Quantcast
Channel: DailyFinance.com
Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live

Market Wrap: Stocks Decline on Fears of Rising Interest Rates

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Financial Markets Wall Street
Richard Drew/AP
By Sinead Carew

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks closed lower Friday and the S&P 500 (^GSPC) declined for a second straight week after a strong monthly jobs report as investors bet that the Federal Reserve could raise interest rates sooner than previously expected.

Some of the worst-hit stocks were utilities and real estate investment trusts as they are high-yielding investments, which would look less attractive after a rate hike. The S&P and the Dow (^DJI), which accelerated their declines as the day wore on, were under additional pressure because they had hit records earlier in the week after a strong February.

U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose 295,000 last month, topping estimates for a gain of 240,000, after a downwardly revised 239,000 increase in January. The unemployment rate fell to 5.5 percent from 5.7 percent in January. The strong report, seen as a gauge for the timing of the Fed's first rate hike in years, may put pressure on the Fed to move soon, said Randy Frederick, managing director of trading and derivatives for Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Austin, Texas. "You have to think that report makes the likelihood of a June rate increase somewhat higher," said Frederick.

AT&T Out of the Dow, Apple In

The S&P extended its losses as the session wore on having found little support after it fell below its two-week intraday low, according to Frank Cappelleri, technical market analyst at Instinet in New York.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell 278.94 points, or 1.54 percent, to 17,856.78, the S&P 500 lost 29.78 points, or 1.42 percent, to 2,071.26 and the Nasdaq composite dropped 55.44 points, or 1.11 percent, to 4,927.37.

For the week, the S&P 500 fell 1.6 percent while the Dow slid 1.5 percent and the Nasdaq dropped 0.7 percent. The S&P and the Dow both ended the day more than 2 percent lower than their March 2 records. The S&P saw its biggest percentage decline since early January on Friday.

In a shakeup of the Dow Jones industrial average, Apple (AAPL), the largest U.S. company by market value, will join the index this month, replacing AT&T (T). Apple shares rose 0.15 percent at $126.60 after rising as high as $129.37 while AT&T fell 1.5 percent to $33.48. "If anything, what that should do is cause the Dow to be more volatile," said Schwab's Frederick, because the Dow is a price-weighted index and Apple has a higher share price than AT&T.

The utilities sector was the worst performing S&P 500 sector with a 3.1 percent decline and the Dow Jones Equity Reit Index finished off 3.2 percent. About 7.2 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, compared with the 6.4 billion average for the last five sessions, according to data from BATS Global Markets.

Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by 2,683 to 438, for a 6.13-to-1 ratio on the downside; on the Nasdaq, 1,926 issues fell and 840 advanced for a 2.29-to-1 ratio favoring decliners. The benchmark S&P 500 index posted 13 new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) recorded 67 new highs and 47 new lows.

What to watch Monday:
  • Urban Outfitters (URBN) and United Natural Foods (UNFI) are due to release quarterly financial results after U.S. markets close.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Sharing Means Declaring: Peer-to-Peer Deals and Your Taxes

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Uber Headquarters
Eric Risberg/AP
By Molly McCluskey

For the past several years, the sharing economy has gained traction as more and more individuals rent out spare rooms to travelers, use their vehicles to earn extra income or opt to rent, rather than own, ball gowns they'll only wear once.

While the concept of shared consumerism can have environmental and financial benefits, the issue of taxes -- who pays, who owes and how they're declared -- has proved challenging to the companies at the heart of the sharing economy, and occasionally baffling to the people who use its services.

To get a sense of the nuances of participating in the sharing economy, look at Zipcar and Lyft. Zipcar, now owned by Avis (CAR), is the sharing-economy equivalent of renting a car, while Lyft, which often competes with Uber, is the equivalent of hiring a taxi. Both have different tax implications.

Whether you're offering a shared service or using one, the sharing economy may have a place on your tax return. The more you use these services, and the more you're trying to deduct or declare, the more you might have to ask whether you're comfortable self-filing, or whether it's time to call in an expert.

Dashboard Simplifies Tracking Expenses

Since a Zipcar membership covers the cost of insurance, parking, gas and maintenance, members who use Zipcar for business purposes may find itemizing their annual deductions more straightforward than renting or owning a car. Zipcar also provides a receipt after each rental period, an online dashboard to view all charges and an app, which makes tracking expenses for tax time a breeze.

"Zipcar membership and driving charges may be tax-deductible if used for business-related purposes," says David Piperno, Zipcar's vice president of finance. "Of course, we suggest checking with a certified accountant to see if your Zipcar expenses can qualify for a tax deduction." Unlike Zipcar, Lyft and Uber offer members the opportunity to earn income, as well as deduct expenses.

Lyft offers an online portal for its drivers (who are independent contractors, not company employees) that tracks how many rides they have given, what they have earned - including non-ride earnings such as bonuses - and the number of miles they have driven while giving lifts via Lyft.

"Drivers who give at least 200 rides and generate at least $20,000 in ride receipts in a year receive Form 1099-K," says Chelsea Wilson, public policy communications director for Lyft. "Drivers who earn at least $600 from bonuses, mentor training and reimbursements get Form 1099-Misc. Drivers who meet neither criteria get no tax form."

But as many 1099 consultants, self-employed folks and entrepreneurs know, not receiving a year-end tax form doesn't mean they can forget about declaring the income they earned. To ease the burden of tax time for its drivers, Lyft offers its drivers a free copy of a popular tax-preparation software. Riders who would ordinarily use taxis for business purposes, and deduct from their taxes accordingly, would be able to use Lyft much the same way.

Airbnb's Tax Issues

Another company often credited with popularizing the sharing economy is Airbnb, which allows apartment dwellers and homeowners to rent out all or some of their homes to travelers. The company has come under fire repeatedly over taxes, with cities such as San Francisco and New York claiming the company lets users set up illegal hotels and dodge the taxes that go along with it.

The company has been working on a city-by-city basis to resolve potential tax issues to maintain its relationships with cities and ease the burden on its local hosts. According to Airbnb's website, "Hosts are responsible for following all laws and regulations, including paying any local taxes that apply to their accommodations."

It seems straightforward. Hosts who earn income from their listings are required to report it, and they may also have to pay a hotel tax, depending on their jurisdiction. The company provides all of its hosts 1099 forms to properly declare their income from rentals, according to Christopher Nulty, a spokesman for Airbnb.

Renting from an Airbnb host for business? If it's a bona fide business expense that would be deducted on your taxes had the stay been in a hotel, for instance, staying in an Airbnb rental should also qualify. "Travel on Airbnb can be claimed as a business expense (if the trip otherwise qualifies for deductibility) -- in other words, there's nothing different about deciding whether travel is deductible business travel just because it's on Airbnb," McNulty says.

Declaring income from a rental through Airbnb or other home-sharing company could have implications on declaring a home office deduction. For instance, the spare room you told the Internal Revenue Service is used exclusively for work (a requirement of the home office deduction) shouldn't be one you're also using to gain income from travelers. That sort of double-dipping on your taxes isn't allowed.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

You Lucky Dog: 28 Ways to Save on Pet Supplies

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Should You Buy Pet Insurance?

By Donna Freedman

How much could that doggie (or kitty) in the window cost? Anywhere from $580 to $875 per year just for the basics, according to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. That's in addition to "capital costs" such as purchase or adoption fees, spaying/neutering, collar, leash, crate, carrier bag, training and microchip implantation.

Obviously, the estimates are merely that. Prices vary by region, and vet bills may be low for a while, then rise as your furry friend gets older. You may already own some of the equipment (e.g., your former cat's carrier), or choose to borrow dog-training books from the library instead of attending formal classes.

Too, different owners have different habits: Some lavish their dogs with toys and treats and keep them in doggy day care, while others crate-train their pooches and throw sticks during daily walks. A doting cat owner might buy a new catnip mouse every week, whereas others will never buy a single toy.
Even the most frugal pet owner is going to have to spend some money. The question is whether you're using that money wisely. The following tactics will help you stretch available funds to provide the best life you can afford for your animal companion.

