a free once-weekly curated slice of what I'm writing, reading and hearing about in the stock market.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


The Best Thing I Ever Bought for $20 or Less

$
0
0

Filed under:

By Christina Lavingia

Sometimes it can seem like $20 doesn't buy much anymore. However, some purchases are far more valuable than their price tags suggest. We asked 15 personal finance experts and frugal living bloggers to share the best purchases they had ever made for $20 or less. Check out the slideshow below: Your faith in the value of a buck (or 20) might be restored -- and you might walk away knowing the next thing you want to buy.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

BlackBerry Hangs Up on Kim Kardashian's Spokesmodel Offer

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Launch Party For The New Pink Blackberry Curve From Verizon Wireless at Intermix
Alexandra Wyman/WireImageKim Kardashian's love of BlackBerrys goes back years.
Kim Kardashian's love for all things BlackBerry (BBRY) isn't going to turn into a spokesmodel gig anytime soon.

BlackBerry CEO John Chen says he has nothing against Kimmy, who has trumpeted her love for the BlackBerry she uses for social media blasts. It's just that Chen's not "bringing celebrities aboard," he told Bloomberg during an interview in Beijing at the APEC CEO summit.

Chen, who took over BlackBerry last November and is credited with lifting the company up from the ashes, wants to invest in corporate partnerships, next-generation technology and servicing business and government clients.

Consumers who worship all things Kardashian are just part of Chen's vision at the moment. "It's not that it's a waste of money, but a question of where you should spend the money today," Chen reportedly said on the topic of bringing celebrities aboard to hawk BlackBerrys.

Three's Company for Her

Why pay for what you're getting for free? In October, Kardashian took her BlackBerry-love public. During a stage interview at the Code Mobile conference, Kardasian said she uses her BlackBerry for posting on social media because she likes the keyboard. She even said she'd consider becoming a spokesmodel for the company.

Kardashian's BlackBerry is her "heart and soul," she said. "I love it, and I'll never get rid of it. ... They don't even have them [Bolds] in stores anymore. I buy them on eBay. ... And I like to have three in my room that I line up in case they break."

Kardashian even said that she'd like to buy the company.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Opting Out of Obamacare? Here's How Much It Will Cost You

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

female doctor with stethoscope...
Andy Dean Photography/Shutterstock
Open enrollment for insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act begins on Nov. 15. Between then and Feb. 15, you'll be able to enroll in a new health care plan, re-enroll in the one you picked for 2014, switch plans, and apply for subsidies, depending on your income.

Crucially, as HealthCare.gov points out, "If you don't enroll in a health plan by Feb.15, 2015, the only way you can get health insurance for 2015 through the Marketplace is if you qualify for a Special Enrollment Period." And unless you have other health coverage, enrolling in Obamacare is the only way you can avoid having to pay the government's fee for failing to secure health care coverage.

Hold Up a Sec -- What Was That About a Fee?

To ensure that insurers have enough healthy persons in the system, paying premiums and offsetting the cost of taking care of those who get sick, Obamacare requires that everyone either sign up for health insurance -- or pay a fee (sometimes referred to as a "tax" or even a "penalty") to opt out.

And the fee the government requires you to pay in 2015 for not signing up for insurance may be double or even triple what it was in 2014 during the slow ramp-up of the Affordable Care Act.

There's a long list of exceptions. For example, if you meet the government's definition of being too poor to afford even Obamacare -- no penalty. If you're an American Indian -- no penalty. Or if you're in jail -- no penalty. (This is what we call a "mixed blessing.")

Crunching the Numbers

Those exceptions aside, in 2014, the first year in which fees were charged for opting out of Obamacare, opt-outers were required to pay either $95 per person or 1 percent of their income above a certain threshold. Whichever number worked out to be greater was the one you paid for forgoing health care insurance. In 2015, these fees jump to the greater of either $325 or 2 percent of income over the filing threshold.

And that's just if you're single. If you have a family to provide for -- and insure -- then forgoing Obamacare could cost you as much as $975 (or 2 percent of income over the threshold). And in 2016, the numbers will jump again. Individuals will pay $695 (or 2.5 percent of income) for opting out of health insurance coverage. Families will pay up to $2,085 or 2.5 percent.

Result: If you didn't pay attention to the Obamacare debate last year, this year it's more important than ever to study the math on whether you can afford to opt out.

Unfortunately, the numbers can quickly get tricky. For example, you probably noticed mentions of a "threshold" above, right? Well, there's not just one threshold, but 10 that could apply to you, depending on your filing status and age. So your penalty can vary based on whether you are a single tax filer, a married couple filing jointly, a married couple filing separately, etc.

The Internet to the Rescue!

Fortunately, the good folks at insuranceQuotes.com, a subsidiary of Bankrate (RATE), have an online calculator that will help you do the math based on your replies to three short questions:
  • How many adults are in your household?
  • How many children are in your household?
  • What is your estimated annual household income?
The Obamacare Penalty Calculator will quickly estimate what your penalty should have been in 2014, and what it will probably rise to in 2015.

A Few Examples, Please?

Our pleasure. The calculator's pretty simple, so we won't spend a lot of time on this, but just to satisfy your interest, here are a couple examples:

A single taxpayer earning an adjusted gross income of $33,422 a year -- which, according to the Internal Revenue Service, was the average earned by single filers in 2012 (the latest year for which the IRS has complete data) -- would have paid a penalty of $232.72 in 2014, rising to $462.44 in 2015 for refusing to buy insurance.

The IRS estimates average adjusted gross incomes at $110,769 for married couples filing jointly. Such a couple, at such an income -- regardless of whether this couple has no children, one child or several children -- would have owed a family penalty of $904.69 for forgoing health insurance in 2014, rising to $1,803.38 in 2015.

These are, of course, just examples. As Leo Tolstoy once wrote: "Every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." To find out how unhappy you will be if you miss the deadline for signing up for health insurance, check out insuranceQuote's Obamacare penalty calculator.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith doesn't have Obamacare (yet), and he has no position in any stocks mentioned above, either (also yet). The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The Holiday Shopping Danger You Won't See Coming

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Credit and debit card machine terminal
Alamy
By Adam Levin

Around this time last year, cybercrime went mainstream with Target's announcement that the credit and debit card accounts of 40 million shoppers were nabbed during the height of the holiday shopping season. Worse, the personally identifiable information of 70 million Target (TGT) customers was in the wind. Before you get too worked up, here's something to remember: Breaches are and will always be the enemy, but the more likely source of financial woe this holiday season looks back at you in the mirror every day.

Getting consumers and enterprises up to speed in the realm of data security continues to be a work in progress. Most people know not to click on any old link that hits their inbox and they are familiar with the basics of how to protect themselves from cybercriminals (whether or not they actually put them in practice).

However, while all of us are at risk of becoming a victim of identity theft this holiday shopping season, there's an even bigger problem. It not only pre-dates the digital era, it was around long before credit cards: It's spending more than you can afford. But don't break that mirror. Seven years of bad luck will seem like a great deal compared to the seven years of tough luck you will experience if you don't manage your credit intelligently.

