Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

E-Gift Cards Gain Popularity, Especially for Millennials

$
0
0

Filed under:

e-gift card for Marks and Spencer online shopping voucher, UK
Geography Photos/UIG/Getty Images
By Ellen Chang

Electronic gift cards are surging in popularity, especially among millennials as the options to personalize have increased.

Since 2010, 59 percent of gift cards are now available electronically, up 18 percentage points from four years ago, according to a new Bankrate.com report. Bankrate.com analyzed the terms and conditions of 62 widely held gift cards in October.

The increase in the availability of electronic gift cards translates into good news for millennials since they are more than twice as likely to lose traditional plastic gift cards than older adults, with 40 percent of 18- to 29 year-olds who admit to losing one. Mobile gift card usage among millennials is double that of older adults.

Multiple Benefits -- but Watch Out for the Fees

"There are lots of reasons why electronic gift cards appeal to customers," said Jeanine Skowronski, Bankrate.com credit card analyst. "For starters, they're a quick fix for anyone who needs a gift on the fly. Second, unlike their plastic counterparts, they don't take up excess real estate in your wallet. Though it may seem counterintuitive, a digital gift card can be easily personalized."

While various age groups disagree on traditional vs. electronic gift card usage, millennials, Generation X and boomers all prefer general purpose gift cards over cards that must be used at a particular store. Unfortunately, general purpose cards charge higher fees.

All seven of the widely held general-purpose cards that Bankrate surveyed charge purchase fees ranging from $3.95 to $6.95, whereas only 7 percent of store-specific cards charge purchase fees. The fees are high, but gift cards are a really quick and easy purchase for gifts," she said. "You are giving people a choice, and that appeals to them."

A whopping 84 percent of Americans have received a gift card, and 72 percent have given one. The most common value is $25 to $50.

It Starts Online or On the Phone

Shoppers are overwhelmingly choosing to go online to purchase gift cards. Online purchases of gift cards increased substantially from 26 percent in 2013 to 34 percent in 2014, while on-premise purchases in store, at restaurant or entertainment locations decreased dramatically from 51 percent in 2013 to just 44 percent in 2014, according to a recent First Data's study. Purchases of gift cards using a social networking site such as Facebook increased from 8 percent in 2013 to 13 percent in 2014. The percentage of respondents using an app was 13 percent.

Purchasing gift cards from your mobile is also gaining in popularity, with 55 percent of consumers who are interested in using an app to store gift card information on their phone and 58 percent of respondents would prefer to use one app to store multiple merchant cards, the survey found.

PayPal now allows consumers to send gift cards online, said Pablo Rodriguez, head of global consumer initiatives at PayPal. "Shoppers can choose from a variety of merchants as well as send, save and check their balances all from their digital wallet online so there is no more hassle dealing with lost gift cards," he said.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Hand Soap Could Cause Liver Cancer, New Study Says

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Man helping himself to a dollop of antibacterial soap, close up of hands
Svanblar/Shutterstock
A common antimicrobial agent called triclosan causes liver fibrosis and cancer in laboratory mice through mechanisms also relevant to humans, researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine have found

Triclosan's broad use in consumer goods -- including liquid hand soaps, toothpastes, shampoos, cosmetics, plastics, yoga mats, cutting boards and ice cream scoops -- presents "a very real risk of liver toxicity for people, as it does in mice," said Robert H. Tukey, a UC-San Diego professor and co-author of the study, published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Triclosan, a synthetic, broad-spectrum antibacterial chemical, is coming under fire because of its links to endocrine disruption that could cause infertility, impaired muscle function and now increased cancer risks.

It's All Around

The UC-San Diego study showed that mice exposed to triclosan for six months (roughly equivalent to 18 human years) had more and larger chemical-induced liver tumors than mice not exposed to the antimicrobial. Researchers believe triclosan may interfere with the protein responsible for detoxifying foreign chemicals in the body, thereby causing liver cells to proliferate and, over time, become cancerous tumors.

Studies have found traces of triclosan in 97 percent of breast milk samples from lactating women and in the urine of nearly 75 percent of people tested, according to a statement by UC San Diego Health System. Triclosan is also one of the seven most frequently detected compounds in streams across the United States, the statement says.

"We could reduce most human and environmental exposures by eliminating uses of triclosan that are high-volume, but of low-benefit, such as inclusion in liquid hand soaps," said Bruce D. Hammock, professor at University of California, Davis. "Yet we could also for now retain uses shown to have health value -- as in toothpaste, where the amount used is small."

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) recently came under fire because its Total toothpaste contains triclosan. A recent Care2 petition, asking Colgate to remove triclosan from its toothpaste, so far has received almost 68,000 signatures.

Triclosan is already under scrutiny by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. On its website, the FDA says, "Triclosan is not currently known to be hazardous to humans. But several scientific studies have come out since the last time FDA reviewed this ingredient that merit further review."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

9 Secrets Your Life Insurance Agent Wants to Hide from You

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

965997|adult|adults|boy|caucasians|child|children|clear sky|daughter|face|faces|family|father|female|girl|girls|happiness|huggin
jupiterimages

We would like to think of life insurance agents as trusted advisers whose only aim is to get us the right coverage. But the nature of life insurance -- and the job of life insurance agents -- makes them something close to our natural enemy.

One easy way to prevent being taken advantage of is to find an independent agent. "Independent agents save you time and money," said Chris Huntley, co-founder of JRCInsuranceGroup.com. "Rather than completing applications and medical exams with 15 different insurance companies to see which one will approve you at the best rating, make one call to a qualified independent agent, who can place you with the most appropriate carrier based on your unique personal and medical history."

In a lot of ways, what hurts us as consumers of life insurance actually benefits life insurance agents. Here are nine examples of what I'm talking about.

1. Their Income Is 100% Commission

Any time you're buying from a person compensated 100 percent by commission, your radar needs to be up and in perfect working order. Being on commission doesn't make a person evil. But it may change his or her perspective, as well as the type and degree of products that you will be introduced to.

If the agent is entirely on commission, he or she will then have a vested personal interest in selling you products that will result in you paying the highest premium possible and hence yielding the highest commission.

2. You May Very Well Be Over-Insured

Whenever an agent evaluates how much life insurance you need to have, he will almost inevitably start with numbers that are larger than anything you'd ever imagine that you would need.

For example, it's not unlikely that the agent will suggest that you need to have life insurance equal to 30 times your annual income. If you are earning $100,000 per year, he may suggest -- without flinching -- that you will be adequately insured by a $3 million life insurance policy. After all, you will need to provide income for your family for the next 20 years, college educations for your children, the payoff of your mortgage and a comfortable retirement for your spouse.

He knows that it is unlikely that you will take a life insurance policy that large, but it's an excellent starting point -- for him. After all, if he suggests $3 million but walks out of your house with an application for a $1 million policy, he wins. That's because he knew going in the door that you probably only wanted a policy for a couple hundred thousand dollars.

And you'd probably be right. After all, if you have other investments and your spouse is also well-employed, you will only need a fraction of the life insurance coverage that the agent will suggest. Most often, life insurance is only needed to settle final arrangements, medical bills, outstanding debts and maybe a few years of living expenses. Providing for your loved ones to live in luxury for the rest of their lives is an expensive you can't afford, nor need.

3. He'd Rather Sell You an Annuity Than an Insurance Policy

An agent will make a lot more money selling you an annuity than a life insurance policy. She might make only a few hundred dollars on the first year of a whole life insurance policy and progressively less each year after that. On a term life insurance policy, she'll make even less. On an annuity however, she can earn thousands of dollars in the first year, and more after that.