Get It Online
  • Forget brick-and-mortar. Sites such as Wag.com, PetSmart and Petco regularly run sales, hand out coupons and offer free shipping for food, medication and supplies. And yes, free shipping may apply even toward heavy stuff, such as giant sacks of kibble or large boxes of cat-box filler.
  • Snag rebates. Access those online merchants through a cash-back shopping site, and you'll get rebates of up to 15 percent.
  • Go generic. Kendal Perez, who blogs at Hassle-Free Savings, always buys generic heartworm meds online for her two dogs. Recently she was about to reorder with a $5 coupon when her husband found a much better price through a different merchant. "It pays to shop around," she says. Use a price comparison website such as PriceGrabber.com or FatWallet.com to make sure you're getting the best deal.
  • Subscribe to save. You can set up a recurring order for products you use regularly, such as food or litter. This may mean a product discount (Amazon.com gives one), but at the very least it saves you time, gasoline and the premium you'll pay if you find you're out of cat food some Sunday evening.
Get It Cheaper
  • Buy in bulk. Perez gets rawhides by the 15-pack at Sam's Club, paying less than $1 apiece -- less than half the price at pet stores. My daughter purchases cat litter by the pound from a giant bin at Petco.
  • Use coupons. Recently I saw coupons for 50 cents and $1 off Iams, a brand many people trust. Sites such as The Coupon Mom, Favado and A Full Cup will provide links to downloadable coupons and also match them to the best pet food prices in your area.
  • Buy secondhand. Yard sales and thrift stores may yield the dog dish or kitty condo of your dreams. "If it looks clean and doesn't have an odor and it's the right price, then I would have no problem [with it]," Los Angeles veterinarian Dr. Jeff Werber says. A spray such as Lysol will take care of bacteria and fungi.
  • Get a built-in discount. Pay with discounted gift cards bought on the secondary market, and you'll save every time you shop. For example, Petco and PetSmart cards are currently available for up to 25 percent off.
  • Pay with free gift cards. Sites such as MyPoints and Swagbucks let you earn plastic or e-gift cards to Amazon, Target, Walmart, Home Depot, Lowe's and other merchants that sell pet supplies. Or cash in rewards credit card points to get cards to those retailers.
Get It Free
  • The Freecycle Network. There's no guarantee that pet items will be there when you need them, but you never know. I've seen food, litter, crates and other pet items being given away.
  • Craigslist. You may luck out in the "free" section. (Patience helps.) Or put up an ad in the "wanted" section, specifying that you're willing to come pick up that crate or skijoring equipment.
  • Gratis grub. Do a daily Internet search for "free pet food." Companies regularly offer free samples or even full-sized products on their Facebook pages or through freebie bloggers.
  • Embrace hand-me-downs. Once you've posted a few Facebook pictures of your lovely rescued greyhound, a friend or family member might offer a late hound's leash and collar or a barely used pet bed.
  • Trade ya! Propose a pet-gear swap among friends, at your place of worship or among people you meet at your favorite bark park.
  • Substitutions rule. Maybe a soup dish or stainless steel bowl will stand in for store-bought food/water dishes. Get the baby gate out of storage: It works just as well as a commercial pet gate to keep the puppy out of the living room, according to Rachel Phelps of a dog blog called Preston Speaks. Build your own dog bed (a friend did this with scrap lumber) and fill it with old towels or sweatshirts. In other words, improvise.
Get Smart
  • Do it yourself. When possible, bathe and/or groom your pet at home. My sister clips her golden retriever's fast-growing nails; she bought a fairly pricey tool, but it quickly paid for itself. You can also learn to clean your pet's ears and do breed-specific haircuts, says Dr. Jules Benson of the Petplan insurance company.
  • Measure that kibble. Benson says those back-of-the-bag recommendations are usually "far too much," especially if your pet is sedentary. Talk to your vet about caloric needs and then use a measuring cup to dole out the daily ration. "You'll be surprised how much further a bag of food goes," he says.
  • Make your own treats. The Internet bristles with pet snack recipes. If your animal companion has digestive issues, ask the vet which ingredients should be avoided. To get you started, check out the why and how by the writer of the blog, theBark.com.
  • Make your own toys. Professional dog trainer Amy Robinson, who's been in the business for 24 years, says the lowly tennis ball is the most popular toy ever. Get the "dead" tennis balls cheaply or free at tennis clubs. Robinson likes to bury one in a cardboard box filled with paper, crumpled cardboard and toilet paper rolls to provide "physical and mental stimulation." She also suggests putting a tennis ball in an old tube sock: "Your dog will have a big time trying to get the ball out, or holding the sock in his teeth and [whipping] it around." Note: Throw the ball away once it develops holes.
  • Make your own cat litter. Not a tactic for everyone, true, but it's certainly cheap. Do an online search for "homemade cat litter." This recipe from the Lifehacker blog uses shredded newspaper and baking soda.
Get Help

Pet owners who've been laid off or suffered some other economic downturn often don't want to give up their companion animals. Some pet owners have always lived close to the bone, so to speak, but are willing to forgo certain creature comforts to make sure the creatures in their lives are comfortable. These tips can help.
  • A humane solution. On its website, the Humane Society of the United States has a section called "Having trouble affording your pet?" It's a tremendous resource of local and national groups that offer free food, vet care, supplies and grooming. Note: This is not a completely comprehensive list, so don't give up if you don't see anything in your area.
  • Pet food banks. The Petco chain has a food bank donation program, and its website links to the names of regional groups that receive and distribute that food. Look for programs in your area.
  • Pet Food Stamps. This is a nonprofit organization, not a government agency. It's open to those in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (aka food stamps) or who receive welfare or Social Security as their only forms of income. Note: It can take many weeks to be approved because of the number of applications.
  • Pets without homes. Couch-surfing while you save up enough money for a place of your own? A national group called Pets of the Homeless makes supplies available to shelters, food pantries, soup kitchens, humane societies and social service organizations.
  • Human food banks. Some of them also collect pet food and supplies.
  • Cast a wider net. Call 211 or visit 211.org to inquire about local pet-related programs (and a wide variety of health and social services) nationwide.
  • Talk to your veterinarian. Ask if he or she knows about local rescue or advocacy groups that donate supplies. Bonus: If the vet knows the reality of your situation, you may be allowed to pay for needed care in installments.
  • Get those shots. If you simply cannot afford a vet visit this year and none of the above resources can help, at least make sure your pet gets vaccinated. Look online for regional shot clinics run by government agencies or animal charities. The price may surprise you; the Michigan Humane Society charges just $5 for rabies, distemper and parvovirus shots.
Pet owners, have any cost-cutting tips to share? Leave a comment below or share them on our Facebook page.

Like this article? Sign up for our newsletter and we'll send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and advice, free! We'll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson's "205 Ways to Save Money" as soon as you've subscribed. It's full of great tips that'll help you save a ton of extra cash.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

The 9 Habits of Highly Successful Early Retirees

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

|sepia|square|exterior|center|travel|tourist|man|eiffel tower|exploration|information|mature 60s|caucasian|american|person|waist
Getty Images
By Mikey Rox

We all dream of retiring early (at least I do), but for most of us that's all it is -- a dream. It doesn't necessarily have to be, however, and you don't need to strike it rich to start enjoying the finer things in life well before age 67. (Yep, that's the government-acknowledged age for full retirement -- and it stinks.) To provide some much-needed motivation to kick your hustle into high gear, here are nine things people who retire early do -- and you should, too.

1. Live Relatively Modestly and Save, Save, Save

If you weren't born into one of those famous family dynasties that provided you a trust fund at birth or otherwise have won some sort of lottery, you've got to work hard for your money. If you want to retire early, live modestly and save like your life depends on it. The truth is your life does depend on it -- at least the one you want, anyway.

"I'm not retired myself yet, but I do know a couple who managed to retire early," says Mike Collins, owner of the personal finance blog Wealthy Turtle. "The secret to their success was saving and investing as much as possible when they were young. They worked lots of extra hours and also built up a side income so they could invest more and more. They kept their expenses low and just increased their saving rate whenever they got a raise. Over time their wealth grew and they were both able to retire young."

2. Build Financial Roadmaps

When we're traveling, we use a map to get where we're going -- and the same principle applies to our professional paths. It's never a bad idea to plan your route so you can achieve your goals with minimal blocks and detours.

Elle Kaplan, founder of LexIon Capital, agrees. "People who retire early build financial roadmaps. They have a step-by-step plan in place that details the route to their financial goals," she says. "They know what a safe spending level would be given their portfolio and any other income they have coming in, from real estate holdings to Social Security. They know what major expenses or windfalls they anticipate, whether that's travel or income from the sale of a home as they downsize or relocate. And they have extra room built in for the bumps in the road that they can't anticipate, taking into account very conservative assumptions: living to 100, and having a plan to address unexpected costs."

3. Earn Passive Income

You don't have to have an ungodly amount of money in the bank to retire early, but you should absolutely have a continued source of income, if that's not the case.

Passive income is an excellent way to continue earning money, even after you slow down or retire. Great sources of passive income include rental properties, a product that people will buy for years to come (could be a book or maybe a new invention), or a brick-and-mortar or online business that you can afford to pay other people to manage for you. The latter comes with a warning, however: It's hard to find help that will treat your business with the level of care and professionalism that you would, so it's wise to prepare accordingly.

4. Make New Investments

If you're able to retire early, chances are you've made some wise investments up to this point -- and you probably have enough dough saved to make some more in the near future. That's how you'll build your passive-income portfolio, and, frankly, if you have excess money in the bank that's not being invested, it's going to waste, anyhow.

Consider this anecdote from Ken Barret, owner of K-Bar Inc., a company he founded after retiring early. "I retired from the auto industry in 2009 when I took a buyout and decided I didn't want to work in the corporate world anymore," he recalls. "I moved to the United States from Canada and purchased three laundromats in seven months. I always considered retirement as being able to do what you want, and that's what I'm doing. Two of my laundromats are unattended and open 24 hours a day, so I can stop by on my own schedule. The other laundromat has three employees and is partially attended. It requires more attention, but still it's my decision when and how much."

5. Go Back to School and Continue Education

Chances are, you won't be retired for long if you use your newfound freedom to whoop it up like some Hollywood hotshot -- you'll drain your retirement fund eventually and find yourself forced back to the workforce before you know it. One way to prevent that fate is by making constructive use of your free time, such as continued education.

Learning should never stop, and if you plan your courses strategically, you can learn new skills that will only improve your business savvy. And if you're not retired yet, additional education can mean a path to increased income, more savings, and an earlier retirement date.The website RetiredBrains has excellent resources for retirees -- young and old -- on how to navigate the prospect of going back to class.

6. Focus on Relationships With Friends and Family

One of the more personal benefits of having ample time on your hands is that you get to spend more time with family and friends. Use this very rare opportunity -- not many people get to focus on the important people in their lives with minimal distractions, after all -- to build stronger relationships that will not only enrich your life, but also theirs. And if you're still working toward an early retirement, spending more time with loved ones is not only a terrific way to enhance your wellbeing, but also an essential strategy for saving money.

7. Spend Time Pursuing New Goals and Passions

If you've retired early, it's a safe bet to assume that you've accomplished many of your goals. But that's no reason to stop. In fact there's no better time -- since you now have much more time -- to set new goals and concentrate on pursuing your passions. And if you've yet to retire, these new goals can help motivate you to find new ways of increasing your income and exiting the corporate world sooner.

"I retired about two years ago after 30-plus years of corporate life," says Judy Freedman, blogger at A Boomer's Life After 50. "I decided to take early retirement at age 55 to slow down and pursue my passions. After losing my husband when I turned 50 and emptying out my nest when my last child graduated college, I decided that it was time to change up my life and have more time to do things that I only dreamed of doing when I was younger and busy raising and supporting a family. In addition to my writing and blogging, I am pursuing my studies to become a yoga instructor. I'm also doing more traveling to places that I've always wanted to go to, most recently to France and Spain."