It's common sense. If you overdo it this holiday season, the credit you use will become the gift that keeps on taking. And it's not just interest charges that will be a drain on your budget -- it's the long-term credit implications.

How Overspending Can Hurt Your Credit

Debt usage is the second biggest factor in your credit score, accounting for about 30 percent of it. Your score considers your amount of debt, including the amount you owe on installment loans, as well as your credit utilization -- how much of your available credit on revolving accounts (like credit cards) you're using. The less you use of your credit lines, the better.

With Black Friday and Cyber Monday rapidly approaching, you may be looking for a way to stretch your buying power. While it may seem counter-intuitive, increasing your available credit with a new card (but not just any card) may actually improve your standing with the credit reporting agencies. But you have to be smart about it.

When you open a new credit card, you can increase your available credit, and thus can raise your credit scores. But if you max out that card when you open it, and carry that balance long past the holidays, it defeats the purpose. A good rule of thumb is to keep your total credit utilization of your credit card accounts under the 10 percent mark.

Don't Overspend

While a new credit card can help make ends meet and facilitate big purchases that would otherwise be out of reach (or a lot of smaller ones for the holidays), it only works when managed correctly.

The first consideration is financial feasibility -- something you know better than even the credit bureaus Equifax, Experian and TransUnion -- and there should not be a sliding rule when it comes time to do your holiday shopping. If you carry a balance on your debts, you should be able to make more than the minimum payment every month. Ideally, you should charge no more than what you can pay in full.

When thinking about how much credit you should have and how much you should use, it can be helpful to think of the various forms of credit as an array of wealth-building tools, kind of like stocks and bonds in an investment portfolio. Your credit portfolio, as it were, has a few moving parts that are used to figure out how much credit you can handle without finding yourself underwater.

The Credit Score Implications

Will a new credit card offer at the checkout counter help your credit score? Not always. (However, you can use Credit.com's free credit score tools to see your credit scores and get a breakdown of how your credit behavior is affecting your scores. Also be sure to pull your full free credit reports at least once a year from AnnualCreditReport.com.) If you have not shopped for a new credit card in a while, a new account will increase your available credit, and if you pay off the balance on that account every month or keep it under the 10 percent mark, your score should increase with this addition to your credit portfolio, which will, in the long run, make you a stronger candidate for bigger loans down the line.

If you handle your credit well, it can be the gift that keeps on giving. Get it wrong and your financial life will make the Grinch smile ear-to-ear.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Parents: Are You Legally Ready for Your Kids to Be Adults?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

paa280000006|young woman| looking at camera| portrait|young|young people|woman|women|looking at camera|portrait|portraits|teenag
jupiterimages
Few parents greet their children's 18th birthdays with the joy of crossing a marathon's finish line, thinking that their job is done. But in some ways, it is. Your 18-year-old may or may not seem like an adult to you, but in the eyes of the legal and financial world, that birthday represents a major shift.

John O. McManus, an attorney and founding principal of McManus & Associates in New York, says that parents need to be aware that once their children turn 18, regardless of how many things stay the same, legally, a lot changes. For example, parents of legal adults are no longer automatically able to access their children's financial or medical accounts or information, and they won't be allowed to make medical decisions on behalf of their offspring. However, parents can take steps to smooth the transition into adulthood, and to make sure they can continue to help their kids when needed.

Legal Tasks

McManus says that because parents cannot automatically take action to benefit their adult children in the event they need medical care or are incapacitated, he suggests that families:
  • Have their adult offspring complete a health care proxy that give parents the right to make medical decisions if their child cannot.
  • Have them assign a durable power of attorney so that that parents can handle financial and legal issues on behalf of their kids if needed.
  • Complete an authorization for release of protected health information so that parents can provide this information to medical personnel and use the information to make decisions on behalf of their kids.
"These issues take on extra urgency if your child is away from home in college or out of the country on a semester abroad," McManus said. In such cases, he recommends learning about the health care system in the country where your child will be living to understand the differences between private and public hospitals and any restrictions on international insurance.

"Colleges will not release a student's medical records, even to parents, if the student is over 18," he said. "This may be extremely detrimental to a child's well-being in a physical or emotional medical emergency. Advance planning can facilitate communication between the foreign hospital and parents."

Financial Tasks

Hopefully you have been teaching your children about money long before they reach 18, but Ric Runestad, principal of Runestad Financial in Fort Wayne, Indiana, said that once they hit that milestone you should start testing what they've learned.

"I'm a proponent of parents co-signing for a credit card with a low limit that only the parents can raise," he said. "This will give the parents information on exactly what it is their children are spending their money on, and it will also get the child used to the idea of paying off their credit card every month."

Chris Alberta, principal of Alberta Enterprises in Brighton, Michigan, agrees that parents should open a credit card account with their kids as well as a joint checking account when they turn 18 to help them manage their money.

Financial Education

"Let's face it. ... Today's young people are financially illiterate, and the modern dilemma has much to do with over-borrowing and lack of financial education," Alberta said. "So instead of letting them get that first credit card on their own and go on a shopping spree, or finance that first car at 20 percent or more, get involved. Co-signing for anything could put you on the hook for your kids, but it's much better to be on the hook with the kids. Let them charge their gas, meals out, necessities, etc. By managing charges and opening a joint checking account with them, you'll be able to see the charges made and make sure the bills get paid each month."

Alberta says that taking these steps can help your kids build a strong credit history that will make it easier to win an approval for financing for their first car or their first home. "Establishing the difference between needs and wants, along with never borrowing more than we earn, are timeless lessons that every kid can benefit from," Alberta said.

Runestad also says parents should reinforce the concept of being responsible. "From the age of 18 on, your children are legally responsible for the things they do. If they acquire debt or drop out of college, those choices are theirs alone. Learning to accept responsibility is a huge part of being an adult, and when your child turns 18, this is a great opportunity to have that talk."

Michele Lerner is a Motley Fool contributing writer. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

A Desperate Microsoft Strikes Back on All Fronts

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Microsoft Minecraft
Ted S. Warren/AP
Microsoft (MSFT) used to be on top of the world. Windows dominated the computing experience. Office was the undisputed leader in productivity software. The Xbox 360 was this country's video game console of choice.

A lot has changed in recent years. Mobile has been the big driver in the computing revolution lately, and Windows is a distant third as a mobile operating system. Office is still the top dog for word processing, spreadsheets and presentations, but the popularity of free and nearly free cloud-computing alternatives is proving a big challenge to Microsoft's second-largest software franchise. On the gaming front, the Xbox One and Sony's (SNE) PlayStation 4 came out just a week apart last November, but it's Sony that's squarely in the lead this time around.

Microsoft is still growing, but that's happening because the global appetite for technology is on the rise. It's still the world's largest software company, but it could be doing better if it wasn't relinquishing market share in key segments. It realizes this, and recent moves suggest that it's willing to sacrifice margins in the near term for bigger payoffs in the long run.