4. Whole Life Isn't a Good Investment -- Or Even Good Insurance

Life insurance agents like to sell whole life insurance as the best of both worlds -- an investment program with life insurance coverage. In truth, it doesn't do either particularly well. The insurance benefit will be limited because the premiums are high. And since so much of the premium goes to pay for investment fees and the life insurance coverage, there is relatively little left over for investment within the plan.

5. The Cash Value of Whole Life Won't Benefit You for Years

Life insurance agents like to hawk the virtues of the cash value build-up in a whole life insurance policy. This is another myth. As a rule, it will take at least five years before you will have a cash value that is equivalent to the amount of money you paid in premiums into the policy. And maybe not even then.

6. "Buy Term and Invest the Difference" Really Is a Better Strategy

There is probably no slogan confronted by life insurance agents that is more irritating to them than this one. And that's because the slogan is true.

Since term insurance is so much less expensive than whole life, you can buy a lot more of it -- in fact a more reasonable amount for your needs. And the investment performance of mutual funds -- particularly index funds -- dramatically outperforms that of any insurance related investment vehicle.
Even if the combination of term life insurance and investment in a mutual fund is no less expensive than a whole life insurance premium, the money you will accumulate in the mutual fund -- and the speed at which you will do it -- make it a far superior investment to a whole life insurance policy. And you'll have a whole lot more life insurance coverage along the way.

7. We Don't Know About the Value of Long-term Care Insurance

From a consumer standpoint, there are two fundamental problems with long-term care insurance coverage:

  • It's very expensive.
  • It's not certain that you will ever need it.
Since people are living longer than ever, making a provision for long-term care has become a hot topic. Insurance agents know this, and they're exploiting the fear.

Emotions aside, most people don't need long-term care. And even if they do, it's often for a short period just before death. If there are other assets available, particularly retirement assets or a home with substantial equity, long-term care insurance with my be unnecessary.

And if it isn't ever needed, you will have spent tens of thousands of dollars over many decades funding an insurance policy that was never necessary. This is an important consideration when there are so many other priorities in your household budget.

Long-term care insurance is relatively new coverage, and it's not at all certain that it will survive the test of time. Some insurance companies have withdrawn long-term care insurance coverage due to the inability to predict future medical costs or the longevity of their clients.

8. Your Kids Don't Really Need Life Insurance

Life insurance agents love to sell whole life insurance policies to parents of young children, stressing the advantages of the investment provisions of the policies. Those provisions, they argue, will help parents to provide funds for their children's college educations. But nowhere is the advice of "by term and invest the difference" more relevant.

You should have only enough insurance coverage on your children to pay for final expenses and uncovered medical costs. In most cases, a $50,000 term life insurance policy will get that job done with money to spare. There is no need to replace lost wages with a ridiculously large policy.
And as we've already discussed, insurance related investment vehicles are underperforming investments. You'll be far better off investing money in a mutual fund for your children.

9. There Is No FDIC Equivalent Back-Stopping Insurance Companies

This is a very relevant question - but seldom asked -- since life insurance agents like to position themselves as investment advisers. The investments that they sell are almost always exclusively insurance products. However, there is no equivalent to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. that will back up the life insurance company in the event of investment failure.

There are arrangements within each state for companies to collectively backup a failed insurance company, but there is no apparatus in place to deal with a systemic failure such as the financial meltdown that hit the banks and financial companies a few years ago.

While this has obvious implications for the life insurance coverage that you pay for and expect to have, it becomes much more significant when you have a lot of money sitting in insurer-sponsored investments.

More Tips for Dealing With Life Insurance Agents

If you apply for life insurance, keep these four tips in mind from Jeff Root, a life insurance agent and founder of Rootfin.com. And again, they're not tips your agent will be likely to recommend.
  • If you're not satisfied, ask for reconsideration. Life insurance underwriters will always offer the best possible rate class as permitted by their underwriting guidelines; however, if you're not happy with the life insurance company's offer, your agent can submit a "reconsideration request" and ask the underwriter for a better offer. Most agents don't even mention this as an alternative because of the extra work involved in drafting a letter convincing the underwriter why they should qualify for a better health classification.
  • Ask for tentative offers. Consumers can get "tentative offers" from life insurance companies before applying for life insurance. Independent life insurance agents send your risk anonymously to various underwriting desks. Underwriters typically reply within 48 hours with a health classification in what we call a "tentative offer". You can attach this tentative offer to the life insurance application, and the company you apply with must give you this rate unless you withheld any information from them. This is a must for people with health issues applying for life insurance.
  • Shopping won't necessarily get you a better rate. Going from website to website won't result in finding better rates. However, each company looks at your health differently. It's your agent's job to fit your unique health situation into the underwriting guidelines of each company and then see who provides the best rates.
  • Most applicants won't get the preferred best rate. Less than 5 percent of people who apply for life insurance can qualify for "preferred best." Yet it's the No. 1 health classification quoted on websites.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

9 Ways to Deal With Debt in Retirement

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Senior African American couple paying bills
Getty Images
By Morgan Quinn

What do you want to do when you retire? I'm guessing paying down debt isn't on your short list. Unfortunately, for many Americans it is. Mortgages, credit card debt, student loans and supporting elderly parents are affecting the retirement plans of many baby boomers. The financial crisis devastated home values and retirement accounts, and a general lack of planning left little time for boomers to recover the losses.

A Fidelity Investments survey showed that almost half of all baby boomers who have pensions expect to retire with debt, with one if five of them saying they did no planning before retirement. Also, a 2012 Demos study found that people 65 and older have more credit card debt than any other age group -- $9,300 on average. Demos suggested that the recession reduced savings and forced those in or near retirement to cut back.

"I don't think people are making a conscious decision to carry debt," Lori Trawinski, senior strategic policy adviser at AARP Public Policy Institute, told Kiplinger. "People have no choice, because they have other obligations they need to take care of."

If you are nearing retirement or already retired, how do you pay down debt? Here are eight ways to get some relief.

How to Pay Down Debt in Retirement

1. Consult a professional. A certified financial planner can help you build a retirement plan, including specific benchmarks so you can dig out of debt and build savings. A CFP can also help you build an overall retirement spending plan that includes debt payments, fixed expenses and anticipated sources of retirement income.

2. Know your benefits. The National Council on Aging, a nonprofit service and advocacy organization that improves the lives of older adults, runs a website called BenefitsCheckup.org. The site has a tool to help you make sure you are receiving all the benefits you are entitled to. These benefits can help you pay for medications, health care, food, utilities and more.

3. Downsize. This is a very emotional decision but selling your house and moving into something much smaller and more affordable will free up cash for living expenses. Ditching your high-maintenance house means you will be free of high mortgage payments and expensive maintenance, insurance and tax bills.

4. Accelerate your mortgage payments. This is only a good option if you have mortgage debt and cash in the bank; this route is not for retirees with other kinds of high-interest debts or low cash reserves. If you compare the interest rate on your mortgage with the current rates on savings accounts and CDs, you might save more money paying down the mortgage instead of keeping the money in the bank. Just don't withdraw from your retirement accounts to pay off the house -- the tax owed on the distributions will cancel out the mortgage savings.

5. Refinance your mortgage. Some retirees have enough equity to refinance their homes, pull out cash, invest the money and try to live off the investments. Retirees might want to avoid using mortgage relief firms, as some debt settlement programs can leave you paying more than the original debt owed. If you do use a mortgage settlement firm, know that the FTC bans these firms from charging upfront fees. Also, be wary of short-term interest rate deals -- those rates can spike later.

6. Get a reverse mortgage. There are risks associated with reverse mortgages: They generally have high fees and interest rates. Also, the loan must be repaid with accumulated interest when the owner passes away, sells the home or no longer uses it as his primary residence. Reverse mortgages are one of the biggest scams targeted at the elderly.

Still, they are an attractive option because retirees do not have to make monthly principle or interest payments while living in the home, although they must stay current on tax and insurance premiums. Retirees considering a reverse mortgage should consult a government-approved housing counselor for help.