8. Allotting Time to Volunteer or Give to Charity

For 25 years, Stan Goldberg was a professor at San Francisco University. He says his life revolved around academia, but when he was forced to retire at age 57 because of a health issue, he thought his contributions to society had ended. Instead, they had just begun.

"Since retiring, I served as a bedside hospice volunteer for eight years, counseled caregivers, wrote two internationally award-winning books, and I currently have a series of books on the sharper points of life under review by mainstream publishers," boasts Goldberg. "Since retiring my life has become fuller and my contributions to society have increased beyond my wildest dreams."

9. Travel for Life-Enriching Experiences

It's almost a given that you'll want to travel when you retire early -- who doesn't, right? -- but it'll cost you. At least that's the theory, anyway. In reality, you can travel the world very inexpensively if you're resourceful. There are plenty of volunteer programs abroad that will subsidize your trip (this guy pulled off the ultimate coup of paying zero dollars to trek the globe), and there are programs that will let you take house-sitting gigs in the destinations of your choice for the paltry fee of $96 a year.

Rachel Martin, co-founder of TrustedHousesitters.com, explains how you can take advantage of the latter by caring for pets in exchange for lodging in over 130 countries. If you've yet to retire, this can be a cost-effective way of seeing the world -- or of making some extra dollars. "From a month in the South Pacific to a couple of weeks in a lodge in Breckenridge, Colorado, it's a simple premise (providing a real win-win: free pet care for free accommodations) and one which is growing in its popularity among retirees who may have time on their hands and are looking for adventure in their 'fun years."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

15 Ways to Insure Your Donated Dollars Matter

$
0
0

Filed under:

Smartest Way to Donate to Charities

By Jim Gold

As the economy has improved, more of us are giving to charity. That's great, because there are groups that need support for their work on a wide array of good causes: disease prevention and research, care for military veterans, disaster relief, environmental protection and hunger alleviation, just to name a few.

Charitable giving topped $335 billion in 2013, the fourth straight year of gains, according to the latest research from Giving USA Foundation and its research partner, the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. The largest source of charitable giving came from individuals, $241 billion from more than nine out of every 10 households. The average household donation was $2,974.
What makes giving gratifying is knowing that our donation has made a difference, which can be a challenge.

1. Look to Guidestar for Facts

When deciding which of the 1.8 million charities recognized by the Internal Revenue Serivce or the thousands more faith-based groups will get your money, many donors start their homework with Guidestar, which provides free access to IRS Forms 990, annual reports, and listings of executives and board members. (Registration required, premium services available.)

A Form 990 for Oxfam America, for example, shows the group received $66.6 million in donations in 2013. The group says it has helped 20.7 million people globally to end poverty and fight injustice through disaster relief and advocacy programs. In 2013, 79 percent of our expenditures went directly to program support. At least 90 percent of funds designated by individual donors for humanitarian emergencies directly support our responses for those emergencies.

2. CharityWatch Rates Nonprofits

CharityWatch, unlike Guidestar, interprets the information available on nonprofits and uses it to grade them, A through F, for potential donors. The group says it reviews IRS filings and audited financial statements to rank 599 charities. More than 200 nonprofits on its top-rated list, it says, generally spend 75 percent or more of their budgets on programs, spend $25 or less to raise $100 in public support, and do not hold excessive assets in reserve. The watchdog group also looks at governance benchmarks and "open-book" status for disclosure of basic financial information.

Earning an A rating from CharityWatch, for example, is Doctors Without Borders, which sends more than 30,000 doctors, nurses and other qualified professionals to provide medical humanitarian emergency aid to people affected by armed conflict, epidemics, malnutrition, natural disasters and exclusion from health care. The group spends 87 percent of its budget on programs and only $12 to raise $100, CharityWatch says.

3. Charity Navigator Issues Stars

Charity Navigator says it rates more than 8,000 groups based on two broad performance areas: financial health, and accountability and transparency. Each charity receives zero (lowest score) to four stars (best-scoring performers). The group breaks down 10 broadly defined charitable activities: animals; arts, culture and humanities; community development; education; environment; health; human and civil rights; international; research and public policy; and religion. Each category has more narrowly defined causes. It also offers Top 10 lists featuring, for instance, celebrity-related charities, troubled charities, and top-notch charities.

The Midwest Food Bank, which has distributed the equivalent of more than 17.5 million meals since its 2003 beginning, tops Charity Navigator's Top Notch list, earning a four-star rating for three straight years. Midwest Food Bank serves more than 755 nonprofit organizations through centers in Illinois, Indiana and Georgia.

4. The Life You Can Save: Emphasis on Efficiency

The Life You Can Save, founded by philosopher Peter Singer, is based on "effective altruism," using a portion of personal wealth and resources to alleviate the effects of extreme poverty. Helmed by Charlie Bresler, former president of The Men's Wearhouse, it says 16 organizations in 2015 are well-suited to deliver highly effective aid. The group encourages donors to publicly pledge a percentage of their incomes.

One charity backed by Singer's group, Project Healthy Children, sends experts to low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa to boost the quality of mandatory micronutrient fortification of staple foods such as sugar, wheat and maize flour. Fortification costs of 26 cents per person per year return much more in productivity gains and savings to a nation's health care system, Singer's group says.

5. Chronicle of Philanthropy: Top givers

The Chronicle of Philanthropy, the charity industry's trade newspaper, tracks gifts at the state, county, metropolitan-area, and ZIP code levels based on taxpayers who itemize deductions. Nevada saw the largest increase in giving between 2006 and 2012, it concluded.

While poor and middle-class Americans dig deeper into their wallets than the rich as a percentage of wealth, The Chronicle says, nonprofits still look to high-income donors. With young tech donors taking a leading role in its Philanthropy 50 list of top givers, a leading recipient of the largess is Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which in 2014 gave grants totaling $474 million to a wide variety of charities based on five strategies: economic security, education, immigrant integration, regional planning and community opportunity.

6. Forbes 50: Biggest Charities

Despite a slight drop in donations, United Way remains No. 1 on the annual Forbes list of the 50 largest U.S. charities, raking in $3.87 billion in 2013, largely through payroll deductions. Salvation Army, with $2.08 billion was No. 2. The church is best known for its social service efforts. United Way Worldwide leads a network of nearly 1,800 community-based United Ways in 41 countries and territories. Volunteers and experts from your community screen and select the programs funded by your local contributions.

7. Religious Underpinnings

About 73 percent of charitable giving goes to faith-based organizations, whether religious institutions or nonprofits that have a religious identity, Indiana University's Lilly Family School of Philanthropy says. Its research also reveals that 34 percent of donors to faith-based charities say they don't belong to an organized religion.

While local congregations make up the largest amount, 41 percent, of religious giving, many people donate to international aid agencies such as World Vision, a Christian humanitarian organization that offers disaster relief and poverty alleviation programs in nearly 100 countries.

8. Healthy Donations

GuideStar says you should focus on a group's mission. Health and human services are among the top five concerns of charitable donors. Partners in Health is a global nonprofit focusing on delivering high-quality health care, addressing the root causes of illness, training providers and advancing research for the poor and marginalized. Ninety-two percent of all donations go directly to PIH's programs in the field from Malawi to Mexico.

9. Disease Fighters

From ebola to birth defects, many donors want to target organizations dedicated to fighting specific health issues. Some commonly known ones include the American Heart Association, Muscular Dystrophy Association, March of Dimes or the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, to name a few.

Among the many cancer fighters are research organizations such as Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, where scientists seek ways to prevent, diagnose and treat cancer, HIV/AIDS and other life-threatening diseases.

10. Hunger Fighters

Millions of people, many of them children, do not get enough food. Some groups work on relief aid, others emphasize sustainability. Feeding America, for example, works with local food banks. Others take a global approach.

Since 1944, Heifer International has helped 20.7 million families in 125 countries by using your money to donate cows, goats, chickens and other livestock that provide life-sustaining products such as milk, eggs, cheese, honey and wool. Families receive farm training and, through "Passing on the gift," donate female animal offspring to other families.

11. Pet Projects

Animal welfare organizations can use your help at the national and local levels. EntirelyPets.com lists 50 top pet charities, including pet rescue and placement groups. The Humane Society of the United States is likely the best-known animal protection organization. With affiliates, the group provides hands-on care and services to more than 100,000 animals each year and professionalizes the field through education and training for local organizations.

12. Culture Contributions

Charity Navigator, JustGive.org and GuideStar break down arts, culture and humanities charities. Whether it's libraries, museums, symphonies, ballets, operas, theater groups or arts festivals, your donations help assure that culture remains accessible.

Many communities have programs similar to Seattle Music Partners, which provides music lessons and instruments to students. Another example: In Connecticut, Little Kids Rock and the SpreadMusicNow education fund recently donated 2,000 musical instruments to Hartford Public Schools.

13. Smart Giving

Only 16 percent of our charitable donations go to education, but last year that was the fastest-rising category of beneficiaries. You may contribute to your college alumni association or groups that give scholarships, promote school reform, provide learning programs or support teachers, parents, students and schools.

Local PTAs organize volunteers, often parents, to help with school building improvements, newsletters, special events and teaching supplies. In some schools, they fund the art teacher, the school counselor or pay for an additional teacher or aide to help bring down class sizes. They are always looking for donations.

14. Give Your Time

If you want to donate to your favorite cause but haven't got the cash, consider giving your time. Nearly 65 million volunteers in 2012 provided 7.9 billion hours of service valued at $175 billion. You can stuff envelopes, feed animals, tutor children, build housing, serve as a museum docent or even join the board of a local nonprofit. Food banks often need help gathering, sorting and distributing contributions. Local Goodwill Industries chapters often need volunteers as tutors, instructor's aide or even vintage fashion collection models.