Mobile Madness

Google's (GOOG) Android and Apple's (AAPL) iOS dominate the mobile market, which includes smartphones and tablet devices. Industry tracker IDC reports that smartphone manufacturers shipped more than 255 million Android devices during this year's second quarter, accounting for 84.7 percent of the market. Apple has slipped to just an 11.7 percent slice, but that springtime showing tends to improve in the fall when the new iPhones come out. This leaves us with Microsoft commanding just 2.5 percent of the market.

Microsoft acquired Nokia's handset business in a push to expand the global reach of its fledgling mobile business, and one can only wonder how much lower its share of the market would be if it couldn't count on Nokia's Lumia phones.

Microsoft needs more than just Nokia, of course. The challenge has been how to get other smartphone makers to offer more than just Android. The challenge in the past has been that it charges handset makers $5 to $15 to install Windows Phone, but that may change. Earlier this year, reports out of India claimed that some phone makers there were given free licensing deals in a push to gain traction in the world's second-most-populous nation.

Word Up

Office has been a meaty contributor to Microsoft's financial performance over the years, but the growing popularity of tablets, smartphones and free online platforms -- such as Google Drive -- are starting to drag it down. Earlier this month Microsoft responded by making a comprehensive version of Office free on mobile devices. Folks on iPads, iPhones and Android tablets can now perform the most essential tasks on new Office apps.

Giving away the cash cow may sound crazy at first. Office accounted for nearly a third of Microsoft's revenue last fiscal year. However, this is a push for expanding its audience and keeping them close to Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other Office features. There's a big problem if the genie gets out of the bottle. Will folks continue to pay for Office? Microsoft feels that it's a gamble worth making at a time when its applications are starting to lack relevance.

Thinking Outside of the Xbox

Then we get to gaming. Windows is still the operating system of choice when it comes to PC gaming, but it's been a challenge on the console front. The PS4 has outsold the Xbox One by millions of systems over the past year, and Microsoft can't afford to let that happen.

The Xbox One began selling for $349 on Nov. 2, a $50 price cut ahead of the critical holiday shopping season. Microsoft can't let Sony run away with the market in back-to-back holiday periods, and the discount -- a markdown that is as large as $150 for some bundles -- will make sure that it stays cheaper than the PS4.

All of these moves will come at a price, of course. Analysts see revenue climbing 13 percent in fiscal 2015, which began in July, but they only see earnings per share moving 2 percent higher (and that's with Microsoft's aggressive stock buybacks, whereby the share count has fallen with every passing fiscal year). It isn't easy to grow the bottom line when you're cutting prices and investing in new opportunities, but Microsoft knows that if it wants to matter tomorrow, it's going to have to make some sacrifices today.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Google (A and C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A and C shares) and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Looking for a new tech investment? Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Oil Prices Likely to Keep on Falling, Says IEA

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

US-ENERGY-OIL
Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images
By Matt Clinch

A dramatic fall in the price of oil in recent months shows no signs of ending, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), which states that weak demand, a strong dollar and booming U.S. oil production mean that a new chapter in the history of the oil markets is beginning which could affect the social stability of some countries.

Prices have declined by around 30 percent since peaking in June, with Brent crude crashing below the $80 level in early November. On Friday, the commodity was trading around a four-year low at $78 with speculators looking ahead to a meeting in Vienna later this month where the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) could look to cut production in the wake of the price falls.

'No Clear Consensus'

The IEA says that there appears to be no "clear consensus" from the Gulf states for a formal supply cut and predicts further downside pressures for the price of oil in the next few months.

"Supply/demand balances suggest that the price rout has yet to run its course," the IEA said in its new monthly report, released on Friday morning. "Our supply and demand forecasts indicate that barring any new supply disruption, downward price pressures could build further in the first half of 2015."


It admits that steep price declines tend to be self‐correcting over the long run but adds that a return to previous price highs may not be a close prospect. China has entered a less oil‐intensive stage of development and innovative new technologies in North America mean that there are "deep structural changes at work in the oil market," according to the IEA.

"It is increasingly clear that we have begun a new chapter in the history of the oil markets," it said. "Economic development no longer spurs oil demand growth as it once did, especially in the absence of wage gains."

Demand Projections

The agency left its yearly forecasts for global oil demand unchanged from last month, with an estimate of 92.4 million b/d (barrels a day) for 2014 and 93.6 million b/d for 2015. Demand growth is now projected at 680 kb/d in 2014 which would be a five-year annual low, according to the IEA.

However, this will rise to 1.1 million b/d next year as the macroeconomic backdrop is expected to improve, it said. It added that despite expectations for a rebound in global economy in 2015, this wouldn't necessarily prevent seasonally weaker demand for oil.



"While our projections suggest that year‐on-year demand growth will recover to 1 million b/d in (the first quarter of 2015) and 1.2 million b/d in (the second quarter) from 770 kb/d in (the fourth quarter of 2014), demand is nevertheless expected to fall steeply early next year from end‐2014 levels, in line with seasonal patterns," it said.

Social Stability Warning

On Wednesday, the IEA warned that the oil rout may cut investment in U.S. shale oil by around 10 percent next year and said Friday that this shouldn't not be misconstrued as a production drop and would likely pale in comparison with recent gains in shale productivity.

Across the globe, many oil-producing countries are finding that their "fiscal breakeven price" is well above the current oil price, it said. The IEA warned that Venezuela is "reeling" from the effects of falling production and plummeting prices and Russia is suffering from both the oil price drop and a currency collapse.

"While that will not necessarily make oil production at current or even lower prices uneconomical, it may take a toll on social stability, and thus indirectly affect production prospects," it said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Week's Winners, Losers: Walmart's Gains, 3-D Printing's Pains

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Retailers Silicon Valley
Jeff Chiu/AP
There were plenty of winners and losers this week, with America's leading online retailer calling a truce with a major book publisher and a solar panel installer letting the market down in its first quarter as a public company. Here's a rundown of the week's smartest moves and biggest blunders.

3-D Printing -- Loser

It was another rough week for 3-D printing. 3D Systems (DDD) kicked things off by reporting quarterly results on Monday. The 3-D printing pioneer saw its adjusted earnings plunge 25 percent. Sales grew, but growth has decelerated significantly.

Smaller rival ExOne (XONE) followed two days later with its own disappointing report. ExOne posted a much wider loss than analysts were expecting, and it also offered up uninspiring guidance.

Walmart (WMT) -- Winner

The world's largest retailer is showing signs of life. Walmart posted encouraging quarterly results on Thursday. Comparable-store sales for its domestic stores increased 0.5 percent. It may not seem like much -- and store traffic itself was negative -- but it's Walmart's first positive comps in nearly two years.

You have to go back to 2012 to find the last time that Walmart posted positive comparable-store sales. Its Neighborhood Market format saw an even more robust 5.5 percent spike in comps.

Vivint Solar (VSLR) -- Loser

The cardinal rule with every initial public offering is that you don't disappoint investors in your first quarter as a public company. You don't make your exchange debut until you're sure that you can deliver strong results. If you let the market down out of the gate, it will take several quarters -- if not years -- to regain the trust of investors. Wall Street winds up assuming that you went public as an exit strategy or a way to raise some quick cash. Well, apparently Vivint Solar didn't get the memo.