7. Postpone retirement. Postponing retirement gives you more time to bring in income and pay down debts. Working later means you can also delay claiming Social Security benefits or other sources of retirement income, which gives your savings extra time to compound. This might be a tough pill to swallow if you've had your eye on retiring sooner rather than later, but just a few extra working years might be all you need to eliminate your debts.

8. File bankruptcy. Senior citizens are the fastest growing number of bankruptcy filers. It's an attractive option to retirees, because chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation does not affect 401(k) accounts, social security benefits or home equity. IRAs are also protected up to more than $1 million. Eliminating debts through bankruptcy makes sense for some boomers, who don't have a chance to increase their income so late in life. There are some exemptions to which accounts are or are not affected, which vary by state. It's best to consult a bankruptcy attorney to understand all the implications.

9. Ask for help. There are several nonprofit counseling agencies that help people establish a manageable schedule for repaying debts. Just avoid debt negotiation firms that charge high fees or are scams. Some trusted sources include the Association of Independent Consumer Credit Counseling Agencies and the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. Debt counselors can review your budget and spending and come up with an action plan; some can even offer a reduction or waiver of interest charges and penalties.

"No one should be worried about making a credit card payment versus paying for medicine," Leslie Linfield, executive director at the Institute for Financial Literacy, told Kiplinger. "You've contributed to the system your whole life. It's okay to ask for assistance."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Amazon's Plan to Take Over Your Holiday Wish List

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

www.amazon.com
This is shaping up to be an interesting shopping season for Amazon.com (AMZN). Analysts are holding out for another quarter of resilient growth. Wall Street pros see the leading online retailer's sales topping $29.8 billion, clocking in 17 percent ahead of last year's holiday quarter.

However, they also see profitability going the other way. Amazon's investing in growth initiatives, and these are moves that won't pay off right away. In short, it's going to cost the dot-com darling on the bottom line.

A big part of Amazon's strategy heading into this seasonally potent shopping period is the introduction of new gadgetry. The push into proprietary consumer electronics began in 2007 with the Kindle. The original e-reader hit the market at the steep price point of $399, and Amazon has had seven years to learn that it needs to price its hardware aggressively.

It's hoping to make a splash this season with a few gadgets that are priced for success. Let's check out three products.

Fire TV Stick

Amazon entered into the TV set-top market in April with Fire TV, a $99 box that turns a television into a smart television with access to leading streaming services and apps. It was priced high relative to Chromecast and Roku boxes, but it also came with some nifty features -- including a remote with voice recognition and the ability to play games.

Now Amazon is ready to address the low end of the market. It rolled out Fire TV Stick on Wednesday. It's similar to the pricier Fire TV but without the voice search and with scaled-back specs. It's a dongle that plugs directly into a television's HDMI port. At $39 it's priced right to take on Roku and Google's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Chromecast. Amazon claims that the Fire TV Stick is the company's fastest-selling device, but it also helped make its own luck by offering its Amazon Prime members the ability to order one for half that price when it was introduced last month.

Demand is certainly outstripping supply right now. Customers placing new orders now are being told that they won't ship out until mid-January.

Echo

Another new toy unveiled by Amazon earlier this month is Echo. It's a cylindrical device that can be planted around the house, responding to voice commands to do everything from providing weather updates to announcing sports scores. It can scour the Internet for research. It also plays tunes.

It's been described as Amazon's response to Apple's (AAPL) Siri, and that's fair. However, this is a stand-alone consumer electronics device that's also more intuitive. It awakens with a predetermined voice prompt, and its ability to do everything from setting alarms to compiling shopping lists could make it a game changer since it doesn't require fidgeting with a smartphone.

Echo's $199 price point isn't cheap, but Amazon Prime members were able to preorder it for half the price. Earlier this month the device was supposed to begin shipping in a few weeks, so that should be sooner rather than later.

Kindle Voyage

The Kindle e-reader and tablet lines have gotten better and cheaper. The most popular e-reader now sells for just $79. and the Kindle Fire tablet starts at just $99. However, late last month Amazon took an upmarket turn, introducing the $219 Kindle Voyage.

The high-end e-reader features an improved high-res display, adaptive front lighting and a new way to turn pages without having to lift a finger. Most readers will be fine with the entry-level $79 model, but Amazon now has a high-end option that's winning critical raves.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Amazon.com, Apple, and Google (A and C shares). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to make 2015 your best investing year ever? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

For Older Investors, Gold Doesn't Seem to be Aging That Well

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

|ks16948|color|studio shot|indoor|nobody|bullion|bars|ounce|gold|9999 fine|wealth|value|real|money|precious metal|embossed|engra
jupiterimages
By Chris Fichera

Investors hold gold for any number of reasons: inflation hedge, portfolio diversifier, risk reducer. Some do for fear of a collapse of our global financial system. Whatever the reason, few gold bugs likely feel good about the yellow metal's slide to a nearly 4½-year low at around $1,150 an ounce. It's a long, painful ways down from gold's high of nearly $2,000 in late 2011.

Of investors who track their portfolios with SigFig and own SPDR Gold Trust (GLD), 86 percent are underwater on their investments, with a median 16 percent loss. The typical (median) investor holds about $6,200 worth of gold, translating to a $1,000 loss, or about the value of a single 1-ounce American eagle gold coin.

Who Are the Gold Bugs?

One of the easiest ways to invest in gold is through ETFs that tracks the price of gold. The largest of these in asset size is the SPDR Gold Trust. Buying its shares places a bit of gold for you in HSBC (HSBC) Bank's London vaults, so you don't have to bolt a safe to your basement floor.

Not surprisingly, SigFig investors who own GLD trend higher in age: older investors focus more on wealth preservation, and they've lived through high-inflation periods. Just 1.5 percent of millennial-age investors hold the Gold Trust, compared with 3 percent of 30-somethings and 6 percent for investors in their 70s.



Unfortunately, that's around the age range gold's slide might hurt the most. And while GLD investors have put on average $24,000 into the ETF, those in their 60s and 80s have invested two to three times as much as those who are 40 or younger.



Will the Bubble Burst?

Pundits will give any number of reasons for gold's decline and when it will end. At some point, they'll be talking about when to get back into the gold trade.

Allocating a small portion of your assets -- around 2 percent -- to gold is not uncommon financial advice, but advice on a proper allocation to gold is often vague.

Some rather decent investors -- like Warren Buffett -- never touch the stuff. One of Buffett's more famous quotes came from a speech at Harvard University: "It gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or some place. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head."

What he means by "no utility" is that gold produces nothing and pays no dividend. It also has ongoing holding costs and gets taxed at a higher rate than the long-term capital gains rate for stocks.

Allocating a couple percent of one's assets to gold may not mean much in the face of a doomsday scenario or hyperinflation. But if you're holding gold and are feeling sore these days, there is one silver lining: you could be holding silver. That metal has lost 27 percent of its value over the past year, making gold's 10 percent slide seem (almost) tolerable.

Chris Fichera is a contributing writer at SigFig. Nearly a million people use SigFig to track, improve and manage over $300 billion in investments.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Toyota Recalls Over 420,000 Lexus Cars to Fix Fuel Leaks

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Pittsburgh Auto Show
Gene J. Puskar/AP
DETROIT -- Toyota is recalling nearly 423,000 Lexus luxury brand cars in the U.S. to fix fuel leaks that can cause fires.

The recalls affect the 2006 to 2011 GS, 2007 to 2010 LS and the 2006 to 2011 IS models.

Toyota (TM) says that the cars' fuel lines have nickel phosphate plating to protect against corrosion. Some lines could have been built with particles coming in contact with a gasket. That can cause the sealing property to deteriorate and trigger fuel leaks.