15. Non-Cash Gifts

Most charities can accept new, unused or nearly new items. Or, suggests CharityNavigator, consider selling jewelry or other items yourself and donating the proceeds. If you have stocks or other securities, says MIT, you may find tax benefits associated with giving appreciated securities rather than selling them first.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

I Was Bank-Hacked - and the System Sort of Worked

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

internet theft   a man wearing...
Shutterstock
By Liz Ozaist

It was early on Valentine's Day, and my phone was pinging. But the texts awaiting me had nothing to do with proclamations of heartfelt adoration, although someone was treating themselves to some high-end self-love -- at my expense.

"Free Debit Card Alerts. Did you make a merchant transaction at Michael Kors Inc. for $1,000 on February 14? Reply 1 if yes, reply 2 if no. To opt out reply STOP." Considering that I was still in bed, cuddled up with my dogs, the answer was a resounding "No!" And "STOP!"

No stranger to having my credit cards compromised over the years, I calmly called my bank -- one of the Big 4 -- to suss out the situation. I've been a customer with this institution for nearly 20 years, and as a premier status client, I was quickly dispatched to a special client agent. The discussion was, frankly, alarming.

Three Strikes, and the Villain's Out

That $1,000 transaction was followed by another one -- at the same store, around the same time -- for another $2,129.60. It wasn't until the V-Day villain tried to put through a third transaction (at the same store!) that the bank finally flagged the fraudulent card use -- but not before over $3,000 had been sucked out of my checking account.

"What kind of fraud monitoring is this?!" I asked the agent, after learning that the Michael Kors fan had somehow created a fake debit card to swipe at the brick-and-mortar store. "Why did it take a third attempt to finally signal a problem?"

The agent tried her best to assuage my serious concerns about the security of my accounts -- but, this time, it was my faith that had been indelibly compromised. Crazy story, right?

Not if you talk to some of the country's top banking security experts, like Kevin F. Streff, director of the National Center for Information Security at Dakota State University and founder of Secure Banking Solutions, a consulting firm focused on helping banks shore up their security practices.

Is the Best Good Enough?

Q: How well equipped are both small and major banks to handle security breaches today? Does the size of the bank give it an advantage?

A: Banks today are really doing the best they can. Hackers are fully armed with tools and time, so bankers are fighting folks who are attacking them on a full-time basis -- and small- and medium-sized banks simply lack the time and resources to really keep these bad guys out.

But generally speaking, the larger the institution, the larger the target. If you're a hacker and you can go after a bank that has 1,000 customer records or a million records, all else held equally, where are you going to choose to invest your time?

And I use the word "invest" because that's how hackers think. It's an investment of their time, and they're gonna get paid for their investment of energy and talent. So the smaller banks aren't in the crosshairs of the cyber criminals as much -- but they're easier targets.

So do they want to take down two or three easier targets -- or go after a big target, and maybe not be able to take them down? Those are the kinds of business decisions hackers need to make.

Hackers for Hire

Q:
So just how sophisticated are bank hackers nowadays?

A: We're seeing multivariate, very coordinated attacks using "distractionary tactics," as we call them. Maybe they'll flood a server with a lot of bogus transactions to get the banks to look at that server -- and then they'll attack a different part of the network.

The way it works in foreign countries like China is that they have folks do this for hire -- they have goals and objectives, and roles and responsibilities, just like at other companies. They pull into parking spots and hack for 10-12 hours a day. And when they're successful, they're promoted.

So [the operation] is not just the kid in the basement anymore -- it's sophisticated, and people are able to monetize the stolen digits.

Yet Crooks Are Working 24/7

Q:
What are banks not doing enough of to keep customers' information and accounts safer?

A: Banks do a lot of "point in time" things. So somebody will do a penetration test on their network, and then do another one 12 months from now.

A penetration test simulates a hacker breaking into your network. So my business might be hired to do an authorized hack, and then write a report about how we got in, so the bank can figure out how to plug those holes. But hackers don't wait 12 months to come around -- they're there all the time.

So how do you get security with a heartbeat, so that every day we're paying attention to this cyber-security problem? How does the board set the tone for cyber-security and establish a security culture at a financial institution -- and not just rely on the IT person to protect them?

There are training programs that boards of directors and management teams at banks simply need to go through to learn Cyber-Security 101, so that they can perform their roles and responsibilities in the bank. For example, the FDIC has a directors' series of free videos. So there are definitely solutions out there in the marketplace for these folks, so they can set the tone from the top.

At Risk Again and Again

Q:
If you've had your bank information hacked once, are you more at risk for a repeat episode?

A: Yeah, I'd say you are. The hackers are very good at sharing tools, techniques and information. So if a hacker spends some time on your account, and is able to compromise it and do some identity theft and fraud, they've made money on that.

And if they feel like law enforcement is gaining on them, they may just sell that account to somebody else -- who'll start messing with you from a different address, using different techniques. It's like hackers get to press the reset button and start all over with you.

So if [your information] is leaked out once, it's even more susceptible to identity theft and fraud.

What You Can Do

Q:
What can you do to specifically safeguard your banking identity?

A: The first thing consumers should definitely do is check their credit reports, bank statements and credit card statements on a periodic basis, so that they can catch anomalies early -- and report them right away.

The bank has a responsibility if there's a fraudulent transaction, but you really can't report those things six months later -- you've got to get on it. As long as you're being diligent as a consumer by reviewing your statements and reporting anomalies, you're not responsible for those fraudulent charges.

Also, using the same passwords, sharing passwords and writing down passwords are all bad habits. If I crack your Facebook password, and then I figure out where you bank, about 60 percent of the time I'll know your bank password.

What Banks Watch For

Q:
If your account has been hacked, what should you do in addition to monitoring your credit?

A: Banks provide credit monitoring services that will look for unusual activities -- those that fall outside your normal behavior, normal spending or normal location -- so anomalies can be brought to your attention very quickly.

There are also some advanced technologies coming soon. For example, Visa has an app it'll be introducing in April. For cardholders who sign up, the app requires the user's cell phone and credit card to be in the same location to make a purchase. So using GPS technology, you register the phone and the card, syncing them up.

Password management is also a big area. There are secure and encrypted electronic password vaults where you can store all your passwords -- and they are affordable compared with the hassle of identity theft.

These are the kinds of security issues that are coming to bear, and I would suggest consumers understand these new technologies -- and embrace them.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Last Week's Biggest Stock Movers: Vivint, Lumber Liquidators

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Engineers checking solar panels running
Goodluz/Shutterstock
Plenty of stocks go up and down in any given week. The gainers inspire us to keep investing. The decliners keep greed in check while reminding us about the risks of the equity markets.

Let's go over some of last week's best and worst performers.

Vivint Solar (VSLR) -- Up 33 percent last week

One of the week's biggest winners was Vivint Solar. The installer of solar energy systems experienced a 191 percent surge in installations and a 150 percent pop in bookings for solar panels.

Vivint Solar is still losing a lot of money in this early stage of the residential solar energy movement, but the encouraging growth was enough to take the shares into the double digits. The stock had been waffling about in the single digits since late last year.

Wayfair (W) -- Up 24 percent last week

The online furniture retailer held up nicely in its first quarter as a public company. Revenue climbed 38 percent to $408.6 million. It did clock in with an adjusted loss of 18 cents a share, but that was actually considerably better than the 28-cent deficit that analysts were forecasting.

Wayfair went public in October at $29, and even though the stock popped to open at $36 in its Wall Street debut, it had fallen all the way to the teens two months later. It bounced back in a major way after last week's report, closing just shy of its original IPO price.

NXP Semiconductor (NXPI) -- Up 16 percent last week

A big merger in the chip market lifted the shares of the buyer and seller. NXP announced plans to snap up rival Freescale Semiconductor (FSL), creating a mixed signal semiconductor giant generating more than $10 billion a year in revenue.

Acquirers don't normally move higher after announcing that they will pay a premium for a purchase, but NXP moved higher after revealing that the deal will shave off $200 million in cost savings in the first year, and eventually as much as $500 million in expense-trimming synergies.

Lumber Liquidators (LL) -- Down 36 percent last week

The New York Stock Exchange's biggest loser was Lumber Liquidators. The leading retailer of hardwood flooring took a big hit following a "60 Minutes" report claiming that its Chinese laminates contained potentially harmful levels of formaldehyde, a possible carcinogen.

It's going to be a challenge for Lumber Liquidators to win back the trust of its customers, and the legal liabilities may mount if earlier buyers can prove that the flooring was mislabeled by the chain. At the very least, it's a public relations nightmare for the company.

Bazaarvoice (BV) -- Down 34 percent last week

Nasdaq's biggest loser was Bazaarvoice, losing more than a third of its value after a poorly received quarterly report. Bazaarvoice helps its corporate clients dissect social data from online word-of-mouth content, turning it into actionable improvements. Revenue climbed just 14 percent despite a 30 percent uptick in active customers.

Bob Evans Farms (BOBE) -- Down 21 percent last week

Bob Evans took a hit after announcing that it would not spin off its food products division. The market was hoping that the restaurant chain would unlock shareholder value by spinning off its retail sausage business. It doesn't seem as if that will happen now, and CNBC's Jim Cramer went on to call Bob Evans the most disappointing stock of 2015 on his "Mad Money" show.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Lumber Liquidators and NXP Semiconductors. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bob Evans Farms, Lumber Liquidators, and NXP Semiconductors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Fast Food's Biggest Secret: McDonald's Is Back

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

McDonald's Sales
Nam Y. Huh/AP
It's so easy to hate on McDonald's (MCD) these days, but the world's largest burger chain is showing signs of life. The once-reeling fast-food icon posted mixed monthly performance results on Monday.

The report wasn't pretty, particularly closer to home where comparable-restaurant sales declined 4 percent in January compared to last year. The chain blames the "aggressive competitive activity" for the downturn, but comps in Europe did inch higher. Asia continues to be a struggle, but McDonald's is addressing the brand weakness in Japan and safety concerns in China that have been holding it back in those markets.