The installer of residential leased solar rooftop panels took a hit on Tuesday after posting a wider loss than analysts were targeting. Vivint Solar's adjusted deficit of 66 cents a share was more than three times the red ink that Wall Street pros were modeling. The stock was already trading below September's IPO price of $16 before the disappointing report. It's naturally trading even lower now.

Amazon.com (AMZN) and Hachette -- Winners

The long-standing dispute between Amazon and Hachette has ended. Amazon was blocking sales of Hachette-published books during the disagreement. Hachette will now be able to set e-book prices, but the terms of the deal are not being made public.

Hachette Book Group may not be out of the woods just yet, though. There are rumblings that authors aren't happy with collecting just 25 percent of their e-book sales. However, it's still good to see Amazon and a leading publisher play nice.

Calvin Klein -- Loser

Fashion designers surround themselves with razor-thin models. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but it could be a problem when they appeal for the mass market. Calvin Klein took some flak this week for promoting a line of plus-size lingerie with a model who wears a size 10.

Social media turned on Calvin Klein for the move. Hiring model Myla Dalbesio for the lingerie shoot could have been a smart move if she hadn't been billed as a plus-size model. She is larger than the typical Calvin Klein model, but she's not going to help with the negative body images that the fashion industry is often accused of promoting. Some sources say that Dalbesio's closer to a size 8, New York Magazine reports.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of 3D Systems, Amazon.com, and ExOne. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

You Take the Hotel Shampoo and Lotion, Don't You?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Toiletries
Alexey Stiop/Alamy
It may not be why you stay in a hotel, but for most guests, leaving with some of the toiletries is a tradition. And now Hilton Hotels (HLT) has tried to quantify it by commissioning a survey.

About three-quarters of the 1,002 surveyed acknowledged taking some toiletries with them. About one-third of those who identified themselves as millennials (Generation Y), said they took toiletries off of the housekeeping cart. Only 13 percent of those ages 55 and over said they went outside the room to grab toiletries.

"We understand the importance of quality toiletries in ensuring guests stay revitalized during -- and after -- their travels," said Chris Naylor, vice president of brand operations for Hilton Worldwide, which used the survey to promote upgraded toiletry selections.

What happens to those tiny bottles? The stuff in them can be made available to guests at their homes, used to shine shoes, wash makeup brushes and clean travel stains. About one in 10 of those surveyed said they gave pilfered hotel room toiletries as a gift. While it might seem like small bottle of shampoo or lotion is a lame present, keep in mind that not every hotel is offering bargain brands.

Brands at hotels across the country include L'Occitane, Malin+Goetz, Peter Thomas Roth, Molton Brown, Gilchrist & Soames, Aromatherapy Associates, Kiehl's and Hermès. Most of those don't come cheap. A one-ounce hand cream from L'Occitane retails for $12.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Looking for a Puppy? That Cutie Online Could be a Scam

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Ten week old female Golden retriever puppy lying on grass.
Adam Gault
Imagine seeing a puppy or pure-breed dog online that needs a home. Maybe the owner is in the military and got transferred. Perhaps the family simply can't afford it any longer. Or it's just a great deal for breed that can cost a ton.

If you're an animal lover looking for a new pet, it can be awfully tempting. But the Federal Trade Commission on Thursday issued a warning that an old scam that involves conning people with photos of an adorable pooch is back -- and more finely tuned than ever.

In other words, that cute dog is a lure to get you to cough up some cash. For one thing, the folks with the dogs (or sub in any other animal someone might want) will be far away. Your cost might only be the shipping, they claim.

They Got Your Heart -- and Now They Want Your Money

At least that's how it starts. Once you go for that initial payment, the scam artists know you're hooked. So, then they'll spring on requests for more money. The reasons: such things as veterinary bills, an inspection fee or crating, the FTC said.

"But when it's all said and spent, Lassie never comes home -- because she wasn't really for sale in the first place," the FTC warning said.

The agency offers these tips to avoid the puppy scam:

  • Don't pay by money transfer or reloadable cash card. Using Western Union (WU) or MoneyGram (MGI) or GreenDot (GDOT) MoneyPak, Vanilla Reload or Reloadit is the same as sending cash. They are the preferred methods of payment for crooks.
  • Do your research. Before you move forward, find out the seller's full name, phone number and mailing address. Then search online for the seller's name or phone number with the word "scam" or "complaint."
  • Do a reverse image search of the photo to see if it appears in older ads. To do this, right click on the photo and select "copy image location" or "copy image address," or go to "properties" to copy the image's location on the Internet. Paste the link into a search engine and select the option that allows you to search by image. If the same picture shows up in an older listing, it's probably a scam.
  • If you want a pet, consider adopting from a local animal shelter. Pets of all types are in shelters across the U.S. waiting for loving homes. Many can be adopted for a small fee.

Here's the last word from the FTC: "If a pretending pooch peddler pilfers money from your pockets, file a complaint with the FTC." And, if you used a money transfer service and realized you were scammed, report it to that service, too.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Middle Class Can't Buy Homes in Most Big Cities

$
0
0

Filed under:

For Sale sign in front yard of house
Brand X/Getty Images
If the traditional American dream is homeownership -- getting the starter, trading up as the family grows -- then in most of the largest metropolitan areas, the middle class is officially in a nightmare. In only 12 out of the biggest 25 cities, median income households can afford median-priced houses, according to data analysis out today by Interest.com.

That's better than last year, where median-income households could afford homes in only eight of the cities. But as things stand now, housing prices will continue to pull away from incomes, Interest.com managing editor Mike Sante told DailyFinance.

Housing Prices Are Rising Faster

"We're seeing the increase in home prices definitely moderating," Sante said, pointing to a 16 percent increase last year and a 6 percent one in 2014. "We've recovered about as much as we're going to cover. However, median incomes were only up a little more than 2 percent in the 25 largest cities," but a drop in mortgage rates helped.

The site compared home prices from the National Association of Realtors to income figures from the Census Bureau's American Consumer Survey, calculating what income was necessary to afford a 20 percent down payment, interest and other city-specific costs.

"The rule of thumb is you shouldn't be spending more than 28 percent of your income on gross housing costs," Sante said. Many in New York spend more than half. Some people in San Francisco spent 70 percent. "I about fell out of my chair [when I realized that]," he said.

They're House-Poor and Have Problems

"When you start spending 40 or 50 percent on housing, that's the definition of being house-poor," Sante said. "You're constantly having to say, 'No, I can't do this' or, 'No, we can't buy this,' or, 'No, we can't save money for retirement because we don't have money left over.' We're telling people, 'You have to save for your own retirement,' but then housing costs keep going up, so more and more of the income they have winds up having to be devoted to housing." As people are forced to pay more for housing, they put retirement and children's education into danger.