Toyota says it's not aware of any fires or injuries caused by the problem.

The company first began looking into the matter in June 2010 after getting a report of gasoline odor coming from a customer's engine compartment, according to documents posted Friday by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Toyota investigated, but didn't find the cause until this year, the documents said. It decided to do the recall in October.

The company and dealers received six reports from the field and 238 warranty claims about the problem.

Dealers will repair the gasket seating surface at no cost to owners.

Some of the Lexuses were recalled in 2009 to fix leaks in aluminum fuel pipes.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Send Your DNA to the Moon With Crowdfunded Mission

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Crowdfunded Moon Mission Offers to Store Your Digital Memory

By Arjun Kharpal | @ArjunKharpal

A British company has launched a 600,000 British pound ($1 million) Kickstarter crowdfunding campaign to get to moon and drill into its surface, with investors able to buy memory on a digital time capsule -- and even send their hair into space.

The Lunar Mission One project will use the initial funds to set up the plans for the moon landing and drilling and has signed up RAL Space -- which has been involved in developing more than 200 space missions -- as its technical advisers.

Enthusiasts can spend 60 pounds to buy some space on a "digital time capsule" -- a memory stick-like device -- to upload photos or videos. This will then be buried in the hole drilled by the capsule launched to the moon's South Pole. For a higher -- yet to be determined -- cost, punters would be able to pay to have strands of their hair taken on the trip.

People who want to be involved more deeply can pay 5,000 pounds for a place in the viewing gallery at mission control.

By mid-morning Wednesday, the Kickstarter campaign had nearly 500 backers who have raised a total of almost 49,000 pounds. Lunar Mission One has up to Dec. 17 to raise the required funds and move the project closer to lift off.

Government Space Cuts

David Iron, founder of Lunar Missions Ltd., said the crowdfunding drive was a response to a cutback in the global cutbacks on space exploration.

"It is a response to the fact that governments' space missions are as limited as ever for financing the kind of space projects that are designed for advancing knowledge and understanding," Iron told CNBC by phone.

"At the same time, by getting people involved in the financing, we are getting them involved in the project itself."

Bury Your Hair in Space?

When Lunar Mission One lands on the moon's south pole, it will drill to a depth of at least 20 meters deep, but could go as far as 100 meters, with the aim of analyzing lunar rock to discover more about life on earth.

Iron said the mission will launch in 2024 and will need around half a billion pounds to become a reality and expects various forms of crowdfunding to make up the bulk of the revenues.

The funds raised will then be used to employ aerospace companies on contracts to build the technology needed to launch a spacecraft to the moon and begin drilling. Iron said he also expects space agencies to "gift us part of the technology".

"The consortium of companies will need to compete for contracts with us. They will want to be part of this and they will be paid for it out of the revenues but they need to assemble the best of breed for the technology," Iron told CNBC.

"We are expecting them to handle the contracts and take on the role a space agency would undertake."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Week's Winners, Losers: Burger IPO's Hot, Not GameStop

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

www.habitburger.com
There were plenty of winners and losers this week, with a critically acclaimed burger chain smoking in its initial public offering and the leading video game retailer seeing store-level sales shrink. Here's a rundown of the week's smartest moves and biggest blunders.

Bill Cosby -- Loser

It was a rough week for comedian Bill Cosby as Hollywood reacted to stories of sexual assault allegations. The public's perception of the "Cosby Show" and "Fat Albert" star began to turn earlier this month when accusations of sexual assault began to surface. One can argue that he's innocent until proven guilty, but the court of public opinion works by a different set of rules.

Netflix (NFLX) decided to nix a Cosby stand-up special that it was slated to begin streaming next week. That was followed by NBC pulling the plug on a Cosby-anchored sitcom that was in development for next year and TV Land eliminating "Cosby Show" reruns, including a Thanksgiving marathon that it was planning.

Nike (NKE) -- Winner

Leave it to the company with the "Just do it" tagline to come through with another dividend increase. Nike announced this week that it's boosting its quarterly dividend to 28 cents a share, a 17 percent increase over its previous rate.

Shareholders should be used to the hikes by now. Nike has now come through with higher payouts for 13 consecutive years. Pair that up with the four-year $8 billion share-repurchase program that it introduced two years ago and Nike's going the extra mile in returning money to its investors.

GameStop (GME) -- Loser

Sometimes scapegoats need scapegoats. GameStop moved lower after posting quarterly results on Thursday afternoon. The small-box video game retailer blames the soft showing on the delay of the "Assassin's Creed: Unity" game.

Having a big game move from its fiscal third quarter to its fiscal fourth quarter would lead one to think that the holiday quarter is going to be great, but that's not the case either. GameStop is offering ho-hum guidance, blaming other game delays.

GameStop should be rolling given the success of the Xbox One and PS4 that were released a year ago, but folks just aren't buying enough games. Comparable-store sales declined 2.3 percent during the fiscal third quarter, and the midpoint of its guidance for the current period suggests that we'll be seeing another negative showing for the holiday quarter.

Habit Restaurants (HABT) -- Winner

There's still plenty of heat in gourmet burgers. Habit Restaurants went public at $18 on Thursday. It wasn't enough. The stock more than doubled, soaring 120 percent to close at $39.54 on its first day of trading. First-day pops are normal, but according to Dealogic, the average opening-day uptick has averaged just 12 percent this year.

Habit Restaurants is the parent company of The Habit Burger Grill. Remember that Consumer Reports survey earlier this year that showed McDonald's (MCD) dead last in terms of burger quality and taste among 21 leading chains? The Habit Burger Grill was the top dog, just ahead of cult faves In-N-Out and Five Guys.

The hot IPO likely paves the way for Shake Shack's inevitable debut. If In-N-Out or Five Guys are listening, now would be a good time follow suit.

Keurig Green Mountain (GMCR) -- Loser

Shares of Keurig Green Mountain slumped after it posted quarterly results. The quarter itself was solid, with revenue climbing 14 percent and its adjusted profit of 90 cents a share blowing past the 77 cents a share that Wall Street was targeting. This is the third quarter in a row that Keurig Green Mountain has beaten analyst profit forecasts by a double-digit margin.

However, bears won out on the announcement that its CFO would be stepping down next year, the java giant warning of weak guidance for the holiday quarter, and signs pointing to a fall release next year for Keurig Cold.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz owns shares of Keurig Green Mountain and Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends Keurig Green Mountain, McDonald's, Netflix and Nike. The Motley Fool owns shares of GameStop, Netflix and Nike. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to make 2015 your best investing year ever? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

5 Tricks Department Stores Use to Get You to Spend More

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

How Department Stores Make You Buy Things You Don't Need

By Maryalene LaPonsie

We all know retailers use marketing tricks to get us to buy more. Everything from the music on the intercom to the scents in the air have been carefully orchestrated to maximize sales.

Money Talks News has previously tackled the subject of grocery store tricks of the trade, and now we'll check out something a bit more holiday-related: department stores.

If you want to learn more and are up for some heavy reading, you could check out this 2001 report from Hong Kong detailing how store environments impact shopping behaviors. Otherwise, we'll make it easy for you: Here are five ways department stores convince you to blow your budget.

1. Store layout means laying out more cash

When it comes to a store's layout, nothing is left to chance.

At the mall, for example, the most appealing items may be placed front and center to convince you to walk in.

Then, on your right, you'll find some of the most profitable items in the store. For whatever reason, we are programmed to veer right when entering, and stores want the next thing we see to be something profitable.

Of course, clearance racks will be in the very back so you need to pass everything else before you can reach the discounted merchandise. As a bonus, the long walk keeps you in the store longer. And the longer you're in the store, the more purchase opportunities you can be presented with.