The news follows an upbeat report a month earlier: U.S. comps in January posted year-over-year growth for the first time in more than a year, with an even better uptick in Europe. With a new CEO at the helm and a few significant trends working in its favor, this could be a real turnaround for McDonald's if February -- and not January -- was the fluke.

I'm Lovin' It

McDonald's investors are starting to see a light at the end of the deep fryer. The stock rose 7.9 percent in February. That may not seem like much, but it's the biggest gain that the shares have posted in more than two years.

There are plenty of welcome tailwinds working in its favor, fueled largely by an improving economy and lower gasoline prices. The improving economy results in more morning and afternoon commuters on the road, hitting up McDonald's for breakfast in the morning or dinner on the way home.

Lower gas prices naturally benefit most consumer-facing retail establishments angling for discretionary income, but McDonald's also benefits because they boost drive-through traffic: You no longer feel guilty about snaking through a potentially long queue of automobiles when gas prices are cheaper.

Shooing Away the Hamburglar

Steve Easterbrook inherited the CEO throne this month, and while obviously one can't credit him solely for the chain's comps turnaround in January and the stock's big bounce in February, it's not fair to discount entirely his impact on the chain's revival. He was promoted internally, heading up the marketing department that's been pushing out the brand-buffing ads that have been airing lately.

Something had to change at McDonald's before he stepped up to lead the way. Monthly comps had been consistently negative since late 2013, and 2014 was the first year in more than a decade that revenue and earnings clocked in lower than the year before.

The coast isn't exactly clear for McDonald's. The unsettling February report will likely make this the sixth consecutive quarter of negative year-over-year comps. It still needs to upgrade the perceived quality of food, and it also wouldn't hurt to silence activists clamoring for the chain's franchisees to pay employees more. However, with the stock rolling and a 3.5 percent yield to reward patient investors, the turnaround at McDonald's may come sooner than expected.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends McDonald's. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Want to make 2015 a winning investment year? Check out The Motley Fool's one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


U.S. Forecast to Run $500 Billion Deficit Again This Year

$
0
0

Filed under: , , ,

Budget
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON -- Slowing health care costs are driving down the price tag of President Barack Obama's health overhaul, just as the Supreme Court is weighing whether to strike a key part of the law.

Estimates released Monday reduce the projected cost to taxpayers by $142 billion over the next decade. That's an 11 percent drop from previous estimates.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office cited two reasons for the decline: Health insurance premiums are rising slower than projected, and new data show there were fewer people without health insurance before the law. Fewer people without insurance means slightly fewer people will need to take advantage of the law to gain coverage, CBO said.

Still, over the next decade, the budget office said 24 million to 25 million people a year will get coverage because of the law.

We're pleased to see that even after just a few years of being in effect, that the impact is both noticeable and positive.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest called the projections the "latest in a long line of data points" showing that Obama's health law was holding down health costs and generating economic benefits for families and businesses. He said one of the goals of the legislation was to address the threat that growing health costs pose to the broader economy.

"We're pleased to see that even after just a few years of being in effect, that the impact is both noticeable and positive," Earnest said.

CBO released updated spending and deficit projections for the upcoming decade. The federal budget deficit will total $486 billion for the budget year that ends in September, nearly matching the lowest shortfall of Obama's term in office.

The forecast includes mixed signals for Congress.

Over the next decade, annual budget deficits will be smaller than previously thought because spending on private health insurance is expected to grow at a slower rate, CBO said. The combined deficits will be $431 billion less than the budget office projected in January.

Beyond the next decade, however, deficits will soar again as more baby boomers retire and start receiving Social Security and Medicare, the government health insurance program for older Americans. In 2025, the budget office says the annual deficit will once again hit $1 trillion, unless Congress acts.

The annual deficit topped $1 trillion in each of Obama's first four years in office, including a record $1.4 trillion in 2009.

The deficit fell to $485 billion in the budget year that ended last September.

Congress' Republican-run budget committees will soon start crafting their own spending blueprints for fiscal 2016, which starts on Oct. 1.

The Supreme Court took up a new challenge to Obama's health overhaul last week in a dispute over the tax subsidies that make insurance affordable for millions of Americans.

The justices are trying to determine whether the law makes people in all 50 states eligible for federal tax subsidies to cut the cost of insurance premiums. Opponents say that only residents of states that set up their own insurance markets, also known as exchanges, can get federal subsidies to help pay the premiums.

Roughly three dozen states didn't set up their own exchanges and rely on the federal healthcare.gov. Residents in these states could lose subsidies if the Supreme Court rules against the federal government.

CBO says the health care law will cost the federal government $1.2 trillion over the next decade. The agency has been steadily reducing the projected cost of the law since it was enacted 2010.

For example, in 2010, the budget agency projected that the insurance-related provisions of the health law would cost the federal government $710 billion from 2015 through 2019. The most recent projections put the five-year cost at $506 billion, a reduction of 29 percent.

In Monday's report, CBO noted the uncertainties of projecting health care spending.

"Projections of spending by private health insurers are highly uncertain, especially because the causes of the pronounced slowdown in spending in the past several years are not well understood," CBO said. "Projections of growth in premiums for private health insurance offered through the exchanges are even more uncertain because the exchanges are so new."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Apple Watch to Sell for Up to $17,000 in Rose Gold

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

tim cook apple unveils smartwatch
Eric Risberg/APApple CEO Tim Cook talks about the new Apple Watch during an event Monday.
By Edwin Chan and Alexei Oreskovic

SAN FRANCISCO -- Apple launched its long-awaited watch Monday, including yellow or rose gold models with sapphire faces costing up to $17,000, but investors questioned whether Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook's first product would be a breakaway hit.

Apple's first new device since Cook became CEO will be available for order April 10 and in stores April 24, including chic boutiques in Paris, London and Tokyo.

I just don't know if it's going to be the power product that everyone's looking for.

In a nod to both fashion and technology, Cook shared the stage with model Christy Turlington Burns, who used it to train for a marathon, and Apple engineers who showed off apps, including how to call an Uber car with the watch.

Apple (AAPL) shares barely budged, however. Investors and analysts agreed that Apple would sell millions to fans but questioned whether it had a "killer app" that would engage a broader audience. Apple in September gave a sneak peek of the watch which included many features shown on Monday.

"I think there's a niche market for these kind of Apple tech people who love Apple and will buy anything they come out with. But I just don't know if it's going to be the power product that everyone's looking for," said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company in Atlanta, Georgia, who described Wall Street as "scratching its head."

Members of the style establishment, in Paris for shows from the glittering likes of Chanel, Givenchy and Hermes mostly said they saw the watch as a gadget, not this season's must-have accessory.

The Apple Watch sport will start at $349 for the smaller, 38-mm model. The standard version of the watch will start at $549 and the high-end "Edition" watch will be priced from $10,000, said Cook, who loved the Dick Tracy ability to hold phone calls by watch.

"I have been wanting to do this since I was five years old," said Cook.

The different models reflect different materials. A $17,000 Edition in the smaller, 38-mm size, has a case made from a customized version of 18-karat rose gold, which is especially hard, along with a sapphire display. It comes with a magnetic charging case.

A $349 Sport model the same size has an aluminum case, a "sport band" and a magnetic charging cable, and no case.

All the watches share digital faces that can look like traditional time pieces, show the heart beat of a friend, and display photos and interfaces for apps.

Personalizing Products

"Apple's been very good at personalizing its products," said Angelo Zino, an analyst at S&P Capital IQ, who said the "intimacy" of the watch was appealing. He saw 10 million in sales this year.

In the presentation, Cook described the watch handling many functions currently associated with the iPhone, which tethers wirelessly to the watch and connects it to the Internet.

The watch will track exercise and remind wearers of events with a tap on the wrist.

Cook also laid out other product successes and launched a new MacBook notebook computer that starts at $1,299 and weighs as little as 2 pounds.

Every major car brand had committed to delivering Apple's CarPlay entertainment system, and the new iPhone 6 and 6 Plus have 99 percent customer satisfaction rates, he said. The Apple Pay payment system is now accepted at 700,000 locations, and Time Warner's (TWX) HBO in April will debut its streaming HBO NOW service on Apple TV.

Apple also is offering researchers new development tools, called ResearchKit, to help medical researchers design apps for clinical trials, the company said.

-With additional reporting by Alexandria Sage, Piya Sinha-Roy and Ellen Wulfhorst. Writing by Peter Henderson.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Market Wrap: Stocks Rebound on Deals; Apple Up After Event

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Stocks Close Sharply Down, Over 250 Points
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK -- U.S. stocks bounced back Monday, helped by merger and acquisitions activity, while Apple shares ended slightly higher following the long-anticipated rollout of its watch.

Alcoa said it would buy RTI International Metals for $1.5 billion. Separately, Shopping mall owner Simon Property Group offered to buy Macerich for $22.4 billion including debt.

Alcoa (AA) lost 5.4 percent to $13.70 while RTI (RTI) jumped 39.3 percent to $38. Macerich (MAC) rose 7 percent to $92.76 and Simon Property (SPG) was down 0.1 percent at $180.44.

We're seeing a little bit of a snapback from Friday's reaction to the jobs report.

The day's gain came after the S&P 500's biggest drop in almost two months Friday, when investors bet a stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs report increased chances the Federal Reserve could raise interest rates sooner.

"We're seeing a little bit of a snapback from Friday's reaction to the jobs report. We're seeing a little of that reversion-to-the-mean trade," said Larry Peruzzi, senior equity trader at Cabrera Capital Marketd in Boston.

Shares of Apple (AAPL) ended up 0.4 at $127.08 after trading both sides of unchanged as details of its watch were released, including that the price would range from $349 to more than $10,000.

"I just don't know if it's going to be the power product that everyone's looking for," said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company in Atlanta.

The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) rose 138.94 points, or 0.78 percent, to 17,995.72, the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GSPC) gained 8.17 points, or 0.39 percent, to 2,079.43 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) added 15.07 points, or 0.31 percent, to 4,942.44.