The five most-affordable metropolitan areas, and by what percentage median household income exceeds that necessary to buy a median-priced home, are:
  • Minneapolis (+23%)
  • Atlanta (+22%)
  • St. Louis (+20%)
  • Detroit (+14%)
  • Pittsburgh (+13%)
The five least-affordable areas:
  • Miami (-26%)
  • Los Angeles (-32%)
  • New York (-32%)
  • San Diego (-38%)
  • San Francisco (-46%)
One general difference between the most and least expensive was the availability of additional development space. All five least-affordable areas are on on the coast. "If you've got 360 degrees, you can expand and grow," Sante said.

Software Engineers, Bankers, Teachers and Firefighters

In some areas, even many more affluent people find they must divert a larger amount of their income into housing. "There are certainly lots of folks in the tech industry being paid very good salaries [in San Francisco], bidding up home prices, but even those folks are spending way too much on housing," Sante said.

"There's a certain amount of income disparity that is driving home prices in some of these big cities," he said. "The software engineers and investment bankers are making it impossible for the teachers and firefighters to buy homes in these big cities. I wish I could say this is going to get better, but the best I can say is it may not get worse as quickly as it has. But the trend lines are incomes not keeping with home prices."

According to Sante, cities and states could take action, like ensuring a supply of moderately priced housing. "You can't count on contractors doing that because they can make so much more money from more expensive houses."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The Magic's Just Starting With Disney's MagicBands

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

disneyworld.disney.go.com
Disney (DIS) reportedly spent $1 billion to get its new theme park technology off the ground, and the combination of the MyMagic+ platform and the MagicBand bracelets that make the "magic" happen are starting to pay off.

"The early returns we are seeing from MyMagic+ are encouraging," CFO Jay Rasulo said during last week's earnings call.

He credits MyMagic+ -- the technology that lets folks do everything from enter its theme parks to reserve access to expedited ride queues -- as contributing to Disney's year-over-year increase in operating profit at its theme park division. There's no way to tell how much of the 4 percent increase in attendance at Walt Disney World and the 6 percent uptick in per capita spending at its domestic parks can be attributed to the rollout of MyMagic+ and the growing popularity of the MagicBand bracelets, but the early signs indicate that Disney's big gamble was the right wager.

Wrist and Reward

It's been a little over a year since Disney began mailing out MagicBand bracelets to guests with reservations to stay at its resort hotels. The colorful rubber wristbands mask RFID chips that identify guests so they can enter theme parks, enter FastPass lines and pay for purchases if their hotel stays have charging privileges on their cards.

MagicBands began rolling out to annual pass holders earlier this year, followed by a springtime rollout of retail availability for day guests. The technology has been generally well received by guests, and rival theme parks that can't afford the investment or don't have the kind of destination-travel gravitas to make it worthwhile are naturally envious.

Things are really just getting started. Last month Disney tied MagicBands to the on-ride photos. Instead of having to purchase the digital snapshots right away, riders can scan their MagicBands over the photo monitors at the end of the attraction and buy them later. It's the latest brilliant move by Disney to extend its reach into patrons' pockets long after they've left the park -- and Disney's apparently just getting started.

Rasulo was asked by an analyst about how to model the roughly $300 million to $400 million that Disney expects to spend to get Shanghai Disneyland up to speed, with a good chunk of that coming in the year ahead. Rasulo talked up MyMagic+ "ramp[ing] up in terms of overall new initiatives" to help offset the incremental costs of opening the new park in China.

Bracelets Are Forever

A MagicBand in cahoots with the My Disney Experience smartphone app already lets guests reserve access to three FastPass queues a day, and those reservations can be made weeks ahead of time. It's easy to see why that is encouraging guests to visit the designated park instead of straying to rival neighboring attractions. Disney also offers a wide array of MagicBands displaying its growing arsenal of characters, making the wristbands fashion statements that guests proudly show off at the parks.

Disney could send personalized smartphone alerts of short lines or flash-sale opportunities.

Where can Disney go from there? It was originally suggested that the MagicBand could be used to pull up guest info that the family entertainment giant could use to enhance the experience. Characters would be able to identify guests by name, if the guests opted in, of course. Armed with info about their favorite rides, restaurants and even characters, Disney could send personalized smartphone alerts of short lines or flash-sale opportunities when guests are in the park.

There's a fine line between enhancing a park outing and being creepy, but arming guests with the power to decide how immersive they want their experiences to be will go a long way toward silencing any privacy concerns.

It also wouldn't be a surprise if MagicBand options themselves grow in the future. There are already limited-edition character wristbands, but what about designer models? What about Disney watches with RFID chips? What about fitness trackers, feeding off my earlier suggestion of a Run Disney MagicBand that takes advantage of its growing competitive running slate to roll out a fitness-tracking MagicBand?

Getting folks to start wearing these bracelets outside of the theme park could also open up possibilities for not just Disney Store interactions but possibly even a digital wallet along the lines of Apple (AAPL) Pay or an unlocking mechanism for digital goodies at movie theaters and beyond. Disney really is just scratching the surface here. One can only imagine what will be possible in another year or two.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Interested in Apple's new bracelet? Check out our free report on the Apple Watch to learn where the real money is to be made for early investors.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Avoid the Dangerous IRA Mistake 6 in 10 Americans Make

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

|business perspectives|ss24|color|vertical|interior|center|business|government|scale|scales of justice|savings|retirement|decisi
Getty Images
Even once you put money aside for your retired years, you also have to avoid investment mistakes that can endanger your retirement nest egg. Unfortunately, many Americans don't know how to protect themselves against those risks, and as a result, they often take extreme positions that can lead to catastrophic consequences if things go badly.

Almost 60 percent of Americans who save for retirement using individual retirement accounts have "extreme" investment allocations, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Such individuals -- at both ends of the perceived risk spectrum -- are thus vulnerable to common circumstances that can make them fail to achieve their savings goals. Let's look at the EBRI research to see what the problem is and how you can solve it.

Too Risky, Too Safe, but Never Just Right

What the EBRI called extreme allocations included IRA portfolios in which 90 percent or more of the account's assets were invested in a single category of investments. Extremely aggressive investors had all or almost all of their money in stocks, with more than a third of all IRA owners having at least 90 percent stocks. Extremely conservative investors also made up a large group of investors, with almost a quarter of those surveyed having 10 percent or less of their assets in stocks, and almost one in five IRA owners having 90 percent or more of their assets in bonds and cash. Add those categories up, and you have almost six out of 10 with extreme allocations in their IRAs.

Yet not all of the results of the study were surprising or contrary to what most advisers would recommend for clients. Those who invested in Roth IRAs were more likely to have more than 90 percent of their money in stocks, with almost half having that concentration, taking maximum advantage of the tax-free growth potential of those specialized types of retirement accounts. Moreover, as the age of the IRA owner rose beyond 55, investors were less likely to have high concentrations in stocks, reflecting the expected reduction in risk that most advisors recommend as people age. By the time IRA owners reached age 85, those concentrated in bonds and cash had almost caught up to those with massive stock allocations.

Taken in its entirety, the EBRI's database of IRAs showed overall allocations of just over half to stocks, about 10 percent to balanced funds, 15 percent to bonds, 13 percent to cash and the rest in other types of investments. That asset allocation would put the typical IRA into a moderate to aggressive strategy, but it's not entirely out of hand with conditions in the financial markets.