If it weren't bad enough stores are using human nature to manipulate us, it seems to be only a matter of time before your smartphone turns against you too. U.K. company Path Intelligence has developed technology that will pick up signals coming from mobile devices and use those signals to track shopping patterns and help businesses improve their layout and sales.

2. 'Racetrack' flooring for 'pit stop' purchasing

The Hong Kong study makes mention of racetrack layouts that lead shoppers to walk around the store with little thought to where they are going or what they are looking for.

That's essentially the purpose of the smooth linoleum floor in department stores, with carpet off to the sides. You enter the store and vroom, vroom, you're on the track. Maybe what you need isn't far inside but by golly, you are going to follow that walkway all the way around the store.

When you see something interesting, you are going to step off the racetrack and onto the carpeted floor and then suddenly feel calm, relaxed ... like maybe you'll just want to stand there for a while and see what else is available on the nearby racks.

I know you think I am making this up, but really, pay attention the next time you are in a department store and see if I'm right.

3. You'll need a rest by the time you reach the restroom

Remember how I said nothing is left to chance when setting up a store's configuration? That goes for the restrooms too.

Retailers aren't necessarily trying to annoy you when they place their restrooms all the way in the back of the store, but they are hoping you will happen to see some must-have item on your way there or back.

Again, the longer you're in the store, the better they like it.

4. Signs that imply 'sale' but really mean 'for sale'

The big sign by the sweaters may announce 2/$50, but that doesn't mean it's a sale price. We've become so accustomed to seeing sale signs on racks we automatically assume any price prominently displayed must be a special.

Retailers exploit this by advertising everyday prices. Nothing illegal -- or unethical -- about that. Businesses are generally free to promote their regular prices in the same way they do sales, but now you know to double check the original price to ensure you are actually getting a deal.

While we are on the topic of signs and pricing, let's talk about that 2/$50 sign for a moment. Stores use this pricing model because they would much rather sell you two sweaters than one. However, unless the sign specifically says so, you can typically buy only one item to get the advertised pricing -- in this case, a sweater for $25.

5. Special promotions they know you won't redeem

You've probably heard manufacturers and retailers love rebates because they make merchandise appear inexpensive, yet many consumers never get around to getting their rebate.

But rebates aren't the only game in town. Retailers roll out awesome promos that will make you feel as though you are practically stealing their merchandise.

The catch is many of their promos require a second purchase. You might get $10 in Kohl's Cash for every $50 you spend, but the store knows a significant portion of people lose the certificate or forget to use it before the expiration date. Meanwhile, Kohl's (KSS) has convinced you to find $50 worth of items to buy when you really only needed to spend $30.

As for rebates, some business owners are even advised on how to make rebate redemptions more difficult. From short redemption periods to mailing checks that look like junk mail, some businesses aren't in the business of making it easy to get your money back.

3 ways to fight retailers' sneaky tricks

Most of the tricks mentioned above work because we shop on auto-pilot. We walk into a store with the vague idea we need to get Aunt Sally a gift, and we think JCPenney (JCP) probably has something she would like.

However, that's when we hit the racetrack walkway, take a detour at the giant must-be-a-sale sign and end up at the register buying armloads of things we didn't know we needed two hours ago.

Instead, keep on task by following these tips:
  • Shop the ads beforehand and make a list of exactly what you need in the store. Don't write down "gift for Aunt Sally"; decide in advance whether that will be a sweater, a Christmas ornament or something else.
  • When you enter the store, make a beeline for the first item on your list. If you don't know where it is, stop the first associate you see and ask rather than wandering the store.
  • If you find yourself scavenging racks for something you "need" so you can qualify for the current store promo, realize you are playing right into the store's plan. My advice would be to head straight to the register at that point.
It isn't rocket science, but there is a science behind how retailers keep you in their stores. Your goal should be to get in and out as quickly as possible with as much money in your wallet as possible. In the event you do go a little crazy in the store, hopefully it is in one of these retailers that have return policies making it easy to get your cash back.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Phony PayPal Accounts Used to Rip Off Online Sellers

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

kiev  ukraine   march 22 ...
shutterstock

With all the warnings about scams collecting money from victims using Green Dot (GDOT) Money Paks or other reloadable debit cards, or a money transfer service like Western Union (WU) or MoneyGram, crooks have now turned to faking transactions on a site known for being legit -- PayPal.

The Federal Trade Commission is warning consumers about a new scam that tries to fool online sellers into using phony PayPal sites. The targets of the scam are typically people selling things online that have significant value, like a car or a boat.

After the item is posted for sale, the FTC said an email will come from someone who says they will pay the full price. The conditions: The transaction must be immediate and it payment will be sent by PayPal. "What's really going on? A ruse to steal your personal information, money or merchandise," the FTC said.

Two Ways to Scam You

In one scenario, if you don't have a PayPal account, the "buyer" will send you a link to set one up. The FTC urges consumers to not follow links sent by email. Anyone who wants to set up a PayPal account can do so by going to PayPal.com.

In another scenario, if you do have a PayPal account, the "buyer" says the payment has been sent. You're told to check your email where you'll be notified that not only has the supposed buyer paid, but he accidentally sent way too much money.

So, you'll have to send back the extra by using -- wait for it -- a money transfer service like Western Union or MoneyGram. The problem is that no money was sent. So, if you wire money, you won't be sending extra, you'll just be sending your own.

What You Should Do Instead

The way to check to see if a payment has been made is not through an email confirmation, the FTC said. Before you ship any item or decide you have been paid, don't rely on an email or by following links. Log directly into PayPal to see if the payment is in your account. And, the FTC warned, when anyone claims they've accidentally overpaid you, it should set off alarm bells.

In the last scenario, your buyer really sends you money and it really came from a PayPal account. But it's not their account. So you've received money for your car, but it was someone else's cash.

The FTC said if that happens you should contact PayPal and request an investigation, and file a complaint with the FTC and the police.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

House GOP Sues Administration Over Obama Health Care Law

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Obama Congress Immigration
J. Scott Applewhite/APHouse Speaker John Boehner of Ohio
By ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON -- House Republicans sued the Obama administration on Friday over its implementation of President Barack Obama's health care law, saying he had overstepped his legal authority in carrying out the program.

GOP lawmakers filed the lawsuit in federal district court in Washington the morning after Obama announced unilateral executive actions to expand protections for millions of immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally. While Republicans complained that Obama had unconstitutionally exceeded his powers with those actions, the suit filed Friday didn't address immigration.

One Republican official said party leaders are considering amending the suit to include Obama's actions on immigration, a change that would require approval by the GOP-controlled House. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal Republican deliberations.

The House has an obligation to stand up for the Constitution, and that is exactly why we are pursuing this course of action.

"If this president can get away with making his own laws, future presidents will have the ability to as well," House Speaker John Boehner said in a written statement announcing the lawsuit. "The House has an obligation to stand up for the Constitution, and that is exactly why we are pursuing this course of action."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi criticized Republicans for spending taxpayer money to use a private attorney to bring a "meritless" case.

"This lawsuit is a bald-faced attempt to achieve what Republicans have been unable to achieve through the political process. The legislative branch cannot sue simply because they disagree with the way a law passed by a different Congress has been implemented," said Pelosi, D-Calif.

She accused the GOP of "prioritizing the special interests and the howls of impeachment-hungry extremists before the needs of the nation."

Within hours of the case being filed, a Democratic group blasted a fundraising email to supporters, calling it "an obvious political stunt to rile up Boehner's Tea Party allies." The House Majority PAC called on contributors "to stand with President Obama before it's too late."

The House authorized the lawsuit in a near party-line vote in July as congressional re-election campaigns were heating up. Democrats said Obama had acted legally and said the GOP measure was a political stunt aimed at motivating conservatives to vote and distracting them from calls by some to go even further and impeach the president.

The lawsuit was filed Friday against the departments of Health and Human Services and the Treasury.