The S&P 500 is about 1.8 percent below its record closing high from last week, while the Dow is about 1.6 percent below its record.

Stocks Making News

Other top gainers included Whiting Petroleum (WLL), which rose 10.8 percent to $37.71. Late Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported that the company was seeking a possible buyer, though a person familiar with the board's thinking told Reuters he wasn't aware of such a plan.

General Motors (GM) shares rose 3.1 percent to $37.66 after it said it plans a new, $5 billion share buyback in an agreement with dissident investors, and put forward more details on capital allocation that promises investors the potential for further cash returns.

Shares of Qualcomm (QCOM) were up 2.3 percent at $74.40 after the bell following its announcement of a $15 billion share buyback.

About 6.2 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, below the 6.6 billion average for the last five sessions, according to BATS Global Markets.

Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by 1,612 to 1,445, for a 1.12-to-1 ratio; on the Nasdaq, 1,521 issues rose and 1,215 fell, for a 1.25-to-1 ratio favoring advancers.

The S&P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq composite recorded 63 new highs and 65 new lows.

What to watch Tuesday:
  • At 10 a.m., the Commerce Department releases wholesale trade inventories for January, 10 a.m.; and the Labor Department releases job openings and labor turnover survey for January.
Earnings Season
  • Barnes & Noble (BKS) and Verifone Systems (PAY) are due to release quarterly financial results.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

9 Tax Questions Every Single Parent Should Ask

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Image 200364220-001  (Royalty-free)  Collection:  Digital VisionCaption:   Daughter (5-7) holding present and father smiling, cl
Getty Images
By Morgan Quinn

As if filing taxes isn't aggravating enough, it can be even more stressful for single and divorced parents. There are tax breaks that benefit single parents, various options to consider and, of course, exceptions to certain rules. Here are the answers to the most common questions single parents ask themselves as they get ready to file taxes.

1. Are There Special Deductions for Single Parents?

Single filers and head of households who make less than $75,000 a year might be eligible for the child tax credit. Married couples filing jointly can also claim this credit, but the income cap is $110,000 a year. To qualify for the child tax credit, the child must be under 17 years old at the end of the year. Also, the child's residence and citizenship is taken into consideration. Single parents can also file as head of household, which could greatly reduce how much taxes they pay overall. This offers a higher standard of deduction, and they can claim a dependent exemption for themselves and each qualifying child.

2. Who Qualifies as Head of Household?

As mentioned, filing as head of household offers a higher deduction and reduces a single parent's taxable income. However, not every single parent is qualified - they must meet certain requirements.

To qualify as head of household, they must pay more than 50 percent of the household expenses, be unmarried on the last day of the tax year, and their child must live with them for more than six months of the year (not including the time they spend at school). So, if a single parent has more than 50 percent custody, they get to claim head of household. Meanwhile, the other parent with less custody cannot.

3. Who Can Claim the Child Tax Credit on Their Return?

Usually the parent with custody claims the child on their tax return. Of course, there are exceptions. For example, if a child spends the majority of time at one parent's house, even if it's not in the custody agreement, the IRS might grant that parent the right to claim the child on their tax returns.

The child tax credit is different than a dependent exemption. It's subtracted from the total amount of taxes the taxpayer owes, and the dependent exemption is deducted from the taxpayer's adjusted gross income.

4. How Much Is the Child Tax Credit?

The child tax credit can decrease parents' taxes by as much as $1,000 per qualifying child. If there is a balance left over after subtracting the credit, a parent might be able to receive it back as a tax refund. This is known as the Additional Child Tax Credit. For example, if a parent owes $500 in tax but claims a $1,000 child tax credit, they might receive up to a $500 tax refund.

5. Who Gets to Claim the Dependent Care Dredit?

Even if the other parent claims the dependent exemption, only the custodial parent can claim the dependent care credit.

6. How Much Is the Dependent Care Credit?

Dependent care expenses are allowed up to $3,000 for one child and $6,000 for two or more children, but only a percentage of those expenses can be claimed. The care must also be used so a parent can work or look for work. Childcare expenses can only be claimed for children 12 years old and younger.

7. How Do I Qualify for a Dependent Exemption?

The IRS allows parents a tax exemption for each qualifying child, which is meant to reduce the financial burden of caring for a child. The exemption is deducted from your adjusted gross income, reducing your taxable income and sometimes resulting in a greater refund.

Only one parent can claim this deduction, and their adjusted gross income must not exceed a certain amount. If there is only one child, or an odd number of children, some parents might alternate each year to determine who can claim the child or children. If there is an even number of children, the parents might decide to split them 50/50. No matter how the parents decide to work it out, the details are typically laid out in the divorce settlement. If the custodial parent doesn't want to take the exemption on their tax return and agrees that the non-custodial parent can take it, the IRS will require the custodial parent to fill out Form 8322.

8. Do I Need to Claim My Child Support?

No. Child support is not considered taxable income. And if a parent paid child support, those payments are not deductible.

9. Does Alimony Count as Income?

Yes, alimony counts as income. The spouse accepting alimony must report all the payments as income when they file taxes. They can increase their employer tax withholding to avoid a surprise tax bill at the end of the year. The ex-spouse paying the alimony may claim a deduction.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

It Takes Just a Few Purchases to Figure Out Who You Are

$
0
0

Filed under: ,

Group of business people hiding their faces behind a question mark sign at office
Rido/Shutterstock
"We respect your privacy."

"Any information you provide will be held in strict confidence."

"All of your information and responses will remain anonymous."

Whether you are asked to respond to personal questions through a poll on the Internet, on a form in the doctor's office or via government questionnaire in the mailbox, we're all used to hearing these kinds of reassuring words. "We know you're worried about privacy and data theft. We hear your concerns -- but don't worry. We're looking out for you!"

Problem is, the road to hell is said to be paved with such best intentions -- and the road to your loss of privacy may be as well.

Big Brother Is Watching You -- and Knows Exactly Who You Are

That's the disturbing conclusion of new research just out of MIT. As reported in the Jan. 30 issue of the journal Science, researchers at MIT have established that they can identify 90 percent of supposedly anonymous shoppers if provided a record of 1.1 million credit card users' purchase histories over a three-month period and the locations and dates of four purchases made by an individual within that time span.

What's more, if provided data on the dollar value of the purchases, the researchers demonstrated that just three location/date pairings were enough to figure out who made the purchases -- for 94 percent of shoppers. Upping the data points to five, and including purchase amounts, allowed researchers to identify "almost everyone" on the list.

What's more, accomplishing this feat didn't require the MIT analysts to possess any of the things we ordinarily worry about being stolen in incidents of data theft -- your name, address, Social Security number or credit card number, for example. Rather, researchers were able to accomplish their mission using such tools as:
  • A copy of a store purchase receipt.
  • A dated Instagram photo picturing you having coffee at a coffee shop.
  • A Tweet describing a purchase you just made.
These tools alone suffice to narrow down a field of 1.1 million credit card transactions and identify your individual credit card records.

Big Brother Doesn't Mean Any Harm -- He Just Can't Help Himself

Nervous yet? But we haven't even gotten to the good part! MIT researchers, by and large, aren't interested in stealing your personally identifiable data, or your identity. Rather, the purpose of this study was to find a way to "vague up" large amounts of raw data in a manner permitting researchers to extract economically useful patterns such as "the relationship of, say, inflation or consumer spending to other economic factors" -- but in a way that preserved shoppers' privacy, leaving them individually unidentifiable.

But it turned out that this was harder than it sounded. The researchers tried "coarsening" the data contained in the 1.1 million purchase records, "intentionally making it less precise." To do this, for example, they might take a purchase of a $5 cup of coffee at Starbucks on Jan. 1, and report it as a purchase of something ... for a price of between $2.50 and $7.50 ... at one of 150 stores-of-which-Starbucks-was-only-one ... at some time between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7.

Given such data on four purchases, they still were able to figure out who bought the coffee 70 percent of the time, even if they didn't necessarily want to.

Now imagine what happens once someone who does want to track you down figures out this trick. Privacy, as we once knew it, might just be dead.

While writing this column, Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith was humming: "Sometimes it feels like... somebody's watching me..." The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Starbucks. To read about our favorite high-yielding dividend stocks for any investor, check out our free report.​

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

7 Items for Your To-Do List in the Year You Retire

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

portrait of two senior women on ...
Pressmaster/Shutterstock

By David Ning

Many workers face a dilemma very close to their planned retirement date. They want to keep working and saving to be sure they won't ever run out of money, but work frustrations and a desire to do other things keep reminding them they can probably get by quitting. Here are some things you should do as you get close to the retirement finish line.

1. Speak Up at Work

Don't be offensive and disrespectful, but start saying what everyone is thinking about in meetings and afraid to say. After all, the consequences of possibly alternating your career trajectory don't matter to you much anymore, and voicing your concerns could lead to changes within the organization. By being a voice of reason, you will likely feel less frustrated at work. Plus, you'll probably find that people from all levels of the organization will start appreciating and respecting you more for the points you bring up.

2. Get Big, One-Time Expenses Out of the Way

You should go on that lifelong dream vacation, fix the nagging house repair you've been putting off and even upgrade aging cars before you retire. If an expense costs more than you anticipate, you can always compensate by working another few months to pay for it. Tackling large costs while you are working is a much better strategy than taking a big chunk of money from your nest egg that can't be easily replaced once you leave your job.

3. Max Out Your Retirement Accounts

Many people claim they don't earn enough to contribute the maximum amount to their retirement accounts, but the year leading up to retirement is the perfect time to stash away as much cash as you can. As you approach retirement, you should put a significant percentage of your paycheck away for retirement so that the stash can grow tax-deferred. Or you could put the money in a Roth account and pay the tax now so that you can take tax-free withdrawals later on in retirement.

4. Test-Drive Your Budget

Use this time to start trying out your retirement spending plan. Can you actually live on the proposed monthly budget? Have you missed a few infrequent but inevitable expenses? By trying out your budget, you will feel more confident about your finances. And if you find that you can't get by on your allotted monthly income, there's still time to alter your original plan and retire a bit later.