Did Investors Chase Performance?

Included in the EBRI study was a look at how the most recent data from 2012 compared with earlier studies in 2010 and 2011. Different methodologies gave different pictures of the state of the U.S. retirement saver.

Looking at the EBRI's full sample size, investors appeared to be chasing performance in the stock market. From 2010 to 2012, the amount invested in stocks rose from 45.7 percent to 52.1 percent, while allocations to bonds and other investments fell dramatically. The shift among older Americans was most pronounced, with those 65 and older raising their stock allocations by 8 to 10 percentage points.

Yet when the EBRI controlled its database to include only those who had IRAs in all three of its survey years, it got a different picture. In this sample, equity exposure fell slightly, while bond allocations rose.

Nevertheless, more than 55 percent of those surveyed had either none of their money or all of their money invested in stocks both in 2010 and in 2012. That points to a lack of prudent risk awareness among retirement investors, as well as a failure to appreciate the value of a diversified portfolio.

How to Avoid a Big Retirement Mistake

In general, IRAs benefit from having a well-thought-out asset allocation strategy spread across different types of investments. By having stocks, bonds, cash and other investments in your IRA, you can ensure that you're protected against major events that dramatically affect the value of one asset class yet leave others relatively unscathed. Such an approach helped mitigate losses during the most recent bear market, yet they left investors in a position to benefit from the ensuing recovery.

It's easy to use an all-or-nothing philosophy in your retirement planning, but it's not the smartest way to invest. By using all the various investments at your disposal, you'll have a better chance of having things work out the way you want in the long run with your retirement savings.

Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger started saving for retirement early and often. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google+. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How to Save on Your Thanksgiving Trip Home

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Thanksgiving Travel
Jeff Chiu/AP

By Trae Bodge

Mark your calendars. Thanksgiving is on Nov. 27, which means the official travel season stretches all the way from Friday, Nov. 21, to Monday, Dec. 1. Even if you haven't made your travel plans yet, it's not too late. You can still book a trip and prevent a major dent to your wallet, and even score a deal, if you just follow these few easy Turkey Day travel guidelines.

Avoid Big-Ticket Days

Compared to last year, 400,000 more people are flying this year, meaning an estimated 24.6 million travelers will take to the air during the last 10 days of November (and first day of December), according to Airlines for America, the largest airline trade association in the United States. Because of all that demand, expect fares to be higher than usual throughout the end of the month, and anticipate that the most popular travel days, which are Wednesday, Nov. 26 and Sunday, Nov. 30, will carry the priciest tickets.

Your best bet: Fly out the Monday before Thanksgiving, and ask your family to serve the big meal on the early side of Thanksgiving Day so you can return home that evening. By flying on Thanksgiving proper, you can save up to 30 percent on your airfare, according to an analysis by Kayak.com. Who knows, all that tryptophan may actually make the flight more enjoyable.

Another option (if your family is willing to push the feast to the evening): Fly out on Thanksgiving morning and return home on Tuesday, Dec. 2, the first day out of the holiday hot-zone. I tested it, and the savings are staggering. An American Airline (AAL) flight from New York to San Francisco, departing the day before Thanksgiving and returning the Sunday after, will set you back about $842. That same flight, departing on Thanksgiving Day and returning Dec. 2, is only $336, saving you over $500. That's not stocking stuffer-level savings. That's a 128GB iPhone 6 Plus.

Clear Your Cache

If you've been searching for cheap airline flights for a while now, you're likely not even seeing the best rates on your computer screen. Clear your cache to empty the airline websites' cookies, and the next time you search, you'll see the cheapest fares available, as opposed to those fares available to only increasingly desperate (or obviously procrastinating) travelers.

Adjust Your Route

Rather than fly into a major hub, check smaller nearby airports to see if cheaper fares are available; they often are. Added bonus: Rental car and parking rates are often cheaper at smaller airports too. Or ditch your dream of flying direct, and embrace the idea of the layover. Just try to think of having a glass of wine in another city for a few hours as romantic, and know that your willingness to be an adventurer is saving you big bucks.

Hit the Road

Gas prices have fallen below $3 a gallon, down to $2.95 on average, for the first time in nearly four years, according to the American Automobile Association's Fuel Gauge Report. Experts say they could drop by up to another 15 cents a gallon in the short term and may remain low all season long. With that in mind, you may want to road trip it to Aunt Maude's house rather than jet it. Before you pile everyone into the car, though, change your oil, using the manufacturer's recommended grade; get a tune-up if anything feels wonky; and check your tire pressure. Doing all three can improve your gas mileage by nearly 10 percent.

Do a Swap

You can still find hotel deals, even this close to Thanksgiving. In fact, by waiting until the last minute, you could save up to $50 a night, according to an analysis by the travel website Hipmunk. If you're looking for homier options, check out HomeAway or Airbnb, which allow you to rent the home or apartment (or individual room) of local hosts, often at cheaper rates than hotels.

If you live in a city where others might like to visit, consider doing a home swap through one of the established exchange sites, like Homelink, LoveHomeSwap or Knok. So many people are looking to travel over the holidays, and if you don't mind trading your home with that of another family, it could be the cheapest option of all. You'll only have to pay the site's membership fee. Homelink's, for example, is only $39 for the year, if you're swapping only in the United States. LoveHomeSwap's is $20 a month. Knok, which specializes in child-friendly homes worldwide, is $29 a month. It might be worth exploring, especially if you're staying the full week.

Host it Yourself

The ultimate way to save on Thanksgiving travel, of course, is to not do it at all. Invite your loved ones over and host the feast, and the furthest distance you'll have to cover is from your house to the supermarket. It will cost you more in groceries, but if you love to cook more than you love to travel on hectic holidays, it will be worth it.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


The Top 7 Most Exclusive Black Cards You Don't Know About

$
0
0

Filed under:

www.blackcard.com
By GoBankingRates staff

Black cards are the most exclusive credit cards on the market, and these rare credit cards are in the pockets of some of the wealthiest citizens around the world. Here's what it takes -- and what you can get.

1. Eurasian Bank Diamond Card

Featuring a 0.02-carat diamond surrounded by a golden heart design, the Eurasian Bank Diamond Card is a sign of wealth and elegance through and through. The black card requirements for this exclusive credit card is you have to be a member of the Eurasian bank in Kazakhstan, and you also have to have $300,000 or more in your bank account.

2. The Visa (V) Signature Card

Visa's true top of the line card is the Visa Signature Card, which features some amazing perks like no preset spending limits; access to special sporting events and concert tickets; VIP access to entertainment venues like Broadway shows and musicals; travel accommodations at spas, hotels and with airlines; and special dining experiences.

3. The Chase (JPM) Sapphire Preferred Card

For those who look for exclusivity but prefer not to bank with Visa or Amex (AXP), there is the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card. The Preferred Card is aimed at households in the United States earning at least $120,000 per year. Big perks include no preset spending limit and a strong rewards program for members. Other notable differences from other black card offerings include: Identity protection; a small $95 per year fee; enhanced travel rewards redemption points; rental insurance; travel protection insurance; emergency travel assistance and extended warranty protection for up to one year.