Illegal Delays

It accuses Obama of unlawfully delaying the 2010 health care law's requirement that many employers provide health care coverage for their workers.

That so-called employer mandate requires companies with 50 or more employees working at least 30 hours weekly to offer health care coverage or pay fines. Businesses with fewer than 50 workers are exempt.

The requirement was initially to take effect this year. Now, companies with 50 to 99 employees have until 2016 to comply while bigger companies have until next year.

The suit also accuses Obama of illegally planning to make an estimated $175 billion in payments over the next decade -- plus $3 billion already paid this past year -- to insurance companies, even though Congress hasn't provided money for that purpose.

According to the suit, insurance companies offering coverage under the health law are supposed to offer reduced rates to policyholders.

The law established a fund to reimburse insurers for some of those lower rates. Congress hasn't put any money into that fund but the administration has started making payments to insurance companies anyway, the suit says.

Congressional Republicans have all opposed the health care overhaul. The GOP-led House has voted over 50 times to repeal it or pare it back.

The case was assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, who was appointed to her post by President George W. Bush in 2003.

-AP Special Correspondent David Espo and reporter Donna Cassata contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Walmart Changes Price-Match Policy Again After PS4 Fraud

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Oklahoma Black Friday
Sue Ogrocki/AP
In the wake of a PlayStation 4 pricing scam, Walmart has again changed its online price matching policy.

Walmart (WMT) updated its price-match policy on Nov. 13 to codify what some store managers already were doing -- price matching from select sites including Amazon.com (AMZN). But then, some online smarties duped the megaretailer by setting up bogus third-party Amazon accounts and selling $400 PlayStation 4s for as little as $50.

Walmart has wised up and changed its match policy yet again.

"We launched online price matching because it's the right thing for our customers," according to a Walmart statement, which sounds a little no-good-deed-goes-unpunished to us. "At the same time, we can't tolerate fraud or attempts to trick our cashiers. This kind of activity is unfair to the millions of customers who count on us every day for honest value."

So the company has updated its policy to clarify "that we will match prices from Walmart.com and 30 major online retailers, but we won't honor prices from marketplace vendors, third-party sellers, auction sites or sites requiring memberships."

Here's the full statement.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Danger Lurks When Products Recalls Are Ignored, Forgotten

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

www.cspc.govThe Nap Nanny has been connected to at least six deaths by government investigators.

Whether the product can start fires, lops off the fingers of babies or even has caused deaths, chances are you're not going to do anything about it. And worse still, maybe you'll even turn around and sell that dangerous product to someone else.

It's not that consumers are callous. But when it comes to product recalls, most of us just don't pay attention. And that has led to people dying or getting badly hurt because a recalled product either wasn't returned or repaired.

On Friday, the issue will got some attention on the the ABC show "20/20," which will show how TV stations around the country routinely found recalled products for sale around the country. Much of the way the product recall system works is based on the companies' initiative.

Corporate Behavior Varies Widely

It's mostly up to companies to report when they have a problem and issue a recall, and it's entirely up to the companies what happens after that. Some companies are just not all that interested in spending money to fix their defective products or alert consumers to the problems.

Some companies take the responsibility seriously and aggressively announce product recalls as soon as they become aware of problem, often before any incidents are reported. Others hold off conducting a recall as long as possible, when they sell out all the inventory and are less likely to have consumers come back to them for repairs or replacements.

It is common for fewer than one in 10 recalled products to either get returned or repaired as part of an official recall.

Federal Official Wants More

"We need to solve this problem and we need as much energy and as much participation from all different aspects we can," U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairman Elliot Kaye told ABC. "We need industry to do more, and we certainly need more done on the tech side, and so be able to get these minds, who are so creative, to commit to working in this space really can make a difference."

Many recalls are announced, and that's about it. Some companies will place ads, prominently display notes on their websites or emails customers alerting them to the problem. A responsible company would want as many consumers as possible to be aware that a product it produced has a problem that could hurt someone.

Clearly, not every company cares all that much about their customers. And that leaves consumers often unaware they've got a dangerous product in their homes and it makes it even less likely that the next person they might sell that product to would have a clue. And the danger moves on.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

3 Things That Could Save Best Buy This Holiday Season

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Best Buy Sales
J Pat Carter/AP
The market ate up Best Buy's (BBY) quarterly report on Thursday, sending the shares 7 percent higher on the day. However, even with Thursday's pop, the stock is still trading lower than it was when the year began. Sure, it's also important to remember that the stock nearly quadrupled in 2013. Investors who have owned the big-box retailer of consumer electronics can't complain too much if they've owned the stock for two years.

However, there's plenty riding on Best Buy as we kick off the 2014 holiday shopping season. Let's go over a few of the things that will need to go right to keep the recent positive momentum at Best Buy going.

1. Be a Dot-Com Darling

Revenue climbed a mere 0.6 percent at Best Buy during the third quarter, and it would have been slightly negative if it wasn't for a nearly 22 percent pop in online sales. Clocking in at $601 million, online sales made up 6.4 percent of Best Buy's revenue. It's going to have to keep growing.

The holiday quarter will be a challenge. Walmart (WMT) has stepped up its efforts to price-match leading online sites this season. This follows Best Buy's lead, but it may also find some shoppers going to the larger Walmart to check off their holiday wish lists.

Best Buy also said on Thursday that online sales growth will be stacked against last year's results, when the rollout of the Xbox One and PS4 consoles padded sales as early adopters scrambled to order the video game systems.

2. Get Services Back on Track

One of the more surprising setbacks at Best Buy in its fiscal third quarter was a better than 10 percent slide in services comparable sales. Best Buy claims that this was driven largely by lower mobile repair revenue given a decrease in claims, but it also points out that attach rates -- the percentage of people who opt into one of Best Buy's services when making purchases -- were lower this time around.

That's not good. The economy's improving, so it's not as if customers don't have as much money as they did a year ago to protect their purchases. Best Buy also recently introduced a new insurance program for lost or stolen smartphones, expanding the number of offerings that it makes available.
Services are important. They keep customers close with offerings that can't be conveniently duplicated by online merchants. They also keep customers coming back.

3. Navigate the Set-Top Challenge

Selling TVs hasn't been easy lately. Just ask Sony (SNE), which after several years of losses spun off its TV subsidiary earlier this year. On the retail front, the 3-D craze never truly took off, and now the smart television movement is being challenged by a wave of set-top gadgetry.

Roku, Chromecast, and now the Fire TV Stick given anyone with a modern TV the ability to turn it into a streaming machine. There's no need to trade up to a smart television. That's a pretty big deal given the growing popularity of streaming services.

Best Buy is hoping that ultra-high-definition TV, or 4K, will catch on. It has even been expanding the number of stores that have Magnolia home theater design centers. However, consumers still need to be convinced that 4K is worth the investment, especially for those who rely heavily on streaming where connectivity speeds need to improve. This will be a hot category to watch for Best Buy this holiday shopping season. It needs to be a TV star.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to make 2015 your best investing year ever? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


The Trickle of TV Streaming Services Will Soon Be a Deluge

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Woman watching TV under water
Getty Images
The stream is about to turn into a gush.

Streaming video-on-demand purveyors like Netflix (NFLX), Hulu and Amazon.com (AMZN) are set to open their wallets a lot wider for content. And where will that cash flow? For the most part, into the bank accounts of the content producers, specifically the Hollywood TV industry.

The Fight for Eyeballs

As everyone expected with the advance of streaming technology (and the bandwidth to accommodate it), video on demand has become one of the hottest items in entertainment.

The evolution has been fast. Five years ago, Amazon's Prime was essentially just a subscription service that provided free two-day shipping of physical goods for its members. Since 2011, though, it's been an increasingly aggressive player in the streaming market.