5. Really Start Exercising

Many stressed-out people have low energy and live an unhealthy life. Now is the time to prioritize your health by making the effort to start exercising. It will be tough at the beginning, but you'll feel great once your body adapts to the new routine. You'll have richer conversations because your energy levels will increase, and you'll feel younger and more alive than ever.

6. Simplify Your Financial Picture

Start to consolidate your financial accounts and consider simplifying your investments. Just remember to consider the tax consequences before you sell investments that have large capital gains. This way, you won't need to spend as much time managing specific investments in retirement, and it will help cut down on the chances you will make a mistake that hurts your finances down the road.

7. Explore Part-Time Retirement

Talk to your boss and see if there are opportunities to work part-time as a consultant. By working less, your stress level will go way down, helping you hang on to your job for a few more years. If that's not an option, ask the management to consider letting you work from home at least part of the time. It's amazing just how much stress a daily commute can add to our lives, and how eliminating it can help you stay more motivated to work. You may even want to start a small business on the side. While not all businesses are successful, there's certainly the hope that a side gig will start making you enough money to help you retire a little sooner or finance a better lifestyle.

David Ning is the founder of MoneyNing.com.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

6 Investing Lessons from Buffett's 50 Years of Success

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Earns Berkshire Hathaway
Nati Harnik/AP
By Sarah Morgan

In a sense, the Oracle of Omaha turned 50 this month. While Warren Buffett himself is 84 years old, he's now celebrating the 50th anniversary of when he took charge of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) (BRK-B). At that time, Berkshire was a declining textile manufacturer operating at a loss and closing plants. Today, it's a huge conglomerate that owns and operates numerous successful businesses, including the insurance companies that provide it with the huge pool of cash that Buffett and his team use to acquire new businesses and invest in the stock market. Berkshire Hathaway has grown over 20 percent a year, on average, over the past 50 years -- a return that's roughly twice that of the S&P 500 (^GSPC) over the same period.

Buffett has plenty to celebrate, but in this year's letter to shareholders, he spends almost as much time reflecting on his mistakes as he does his successes. Buffett not only writes about the past year's results, but looks back on his whole 50-year journey at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway -- and looks ahead to the future, including what the firm will do when he's gone.

He's learned a lot in the past 50 years, as you might imagine, and he has plenty of advice for individual investors -- including how to save money on your flight down to Berkshire's annual meeting, if you're going, and what to order at his favorite restaurant (the root beer float at Piccolo's). Let's focus on investing, though. Here are six lessons individual investors can learn from Buffett's golden anniversary reflections:

1. Your Behavior Makes Investing Risky, Not Volatility

Volatility shouldn't matter if you're investing for the long haul, Buffett points out. The real problem is, if you're spooked by volatility, you may end up doing something really risky -- like trying to time the market. It's investor behavior -- actively trading, failing to diversify and paying excessive fees -- that makes owning stocks risky, Buffett says.

2. Be Wary of Salespeople

"Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut," Buffett writes. Consider the business model of anyone who's giving you advice -- do they make more money when you take action as opposed to sitting tight in an index fund? Buffett also notes that most advisers "are far better at generating high fees than they are at generating high returns." They're really salespeople, he says. Research by San Francisco investment firm SigFig supports this: advisers generally don't justify their fees by outperforming individuals who manage their own accounts.

3. Face Your Mistakes

Buffett owns up to quite a few mistakes in this letter--starting with building up a large stake in Berkshire Hathaway in the '60s, which he essentially says he did out of spite. He mentions businesses he shouldn't have acquired, and opportunities he missed. He also says he should have sold out of Tesco (TESO) sooner than he did (although he notes that it has now hired new management). That serves as a lesson for investors who tend to hold onto the losers in their portfolios too long, to avoid the pain of taking the loss. Take Buffett as your role model and learn to own up to your mistakes, take your hits, and move on.

4. Don't Expect Another 50 Years Like the Last 50

Buffett is very confident that Berkshire will continue to be well-managed and the value of the business will continue to grow. However, he says investors still shouldn't expect the kind of percentage gains from Berkshire in the next 50 years that it's enjoyed over the last 50. "The numbers have become too big," he says. A business of Berkshire's size simply can't continue gaining 20 percent a year.

It's obviously been a great 50 years for Buffett, as well as for Berkshire Hathaway investors. The stock has gained a staggering total of 1,826,163 percent from 1964 to 2014. Even if such returns are a thing of the past, Buffett still has plenty to offer investors: his timeless, sensible, down-to-earth advice. Especially about that root beer float. (He says to get the large.)

5. A Single Year Often Says More About the Market Than the Stock

As Buffett's own investing mentor, Ben Graham, famously said, "In the short term, the market is a voting machine; in the long run it acts as a weighing machine." In other words, in the long term, stronger businesses will ultimately be worth more -- but in the short term, anything can happen. Nobody knows what any stock will be worth a year from now, but you can be reasonably confident that investing in a solid business will reward you in the long run -- unless you've overpaid for that stock in the first place.

6. Avoid Overpriced Investments

Buffett returns to this point a few times in his letter. It's one of his core principles when looking for businesses to acquire: even a good business is a bad investment if you pay too much for it. This absolutely applies to individuals buying common stock. As Buffett writes of Berkshire Hathaway's own stock, "a sound investment can morph into a rash speculation if it is bought at an elevated price." This point is worth remembering -- particularly when you're considering buying shares in a hot new IPO. Individual investors tend to pay a premium for newly public shares, which cuts into any potential returns.

Sarah Morgan is a contributing writer at SigFig. Nearly a million people use SigFig to track, improve and manage over $300 billion in investments.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Even After Adding Apple, the Dow Is Failing You

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Investors Mood
Bebeto Matthews/AP
The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) is finally taking a bite out of the Apple (AAPL). Last week's announcement that the leading consumer tech company was being added to the iconic market gauge made waves, but in the end it only illustrates how out of touch the Dow is these days.

Investors know that the S&P 500 (^GSPC) -- the index that welcomed Apple with open arms in 1982 when it was much earlier in its path of market-thumping gains and disruption -- is Wall Street's ultimate measuring stick. Mutual fund managers use the S&P 500, and not the Dow 30, when it's time to chalk up their relative performance. Investors flocking to index funds choose investment vehicles that mimic the S&P 500 far more often than they do the Dow when they want their money to keep pace with the general market.

It's not just because 500 large-cap companies offer broader market exposure than the 30 names that make up the Dow. The Dow Jones industrial average is a flawed metric, and the only surprise bigger than how long it took to add Apple in the first place is that it's still around at all.

How Now Dow Cow?

There isn't a lot of mystery behind why tech tastemakers Apple and Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) haven't been a part of the illustrious Dow's past. Their stock prices have been too high in recent years. That's the fatal flaw with the Dow as a price-weighted index. Most indexes -- including the S&P 500 -- are based on market cap. The biggest companies make up the biggest chunks of the performance.

It doesn't work that way with the Dow. A company that happens to have a stock price of $100 contributes 10 times the weight of a $10 stock. This could be a problem when a stock has too high a price. That was the case with Apple when it traded just north of $705 at its pre-split peak three years ago.

If we add up the 30 Dow components -- or 29 if we subtract the departing AT&T (T) -- we get $2,747.10. If Apple were still trading at $705, it would account for 20 percent of the index. That would be too much. If shares of Apple ever tumbled 10 percent on a bad earnings report, the Dow would lose 2 percent of its value. If the stock happened to soar 25 percent on the rollout of, say, the iBurrito, the Dow would move 5 percent higher.

It's easy to see why Apple at $705 or Google trading for nearly $1,230 the way it did 13 months ago wouldn't fly in the Dow. However, instead of conceding defeat and tweaking the methodology to get these great growth stocks in, the Dow chose to stay the course.

The Debacle of 2013

The Dow's last major shakeup took place in 2013 when three stocks were added to the index: Goldman Sachs (GS), Visa (V), and Nike (NKE). There was naturally an outcry from Apple fans. Google's market cap was greater than all three of the companies being added combined. Apple's capitalization was nearly twice the value of the combined companies. The Dow blew it, then.

Apple's stock went on to nearly double, up 95 percent in that time. The Dow has only gone on to rise 16 percent. The gap of underperformance grows over the years. The Dow could have -- and should have -- added Apple when it introduced the iPod in 2001, the iPhone in 2007, or even the iPad in 2010. It missed Apple at every turn, and then it had to pass when Apple's stock price grew too large.

There will be more Apples that the Dow misses because of its price-weighted methodology. It's irrelevant, and showing up late to the Apple party -- and doing so now only because Apple executed a 7-for-1 stock split this past summer -- doesn't make it any more relevant.

Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Goldman Sachs, Google (A and C shares), Nike and Visa. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A and C shares), Nike and Visa. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. Check out our free report on one great stock to buy for 2015 and beyond.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Red Light Cameras, Your Wallet and Your Safety

$
0
0

Filed under: , ,

Traffic Cameras-Backlash
Mel Evans/AP
By Robert McGarvey

The envelope quietly lands in your mailbox, but when you open it, there will be loud curses. That's because, across America, daily thousands of traffic citations triggered by red light and other cameras are issued and, in almost all cases, drivers are oblivious to the violations until the demand for cash arrives in the mailbox. And so the fight begins.

The sides could not be more starkly drawn. On the one side are motorists who, among those who have been ticketed, raise loud complaints about perceived unfairness of the traffic cameras that are proliferating across the nation. They add that -- in their mind -- the reality is that the cameras make roads more dangerous, not safer.

Morgan State University mathematics professor Jonathan Farley articulated this position: "Traffic cameras make roads more dangerous, because sometimes you really are going too fast to stop at the light. Braking suddenly can cause the guy behind you to crash into you." Farley's point: you speed toward an intersection, catch a glimpse of the cameras, know you are looking at a fine of at least $100, maybe over $500, depending upon the jurisdiction, so you slam on the brakes -- and good luck to anybody following in your lane.