4. The Black Brazilian MasterCard (MA) from the Santander Group

The Santander Group (BSBR) in Brazil offers the unlimited Brazilian Black MasterCard, which is only issued to members of its private bank with a certain undisclosed amount of funds in their accounts. Currently, it is one of the hottest cards in Latin America -- with only about 3,000 in circulation. Perks of the card include airport lounge access anywhere in the world, private jet discounts, a 24-hour concierge service and an annual fee of $349.

5. The Black Chairman Card from Citigroup (C)

The Citigroup Chairman MasterCard is exclusively for elite cardholders who can afford a $500 annual fee and are currently private, wealthy clients of Smith Barney or Citi Bank. You will have access to the usual perks such as concierge, airport lounge access and various travel accommodations. The biggest perk is the $300,000 credit limit available to the 5 percent of the U.S. population who are lucky enough to own one.

6. The Black Bull Card from Merrill Lynch

With a spending limit of $250,000, the Merrill Lynch Black Card is known for free flight hours on Marquis Jets for cardholders. The card is limited to 5 percent of U.S. residents and offers the usual bells and whistles associated with black cards. The Black Card requirements for this card depends on your credit information and other personal finance information such as assets.

7. The NatWest Black MasterCard

The NatWest Black MasterCard offers an outrageous $1,500,000 spending limit and a Priority Pass to all airport lounges. Annual fees are also a bargain at $395 compared to other black cards. You'll also have the usual black card perks such as 24-hour concierge services and various discounts and accommodations while traveling.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

New Protections Proposed for Users of Prepaid Cards

$
0
0

Filed under:

Horizontal|Cut Out|Photography|Color Image|Credit Card|Adult|Human Hand|Shopping|Part Of|White Background|Receipt|Paying|One Man
Getty Images
By Krystal Steinmetz

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed new rules that would extend a number of the financial protections of bank accounts to prepaid cards.

The prepaid market has experienced rapid growth in recent years. According to the CFPB, the amount of money loaded onto general purpose reloadable cards has gone from less than $1 billion in 2003 to nearly $100 billion by the end of 2014.

"Consumers are increasingly relying on prepaid products to make purchases and access funds, but they are not guaranteed the same protections or disclosures as traditional bank accounts," CFPB director Richard Cordray said in a statement released Thursday. "Our proposal would close the loopholes in this market and ensure prepaid consumers are protected whether they are swiping a card, scanning their smartphone, or sending a payment." The proposed new rules include:
  • Prepaid protections. These would expand the limited federal consumer protections available for prepaid accounts now. The proposal includes protections similar to those provided to checking account customers, including free access to account balance and history, error resolution rights, and protection against fraud or a lost card.
  • Disclosure of fees. Currently many prepaid cards' fees and disclosures are inaccessible before purchase because they're sealed inside the card's packaging or they're hard to find online. The CFPB proposal would require that companies adopt an industry standard for disclosures so consumers can comparison shop. The CFPB also wants to require that prepaid card companies post their card agreements on their websites, as well as on a CFPB website.
  • Credit protections. Although most prepaid products only allow customers to spend what they have in their account, some companies offer credit products and overdrafts. Under the new rules, if a consumer opts to "use a credit product related to their prepaid account, they would be entitled to the same protections that credit card consumers receive today," the CFPB said. Those protections include assessing a consumer's ability to pay before extending credit and access to a monthly billing statement, among others.
The proposed rules would cover a broad spectrum of prepaid cards, including traditional plastic cards that are used like debit cards, as well as payroll cards, some government benefit cards, and mobile and electronic accounts that store funds, such as eBay's (EBAY) PayPal and Google (GOOG) Wallet.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks End Mostly Up as Market Extends Gains

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Alcoa CEO Klaus Kleinfeld Rings The Closing Bell At The New York Stock Exchange
Andrew Burton/Getty Images
By BERNARD CONDON

NEW YORK -- Stocks ended mostly higher on Friday as major indexes extended gains for a fourth week in a row, a rare stretch for this year.

After flitting between tiny gains and losses for most of the day, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) rose just two-hundredths of one percent to close at a record high. The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) ended slightly lower, but the losses were limited by a gain in energy shares, which have been falling sharply in recent months as oil prices drop.

As of Friday, the S&P 500 is up 10 percent so far this year.

"The market has continued to surprise me with its strength," said Uri Landesman, president of Platinum Partners, an investment fund in New York. "It's been almost a six-year party ... and it takes a lot to upset that momentum."

The S&P 500 rose 0.49 points to 2,039.82. The Dow slipped 18.05 points, or 0.1 percent, to 17,634.74. The Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) rose 8.4 points, or 0.2 percent, to 4,688.54.

Stocks have been mostly rising since Oct. 15, when the S&P 500 nearly fell into a "correction," a trading term for a drop of 10 percent or more from a recent peak. Generally strong corporate earnings results and solid U.S. economic data have lifted shares sharply since then.

On Friday, investors got more good economic news. The Commerce Department reported that retail sales rose 0.3 percent in October after a drop in September. The reversal, though modest, was interpreted by some market experts as evidence that recent job gains and lower gas prices are lifting spirits as the holiday shopping season begins.

"American consumers are starting to spend again," said John Manley, chief stock strategist at Wells Fargo Funds, which manages $250 billion. "More people are working ... and that makes us a little freer at the cash registers."

Six of the S&P 500 index's 10 industry sectors rose for day, led by an 0.8 percent gain in energy shares. Energy stocks had fallen 10 percent in three months as the price of crude plummeted to a four-year low.

Among the highlights of the day, Virgin America, an airline backed by billionaire Richard Branson, soared 30 percent in its initial public offering.

For the week, the S&P 500 and the Dow closed up about a third of percentage point, their fourth week of gains. The only better performance this year was a five-week run started in early August.

Among stocks making moves:
  • Nordstrom (JWN) rose 92 cents, or 1.3 percent, to $74.17 after the high-end retailer reported earnings that topped financial analysts' expectations.
  • Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) sank 5 percent after announcing it needs to restate its financial results for 2012 and 2013. The car-rental company fell $1.04 to $21.69.
The price of oil posted its biggest gain in two months on concerns over Libyan output and strong retail sales in the U.S. that raised expectations for demand. Benchmark U.S. crude rose $1.61 to close at $75.82 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Brent crude, a benchmark for international oils used by many U.S. refineries, rose $1.92 to $79.41 on the ICE Futures exchange in London.

In other energy futures trading on the NYMEX:
  • Wholesale gasoline rose 4.1 cents to close at $2.043 a gallon.
  • Heating oil rose 5.4 cents to close at $2.416 a gallon.
  • Natural gas rose 4.3 cents to close at $4.022 per 1,000 cubic feet.
The price of U.S. government bonds rose slightly. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note slipped to 2.32 percent from 2.34 percent on Thursday. The yield was at 3 percent at the start of the year. Yields move in the opposite direction to the price.

The price of gold rose $24.10, or 2.1 percent, to $1,185.60 an ounce. Silver rose 69 cents, or 4.4 percent, to $16.31 an ounce and copper rose five cents, or 1.7 percent, to $3.05 a pound.