Amazon doesn't break down the figures it spends on streaming video; nevertheless, its "technology and content" expenses line item was $6.6 billion in the first nine months of this year. That was 41 percent higher than in the same period last year, and the amount comprised nearly 10 percent of the company's total net sales.

According to an estimate from Bernstein Research, Amazon is set to spend $1.5 billion to $2 billion this year on streaming syndication and original content, which should balloon to more than $2.5 billion in 2015.

It's in good company. Its two most prominent rivals, Netflix and Hulu -- a joint venture of units from Comcast (CMCSA), 21st Century Fox (FOX) and Disney (DIS) -- are also prepared to write big checks. According to Variety, an analysis from RBC Capital Markets estimates that the troika will spend a collective $6.8 billion on such content next year.

That's a chunky 31 percent increase from the anticipated 2014 figure of $5.2 billion. That higher spend is going both to the original content that has proliferated on such channels (series like Netflix's "Orange Is the New Black"), films, and syndication rights for such broadcast TV series as "The Blacklist," a production of Comcast's Universal brand.

Lights, Camera ...

The streaming services need content, and Hollywood is eagerly providing it, particularly in the form of TV series.

According to the RBC estimates, Lionsgate (LGF) -- whose TV unit makes "Orange Is the New Black" -- stands to take in $61 million from streaming rights next year. A bigger player is CBS (CBS), which at the moment has six series in streaming video syndication deals that will amount to roughly $179 million next year.

Industry stalwarts 21st Century Fox, Sony (SNE) and Universal are also getting in on the action, with anticipated 2015 paydays of $40 million, $43 million, and $22 million, respectively, from their TV production units.

None of these amounts is going to provide a big bump for any of those companies. Sony's take from streaming syndication is only a tiny part of its vast operations, which collectively saw a top line of 7.8 trillion yen ($66 billion) in fiscal 2014. Even a purer film/TV production outfit like Lionsgate makes the vast bulk of its top line elsewhere, to the tune of $2.6 billion in total in its most recent fiscal year.

Rather than a cash cow, streaming for the studios is a newish source of revenue either for a product they've already manufactured (like "The Blacklist") or for a fresh offering destined solely for one of the streamers ("Orange Is the New Black").

And that source will almost certainly rise steeply. RBC anticipates that its $6.8 billion estimate for 2015 (already a 31 percent hike, remember) will advance by double-digit percentages each year well into the future.

There's plenty of room to grow, after all. At the moment, for example, Netflix is driving deeper into foreign markets, launching this past September in six European countries: Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg.

In those nations it not only has to compete with on-demand services from entrenched local broadcasters like ProSieben, it is battling or will battle with its American rivals there too. Amazon's Prime video on demand, for example, can be accessed directly in the U.K. and Germany. So the more content it can offer, the greater its chances to grab market share.

Creeping Up On Cable

Syndication has been a rich market for the studios for years. A program that proves to be popular in repeats can produce revenue for years. Cable TV is, naturally, the major market for syndication at the moment and will continue to be so, with RBC projections putting that take at $18.4 billion for 2015.

However, the subscriber numbers for cable are shrinking, while those for streaming services are growing. The latter is a market that has momentum and power just now, so that gap in spending between the two will surely narrow, and soon. And Hollywood's studios will keep cranking out product to soak up that river of money.

Motley Fool contributor Eric Volkman owns shares of Lions Gate Entertainment and Walt Disney, and happily streamed both seasons of "House of Cards" in a matter of days. The Motley Fool recommends Amazon.com, Lions Gate Entertainment, Netflix and Walt Disney, and owns shares of Amazon.com, Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Indexes Set Records on Central Bank Action

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , , ,

market news new york stock exchange
Getty Images
By Ryan Vlastelica

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks closed higher Friday, with major indexes notching a fifth straight weekly advance after China's central bank cut its benchmark interest rate and its eurozone peer announced asset purchases in efforts to boost each region's economy.

The gains were broad on a day when both the Dow and S&P 500 ended at closing records. All 10 primary S&P 500 industry sectors ended the day higher, while 63 percent of stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange closed in positive territory. About 50 percent of Nasdaq-listed names were higher on the day.

The People's Bank of China said it was cutting one-year benchmark lending rates for the first time in more than two years.

The move came after European Central Bank head Mario Draghi said "excessively low" inflation had to be raised quickly by whatever means necessary, rekindling expectations the ECB will move to stimulate the euro zone economy. The ECB said it started buying asset-backed securities to encourage banks to lend and revive the economy.

It isn't the size of the moves but the shock value of the direction that is really lifting markets today,

"It isn't the size of the moves but the shock value of the direction that is really lifting markets today," said Mark Luschini, chief investment strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott in Philadelphia, which manages about $67 billion in assets. "This is a one-two punch for global growth."

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) rose 88.94 points, or 0.5 percent, to 17,807.94, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) gained 10.7 points, or 0.52 percent, to 2,063.45 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 11.10 points, or 0.24 percent, to 4,712.97.

Both the Dow and S&P ended at records. For the week, the Dow rose 1 percent, the S&P added 1.2 percent and the Nasdaq rose 0.5 percent. It was the fifth straight weekly advance for all three.

Gains in the Nasdaq were limited by declines in large-cap tech companies. Microsoft (MSFT) fell 1.5 percent to $47.97 while Netflix (NFLX) slid 2.1 percent to $360.28.

GameStop (GME) sank 13 percent to $37.86 a day after the video game retailer posted quarterly revenue and earnings well below expectations. The stock was the biggest decliner on the S&P 500.

The benchmark index's biggest gainers were Ross Stores (ROST) and Autodesk (ADSK), both of which rallied after results late Thursday. Ross jumped 7.3 percent to $89.27 while Autodesk was up 6.1 percent to $61.95.

NYSE advancers outnumbered decliners 2,029 to 1,039, for a 1.95-to-1 ratio on the upside; on the Nasdaq, 1,461 issues rose and 1,286 fell, for a 1.14-to-1 ratio.

The S&P 500 posted 96 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 111 new highs and 44 new lows.

About 6.5 billion shares traded on all U.S. platforms, according to BATS exchange data, above the month-to-date average of 6.35 billion.

What to Watch Monday:
  • Germany's Ifo institute releases its monthly business confidence index, a key indicator for Europe's biggest economy.
  • At 8:30 a.m. Eastern time, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago releases its national survey of economic activity for October.
  • At 10:30 a.m., the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas releases its survey of manufacturing conditions in Texas for November.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Pediatrician Sounds Alert on Wearable Baby Monitors

$
0
0

Filed under:

www.owletcare.com
Unregulated and expensive wearable devices -- designed to send alerts if a baby stops breathing or his or her heart stops beating -- have only an "illusory" benefit, a British pediatrician says.

In a Nov. 18 article in The BMJ, David King, clinical lecturer in pediatrics at the University of Sheffield, says those devices "have no proved use in safeguarding infants or detecting health problems, and they certainly have no role in preventing [Sudden Infant Death Syndrome]." King also says health care professionals "should not recommend these products to reduce parents' fear of SIDS but should instead focus on interventions that have been proved to work, such as encouraging parents to put infants on their back to sleep."

Owlet Measures Vital Signs

King took particular aim at Owlet, a "smart sock" in development that uses pulse oximetry, a non-invasive way of measuring heart rate and oxygen levels. Owlet, which slips over a newborn's foot, monitors the baby's vital signs and can send an alert to a parent's smartphone when vital signs drop from normal ranges.

Kings says companies making these wearables are feeding off fears of SIDS, given as the reason for the deaths of 4,000 children in the U.S. each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Owlet CEO Kurt Workman says the device does not claim to prevent SIDS, but merely promises to provide peace of mind for new parents. "Every parent checks on their baby to make sure they're OK," he told DailyFinance. "Our devise will tell you if your baby stops breathing. Here's something that can let you sleep easier, for if something were to change, you would be alerted."