On the other side are politicians -- primarily mayors of cash-strapped municipalities, some 400 of which currently have traffic cameras -- who cheer on the installation of the cameras, because, to them, the math is seductive. Every click of the flash means another $100, maybe much more, in the city coffers.

Other supporters said that in fact they believe cameras are making us safer drivers. Chicago lawyer Jeff Kroll -- who said he himself had gotten a $120 ticket for an incident involving a red light - defended the cameras. "Cameras act as a tremendous deterrent," he said. "People are more cautious. They are changing behavior."

Easy Questions, Tough Answers

Here is where the debate is framed. Are the cameras just a way to raise cash, a kind of sneaky taxation that, worse still, cause accidents? Or are the cameras a genuine contributor to road safety?

New Jersey illustrates the complexities. In the Garden State, there were cameras at 73 intersections in 24 towns and, in a five-year run, the cameras generated a staggering $156 million in fines. So why did New Jersey pull the plug on every red light camera in the state on Dec. 16? "Red light cameras don't improve safety," said state assemblyman Declan O'Scanlon, a leader of the effort to unplug the cameras. "It is unquestionable that the devices are all about raising money."

Perhaps more telling is the case of Charlotte, North Carolina, which installed cameras in 1998 and yanked them in 2006 because a state court ruled that 90 percent of revenues from red light cameras had to go to schools and the city could not meet that quota and pay the operating costs; as a result, Charlotte unplugged the cams.

Now the Charlotte Observer has analyzed traffic accident data, and it came to this conclusion: "Although the number of accidents per day remained about the same [after the cameras were unplugged], the percentage of accidents that resulted in injury increased after the cameras were removed - jumping from 24 precent to 33 percent." The conclusion, at least as far as some in North Carolina believe: the cameras reduced the number of accidents involving serious injury.

A Big Issue in Chicago

Ground zero for the red light camera debate may now be Chicago, where incumbent mayor (and onetime President Bill Clinton assistant) Rahm Emanuel faces an April 7 runoff for re-election and, said many, he was denied an outright win in a February election because he supports the cameras. Three of four of his opponents were anti-camera.

His opponent in the runoff is Cook County Commissioner Jesus Garcia, who is on record as anti-camera. He is quoted by Reuters saying: "It's one more way Chicagoans are pickpocketed every day."

Chicago has 174 red light cameras at intersections and another 144 speed cameras near schools and parks. Since 2003, they are believed to have brought in over $500 million in fines, although the city has not confirmed or denied that number.

A New Battleground

The Chicago evidence around cameras is confusingly mixed. In research performed for the Chicago Tribune by Texas A&M, it was found that the cameras had reduced right angle crashes that caused injury by 15 percent -- but there was a 22 percent jump in rear-end crashes caused by drivers slamming on brakes to avoid camera tickets.

So do cameras reduce traffic accidents or increase them? Do they improve road safety -- or worsen it? The maddening reality is: no one knows. What is known is that motorists who get tickets in the mail hate the cameras. Politicians whose town are awash with easy money from traffic cameras love them. And the twain are nowhere close to meeting.

One last thought: The number of red-light cameras nationwide is falling, The Associated Press reports, but the use of cameras to catch speeders is slowly rising, potentially signaling a new battleground.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Nasdaq at 5,000: Compare Today to 2000's Record High

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Financial Meltdown
Julie Jacobson/APThe Nasdaq last set a new high on on March 10, 2000. In the 15 years since, the index has gone up and down, with this photo taken on one of those up days, in 2008.
Today is a historic anniversary for Wall Street. On March 10, 2000, the Nasdaq composite index (^IXIC) soared to a record high, closing at 5,048.62. It has not set another all-time high since.

"It was a speculative mania for internet and dot-com stocks, essentially a bubble, a period of wild speculation," recalls Wall Street veteran Hugh Johnson, now chairman of his own firm, Hugh Johnson Advisors. "Individuals and institutions were borrowing money to buy assets that were way overvalued, with the hope and the dream that they would become even more overvalued."

While the Nasdaq has languished for 15 years, the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) and the S&P 500 (^GSPC) have soared. In the same span, the Dow has set 154 new record highs, and the S&P has posted 116 new highs, according to data from S&P Dow Jones Indices. The Nasdaq did come close last week, briefly topping 5,000 for the first time since the dot-com bubble burst, but it's been a long and arduous climb back.

"Everybody knew it was over-extended, but no one knew how far it would do down. In the spring and summer of 2000 it fell from 5,000 to 3,500, and eventually down to 1,200," said market historian Philip Roth. It lost 78 percent of its value over two years, far more than the other major indexes.

No Earnings, No Revenue, No Hope

Looking back it's easy to see that many Nasdaq stocks had wild, crazy valuations. A number of prominent companies had no earnings, and in some cases, no revenue. They simply had a business model that seemed to promise future growth, and maybe "dot.com" attached to their name. (Think Pets.com.)

So this is probably a good time to ask: with the Nasdaq again hovering around 5,000, is it nearing another speculative bubble? Most analysts say that although the market could certainly take a turn down at any time after nearly six years of steady gains, they don't foresee another major collapse.
"Back then, individual investors had the appetite and the means to speculate," according to Johnson, "today they have neither. That's one of the reasons the situation is different today."

The creation of the dot-com bubble "showed up with many IPOs with insane valuation, but we have nothing like that now," said Roth. "People went crazy for the IPOs in the late 1990s. People didn't care about earnings. It was totally irrational."

A Different World

Internally, the Nasdaq is much different now too. Even though it's still referred to as a tech-heavy index, technology, and telecommunications account for a significantly smaller percentage of the index than it did 15 years ago, and due to acquisitions and companies that have gone bust (remember Worldcom?), there are 45 percent fewer stocks listed on the Nasdaq today.

The three biggest stocks on the Nasdaq in its heyday were Microsoft (MSFT), Cisco (CSCO) and Intel (INTC). All are still major players today, but their stock have still not recovered. Cisco is down 53 percent in the past 15 years.

Meanwhile, today's Nasdaq is led by Apple (AAPL), which was an fairly insignificant PC maker then but is now the world's largest company, as well as Google (GOOG) (GOOGL), which very few people had even heard of yet, and Facebook (FB), which wasn't born until 2004. These are companies that now have billions of dollars in profits each year.

Analysts say that today's Nasdaq is much more mature than it was 15 years ago. "We're approaching the same level," said Johnson, "but the level of speculation is not even close."

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Arbitration Not a Good Deal for Consumers, Watchdog Warns

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Arbitration Hearing
Getty Images
By Elvina Nawaguna

WASHINGTON -- The top U.S. consumer watchdog said Tuesday that arbitration clauses used by companies to dodge lawsuits take away consumers' rights to sue in courts and don't provide much relief to them.

The findings by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau raise the prospect that the agency could move to regulate the pre-dispute arbitration practice that U.S. companies say helps prevent petty lawsuits and reduce legal costs.

The practice, however, has faced criticism from lawmakers and federal regulators who argue that people should be allowed to choose whether to go to court or settle disputes by arbitration.

Richard Hunt, president and CEO of Consumer Bankers Association, argued in a statement that arbitration has for decades proved to be the best and most affordable way for consumers to quickly solve disputes with companies.

The CFPB, which studied arbitration clauses in checking accounts, credit cards, prepaid cards, payday and private student loans, and mobile wireless services, found that tens of millions of consumers were under arbitration agreements, but few knew about them or understood their impact.

"Now that our study has been completed, we will consider what next steps are appropriate," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a statement.

The 2010 Dodd-Frank Act requires the CFPB to study pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer financial markets and allows it to craft rules regulating their use to protect consumers.

The agency found that 53 percent of credit cards studied, 92 percent of prepaid cards and 86 percent of private student loan lenders include arbitration clauses.

Susan Weinstock, director of consumer banking at the Pew Charitable Trusts, said that the problem with arbitration clauses is that they take the choice away from consumers who may want to seek legal redress through the courts, and that results of arbitration aren't public and can't be appealed.

A top U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission official has also waved a red flag over arbitration in Wall Street, urging the government to issue rules restricting the practice by brokerage firms.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Report: Specialty Drugs Drive Prescription Spending Jump

$
0
0

Filed under: , , , ,

Prescription Drugs-Spending
Matt Rourke/AP
Prescription drugs spending jumped 13 percent last year, the biggest annual increase since 2003, according to the nation's largest pharmacy benefits manager.

Express Scripts (ESRX) said Tuesday that the jump was fueled in part by pricey specialty drugs that accounted for more than 31 cents of every dollar spent on prescriptions even though they represented only 1 percent of all U.S. prescriptions filled.

Specialty drugs are advanced medications that treat complex or chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis or certain forms of cancer. Many are seen as treatment breakthroughs, especially newer hepatitis C treatments like Sovaldi from Gilead Sciences (GILD). But Sovaldi also can cost $84,000 for a course of treatment, and those prices have drawn criticism from patient groups, insurers and Express Scripts, which runs prescription coverage for insurers and employers across the country.

Drugmakers have said the higher cost of their drugs can be recouped over time because the treatments will reduce future health care costs. In Sovaldi's case, Gilead has said that means fewer patients suffering from liver failure or transplant complications.

Express Scripts said in its annual report that spending on specialty drugs rose 31 percent last year, and compound drug costs also affected overall spending growth. In contrast, spending on more traditional prescription drugs rose 6.4 percent.

The St. Louis company also said the trend on specialty drugs will slow to more sustainable levels in the next three years.

Express Scripts and other prescription bill payers have been negotiating preferred treatment agreements with some specialty drugmakers in an attempt to gain leverage over the cost of the drugs. Some also have started using management tools like limiting use of drugs like Sovaldi to the most serious forms of hepatitis C.

Express Scripts manages drug benefits for 85 million people and analyzed more than 750 million pharmacy claims from its customers for its report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Viewing all 9760 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images