What to watch Monday:
  • The Federal Reserve releases industrial production for October at 9:15 a.m. Eastern time.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

As Gas Prices Drop, America Resumes Big Car Love Affair

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Washington Auto Show
Basri Sahin, Anadolu Agency/Getty ImagesCheaper gas prices mean more Americans are eyeing a return to owning big SUVs, such as the GMC Yukon.
By Ben Klayman and Bernie Woodall

DETROIT -- It is the automotive equivalent of Pavlov's bell: when gasoline is expensive, U.S. car owners try to downsize, but once pump prices ring down, they salivate over big pickup trucks and SUVs.

With gas prices slipping below $3 a gallon last month for the first time since December 2010, size is back in vogue.

The migration to trucks will turn into a stampede if these gas prices go lower or stay low.

"The migration to trucks will turn into a stampede if these gas prices go lower or stay low," Mike Jackson, chief executive of AutoNation (AN), leading U.S. auto retailer, told Reuters.

"Americans just love big."

Helping fuel the upswing is an improving economy and better fuel efficiency that allows people to go for size and feel less guilty about it.

"A new Ford Escape (crossover SUV) is more fuel efficient than a 10-year-old Camry," says Barclays auto analyst Brian Johnson. "The days of having to be ashamed of your Yukon seem to be fading," he said, referring to General Motors' full-sized SUV powered by a V8 engine.

Analysts and industry executives say SUV and truck sales have been rising already before fuel prices fell and cheaper gas could sustain the trend into 2015.

Improved Truck Sales

In October, for instance, SUVs and trucks accounted for 72 percent of Ford's sales, up from 68.5 percent a year ago, while Chrysler's sales surged 22 percent thanks to strong demand for its Ram pickups and Jeep SUVs.

With a greater share of big vehicles in their line-up than their European, Japanese and Korean rivals, the Detroit three -- General Motors (GM), Ford (F) and Chrysler (FCAU) -- are well placed to cash in on the trend.

Pickups and SUVs remain a pillar of profitability for Detroit, accounting for more than two-thirds of U.S. automakers' global pre-tax earnings, even though they make up just 16 percent of North American vehicle production.

So far this year, they account for 77 percent of Chrysler's U.S. sales, 68 percent of Ford's and 54 percent of GM's. compared with roughly 45 percent for Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) and less for other rivals.

Electrics, Hybrids Slip

Electric and hybrid vehicles that account for 2 percent of U.S. sales, are the big losers, with October sales of Toyota Prius down over 13 percent from a year ago, Ford C-Max down over 22 percent and Chevrolet Volt sales down about 29 percent.

The challenge for carmakers is how do you adjust to buying patterns that follow wild swings in gasoline prices?

AutoNation's Jackson says you simply can't and recalls 2008 when prices spiked above $4 in the summer to end the year around $1.60.

"I was trading in Escalades on Smarts and by December they wanted the Escalade back."

Among the Detroit Three, Ford is betting that fuel economy will remain a selling point, investing in its redesigned, more aluminum-intensive F-150 full-size pickup truck.

Chrysler appears to be hedging its bets with its U.S. sales chief Reid Bigland talking of "very limited" impact of gas prices so far. General Motors Chief Economist Mustafa Mohatarem struck a more optimistic note, saying the improving U.S. economy and its newfound energy self-sustainability should sustain Americans' appetite for size.

"All else equal, Americans want large vehicle they can drive long distances."

-With additional reporting by Paul Lienert.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

How Much Is Too Much to Borrow for College?

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

College students taking test in classroom
OJO Images RF/Getty Images
With high school seniors in the thick of college applications season, parents of teens everywhere are discussing how they're going to pay for their educations. Most families cobble together a mix of savings, grants, scholarships, wages from part-time jobs, and loans.

Oh, those loans: We've all heard plenty about the student debt crisis. At this point more than $1 trillion is owed in U.S. college debt, a staggering amount, and the average student loan debt now is $29,400.

Which leads to the obvious, if too rarely asked, question: For the individual, how much is too much to take out in student loans? Craig Myers, founder of CR Myers & Associates in Southfield, Michigan, says his advice is simple: "As little as possible." Sound easier said than done? Here's some guidance.

Reducing Your Borrowing

Pat Simasko, president of Simasko Law in Mt. Clemens, Michigan, says he tells his clients to have their students apply for every scholarship and grant imaginable. "As a father of three, I know we all want our kids to go to the best college in their chosen field; however, when life takes unexpected twists and turns, the college fund is the first item parents will draw from," he says.

In addition to researching scholarship and grant opportunities, "Many kids keep their educational costs down by starting out at a community college for their first two years of basic curriculum. This way they can save their loans for later enrolling in their specialty at a university."

Simasko agrees, suggesting that parents have their kids live with them while they earn their associate's degrees, and that the students also work part-time to save money for their final two years at a university.

How Much Should You Borrow?

The general rule of thumb is that the total student debt should not be more than the borrower's anticipated annual salary the first year out of school, says Ernest Romero, founder of CoreCap Solutions in Sterling Heights, Michigan. "Future artists and musicians would be wise to borrow less than future computer programmers or engineers," says Romero. "The monthly repayment of the loan should not be more than 10 to 20 percent of their anticipated future monthly salary."

Myers agrees and suggests that parents also look at the financial growth opportunities in the profession their child intends to pursue. "Once you have an idea of their future income, you can then determine a reasonable loan amount that won't drown them when it comes time to pay it back."

However, the challenge, Simasko says, is that few freshmen in college know what they want to do when they graduate, and even if they do, they don't always know what the salary will be or if they'll be able to get a job in their chosen field. In that case, families would be wise to estimate a minimum anticipated salary after graduation and limit borrowing to a loan with a repayment schedule that would be affordable at that salary level.

Also, reminds Myers, "When a student loan is taken out, it should be used only for school tuition, not to help pay rent, go out to eat or for other extras. If the student wants those extras, they should be paid for by earned income."

Parent Loan or Student Loan?

Government student loans are preferable over private student loans because they typically carry lower interest rates, but some parents may be tempted to take out a loan in their own name so as not to burden their kids with too much debt. However, financial planners recommend having the students, rather than their parents, borrow for college.

"For most loans, it makes sense for the student to take on the loans in their name, because of the future options that may be available, including student loan forgiveness programs as well as various repayment programs that could benefit the student and not the parents," says Romero. "For example, Mrs. Smith takes on $40,000 of student debt in her name to help her son pay for his education, and now she is having a hard time making payments on the loan. However, her son is working for a qualified nonprofit that would have allowed for student loan forgiveness if only the loan had been in his name."

Romero recommends that students look into options for loan forgiveness programs when they apply for a student loan. Simasko agrees: "Everyone is so confident at the time when the student is being accepted to a huge university that when they come out of college they will be immediately making the money to cover the loan payments, but the reality of the situation and what I see firsthand in my office is that 80 percent of graduates in their first job can hardly afford basic living expenses."

Michele Lerner is a Motley Fool contributor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images