The $249 Owlet is expected to hit the market in the next three or four months. Its website, which Workman says is changing every day, does not yet caution consumers that the device is not a safeguard against SIDS -- a chief concern for King.

"Manufacturers should place prominent disclaimers at the point of sale to emphasize that they are not medical devices and that no evidence shows that they reduce the risk of SIDS or have any other health benefits," King says in the article.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Who's Open and Who's Closed on Thanksgiving?

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Woman holding shopping bags
gpointstudio/Shutterstock
Thanksgiving Day shopping -- also known as "Black Friday creep" -- has drawn dominant merchants like Walmart (WMT) and strugglers like RadioShack (RSH). But many companies are refusing to participate -- with some turning the decision into a marketing boon. Here is rundown to help you map out your turkey-day shopping.

Superstores

Those looking to buy in bulk at discount prices can head to Walmart (WMT), which will be open all day in some locations -- although doorbuster sales may have to wait until Thursday evening. "Black Friday is no longer an event for customers who wake up at the crack of dawn to get good deals," according to the world's largest retailer. Kmart (SHLD) will open as early as 6 a.m. Thanksgiving day, with some unidentified employees claiming that shifts on either Thanksgiving or Black Friday are mandatory -- and they'll be terminated if they refuse. Similar unidentified reports have emerged from Target (TGT), which opens most locations at 6 p.m. Thanksgiving Day.

Costco (COST) chose to close because employees "deserve the opportunity to spend Thanksgiving with their families." "Consistent with our company values," BJ's Wholesale Club (BJ) is giving all 25,000 employees the day off.

Clothing and Department Stores

Kohl's (KSS), Sears and Macy's (M) will open at 6 p.m. this Thanksgiving. Nordstrom's (JWN) is doing nothing new by staying closed. "This is how we've approached the holidays as long as anyone here can remember," Nordstrom's spokesman Colin Johnson said. Upscale chain Dillard's (DDS) remains closed on Thursday as well, while opening at 8 a.m. on Black Friday, two hours earlier.

DSW (DSW) (closed on Thanksgiving) shamed its competitors in a Facebook post that declares "we believe family comest first." The TJX (TJX) group of off-price retailers -- including T.J. Maxx, Marshall's and Home Goods -- will close as well -- telling ThinkProgress that it is "pleased to give our associates the time to enjoy the Thanksgiving holiday with family and friends."

Outdoor Gear

For the second year in a row, Sports Authority will open at 6 p.m. for Black Friday doorbuster sales. For more outdoor-centric outfitting, you'll have to wait until Friday for both REI and Patagonia. REI will open at 8 a.m. Friday, while Patagonia bluntly said "It's a holiday -- we're closed!"

Entertainment

Best Buy (BBY) doorbuster sales start at 5 p.m. Barnes & Noble (BKS) explained its reason for closing, "so that our booksellers can be with their family and friends."

GameStop (GME) offered a more elaborate explanation: "At GameStop we often use the phrase "protect the family" in reference to our business. A large part of what that means to us is to not open any of our GameStop, SimplyMac, Spring Mobile or Cricket Wireless U.S. locations on Thanksgiving Day out of respect for our store associates and their families and friends. We believe it's the right decision not only for our employees, but also for our customers. Enjoy this time with your loved ones and we'll see you on Black Friday."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

These 7 Favorite Tax Breaks Are on the Chopping Block

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

72262000.jpeg
Other
Despite their well-known tendencies to procrastinate, American taxpayers always like to have at least some sense of what they're likely to owe on their tax returns. Unfortunately, the government doesn't always provide those answers in a timely fashion, and this year, they're going down to the wire in deciding the fate of seven of the favorite tax breaks that Americans want to use in order to reduce the amount they have to pay to the IRS next April.

Several popular tax provisions expired at the end of last year, making their fate for the current 2014 tax year uncertain. The measures are largely ones that require renewal every year, with lawmakers choosing to extend their availability for only a single year at a time to avoid bearing the full long-term budgetary cost of the provisions at any one time. With the midterm elections having made it hard to make forward progress on legislation to extend these provisions, it's up to a potential lame-duck session of Congress to work on restoring the tax breaks -- or affirmatively allowing them to go away once and for all. Let's take a look at seven of the most popular provisions that will disappear without intervention from lawmakers.

1. Deduction for State and Local Sales Taxes

When enacted in 2004, the deduction for state and local sales taxes made the tax system fairer for those who live in states that don't impose a state-level income tax. Under this provision, you can choose to deduct state and local sales taxes instead of income taxes, picking whichever one is more favorable to you. Moreover, you don't have to keep track of every penny you pay in sales taxes, as the IRS allows you to use a chart that estimates the typical sales-tax expenditure for families with various levels of income. Failure to restore this provision will hurt taxpayers in Texas, Florida and several other states in which residents pay no or minimal income tax.

2. Teachers' Deduction for Out-of-Pocket Expenses

Lawmakers recognize the fact that many educators facing squeezed school budgets choose to take money out of their own pocket to pay for supplies and other needs in the classroom. Accordingly, the IRS allows teachers to write off up to $250 in personal expenditures for classroom use. Even though the $25 to $100 or so in potential tax savings isn't a huge dollar amount, the perception of treating educational professionals badly has historically put enough pressure on politicians to ensure that they renew the provision each year.

3. Exemption for IRA Distributions to Charity

Many retirees prefer to use some of the money they have in their retirement accounts to fund gifts to charity. Without this special exemption, retirees would have to take taxable withdrawals from their IRAs and make charitable gifts subject to the itemized deduction rules, which in some cases won't have value because of the standard deduction that each taxpayer gets. Still, the perception that this deduction goes disproportionately to wealthier Americans could create political roadblocks to its extension.

4. Deductions for College Tuition and Fees

This provision allows students and parents to deduct as much as $4,000 from their income for expenses related to qualifying tuition and fees of college and advanced education. In some ways, though, the loss of this deduction wouldn't be as devastating as it might be, because most people who qualify for this deduction also qualify for other educational tax breaks. Specifically, the American Opportunity Credit and the Lifetime Learning Credit also reduce tax liability for college or other educational expenses, with the primary difference being different threshold levels at which each tax break disappears.

5. Credit for Home Energy Improvements

The government has encouraged homeowners to take steps to make their homes more energy-efficient, including installation of insulation, windows, doors, roofs, and other items that limit loss of hot or cold air. In addition, credits have been available for heating and cooling equipment that meets guidelines for efficiency. Even if these credits are allowed to expire, other credits are still available for installing solar panels or other alternative-energy equipment through the end of 2016.

6. Deduction for Private Mortgage Insurance

Historically, those who had to pay private mortgage insurance because they paid less than 20 percent toward a down payment weren't allowed to deduct what they paid for that insurance. That changed in 2007, but it's uncertain whether lawmakers will choose to extend the provision or whether they'll let it lapse because of the vast improvement in the housing market.

7. Exclusion of Income From Forgiven Mortgage Debt

During the financial crisis, millions of American homeowners were horrified to discover that even when a lender voluntarily reduced the principal outstanding on their mortgages in response to their financial distress, the IRS wanted to treat that principal reduction as income. In order to avoid hitting homeowners while they were already down, Congress passed a law that temporarily made forgiven mortgage debt exempt from taxation. With default rates down, the need for this tax break is less than it once was, but those who benefited from it will certainly miss it if it disappears.

2014 won't be the first time that lawmakers have gone down to the wire in extending expiring tax provisions. That makes it impossible to plan in advance, and with Congress and the White House now in complete opposition politically, it's far from certain whether provisions extending these tax breaks will become law in time for you to benefit from them.

Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger thinks you should use any tax break you can get as long as it's available. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google+. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images